Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Laminectomy | Research article

Unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression improves low back pain while standing equally on both sides in patients with lumbar canal stenosis: analysis using a detailed visual analogue scale

Authors: Hiroshi Takahashi, Yasuchika Aoki, Junya Saito, Arata Nakajima, Masato Sonobe, Yorikazu Akatsu, Masahiro Inoue, Shinji Taniguchi, Manabu Yamada, Keita Koyama, Keiichiro Yamamoto, Yasuhiro Shiga, Kazuhide Inage, Sumihisa Orita, Satoshi Maki, Takeo Furuya, Masao Koda, Masashi Yamazaki, Seiji Ohtori, Koichi Nakagawa

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a less invasive technique compared to conventional laminectomy. Recently, several authors have reported favorable results of low back pain (LBP) in patients of LSS treated with ULBD. However, the detailed changes and localization of LBP before and after ULBD for LSS remain unclear. Furthermore, unsymmetrical invasion to para-spinal muscle and facet joint may result in the residual unsymmetrical symptoms. To clarify these points, we conducted an observational study and used detailed visual analog scale (VAS) scores to evaluate the characteristics and bilateral changes of LBP and lower extremity symptoms.

Methods

We included 50 patients with LSS treated with ULBD. A detailed visual analogue scale (VAS; 100 mm) score of LBP in three different postural positions: motion, standing, and sitting, and bilateral VAS score (approached side versus opposite side) of LBP, lower extremity pain (LEP), and lower extremity numbness (LEN) were measured. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was used to quantify the clinical improvement.

Results

Detailed LBP VAS score before surgery was 51.5 ± 32.5 in motion, 63.0 ± 30.1 while standing, and 37.8 ± 31.8 while sitting; and showed LBP while standing was significantly greater than LBP while sitting (p < 0.01). After surgery, LBP while standing was significantly improved relative to that while sitting (p < 0.05), and levels of LBP in the three postures became almost the same with ODI improvement. Bilateral VAS scores showed significant improvement equally on both sides (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

ULBD improves LBP while standing equally on both sides in patients with LCS. The improvement of LBP by the ULBD surgery suggests radicular LBP improved because of decompression surgery. Furthermore, the symmetric improvement of LBP by the ULBD surgery suggests unsymmetrical invasion of the paraspinal muscles and facet joints is unrelated to residual LBP.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Johnsson KE, Willner S, Johnsson K. Postoperative instability after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1986;11(2):107–10.PubMed Johnsson KE, Willner S, Johnsson K. Postoperative instability after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1986;11(2):107–10.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Chang LC, Levine SA, Fossel AH, Liang MH. Seven- to 10-year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1996;21(1):92–8.PubMed Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Chang LC, Levine SA, Fossel AH, Liang MH. Seven- to 10-year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1996;21(1):92–8.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Young S, Veerapen R, O'Laoire SA. Relief of lumbar canal stenosis using multilevel subarticular fenestrations as an alternative to wide laminectomy: preliminary report. Neurosurgery. 1988;23(5):628–33.PubMed Young S, Veerapen R, O'Laoire SA. Relief of lumbar canal stenosis using multilevel subarticular fenestrations as an alternative to wide laminectomy: preliminary report. Neurosurgery. 1988;23(5):628–33.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Arai Y, Hirai T, Yoshii T, Sakai K, Kato T, Enomoto M, et al. A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD). Spine. 2014;39(4):332–40.PubMed Arai Y, Hirai T, Yoshii T, Sakai K, Kato T, Enomoto M, et al. A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD). Spine. 2014;39(4):332–40.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Cavusoglu H, Kaya RA, Turkmenoglu ON, Tuncer C, Colak I, Aydin Y. Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year prospective study. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(12):2133–42.PubMedPubMedCentral Cavusoglu H, Kaya RA, Turkmenoglu ON, Tuncer C, Colak I, Aydin Y. Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year prospective study. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(12):2133–42.PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Choi WS, Oh CH, Ji GY, Shin SC, Lee JB, Park DH, et al. Spinal canal morphology and clinical outcomes of microsurgical bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(5):991–8.PubMed Choi WS, Oh CH, Ji GY, Shin SC, Lee JB, Park DH, et al. Spinal canal morphology and clinical outcomes of microsurgical bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(5):991–8.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Oertel MF, Ryang YM, Korinth MC, Gilsbach JM, Rohde V. Long-term results of microsurgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(6):1264–9.PubMed Oertel MF, Ryang YM, Korinth MC, Gilsbach JM, Rohde V. Long-term results of microsurgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(6):1264–9.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Tanaka N, Nakanishi K, Kamei N, Yamamoto R, Nakamae T, Izumi B, et al. Clinical results of microsurgical bilateral decompression via unilateral approach for lumbar canal stenosis with multiple-level involvement. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015;25(Suppl 1):S191–8.PubMed Tanaka N, Nakanishi K, Kamei N, Yamamoto R, Nakamae T, Izumi B, et al. Clinical results of microsurgical bilateral decompression via unilateral approach for lumbar canal stenosis with multiple-level involvement. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015;25(Suppl 1):S191–8.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Miyashita T, Ataka H, Kato K, Tanno T. Good clinical outcomes and fusion rate of facet fusion with a percutaneous pedicle screw system for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: minimally invasive evolution of posterolateral fusion. Spine. 2015;40(9):E552–7.PubMed Miyashita T, Ataka H, Kato K, Tanno T. Good clinical outcomes and fusion rate of facet fusion with a percutaneous pedicle screw system for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: minimally invasive evolution of posterolateral fusion. Spine. 2015;40(9):E552–7.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Aoki Y, Sugiura S, Nakagawa K, Nakajima A, Takahashi H, Ohtori S, et al. Evaluation of nonspecific low back pain using a new detailed visual analogue scale for patients in motion, standing, and sitting: characterizing nonspecific low back pain in elderly patients. Pain Res Treat. 2012;2012:680496.PubMedPubMedCentral Aoki Y, Sugiura S, Nakagawa K, Nakajima A, Takahashi H, Ohtori S, et al. Evaluation of nonspecific low back pain using a new detailed visual analogue scale for patients in motion, standing, and sitting: characterizing nonspecific low back pain in elderly patients. Pain Res Treat. 2012;2012:680496.PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Sugiura S, Aoki Y, Toyooka T, Shiga T, Otsuki K, Aikawa E, et al. Characteristics of low back pain in adolescent patients with early-stage spondylolysis evaluated using a detailed visual analogue scale. Spine. 2015;40(1):E29–34.PubMed Sugiura S, Aoki Y, Toyooka T, Shiga T, Otsuki K, Aikawa E, et al. Characteristics of low back pain in adolescent patients with early-stage spondylolysis evaluated using a detailed visual analogue scale. Spine. 2015;40(1):E29–34.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Stromqvist BH, Berg S, Gerdhem P, Johnsson R, Moller A, Sahlstrand T, et al. X-stop versus decompressive surgery for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Spine. 2013;38(17):1436–42.PubMed Stromqvist BH, Berg S, Gerdhem P, Johnsson R, Moller A, Sahlstrand T, et al. X-stop versus decompressive surgery for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Spine. 2013;38(17):1436–42.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Toyone T, Tanaka T, Kato D, Kaneyama R: Low-back pain following surgery for lumbar disc herniation. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg American volume 2004, 86-a (5): 893–896. Toyone T, Tanaka T, Kato D, Kaneyama R: Low-back pain following surgery for lumbar disc herniation. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg American volume 2004, 86-a (5): 893–896.
14.
go back to reference Kikuchi S. The recent trend in diagnosis and treatment of chronic low Back pain. Spine Surgery and Related Research. 2017;1(1):1–6. Kikuchi S. The recent trend in diagnosis and treatment of chronic low Back pain. Spine Surgery and Related Research. 2017;1(1):1–6.
15.
go back to reference Kleinstuck FS, Grob D, Lattig F, Bartanusz V, Porchet F, Jeszenszky D, et al. The influence of preoperative back pain on the outcome of lumbar decompression surgery. Spine. 2009;34(11):1198–203.PubMed Kleinstuck FS, Grob D, Lattig F, Bartanusz V, Porchet F, Jeszenszky D, et al. The influence of preoperative back pain on the outcome of lumbar decompression surgery. Spine. 2009;34(11):1198–203.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Mobbs RJ, Li J, Sivabalan P, Raley D, Rao PJ. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article. Journal of neurosurgery Spine. 2014;21(2):179–86.PubMed Mobbs RJ, Li J, Sivabalan P, Raley D, Rao PJ. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article. Journal of neurosurgery Spine. 2014;21(2):179–86.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Hong SW, Choi KY, Ahn Y, Baek OK, Wang JC, Lee SH, Lee HY. A comparison of unilateral and bilateral laminotomies for decompression of L4-L5 spinal stenosis. Spine. 2011;36(3):E172–8.PubMed Hong SW, Choi KY, Ahn Y, Baek OK, Wang JC, Lee SH, Lee HY. A comparison of unilateral and bilateral laminotomies for decompression of L4-L5 spinal stenosis. Spine. 2011;36(3):E172–8.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Ohtori S, Miyagi M, Inoue G. Sensory nerve ingrowth, cytokines, and instability of discogenic low back pain: a review. Spine Surgery and Related Research. 2018;2(1):11–7. Ohtori S, Miyagi M, Inoue G. Sensory nerve ingrowth, cytokines, and instability of discogenic low back pain: a review. Spine Surgery and Related Research. 2018;2(1):11–7.
19.
go back to reference Thome C, Zevgaridis D, Leheta O, Bazner H, Pockler-Schoniger C, Wohrle J, et al. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy. Journal of neurosurgery Spine. 2005;3(2):129–41.PubMed Thome C, Zevgaridis D, Leheta O, Bazner H, Pockler-Schoniger C, Wohrle J, et al. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy. Journal of neurosurgery Spine. 2005;3(2):129–41.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Orita S, Yamashita T, Ohtori S, Yonenobu K, Kawakami M, Taguchi T, et al. Prevalence and location of neuropathic pain in lumbar spinal disorders: analysis of 1804 consecutive patients with primary lower Back pain. Spine. 2016;41(15):1224–31.PubMed Orita S, Yamashita T, Ohtori S, Yonenobu K, Kawakami M, Taguchi T, et al. Prevalence and location of neuropathic pain in lumbar spinal disorders: analysis of 1804 consecutive patients with primary lower Back pain. Spine. 2016;41(15):1224–31.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Lu WW, Luk KD, Ruan DK, Fei ZQ, Leong JC. Stability of the whole lumbar spine after multilevel fenestration and discectomy. Spine. 1999;24(13):1277–82.PubMed Lu WW, Luk KD, Ruan DK, Fei ZQ, Leong JC. Stability of the whole lumbar spine after multilevel fenestration and discectomy. Spine. 1999;24(13):1277–82.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy JP, Lafage V. Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine. 2010;35(25):2224–31.PubMed Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy JP, Lafage V. Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine. 2010;35(25):2224–31.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Aoki Y, Nakajima A, Takahashi H, Sonobe M, Terajima F, Saito M, et al. Influence of pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch on surgical outcomes of short-segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:213.PubMedPubMedCentral Aoki Y, Nakajima A, Takahashi H, Sonobe M, Terajima F, Saito M, et al. Influence of pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch on surgical outcomes of short-segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:213.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression improves low back pain while standing equally on both sides in patients with lumbar canal stenosis: analysis using a detailed visual analogue scale
Authors
Hiroshi Takahashi
Yasuchika Aoki
Junya Saito
Arata Nakajima
Masato Sonobe
Yorikazu Akatsu
Masahiro Inoue
Shinji Taniguchi
Manabu Yamada
Keita Koyama
Keiichiro Yamamoto
Yasuhiro Shiga
Kazuhide Inage
Sumihisa Orita
Satoshi Maki
Takeo Furuya
Masao Koda
Masashi Yamazaki
Seiji Ohtori
Koichi Nakagawa
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2475-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2019 Go to the issue