Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Surgery 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Case report

Giant duodenal ulcers after neurosurgery for brainstem tumors that required reoperation for gastric disconnection: a report of two cases

Authors: Chihoko Nobori, Kenjiro Kimura, Go Ohira, Ryosuke Amano, Sadaaki Yamazoe, Hiroaki Tanaka, Kentaro Naito, Toshihiro Takami, Kosei Hirakawa, Masaichi Ohira

Published in: BMC Surgery | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite the efficacy of pharmacotherapy for gastrointestinal ulcers, severe cases of bleeding or perforation due to gastrointestinal ulcers still occur. Giant duodenal ulcer perforation is an uncommon but difficult-to-manage pathology with a high mortality rate. We report two cases of giant duodenal ulcer perforation after neurosurgery for brainstem tumors that needed reoperation for gastric disconnection because of postoperative leakage and bleeding.

Case presentation

Both cases had undergone neurosurgery for brainstem tumors, and the patients were in a shock state for several days with peritonitis due to giant duodenal perforation. In Case 1, antrectomy with Billroth II reconstruction was performed. However, reoperation for gastric disconnection was needed because of major leakage of gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy. In Case 2, an omental patch, cholecystectomy, and insertion of a bile drainage tube from the cystic duct were performed for the giant duodenal ulcer, but leakage and bleeding from the ulcer edge required reoperation for gastric disconnection.

Conclusions

Brainstem tumors in these cases might have been related to duodenal ulcer perforation with late diagnosis that progressed to severe sepsis. For giant duodenal ulcer perforation with poor general condition, simple closure including omental patch or antrectomy with reconstruction is hazardous. Antrectomy with gastric disconnection, meaning gastrostomy, duodenostomy, feeding jejunostomy and cholecystectomy, is recommended.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cushing H. Peptic ulcers and the inter-brain. Surg Gynecol Obste. 1932;55:1–34. Cushing H. Peptic ulcers and the inter-brain. Surg Gynecol Obste. 1932;55:1–34.
3.
go back to reference Rokitansky c. Handbuch der pathologischen Anatomie, vol. 2. Wien: Braumüller & Seidel; 1846. Rokitansky c. Handbuch der pathologischen Anatomie, vol. 2. Wien: Braumüller & Seidel; 1846.
4.
go back to reference Brooks FP. Stress ulcer: etiology, diagnosis and treatment. Med Clin North Am. 1966;50(5):1447–55.PubMed Brooks FP. Stress ulcer: etiology, diagnosis and treatment. Med Clin North Am. 1966;50(5):1447–55.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Leonard AS, Long D, French LA, Peter ET, Wangensteen OH. Pendular pattern in gastric secretion and blood flow following hypothalamic stimulation -- origin of stress ulcer? Surgery. 1964;56:109–20.PubMed Leonard AS, Long D, French LA, Peter ET, Wangensteen OH. Pendular pattern in gastric secretion and blood flow following hypothalamic stimulation -- origin of stress ulcer? Surgery. 1964;56:109–20.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Porter RW, Movius HJ, French JD. Hypothalamic influences on hydrochloric acid secretion of the stomach. Surgery. 1953;33(6):875–80.PubMed Porter RW, Movius HJ, French JD. Hypothalamic influences on hydrochloric acid secretion of the stomach. Surgery. 1953;33(6):875–80.PubMed
7.
go back to reference French JD, Porter RW, Von Amerongen FK, Raney RB. Gastrointestinal hemorrhage and ulceration associated with intracranial lesions; a clinical and experimental study. Surgery. 1952;32(2):395–407.PubMed French JD, Porter RW, Von Amerongen FK, Raney RB. Gastrointestinal hemorrhage and ulceration associated with intracranial lesions; a clinical and experimental study. Surgery. 1952;32(2):395–407.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Boles RS. Neurogenic factors in production of acute gasatric ulcer. JAMA. 1940;115(21):1771–3.CrossRef Boles RS. Neurogenic factors in production of acute gasatric ulcer. JAMA. 1940;115(21):1771–3.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hernandez DE. The role of brain peptides in the pathogenesis of experimental stress gastric ulcers. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1990;597:28–35.CrossRefPubMed Hernandez DE. The role of brain peptides in the pathogenesis of experimental stress gastric ulcers. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1990;597:28–35.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Spencer JA, Morlock CG, Sayre GP. Lesions in upper portion of the gastrointestinal tract associated with intracranial neoplasms. Gastroenterology. 1959;37(1):20–7.PubMed Spencer JA, Morlock CG, Sayre GP. Lesions in upper portion of the gastrointestinal tract associated with intracranial neoplasms. Gastroenterology. 1959;37(1):20–7.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Boey J, Choi SK, Poon A, Alagaratnam TT. Risk stratification in perforated duodenal ulcers. A prospective validation of predictive factors. Ann Surg. 1987;205(1):22–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Boey J, Choi SK, Poon A, Alagaratnam TT. Risk stratification in perforated duodenal ulcers. A prospective validation of predictive factors. Ann Surg. 1987;205(1):22–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Billing A, Frohlich D, Schildberg FW. Prediction of outcome using the Mannheim peritonitis index in 2003 patients. Peritonitis Study Group Br J Surg. 1994;81(2):209–13. Billing A, Frohlich D, Schildberg FW. Prediction of outcome using the Mannheim peritonitis index in 2003 patients. Peritonitis Study Group Br J Surg. 1994;81(2):209–13.
13.
go back to reference Qureshi AM, Zafar A, Saeed K, Quddus A. Predictive power of Mannheim Peritonitis Index. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2005;15(11):693–6.PubMed Qureshi AM, Zafar A, Saeed K, Quddus A. Predictive power of Mannheim Peritonitis Index. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2005;15(11):693–6.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Demmel N, Maag K, Osterholzer G. The value of clinical parameters for determining the prognosis of peritonitis--validation of the Mannheim Peritonitis Index. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1994;379(3):152–8.CrossRefPubMed Demmel N, Maag K, Osterholzer G. The value of clinical parameters for determining the prognosis of peritonitis--validation of the Mannheim Peritonitis Index. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1994;379(3):152–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ahuja A, Pal R. Prognostic scoring indicator in evaluation of clinical outcome in intestinal perforations. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(9):1953–5.PubMedPubMedCentral Ahuja A, Pal R. Prognostic scoring indicator in evaluation of clinical outcome in intestinal perforations. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(9):1953–5.PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Mishra A, Sharma D, Raina VK. A simplified prognostic scoring system for peptic ulcer perforation in developing countries. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2003;22(2):49–53.PubMed Mishra A, Sharma D, Raina VK. A simplified prognostic scoring system for peptic ulcer perforation in developing countries. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2003;22(2):49–53.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Surapaneni S, Rajkumar S, Reddy AV. The Perforation-Operation time Interval; An Important Mortality Indicator in Peptic Ulcer Perforation. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(5):880–2.PubMedPubMedCentral Surapaneni S, Rajkumar S, Reddy AV. The Perforation-Operation time Interval; An Important Mortality Indicator in Peptic Ulcer Perforation. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(5):880–2.PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Kocer B, Surmeli S, Solak C, Unal B, Bozkurt B, Yildirim O, Dolapci M, Cengiz O. Factors affecting mortality and morbidity in patients with peptic ulcer perforation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22(4):565–70.CrossRefPubMed Kocer B, Surmeli S, Solak C, Unal B, Bozkurt B, Yildirim O, Dolapci M, Cengiz O. Factors affecting mortality and morbidity in patients with peptic ulcer perforation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22(4):565–70.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Tas I, Ulger BV, Onder A, Kapan M, Bozdag Z. Risk factors influencing morbidity and mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease. Ulus Cerrahi Derg. 2015;31(1):20–5.PubMed Tas I, Ulger BV, Onder A, Kapan M, Bozdag Z. Risk factors influencing morbidity and mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease. Ulus Cerrahi Derg. 2015;31(1):20–5.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Boey J, Wong J, Ong GB. Bacteria and septic complications in patients with perforated duodenal ulcers. Am J Surg. 1982;143(5):635–9.CrossRefPubMed Boey J, Wong J, Ong GB. Bacteria and septic complications in patients with perforated duodenal ulcers. Am J Surg. 1982;143(5):635–9.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Bertleff MJ, Lange JF. Perforated peptic ulcer disease: a review of history and treatment. Dig Surg. 2010;27(3):161–9.CrossRefPubMed Bertleff MJ, Lange JF. Perforated peptic ulcer disease: a review of history and treatment. Dig Surg. 2010;27(3):161–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Graham RR. The treatment of perforated duodenal ulcers. Surg Gynec Obstet. 1937;64:235–8. Graham RR. The treatment of perforated duodenal ulcers. Surg Gynec Obstet. 1937;64:235–8.
24.
go back to reference Cienfuegos JA, Rotellar F, Valenti V, Arredondo J, Baixauli J, Pedano N, Bellver M, Hernandez-Lizoain JL. Giant duodenal ulcer perforation: a case of innovative repair with an antrum gastric patch. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2012;104(8):436–9.CrossRefPubMed Cienfuegos JA, Rotellar F, Valenti V, Arredondo J, Baixauli J, Pedano N, Bellver M, Hernandez-Lizoain JL. Giant duodenal ulcer perforation: a case of innovative repair with an antrum gastric patch. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2012;104(8):436–9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Chaudhary A, Bose SM, Gupta NM, Wig JD, Khanna SK. Giant perforations of duodenal ulcer. Indian J Gastroenterol. 1991;10(1):14–5.PubMed Chaudhary A, Bose SM, Gupta NM, Wig JD, Khanna SK. Giant perforations of duodenal ulcer. Indian J Gastroenterol. 1991;10(1):14–5.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Sharma D, Saxena A, Rahman H, Raina VK, Kapoor JP. ‘Free omental plug’: a nostalgic look at an old and dependable technique for giant peptic perforations. Dig Surg. 2000;17(3):216–8.CrossRefPubMed Sharma D, Saxena A, Rahman H, Raina VK, Kapoor JP. ‘Free omental plug’: a nostalgic look at an old and dependable technique for giant peptic perforations. Dig Surg. 2000;17(3):216–8.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference McIlrath DC, Larson RH. Surgical management of large perforations of the duodenum. Surg Clin North Am. 1971;51(4):857–61.CrossRefPubMed McIlrath DC, Larson RH. Surgical management of large perforations of the duodenum. Surg Clin North Am. 1971;51(4):857–61.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Lal P, Vindal A, Hadke NS. Controlled tube duodenostomy in the management of giant duodenal ulcer perforation: a new technique for a surgically challenging condition. Am J Surg. 2009;198(3):319–23.CrossRefPubMed Lal P, Vindal A, Hadke NS. Controlled tube duodenostomy in the management of giant duodenal ulcer perforation: a new technique for a surgically challenging condition. Am J Surg. 2009;198(3):319–23.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Cranford Jr CA, Olson R, Bradley 3rd EL. Gastric disconnection in the management of perforated giant duodenal ulcer. Am J Surg. 1988;155(3):439–42.CrossRefPubMed Cranford Jr CA, Olson R, Bradley 3rd EL. Gastric disconnection in the management of perforated giant duodenal ulcer. Am J Surg. 1988;155(3):439–42.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Giant duodenal ulcers after neurosurgery for brainstem tumors that required reoperation for gastric disconnection: a report of two cases
Authors
Chihoko Nobori
Kenjiro Kimura
Go Ohira
Ryosuke Amano
Sadaaki Yamazoe
Hiroaki Tanaka
Kentaro Naito
Toshihiro Takami
Kosei Hirakawa
Masaichi Ohira
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Surgery / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-016-0189-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Surgery 1/2016 Go to the issue