Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Research article

Reverse wedge effect following intramedullary nailing of a basicervical trochanteric fracture variant combined with a mechanically compromised greater trochanter

Authors: Yu Zhang, Jun Hu, Xiang Li, Xiaodong Qin

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To introduce an unreported intraoperative complication in intramedullary nailing (IN) of an anatomically reduced trochanteric fracture variant characterized by a basicervical fracture line and coronally disrupted greater trochanter (GT).

Methods

A total of 414 trochanteric fractures (TF) treated with intramedullary nails from 2013 to 2017 were included in this study. After analysis of intraoperative fluoroscopy data, 33 cases, including 21 females and 12 males, with a mean age of 72.5 years (33 to 96 years) were identified for internal rotation of the cephalocervical fragment and inferior opening at the basicervical fracture line caused by nailing a satisfactorily reduced TF. The morphological features of this group of patients were analyzed on computed tomography (CT) scan. On radiograph, the magnitude of the displacement and final femoral neck-shaft angle (NSA) were measured.

Results

CT analysis demonstrated that the basicervical fracture line and the posterolateral fragment (PLF) detached from the GT were the two dominant features of this cohort. They were classified according to the number of main fragments: a 3-fragmentary subgroup containing three consistent fragments (cephalocervical fragment, PLF and distal femoral shaft) and a 4-fragmentary subgroup embracing one additional fragment (lesser trochanter). The four subtypes were as follows: the 3-fragmentary S indicating a small PLF (6 cases), the 3-fragmentary M presenting a moderate PLF (3 cases), the 3-fragmentary L standing for the PLF involving whole lesser trochanter (LT) (4 cases) and the 4-fragmentary GL incorporating separated PLF and LT fragments (20 cases). Geological analysis demonstrated that the majority of the basicervical fracture lines (81.8%) just crossed the center of the piriformis fossa, while the others marginally involved the medial wall of the GT. Postoperatively, the mean width of the inferior opening at the basicervical region was 9.2 ± 4.6 mm. The mean NSA was 135.2 ± 7.8 degrees. The comparison between the 3- and 4-fragmentary subgroups revealed no significant differences in magnitude of displacement and NSA.

Conclusion

This unreported intraoperative complication predominantly occurred in the intramedullary nailed basicervical trochanteric fracture variant combined with a PLF from the GT. The magnitude of the secondary displacement was substantial and resulted in a relative valgus reduction. This secondary displacement was caused by an impingement of the reamer with the superolateral cortex of the cephalocervical fragment and should be addressed during the operation.

Level of evidence

Therapy IV.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cummings SR, Rubin SM, Black D. The future of hip fractures in the United States: numbers, costs, and potential effects of postmenopausal estrogen. Clin Orthop. 1990;252:163–6. Cummings SR, Rubin SM, Black D. The future of hip fractures in the United States: numbers, costs, and potential effects of postmenopausal estrogen. Clin Orthop. 1990;252:163–6.
2.
go back to reference Babhulkar S. Unstable trochanteric fractures: issues and avoiding pitfalls. Injury. 2017;48(4):803–18.CrossRef Babhulkar S. Unstable trochanteric fractures: issues and avoiding pitfalls. Injury. 2017;48(4):803–18.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sharma G, Kumar GNK, Yadav S, et al. Pertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA 31-A1 and A2) not amenable to closed reduction: causes of irreducibility. Injury. 2014;45(12):1950–7.CrossRef Sharma G, Kumar GNK, Yadav S, et al. Pertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA 31-A1 and A2) not amenable to closed reduction: causes of irreducibility. Injury. 2014;45(12):1950–7.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kashigar A, Vincent A, Gunton MJ, et al. Predictors of failure for cephalomedullary nailing of proximal femoral fractures. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(8):1029–34.CrossRef Kashigar A, Vincent A, Gunton MJ, et al. Predictors of failure for cephalomedullary nailing of proximal femoral fractures. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(8):1029–34.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hak DJ, Bilat C. Avoiding varus malreduction during cephalomedullary nailing of intertrochanteric hip fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131(5):709–10.CrossRef Hak DJ, Bilat C. Avoiding varus malreduction during cephalomedullary nailing of intertrochanteric hip fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131(5):709–10.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference O'Malley MJ, Kang KK, Azer E, et al. Wedge effect following intramedullary hip screw fixation of intertrochanteric proximal femur fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135(10):1343–7.CrossRef O'Malley MJ, Kang KK, Azer E, et al. Wedge effect following intramedullary hip screw fixation of intertrochanteric proximal femur fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135(10):1343–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Shoda E, Kitada S, Sasaki Y, et al. Proposal of new classification of femoral trochanteric fracture by three-dimensional computed tomography and relationship to usual plain X-ray classification. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017;25(1):1–5.CrossRef Shoda E, Kitada S, Sasaki Y, et al. Proposal of new classification of femoral trochanteric fracture by three-dimensional computed tomography and relationship to usual plain X-ray classification. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017;25(1):1–5.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, et al. Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32(Suppl 1):S1–S170.CrossRef Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, et al. Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32(Suppl 1):S1–S170.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Watson ST, Schaller TM, Tanner SL, et al. Outcomes of low-energy Basicervical proximal femoral fractures treated with Cephalomedullary fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(13):1097–102.CrossRef Watson ST, Schaller TM, Tanner SL, et al. Outcomes of low-energy Basicervical proximal femoral fractures treated with Cephalomedullary fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(13):1097–102.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gill JM, Johnson GR, Sher JL, et al. Biomechanical aspects of the repair of intertrochanteric fractures. J Biomed Eng. 1989;11(3):235–9.CrossRef Gill JM, Johnson GR, Sher JL, et al. Biomechanical aspects of the repair of intertrochanteric fractures. J Biomed Eng. 1989;11(3):235–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Baumgaertner MR, Higgins TF. Femoral neck fractures. In: Rockwood CA, Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Green DP, editors. Rockwood and green’s fractures in adults, vol. 2. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2001. p. 1588. Baumgaertner MR, Higgins TF. Femoral neck fractures. In: Rockwood CA, Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Green DP, editors. Rockwood and green’s fractures in adults, vol. 2. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2001. p. 1588.
12.
go back to reference Su BW, Heyworth BE, Protopsaltis TS, et al. Basicervical versus intertrochanteric fractures: an analysis of radiographic and functional outcomes. Orthopedics. 2006;29(10):919–25.CrossRef Su BW, Heyworth BE, Protopsaltis TS, et al. Basicervical versus intertrochanteric fractures: an analysis of radiographic and functional outcomes. Orthopedics. 2006;29(10):919–25.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hu SJ, Yu GR, Zhang SM. Surgical treatment of basicervical intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with cephalomeduallary hip nails. Orthop Surg. 2013;5(2):124–9.CrossRef Hu SJ, Yu GR, Zhang SM. Surgical treatment of basicervical intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with cephalomeduallary hip nails. Orthop Surg. 2013;5(2):124–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Reece GM, Poole KE, Gee AH. Imaging the femoral cortex: thickness, density and mass from clinical CT. Med Image Anal. 2012;16(5):952–65.CrossRef Reece GM, Poole KE, Gee AH. Imaging the femoral cortex: thickness, density and mass from clinical CT. Med Image Anal. 2012;16(5):952–65.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Cho JW, Kent WT, Yoon YC, et al. Fracture morphology of AO/OTA 31-A trochanteric fractures: A 3D CT study with an emphasis on coronal fragments. Injury. 2017;48(2):277–84.CrossRef Cho JW, Kent WT, Yoon YC, et al. Fracture morphology of AO/OTA 31-A trochanteric fractures: A 3D CT study with an emphasis on coronal fragments. Injury. 2017;48(2):277–84.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Van Embden D, Meylaerts S, Rhemrev S, et al. The comparison of two classifications for trochanteric femur fracture: the AO/ASIF classification and the Jensen classification. Injury. 2010;41(4):377–81.CrossRef Van Embden D, Meylaerts S, Rhemrev S, et al. The comparison of two classifications for trochanteric femur fracture: the AO/ASIF classification and the Jensen classification. Injury. 2010;41(4):377–81.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Saarenpaa I, Partanen J, Jalovaara P. Basicervical fracture-a rare type of hip fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002;122(2):69–72.CrossRef Saarenpaa I, Partanen J, Jalovaara P. Basicervical fracture-a rare type of hip fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002;122(2):69–72.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Okano I, Sawada T, Kushima N, et al. Treatment with helical blade Cephalomedullary nail for two-part Basicervical proximal femoral fracture in elderly patients: a retrospective observational study. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2017;8(4):244–51.CrossRef Okano I, Sawada T, Kushima N, et al. Treatment with helical blade Cephalomedullary nail for two-part Basicervical proximal femoral fracture in elderly patients: a retrospective observational study. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2017;8(4):244–51.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Evans EM. The treatment of trochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1949;31(2):190–203.CrossRef Evans EM. The treatment of trochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1949;31(2):190–203.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Chang SM, Zhang YQ, Ma Z, et al. Fracture reduction with positive medial cortical support: a key element in stability reconstruction for the unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135(6):811–8.CrossRef Chang SM, Zhang YQ, Ma Z, et al. Fracture reduction with positive medial cortical support: a key element in stability reconstruction for the unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135(6):811–8.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ciufo DJ, Zaruta DA, Lipof JS, et al. Risk factors associated with Cephalomedullary nail cutout in the treatment of trochanteric hip fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(11):583–8.CrossRef Ciufo DJ, Zaruta DA, Lipof JS, et al. Risk factors associated with Cephalomedullary nail cutout in the treatment of trochanteric hip fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(11):583–8.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, et al. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(7):1058–64.CrossRef Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, et al. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(7):1058–64.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Reverse wedge effect following intramedullary nailing of a basicervical trochanteric fracture variant combined with a mechanically compromised greater trochanter
Authors
Yu Zhang
Jun Hu
Xiang Li
Xiaodong Qin
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03212-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2020 Go to the issue