Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research article

Comparison of three treatment methods for simple bone cyst in children

Authors: Ke-Xue Zhang, Wei Chai, Jia-Jia Zhao, Jun-Hao Deng, Zhan Peng, Ji-Ying Chen

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The unicameral bone cyst (UBC) is a kind of benign tumor whose clinical treatments and efficacy are controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN), the injection of autologous bone marrow (ABM), and the combination of ESIN and ABM in the treatment of bone cyst in children.

Methods

Eighty-three cases with simple bone cyst were analyzed retrospectively. Twenty-eight cases were treated with ABM. Twenty-eight cases were treated with ESIN. Twenty-seven cases were treated with ABM and ESIN. All cases were diagnosed through X-ray, CT, or MRI scans. For the suspicious ones, the pathological biopsy was performed for an accurate diagnosis. X-ray examinations were carried out for the postoperative follow-up. Capanna criteria for bone cyst was used for postoperative evaluation of three methods.

Results

All cases accomplished the follow-up. The effective rate of the ABM + ESIN group was significantly higher than that of the ABM group (P < 0.05), and the cure rates of the ESIN group and the ABM + ESIN group were higher than that of the ABM group (P < 0.05, respectively). The cure time in the ESIN group was lower than that of the other two groups (P < 0.05, respectively). The times for admission were 2.0 ± 0.0 in the ESIN group, 5.7 ± 1.9 in the ABM group, and 4.7 ± 2.4 in the ABM + ESIN group (P < 0.05 when compared with each other).

Conclusions

The method of ABM combined with ESIN for children’s bone cyst has the highest effective rate and curative rate. For the individual method, ESIN has a higher effective rate and curative rate than that of ABM. Meanwhile, it has the fewest time of hospitalization.
Literature
7.
go back to reference Kadhim M, Sethi S, Thacker MM. Unicameral Bone Cysts in the Humerus:Treatment Outcomes. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016;36(4):7. Kadhim M, Sethi S, Thacker MM. Unicameral Bone Cysts in the Humerus:Treatment Outcomes. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016;36(4):7.
12.
go back to reference Capanna R, Dal Monte A, Gitelis S, et al. The natural history of unicameral bone cyst after steroid injection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;(166):204–11. Capanna R, Dal Monte A, Gitelis S, et al. The natural history of unicameral bone cyst after steroid injection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;(166):204–11.
15.
go back to reference Chigira M, Maehara S, Arita S, et al. The aetiology and treatment of simple bone cysts. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983;65(5):633–7.CrossRef Chigira M, Maehara S, Arita S, et al. The aetiology and treatment of simple bone cysts. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983;65(5):633–7.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Neer CS 2nd, Francis KC, Marcove RC, et al. Treatment of unicameral bone cyst. A follow-up study of one hundred seventy-five cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1966;48(4):731–45.CrossRef Neer CS 2nd, Francis KC, Marcove RC, et al. Treatment of unicameral bone cyst. A follow-up study of one hundred seventy-five cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1966;48(4):731–45.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison of three treatment methods for simple bone cyst in children
Authors
Ke-Xue Zhang
Wei Chai
Jia-Jia Zhao
Jun-Hao Deng
Zhan Peng
Ji-Ying Chen
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03933-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2021 Go to the issue