Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Carpal Tunnel Syndrome | Research article

Structural validity of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire and its short version, the 6-Item CTS symptoms scale: a Rasch analysis one year after surgery

Authors: Juhani Multanen, Jari Ylinen, Teemu Karjalainen, Joona Ikonen, Arja Häkkinen, Jussi P. Repo

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) and its shorter version, the Six-Item Carpal Tunnel Symptoms Scale (CTS-6), are widely used for assessing function and/or symptoms in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. This study examined the structural validity of the BCTQ and CTS-6 among patients who had undergone surgery for treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Methods

The data for this cross-sectional analysis were obtained from 217 adult patients who had undergone carpal tunnel release surgery 1 year earlier. All patients completed the CTS-6, Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) and Functional Status Scale (FSS) of the BCTQ at 12 months after surgery. The Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT) was applied to investigate the unidimensionality, residual correlation, differential item functioning, scale coverage/targeting, and person separation of the CTS-6, SSS and FSS of the BCTQ.

Results

The FSS showed unidimensionality and good scale and item fit. All items showed ordered response category thresholds. Eight of the FSS items displayed differential item functioning favoring age or gender. The multidimensional structure of the CTS-6 was absorbed by creating a testlet for frequency of symptoms or testlets for pain and numbness. The testlets supported unidimensionality in the BCTQ SSS. One item in the CTS-6 and two items in the BCTQ SSS showed differential item functioning favoring age or gender. Four items in the BCTQ SSS and two items in the CTS-6 exhibited disordered response category thresholds. Merging of the relevant response categories led to ordered response category thresholds. The person separation indices were 0.73, 0.86 and 0.77 for the CTS-6, BCTQ SSS and FSS, respectively.

Conclusions

Based on the RMT analysis, the CTS-6 has superior psychometric properties compared to the BCTQ SSS in surgically treated patients. The CTS-6 might be more accurate when separated into item sets measuring pain or numbness. The FSS of the BCTQ has acceptable construct validity, although gender differences at some ages were observed in responses.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Vignais N, Weresch J, Keir PJ. Posture and Loading in the Pathomechanics of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Review. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2016;44(5):397–410.CrossRef Vignais N, Weresch J, Keir PJ. Posture and Loading in the Pathomechanics of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Review. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2016;44(5):397–410.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hemminki K, Li X, Sundquist K. Familial risks for nerve, nerve root and plexus disorders in siblings based on hospitalisations in Sweden. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61(1):80–4.CrossRef Hemminki K, Li X, Sundquist K. Familial risks for nerve, nerve root and plexus disorders in siblings based on hospitalisations in Sweden. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61(1):80–4.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Shiri R, Miranda H, Heliövaara M, Viikari-Juntura E. Physical work load factors and carpal tunnel syndrome: a population-based study. Occup Environ Med. 2009;66(6):368–73.CrossRef Shiri R, Miranda H, Heliövaara M, Viikari-Juntura E. Physical work load factors and carpal tunnel syndrome: a population-based study. Occup Environ Med. 2009;66(6):368–73.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Szabo RM. Outcomes assessment in hand surgery: when are they meaningful? J Hand Surg Am. 2001;26(6):993–1002.CrossRef Szabo RM. Outcomes assessment in hand surgery: when are they meaningful? J Hand Surg Am. 2001;26(6):993–1002.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sambandam SN, Priyanka P, Gul A, Ilango B. Critical analysis of outcome measures used in the assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Int Orthop. 2008;32(4):497–504.CrossRef Sambandam SN, Priyanka P, Gul A, Ilango B. Critical analysis of outcome measures used in the assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Int Orthop. 2008;32(4):497–504.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, Daltroy LH, Hohl GG, Fossel AH, Katz JN. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75(11):1585–92.CrossRef Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, Daltroy LH, Hohl GG, Fossel AH, Katz JN. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75(11):1585–92.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Atroshi I, Johnsson R, Sprinchorn A. Self-administered outcome instrument in carpal tunnel syndrome. Reliability, validity and responsiveness evaluated in 102 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1998;69(1):82–8.CrossRef Atroshi I, Johnsson R, Sprinchorn A. Self-administered outcome instrument in carpal tunnel syndrome. Reliability, validity and responsiveness evaluated in 102 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1998;69(1):82–8.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Padua R, Padua L, Romanini E, Aulisa L, Lupparelli S, Sanguinetti C. Versione italiana del questionario Boston Carpal Tunnel: valutazione preliminare. Giornale Italiano di Ortopedia e Traumatologia. 1998;24:121–9. Padua R, Padua L, Romanini E, Aulisa L, Lupparelli S, Sanguinetti C. Versione italiana del questionario Boston Carpal Tunnel: valutazione preliminare. Giornale Italiano di Ortopedia e Traumatologia. 1998;24:121–9.
10.
go back to reference de Campos CC, Manzano GM, de Andrade LB, Castelo Filho A, Nobrega JA. Translation and validation of an instrument for evaluation of severity of symptoms and the functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2003;61(1):51–5.CrossRef de Campos CC, Manzano GM, de Andrade LB, Castelo Filho A, Nobrega JA. Translation and validation of an instrument for evaluation of severity of symptoms and the functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2003;61(1):51–5.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sezgin M, Incel NA, Serhan S, Camdeviren H, As I, Erdogan C. Assessment of symptom severity and functional status in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: reliability and functionality of the Turkish version of the Boston Questionnaire. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(20):1281–5.CrossRef Sezgin M, Incel NA, Serhan S, Camdeviren H, As I, Erdogan C. Assessment of symptom severity and functional status in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: reliability and functionality of the Turkish version of the Boston Questionnaire. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(20):1281–5.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Upatham S, Kumnerddee W. Reliability of Thai version Boston questionnaire. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008;91(8):1250–6.PubMed Upatham S, Kumnerddee W. Reliability of Thai version Boston questionnaire. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008;91(8):1250–6.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Mody GN, Anderson GA, Thomas BP, Pallapati SC, Santoshi JA, Antonisamy B. Carpal tunnel syndrome in Indian patients: use of modified questionnaires for assessment. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2009;34(5):671–8.CrossRef Mody GN, Anderson GA, Thomas BP, Pallapati SC, Santoshi JA, Antonisamy B. Carpal tunnel syndrome in Indian patients: use of modified questionnaires for assessment. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2009;34(5):671–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Park DJ, Kang JH, Lee JW, Lee KE, Wen L, Kim TJ, Park YW, Nam TS, Kim MS, Lee SS. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Korean version of the Boston carpal tunnel questionnaire: its clinical evaluation in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome following local corticosteroid injection. J Korean Med Sci. 2013;28(7):1095–9.CrossRef Park DJ, Kang JH, Lee JW, Lee KE, Wen L, Kim TJ, Park YW, Nam TS, Kim MS, Lee SS. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Korean version of the Boston carpal tunnel questionnaire: its clinical evaluation in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome following local corticosteroid injection. J Korean Med Sci. 2013;28(7):1095–9.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lue YJ, Lu YM, Lin GT, Liu YF. Validation of the Chinese version of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(1):139–45.CrossRef Lue YJ, Lu YM, Lin GT, Liu YF. Validation of the Chinese version of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(1):139–45.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Oteo-Alvaro A, Marin MT, Matas JA, Vaquero J. Spanish validation of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. Med Clin (Barc). 2016;146(6):247–53.CrossRef Oteo-Alvaro A, Marin MT, Matas JA, Vaquero J. Spanish validation of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. Med Clin (Barc). 2016;146(6):247–53.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bougea A, Zambelis T, Voskou P, Katsika PZ, Tzavara C, Kokotis P, Karandreas N. Reliability and Validation of the Greek Version of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. Hand (N Y). 2018;13(5):593–9.CrossRef Bougea A, Zambelis T, Voskou P, Katsika PZ, Tzavara C, Kokotis P, Karandreas N. Reliability and Validation of the Greek Version of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. Hand (N Y). 2018;13(5):593–9.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hassankhani GG, Moradi A, Birjandinejad A, Vahedi E, Kachooei AR, Ebrahimzadeh MH. Translation and Validation of the Persian Version the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2018;6(1):71–7.PubMedPubMedCentral Hassankhani GG, Moradi A, Birjandinejad A, Vahedi E, Kachooei AR, Ebrahimzadeh MH. Translation and Validation of the Persian Version the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2018;6(1):71–7.PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Atroshi I, Lyren PE, Gummesson C. The 6-item CTS symptoms scale: a brief outcomes measure for carpal tunnel syndrome. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(3):347–58.CrossRef Atroshi I, Lyren PE, Gummesson C. The 6-item CTS symptoms scale: a brief outcomes measure for carpal tunnel syndrome. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(3):347–58.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–49.CrossRef Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–49.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Multanen J, Ylinen J, Karjalainen T, Kautiainen H, Repo JP, Häkkinen A. Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of The Boston Carpal tunnel questionnaire among surgically treated Carpal Tunnel Syndrome patients. Scand J Surg. 2020;109(4):343–50. Multanen J, Ylinen J, Karjalainen T, Kautiainen H, Repo JP, Häkkinen A. Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of The Boston Carpal tunnel questionnaire among surgically treated Carpal Tunnel Syndrome patients. Scand J Surg. 2020;109(4):343–50.
22.
go back to reference Rasch G. Probalististic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Reprinted. ed. 5835 S. Chicago: Danish Institute for Education Research, MESA Press; 1993. Rasch G. Probalististic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Reprinted. ed. 5835 S. Chicago: Danish Institute for Education Research, MESA Press; 1993.
23.
go back to reference Tennant A, McKenna SP, Hagell P. Application of Rasch analysis in the development and application of quality of life instruments. Value Health. 2004;7(Suppl 1):S22–6.CrossRef Tennant A, McKenna SP, Hagell P. Application of Rasch analysis in the development and application of quality of life instruments. Value Health. 2004;7(Suppl 1):S22–6.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Andrich D. Rating scales and Rasch measurement. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011;11(5):571–85.CrossRef Andrich D. Rating scales and Rasch measurement. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011;11(5):571–85.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Bond T, Fox C. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. 3rd ed. New York and London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2015.CrossRef Bond T, Fox C. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. 3rd ed. New York and London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2015.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Wainer H, Kiely GL. Item Clusters and Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Case for Testlets. J Educ Meas. 1987;24(3):185–201.CrossRef Wainer H, Kiely GL. Item Clusters and Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Case for Testlets. J Educ Meas. 1987;24(3):185–201.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Christensen KB, Makransky G, Horton M. Critical Values for Yen's Q3: Identification of Local Dependence in the Rasch Model Using Residual Correlations. Appl Psychol Meas. 2017;41(3):178–94.CrossRef Christensen KB, Makransky G, Horton M. Critical Values for Yen's Q3: Identification of Local Dependence in the Rasch Model Using Residual Correlations. Appl Psychol Meas. 2017;41(3):178–94.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Wright BD. Model selection: Rating Scale Model (RSM) or Partial Credit Model (PCM)? Rasch Meas Trans. 1998;12(3):641–2. Wright BD. Model selection: Rating Scale Model (RSM) or Partial Credit Model (PCM)? Rasch Meas Trans. 1998;12(3):641–2.
29.
go back to reference Tennant A, Conaghan PG. The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(8):1358–62.CrossRef Tennant A, Conaghan PG. The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(8):1358–62.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Structural validity of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire and its short version, the 6-Item CTS symptoms scale: a Rasch analysis one year after surgery
Authors
Juhani Multanen
Jari Ylinen
Teemu Karjalainen
Joona Ikonen
Arja Häkkinen
Jussi P. Repo
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03626-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2020 Go to the issue