Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2021

01-12-2021 | Wound Debridement | Research article

Reconstruction of massive tibial bone and soft tissue defects by trifocal bone transport combined with soft tissue distraction: experience from 31 cases

Authors: Yong-Qing Xu, Xin-Yu Fan, Xiao-Qing He, Hong-Jie Wen

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Large post-traumatic tibial bone defects combined with soft tissue defects are a common orthopedic clinical problem associated with poor outcomes when treated using traditional surgical methods. The study was designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of trifocal bone transport (TFT) and soft-tissue transport with the Ilizarov technique for large posttraumatic tibial bone and soft tissue defects.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 31 patients with massive posttraumatic tibial bone and soft tissue defects from May 2009 to May 2016. All of the eligible patients were managed by TFT and soft-tissue transport. The median age was 33.4 years (range, 2–58 years). The mean defect of bone was 11.87 cm ± 2.78 cm (range, 8.2–18.2 cm) after radical resection performed by TFT. The soft tissue defects ranged from 7 cm × 8 cm to 24 cm × 12 cm. The observed results included bone union time, wound close time and true complications. The Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) scoring system was used to assess bone and functional results and postoperative complications were evaluated by Paley classification.

Results

The mean duration of follow-up after frame removal was 32 months (range, 12–96 months). All cases achieved complete union in both the elongation sites and the docking sites, and eradication of infection. The mean bone transport time was 94.04 ± 23.33 days (range, 63.7–147 days). The mean external fixation time was 22.74 ± 6.82 months (range, 14–37 months), and the mean external fixation index (EFI) was 1.91 ± 0.3 months/cm (range, 1.2–2.5 months/cm). The bone results were excellent in 6 patients, good in 14 patients, fair in 8 patients and poor in 3 patients. The functional results were excellent in 8 patients, good in 15 patients, fair in 5 patients and poor in 3 patients. Conclusion: TFT, in conjunction with soft tissue transport technique, can give good results in most patients (in this article, good and excellent results were observed in 64% of patients). Soft tissue transport is a feasible method in providing good soft tissue coverage on the bone ends. Although it has no advantages over microvascular techniques, it might be an good alternative in the absence of an experienced flap surgeon. Nonetheless, high-quality controlled studies are needed to assess its long-term safety and efficacy.
Literature
1.
Wu Y, Yin Q, Rui Y, Sun Z, Gu S. Ilizarov technique: bone transport versus bone shortening-lengthening for tibial bone and soft-tissue defects. J Orthop Sci. 2018;23(2):341–5.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Tong K, Zhong Z, Peng Y, Lin C, Cao S, Yang Y, et al. Masquelet technique versus Ilizarov bone transport for reconstruction of lower extremity bone defects following posttraumatic osteomyelitis. Injury. 2017;48(7):1616–22.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Tetsworth K, Paley D, Sen C, Jaffe M, Maar DC, Glatt V, et al. Bone transport versus acute shortening for the management of infected tibial non-unions with bone defects. Injury. 2017;48(10):2276–84.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Konda SR, Gage M, Fisher N, Egol KA. Segmental bone defect treated with the induced membrane technique. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(Suppl 3):S21–2.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Aktuglu K, Günay H, Alakbarov J. Monofocal bone transport technique for bone defects greater than 5 cm in tibia: our experience in a case series of 24 patients. Injury. 2016;47:S40–6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Abdelkhalek M, El-Alfy B, Ali AM. Ilizarov bone transport versus fibular graft for reconstruction of tibial bone defects in children. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2016;25(6):556–60.CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
Pipitone PS, Rehman S. Management of traumatic bone loss in the lower extremity. Orthop Clin North Am. 2014;45(4):469–82.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Aktuglu K, Erol K, Vahabi A. Ilizarov bone transport and treatment of critical-sized tibial bone defects: a narrative review. J Orthop Traumatol. 2019;20(1):22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
Zhang Y, Wang Y, Di J, Peng A. Double-level bone transport for large post-traumatic tibial bone defects: a single centre experience of sixteen cases. Int Orthop. 2018;42(5):1157–64.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Catagni MA, Azzam W, Guerreschi F, Lovisetti L, Poli P, Khan MS, et al. Trifocal versus bifocal bone transport in treatment of long segmental tibial bone defects. Bone Joint J. 2019;101-B(2):162–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Tang H, Xu YQ, Li CX, et al. Treatment of chronic tibial osteomyelitis of Cierny-Mader type IV with Ilizarov technique and lesion osteotomy. Chin J Orthop Trauma. 2018;20(2):105–11.
13.
Haidar R, Der Boghossian A, Atiyeh B. Duration of post-surgical antibiotics in chronic osteomyelitis: empiric or evidence-based? Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14(9):e752–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
Paley D. Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;250:81–104.
16.
Mahaluxmivala J, Nadarajah R, Allen PW, Hill RA. Ilizarov external fixator: acute shortening and lengthening versus bone transport in the management of tibial non-unions. Injury. 2005;36(5):662–8.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Xu YQ, Fang XY. Bifocal corticotomy and bone transport for large segmental defects of the infected tibia and soft tissue. Chin J Orthop Trauma. 2015;17(10):850–3.
18.
Yushan M, Ren P, Abula A, Alike Y, Abulaiti A, Ma C, et al. Bifocal or trifocal (double-level) bone transport using unilateral rail system in the treatment of large tibial defects caused by infection: a retrospective study. Orthop Surg. 2020;12(1):184–93.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
Robert Rozbruch S, Weitzman AM, Tracey Watson J, Freudigman P, Katz HV, Ilizarov S. Simultaneous treatment of tibial bone and soft-tissue defects with the Ilizarov method. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(3):197–205.PubMed
20.
Paley D, Maar DC. Ilizarov bone transport treatment for tibial defects. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14(2):76–85.CrossRefPubMed
21.
22.
Dendrinos GK, Kontos S, Lyritsis E. Use of the Ilizarov technique for treatment of non-union of the tibia associated with infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(6):835–46.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Thakeb MF, Fayyad TA, ElGebeily MA, Diab RA, El Zahlawy H, Sharafeldin MS, et al. Bifocal compression-distraction for combined bone and soft-tissue defects in post-traumatic tibial nonunion. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33(10):e372–7.CrossRefPubMed
24.
El-Alfy B, El-Mowafi H, El-Moghazy N. Distraction osteogenesis in management of composite bone and soft tissue defects. Int Orthop. 2010;34(1):115–8.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Suger G, Fleischmann W, Hartwig E, Kinzl L. Open segmental bone transport. A therapeutic alternative in post-traumatic and osteitis soft tissue and bone defects. Unfallchirurg. 1995;98(7):381–5.PubMed
26.
DiPasquale D, Ochsner MG, Kelly AM, Maloney DM. The Ilizarov method for complex fracture nonunions. J Trauma. 1994;37:629–34.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Sen C, Kocaoglu M, Eralp L, Gulsen M, Cinar M. Bifocal compression-distraction in the acute treatment of grade III open tibia fractures with bone and soft-tissue loss: a report of 24 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:150–7.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Bundgaard K, Christensen K. Tibial bone loss and soft-tissue defect treated simultaneously with Ilizarov-technique: a case report. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:534–6.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Lee DK, Duong ET, Chang DG. The Ilizarov method of external fixation: current intraoperative concepts. AORN J. 2010;91(3):326–37 38-40.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Yang Z, Jin L, Tao H, Yang D. Reconstruction of large tibial bone defects following osteosarcoma resection using bone transport distraction: a report of two cases. Oncol Lett. 2016;12(2):1445–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
Peng RJ, Zhang YH, Li XH, Shi HN, Lu YJ, Yang Q. Accordion operation for the bone transport in treating tibial bone defect. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2018;31(9):824–8.PubMed
32.
Deng Z, Cai L, Jin W, Ping A, Wei R. One-stage reconstruction with open bone grafting and vacuum-assisted closure for infected tibial non-union. Arch Med Sci. 2014;4:764–72.CrossRef
33.
Deng K, Yu AX, Xia CY, Li ZH, Wang WY. Combination of negative pressure wound therapy with open bone grafting for bone and soft tissue defects. Mol Med Rep. 2013;8(2):468–72.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Ping A. Effect of vacuum-assisted closure combined with open bone grafting to promote rabbit bone graft vascularization. Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:1200–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
Peng J, Min L, Xiang Z, Huang F, Tu C, Zhang H. Ilizarov bone transport combined with antibiotic cement spacer for infected tibial nonunion. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(6):10058–65.PubMedPubMedCentral
36.
37.
Xu WG. Comparison of intramedullary nail versus conventional Ilizarov method for lower limb lengthening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop Surg. 2017;9(2):159–66.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
Bukva B, Vrgoc G, Rakovac I, Ducic S, Sindik J, Coklo M, et al. Complications in leg lengthening using an Ilizarov external fixator and intramedullary alignment in children: comparative study during a fourteen-year period. Injury. 2015;46(Suppl 6):S48–51.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Gulabi D, Erdem M, Cecen GS, Avci CC, Saglam N, Saglam F. Ilizarov fixator combined with an intramedullary nail for tibial nonunions with bone loss: is it effective? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(12):3892–901.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
40.
Oh CW, Song HR, Roh JY, Oh JK, Min WK, Kyung HS, et al. Bone transport over an intramedullary nail for reconstruction of long bone defects in tibia. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128(8):801–8.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Lin CC, Chen CM, Chiu FY, Su YP, Liu CL, Chen TH. Staged protocol for the treatment of chronic tibial shaft osteomyelitis with Ilizarov’s technique followed by the application of intramedullary locked nail. Orthopedics. 2012;35(12):e1769–74.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Reconstruction of massive tibial bone and soft tissue defects by trifocal bone transport combined with soft tissue distraction: experience from 31 cases
Authors
Yong-Qing Xu
Xin-Yu Fan
Xiao-Qing He
Hong-Jie Wen
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03894-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2021 Go to the issue

Research

The incidence of distal radius fractures in a Swedish pediatric population - an observational cohort study of 90 970 individual fractures

Research article

Epidemiology of distal radius fractures in children and adults during the COVID-19 pandemic – a two-center study

Research article

Urinary pentosidine level is associated with grip strength and gait speed in community-dwelling adults: a cross-sectional study

Research article

Characterization of hyaluronan-coated extracellular vesicles in synovial fluid of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis

Research

Prediction and trend of tactile acuity, pain and disability in acute LBP: a six-month prospective cohort study

Study protocol

Stratified care integrated with eHealth versus usual primary care physiotherapy in patients with neck and/or shoulder complaints: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial