Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Physical Therapy | Study protocol

The effects of integrating work-related factors and improving cooperation in musculoskeletal physical therapy practice: protocol for the ‘WORK TO BE DONE’ cluster randomised controlled trial

Authors: Nathan Hutting, Wiebke Oswald, Maria W.G. Nijhuis - van der Sanden, Monique Filart, Tamara Raaijmakers, Hendrik J. Bieleman, J. Bart Staal, Yvonne F. Heerkens

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are the primary cause of disability worldwide and a major societal burden. Recent qualitative research found that although a patient’s work is considered important, physical therapists take work participation insufficiently into account as a determining factor in the treatment of patients with MSDs. Therefore, the aim of this study is to improve the effectiveness of physical therapy (in primary healthcare) with respect to the work participation of employees with MSDs by increasing the knowledge and skills of generalist physical therapists and by improving the collaboration between generalist physical therapists and physical therapists specialised in occupational health.

Methods/design

This trial is a two-arm non-blinded cluster randomised controlled trial. Working patients with MSDs visiting a physical therapy practice are the target group. The control group will receive normal physical therapy treatment. The intervention group will receive treatment from a physical therapist with more knowledge about work-related factors and skills in terms of integrating work participation into the patients’ care. Data are gathered at baseline (T0), at four months (T1) and eight months (T2) follow-up. Most outcomes will be assessed with validated patient-reported questionnaires. Primary outcomes are the limitations in specific work-related activities and pain during work. Secondary outcomes include limitations in general work-related activities, general pain, quality of life, presenteeism, sick leave (absenteeism), estimated risk for future work disability, work-related psychosocial risk factors, job performance, and work ability. Based on a sample size calculation we need to include 221 patients in each arm (442 in total). During data analysis, each outcome variable will be analysed independently at T1 and at T2 as a dependent variable using the study group as an independent variable. In addition to the quantitative evaluation, a process evaluation will be performed by interviewing physical therapists as well as patients.

Discussion

The trial is expected to result in a more effective physical therapy process for working patients with MSDs. This will lead to a substantial reduction of costs: lower costs thanks to a more effective physical therapy process and lower costs due to less or shorter sick leave and decreased presenteeism.

Trial registration

Netherlands Trial Register, registration number: NL8518, date of registration 9 April 2020, URL registration: https://​www.​trialregister.​nl/​trial/​8518
Literature
1.
go back to reference Vos T, Abajobir AA, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abate KH, Abd-Allah F, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390:1211–59.CrossRef Vos T, Abajobir AA, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abate KH, Abd-Allah F, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390:1211–59.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Banerjee A, Jadhav S, Bhawalkar J. Limitations of activities in patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research. 2012;2:5.CrossRef Banerjee A, Jadhav S, Bhawalkar J. Limitations of activities in patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research. 2012;2:5.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Briggs AM, Cross MJ, Hoy DG, Sànchez-Riera L, Blyth FM, Woolf AD, et al. Musculoskeletal health conditions represent a global threat to healthy aging: a report for the 2015 World Health Organization world report on ageing and health. The Gerontologist. 2016;56(Suppl 2):S243–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw002.CrossRefPubMed Briggs AM, Cross MJ, Hoy DG, Sànchez-Riera L, Blyth FM, Woolf AD, et al. Musculoskeletal health conditions represent a global threat to healthy aging: a report for the 2015 World Health Organization world report on ageing and health. The Gerontologist. 2016;56(Suppl 2):S243–55. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​geront/​gnw002.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lewis J, O’Sullivan P. Is it time to reframe how we care for people with non-traumatic musculoskeletal pain? Br J Sports Med. 2018;52:1543–4.CrossRef Lewis J, O’Sullivan P. Is it time to reframe how we care for people with non-traumatic musculoskeletal pain? Br J Sports Med. 2018;52:1543–4.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference WHO Expert Committee on Identification and Control of Work-Related Diseases & World Health Organization. Identification and control of work-related diseases : report of a WHO expert committee. 1985. WHO Expert Committee on Identification and Control of Work-Related Diseases & World Health Organization. Identification and control of work-related diseases : report of a WHO expert committee. 1985.
7.
go back to reference Briggs AM, Woolf AD, Dreinhöfer K, Homb N, Hoy DG, Kopansky-Giles D, et al. Reducing the global burden of musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ. 2018;96:366–8.CrossRef Briggs AM, Woolf AD, Dreinhöfer K, Homb N, Hoy DG, Kopansky-Giles D, et al. Reducing the global burden of musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ. 2018;96:366–8.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Closing the gap in a generation Health equity through action on the social determinants of health Commission on Social Determinants of Health. 2008. Closing the gap in a generation Health equity through action on the social determinants of health Commission on Social Determinants of Health. 2008.
10.
go back to reference Huber M, André Knottnerus J, Green L, van der Horst H, Jadad AR, Kromhout D, et al. How should we define health? BMJ (Online). 2011;343. Huber M, André Knottnerus J, Green L, van der Horst H, Jadad AR, Kromhout D, et al. How should we define health? BMJ (Online). 2011;343.
11.
go back to reference van Tulder M, Becker A, Bekkering T, Breen A, del Real MTG, Hutchinson A, et al. Chapter 3. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society. 2006;15 Suppl 2:S169–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-1071-2. van Tulder M, Becker A, Bekkering T, Breen A, del Real MTG, Hutchinson A, et al. Chapter 3. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society. 2006;15 Suppl 2:S169–91. doi:https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00586-006-1071-2.
12.
go back to reference Bishop A, Wynne-Jones G, Lawton SA, van der Windt D, Main C, Sowden G, et al. Rationale, design and methods of the study of work and pain (SWAP): a cluster randomised controlled trial testing the addition of a vocational advice service to best current primary care for patients with musculoskeletal pain (ISRCTN 52269669). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:232. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-232.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bishop A, Wynne-Jones G, Lawton SA, van der Windt D, Main C, Sowden G, et al. Rationale, design and methods of the study of work and pain (SWAP): a cluster randomised controlled trial testing the addition of a vocational advice service to best current primary care for patients with musculoskeletal pain (ISRCTN 52269669). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:232. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​1471-2474-15-232.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Raad S. Betere zorg voor werkenden: Een visie op de toekomst van de arbeidsgerelateerde zorg. 2014. www.ser.nl. Raad S. Betere zorg voor werkenden: Een visie op de toekomst van de arbeidsgerelateerde zorg. 2014. www.​ser.​nl.
17.
go back to reference Oswald W, Hutting N, Engels JA, Staal JB, Nijhuis-Van Der Sanden MWG, Heerkens YF. Work participation of patients with musculoskeletal disorders: Is this addressed in physical therapy practice? Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology. 2017;12. Oswald W, Hutting N, Engels JA, Staal JB, Nijhuis-Van Der Sanden MWG, Heerkens YF. Work participation of patients with musculoskeletal disorders: Is this addressed in physical therapy practice? Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology. 2017;12.
18.
go back to reference Hutting N, Oswald W, Staal JB, Engels JA, Nouwens E, Nijhuis-Van-Der Sanden MWG, et al. Physical therapists and importance of work participation in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a focus group study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18. Hutting N, Oswald W, Staal JB, Engels JA, Nouwens E, Nijhuis-Van-Der Sanden MWG, et al. Physical therapists and importance of work participation in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a focus group study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18.
22.
go back to reference Bartys S, Stochkendahl MJ. Work-focused healthcare for low back pain; 2018. Bartys S, Stochkendahl MJ. Work-focused healthcare for low back pain; 2018.
25.
go back to reference Efird J. Blocked randomization with randomly selected block sizes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8:15–20.CrossRef Efird J. Blocked randomization with randomly selected block sizes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8:15–20.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Stratford P. Assessing disability and change on individual patients: a report of a patient specific measure. Physiother Can. 1995;47:258–63.CrossRef Stratford P. Assessing disability and change on individual patients: a report of a patient specific measure. Physiother Can. 1995;47:258–63.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Köke AJ, Lindeman E. Patient-specific approach. J Manip Physiol Ther. 1999;22:144–8.CrossRef Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Köke AJ, Lindeman E. Patient-specific approach. J Manip Physiol Ther. 1999;22:144–8.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Chatman AB, Hyams SP, Neel JM, Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Schomberg A, et al. The patient-specific functional scale: measurement properties in patients with knee dysfunction. Phys Ther. 1997;77:820–9.CrossRef Chatman AB, Hyams SP, Neel JM, Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Schomberg A, et al. The patient-specific functional scale: measurement properties in patients with knee dysfunction. Phys Ther. 1997;77:820–9.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Hefford C, Abbott JH, Arnold R, Baxter GD. The patient-specific functional scale: validity, reliability, and responsiveness in patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal problems. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42:56–65.CrossRef Hefford C, Abbott JH, Arnold R, Baxter GD. The patient-specific functional scale: validity, reliability, and responsiveness in patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal problems. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42:56–65.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Childs JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine. 2005;30:1331–4.CrossRef Childs JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine. 2005;30:1331–4.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Farrar JT, Young JP, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001;94:149–58.CrossRef Farrar JT, Young JP, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001;94:149–58.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005;14:798–804.CrossRef Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005;14:798–804.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Price DD, Bush FM, Long S, Harkins SW. A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain. 1994;56:217–26.CrossRef Price DD, Bush FM, Long S, Harkins SW. A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain. 1994;56:217–26.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Hutting N, Bart Staal J, Engels JA, Heerkens YF, Detaille SI, Nijhuis-Van Der Sanden MWG. Effect evaluation of a self-management programme for employees with complaints of the arm, neck or shoulder: A randomised controlled trial. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2015;72. Hutting N, Bart Staal J, Engels JA, Heerkens YF, Detaille SI, Nijhuis-Van Der Sanden MWG. Effect evaluation of a self-management programme for employees with complaints of the arm, neck or shoulder: A randomised controlled trial. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2015;72.
39.
go back to reference Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220–33.CrossRef Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220–33.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Hutting N, Engels JA, Heerkens YF, Staal JB. Nijhuis-Van der Sanden MWG. Development and measurement properties of the Dutch version of the Stanford presenteeism scale (SPS-6). J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24. Hutting N, Engels JA, Heerkens YF, Staal JB. Nijhuis-Van der Sanden MWG. Development and measurement properties of the Dutch version of the Stanford presenteeism scale (SPS-6). J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24.
41.
go back to reference Linton SJ, Nicholas M, MacDonald S. Development of a short form of the Örebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire. Spine. 2011;36:1891–5.CrossRef Linton SJ, Nicholas M, MacDonald S. Development of a short form of the Örebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire. Spine. 2011;36:1891–5.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Post Sennehed C, Gard G, Holmberg S, Stigmar K, Forsbrand M, Grahn B. Blue flags, development of a short clinical questionnaire on work-related psychosocial risk factors - a validation study in primary care. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18. Post Sennehed C, Gard G, Holmberg S, Stigmar K, Forsbrand M, Grahn B. Blue flags, development of a short clinical questionnaire on work-related psychosocial risk factors - a validation study in primary care. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18.
43.
go back to reference Lerner D, Amick BC, Rogers WH, Malspeis S, Bungay K, Cynn D. The work limitations questionnaire. Med Care. 2001;39:72–82.CrossRef Lerner D, Amick BC, Rogers WH, Malspeis S, Bungay K, Cynn D. The work limitations questionnaire. Med Care. 2001;39:72–82.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Ahlstrom L, Grimby-Ekman A, Hagberg M, Dellve L. The work ability index and single-item question: associations with sick leave, symptoms, and health - a prospective study of women on long-term sick leave. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010;36:404–12.CrossRef Ahlstrom L, Grimby-Ekman A, Hagberg M, Dellve L. The work ability index and single-item question: associations with sick leave, symptoms, and health - a prospective study of women on long-term sick leave. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010;36:404–12.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Kersten P, White PJ, Tennant A. Is the pain visual analogue scale linear and responsive to change? An exploration using rasch analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9. Kersten P, White PJ, Tennant A. Is the pain visual analogue scale linear and responsive to change? An exploration using rasch analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9.
47.
go back to reference Tashjian RZ, Deloach J, Porucznik CA, Powell AP. Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for visual analog scales (VAS) measuring pain in patients treated for rotator cuff disease. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 18:927–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.021. Tashjian RZ, Deloach J, Porucznik CA, Powell AP. Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for visual analog scales (VAS) measuring pain in patients treated for rotator cuff disease. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 18:927–32. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jse.​2009.​03.​021.
50.
go back to reference Twisk JWR. Applied longitudinal data analysis for epidemiology: a practical guide. Camebridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013.CrossRef Twisk JWR. Applied longitudinal data analysis for epidemiology: a practical guide. Camebridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The effects of integrating work-related factors and improving cooperation in musculoskeletal physical therapy practice: protocol for the ‘WORK TO BE DONE’ cluster randomised controlled trial
Authors
Nathan Hutting
Wiebke Oswald
Maria W.G. Nijhuis - van der Sanden
Monique Filart
Tamara Raaijmakers
Hendrik J. Bieleman
J. Bart Staal
Yvonne F. Heerkens
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03375-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2020 Go to the issue