Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation

Published in: BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There are many methods for assessing hearing performance after cochlear implantation. Standard evaluations often encompass objective hearing tests only, while patients’ subjective experiences gain importance in today’s healthcare. The aim of the current study was to analyze the correlation between subjective (self-reported questionnaires) and objective (speech perception and localization) hearing test results in adult cochlear implant (CI) users. Secondary, the correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests was compared between bilateral and unilateral CI patients.

Methods

Data for this study were prospectively collected as part of a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Thirty-eight postlingually deafened adult patients were randomly allocated to receive either unilateral (n = 19) or bilateral (n = 19) cochlear implantation. We used data gathered after one year of follow-up. We studied the correlation between objectively measured speech perception and localization skills on the one hand and related domains of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) on the other hand. We also compared these correlations between unilateral and bilateral CI users.

Results

We found significant weak to moderate negative correlations between the subjective test results (speech domain of the SSQ and the advanced speech perception domain of the NCIQ) and the related objective speech perception in noise test results (r = −0.33 to −0.48). A significant moderate correlation was found between the subjective test results (spatial domain of the SSQ) and the related objective localization test results (r = 0.59). The correlations in the group of bilateral CI patients (r = −0.28 to −0.54) did not differ significantly from the correlations in the group of unilateral CI patients (r = 0.15 to −0.40).

Conclusions

Current objective tests do not fully reflect subjective everyday listening situations. This study elucidates the importance and necessity of questionnaires in the evaluation of cochlear implantation. Therefore, it is advised to evaluate both objective and subjective tests in CI patients on a regular basis.

Trial registration

This trial was registered on March 11, 2009 in the Dutch Trial Register. Trial registration number: NTR1722.
Literature
1.
go back to reference van Schoonhoven J, Sparreboom M, van Zanten BG, et al. the effectiveness of bilateral Cochlear implants for severe-to-profound deafness in Adults: a systematic review. Otol Neurotol. 2013;34(2):190–8. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181e3d62c. van Schoonhoven J, Sparreboom M, van Zanten BG, et al. the effectiveness of bilateral Cochlear implants for severe-to-profound deafness in Adults: a systematic review. Otol Neurotol. 2013;34(2):190–8. doi:10.​1097/​MAO.​0b013e3181e3d62c​.
3.
5.
go back to reference Capretta NR, Moberly AC. Does quality of life depend on speech recognition performance for adult Cochlear implant Users ? March. 2016:699–706. doi:10.1002/lary.25525. Capretta NR, Moberly AC. Does quality of life depend on speech recognition performance for adult Cochlear implant Users ? March. 2016:699–706. doi:10.​1002/​lary.​25525.
6.
go back to reference Ramakers GGJ, Smulders YE. Van Zon A, et al. Agreement between health utility instruments in cochlear implantation. Clin Otolaryngol. 2016;41(6):737–43. doi:10.1111/coa.12626. Ramakers GGJ, Smulders YE. Van Zon A, et al. Agreement between health utility instruments in cochlear implantation. Clin Otolaryngol. 2016;41(6):737–43. doi:10.​1111/​coa.​12626.
7.
go back to reference Torrance GW. Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of. life. 1987;40(6) Torrance GW. Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of. life. 1987;40(6)
8.
go back to reference Mcrackan TR, Bauschard M, Hatch JL, et al. Meta-analysis of Quality-of-Life Improvement After Cochlear Implantation and Associations With Speech Recognition Abilities. 2017:1-9. doi:10.1002/lary.26738. Mcrackan TR, Bauschard M, Hatch JL, et al. Meta-analysis of Quality-of-Life Improvement After Cochlear Implantation and Associations With Speech Recognition Abilities. 2017:1-9. doi:10.​1002/​lary.​26738.
9.
go back to reference Damen GWJA, Beynon AJ, Krabbe PFM, Mulder JJS, Mylanus EAM. Cochlear implantation and quality of life in postlingually deaf adults: long-term follow-up. Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 2007;136(4):597–604. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2006.11.044. Damen GWJA, Beynon AJ, Krabbe PFM, Mulder JJS, Mylanus EAM. Cochlear implantation and quality of life in postlingually deaf adults: long-term follow-up. Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 2007;136(4):597–604. doi:10.​1016/​j.​otohns.​2006.​11.​044.
13.
go back to reference Moberly AC, Harris MS, Boyce L, et al. Relating Quality of Life to Outcomes and Predictors in Adult Cochlear Implant Users : Are We Measuring the Right Things ? 2017:1-8. doi:10.1002/lary.26791. Moberly AC, Harris MS, Boyce L, et al. Relating Quality of Life to Outcomes and Predictors in Adult Cochlear Implant Users : Are We Measuring the Right Things ? 2017:1-8. doi:10.​1002/​lary.​26791.
14.
go back to reference Smulders YE, van Zon A, Stegeman I, et al. Comparison of bilateral and unilateral Cochlear implantation in adults: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016:1–8. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2015.3305. Smulders YE, van Zon A, Stegeman I, et al. Comparison of bilateral and unilateral Cochlear implantation in adults: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016:1–8. doi:10.​1001/​jamaoto.​2015.​3305.
15.
go back to reference Smulders YE, Rinia AB, Pourier VEC, et al. Validation of the U-STARR with the AB-York crescent of sound, a new instrument to evaluate speech intelligibility in noise and spatial hearing skills. Audiol Neurotol Extra. 2015;5(1):1–10. doi:10.1159/000370300.CrossRef Smulders YE, Rinia AB, Pourier VEC, et al. Validation of the U-STARR with the AB-York crescent of sound, a new instrument to evaluate speech intelligibility in noise and spatial hearing skills. Audiol Neurotol Extra. 2015;5(1):1–10. doi:10.​1159/​000370300.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hinderink JB, Krabbe PF, Van Den Broek P. Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;123(6):756–65. doi:10.1067/mhn.2000.108203.CrossRefPubMed Hinderink JB, Krabbe PF, Van Den Broek P. Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;123(6):756–65. doi:10.​1067/​mhn.​2000.​108203.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Benajmini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery Rate : a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing author ( s ): Yoav Benjamini and Yosef Hochberg Source: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (methodological), Vol. 57, no. 1 published by. J R Stat Soc B. 1995;57(1):289–300. Benajmini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery Rate : a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing author ( s ): Yoav Benjamini and Yosef Hochberg Source: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (methodological), Vol. 57, no. 1 published by. J R Stat Soc B. 1995;57(1):289–300.
Metadata
Title
Correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation
Publication date
01-12-2017
Published in
BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6815
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12901-017-0043-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders 1/2017 Go to the issue