Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Surgery 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Rectal Cancer | Research article

Functional outcomes after resections for low rectal tumors: comparison of Transanal with laparoscopic Total Mesorectal excision

Authors: Mateusz Rubinkiewicz, Piotr Zarzycki, Jan Witowski, Magdalena Pisarska, Natalia Gajewska, Grzegorz Torbicz, Michał Nowakowski, Piotr Major, Andrzej Budzyński, Michał Pędziwiatr

Published in: BMC Surgery | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Aim of this study was to evaluate functional outcomes of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) in comparison to conventional laparoscopic approach (LaTME) in terms of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS).

Methods

Forty-six patients who underwent total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer between 2013 and 2017 were enrolled. Primary outcome was the severity of faecal incontinence, assessed both before the treatment and 6 months after ileostomy reversal. LARS score and Jorge-Wexner scale were utilized to analyze its severity.

Results

Twenty (87%) from TaTME and 21 (91%) from LaTME group developed LARS postoperatively. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of LARS occurrence (p = 0.63) and severity. The median Wexner score was comparable in both groups (8 [IQR: 4–12] vs 7 [3–11], p = 0.83). Univariate analysis revealed that postoperative complications were a risk factor for LARS development (p = 0.02). Perioperative outcomes, including operative time, blood loss and intraoperative adverse events did not differ significantly between groups either. Five TaTME patients developed postoperative complications, while there were morbidity 6 cases in LaTME group. Quality of mesorectal excision was comparable with 20 and 19 complete cases in TaTME and LaTME groups, respectively.

Conclusions

TaTME provided comparable outcomes in terms of functional outcomes in comparison to LaTME for total mesorectal excision in low rectal cancers. Having said that, LARS prevalence is still high and requires further evaluation of the technique.
Literature
11.
go back to reference Rubinkiewicz M, Nowakowski M, Wierdak M, Mizera M, Dembiński M, Pisarska M, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: a case-matched study comparing TaTME versus standard laparoscopic TME. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;Volume 10:5239–45. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S181214.CrossRef Rubinkiewicz M, Nowakowski M, Wierdak M, Mizera M, Dembiński M, Pisarska M, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: a case-matched study comparing TaTME versus standard laparoscopic TME. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;Volume 10:5239–45. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2147/​CMAR.​S181214.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:77–97.CrossRef Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:77–97.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Elmore U, Fumagalli Romario U, Vignali A, Sosa MF, Angiolini MR, Rosati R. Laparoscopic anterior resection with Transanal Total Mesorectal excision for rectal Cancer: preliminary experience and impact on postoperative bowel function. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2015;25:364–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2014.0435.CrossRef Elmore U, Fumagalli Romario U, Vignali A, Sosa MF, Angiolini MR, Rosati R. Laparoscopic anterior resection with Transanal Total Mesorectal excision for rectal Cancer: preliminary experience and impact on postoperative bowel function. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2015;25:364–9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1089/​lap.​2014.​0435.CrossRef
28.
33.
go back to reference Rubinkiewicz M, Czerwińska A, Zarzycki P, Małczak P, Nowakowski M, Major P, et al. Comparison of Short-Term Clinical and Pathological Outcomes after Transanal versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Low Anterior Rectal Resection Due to Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2018, Vol 7, Page 448 2018;7:448. https://doi.org/10.3390/JCM7110448.CrossRef Rubinkiewicz M, Czerwińska A, Zarzycki P, Małczak P, Nowakowski M, Major P, et al. Comparison of Short-Term Clinical and Pathological Outcomes after Transanal versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Low Anterior Rectal Resection Due to Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2018, Vol 7, Page 448 2018;7:448. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​JCM7110448.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Lelong B, de Chaisemartin C, Meillat H, Cournier S, Boher JM, Genre D, et al. A multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy, morbidity and functional outcome of endoscopic transanal proctectomy versus laparoscopic proctectomy for low-lying rectal cancer (ETAP-GRECCAR 11 TRIAL): rationale and design. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:253. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3200-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lelong B, de Chaisemartin C, Meillat H, Cournier S, Boher JM, Genre D, et al. A multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy, morbidity and functional outcome of endoscopic transanal proctectomy versus laparoscopic proctectomy for low-lying rectal cancer (ETAP-GRECCAR 11 TRIAL): rationale and design. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:253. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12885-017-3200-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Functional outcomes after resections for low rectal tumors: comparison of Transanal with laparoscopic Total Mesorectal excision
Authors
Mateusz Rubinkiewicz
Piotr Zarzycki
Jan Witowski
Magdalena Pisarska
Natalia Gajewska
Grzegorz Torbicz
Michał Nowakowski
Piotr Major
Andrzej Budzyński
Michał Pędziwiatr
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Surgery / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0550-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Surgery 1/2019 Go to the issue