Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Reattachment of the flexor and extensor tendons at the epicondyle in elbow instability: a biomechanical comparison of techniques

Authors: Andreas Lenich, Christian Pfeifer, Philipp Proier, Roman Fleer, Coen Wijdicks, Martina Roth, Frank Martetschläger, Jonas Pogorzelski

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Elbow dislocation represents a common injury, especially in the younger population. If treated surgically, the reattached tendons require a high amount of primary stability to allow for an early rehabilitation to avoid postoperative stiffness. The purpose of this study was to assess the biomechanical properties of a single and a double row technique for reattachment of the common extensor and common flexor muscles origin. We hypothesized that the double row technique would provide greater stability in terms of pullout forces than the single row technique.

Methods

Twelve cadaveric specimens were randomized into two groups of fixation methods for the common extensor tendon or the common flexor tendon at the elbow (1): a single row technique using two knotted 3.0 mm suture anchors, and (2) a double row technique using an additional knotless 3.5 mm anchor. The repairs were cyclically loaded over 500 cycles at 1 Hz from 10 N to a maximum of 100 N (extensors) or 150 N (flexors), and then pulled to failure. Stiffness and maximum load at failure and mode of failure were recorded and calculated.

Results

No significant differences in stiffness were observed between the two techniques for both the extensor and flexor reattachment (P = 0.701 and P = 0.306, respectively). The mean maximum load at failure indicated that the double row construct was significantly stronger than the single row construct. This was found to be true for both the extensor and flexor reattachment (213.6; SD 78.7 N versus 384.1; SD 105.6 N, P = 0.010 and 203.7; SD 65.8 N versus 318.0; SD 64.6 N, P = 0.013, respectively).

Conclusions

The double row technique provides significant greater stability to the reattached common flexor or extensor origin to the medial or lateral epicondyle. Thus, it should be considered in the development of improved repair techniques for stabilizers of the elbow.

Study design

Controlled laboratory study.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stoneback JW, Owens BD, Sykes J, Athwal GS, Pointer L, Wolf JM. Incidence of elbow dislocations in the United States population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(3):240–5.CrossRefPubMed Stoneback JW, Owens BD, Sykes J, Athwal GS, Pointer L, Wolf JM. Incidence of elbow dislocations in the United States population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(3):240–5.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Mehta JA, Bain GI. Elbow dislocations in adults and children. Clin Sports Med. 2004;23(4):609–27 ix.CrossRefPubMed Mehta JA, Bain GI. Elbow dislocations in adults and children. Clin Sports Med. 2004;23(4):609–27 ix.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference O'Driscoll SW. Classification and evaluation of recurrent instability of the elbow. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;370:34–43.CrossRef O'Driscoll SW. Classification and evaluation of recurrent instability of the elbow. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;370:34–43.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference McGuire DT, Bain GI. Management of dislocations of the elbow in the athlete. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2014;22(3):188–93.CrossRefPubMed McGuire DT, Bain GI. Management of dislocations of the elbow in the athlete. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2014;22(3):188–93.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Taylor F, Sims M, Theis JC, Herbison GP. Interventions for treating acute elbow dislocations in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;4:CD007908. Taylor F, Sims M, Theis JC, Herbison GP. Interventions for treating acute elbow dislocations in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;4:CD007908.
7.
go back to reference Hildebrand KA, Patterson SD, King GJ. Acute elbow dislocations: simple and complex. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999;30(1):63–79.CrossRefPubMed Hildebrand KA, Patterson SD, King GJ. Acute elbow dislocations: simple and complex. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999;30(1):63–79.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Anderson DR, Haller JM, Anderson LA, Hailu S, Chala A, O'Driscoll SW. Surgical treatment of chronic elbow dislocation allowing for early range of motion: operative technique and clinical results. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32(4):196–203.CrossRefPubMed Anderson DR, Haller JM, Anderson LA, Hailu S, Chala A, O'Driscoll SW. Surgical treatment of chronic elbow dislocation allowing for early range of motion: operative technique and clinical results. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32(4):196–203.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Jupiter JB, Ring D. Treatment of unreduced elbow dislocations with hinged external fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A(9):1630–5.CrossRefPubMed Jupiter JB, Ring D. Treatment of unreduced elbow dislocations with hinged external fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A(9):1630–5.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Iordens GI, Van Lieshout EM, Schep NW, De Haan J, Tuinebreijer WE, Eygendaal D, et al. Early mobilisation versus plaster immobilisation of simple elbow dislocations: results of the FuncSiE multicentre randomised clinical trial. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(6):531–8.CrossRefPubMed Iordens GI, Van Lieshout EM, Schep NW, De Haan J, Tuinebreijer WE, Eygendaal D, et al. Early mobilisation versus plaster immobilisation of simple elbow dislocations: results of the FuncSiE multicentre randomised clinical trial. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(6):531–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bachman DR, Thaveepunsan S, Park S, Fitzsimmons JS, An KN, O'Driscoll SW. The effect of prosthetic radial head geometry on the distribution and magnitude of radiocapitellar joint contact pressures. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(2):281–8.CrossRefPubMed Bachman DR, Thaveepunsan S, Park S, Fitzsimmons JS, An KN, O'Driscoll SW. The effect of prosthetic radial head geometry on the distribution and magnitude of radiocapitellar joint contact pressures. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(2):281–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Wake H, Hashizume H, Nishida K, Inoue H, Nagayama N. Biomechanical analysis of the mechanism of elbow fracture-dislocations by compression force. J Orthop Sci. 2004;9(1):44–50.CrossRefPubMed Wake H, Hashizume H, Nishida K, Inoue H, Nagayama N. Biomechanical analysis of the mechanism of elbow fracture-dislocations by compression force. J Orthop Sci. 2004;9(1):44–50.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Brand PW, Beach RB, Thompson DE. Relative tension and potential excursion of muscles in the forearm and hand. J Hand Surg Am. 1981;6(3):209–19.CrossRefPubMed Brand PW, Beach RB, Thompson DE. Relative tension and potential excursion of muscles in the forearm and hand. J Hand Surg Am. 1981;6(3):209–19.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference O'Brien MJ, Lee Murphy R, Savoie FH 3rd. A preliminary report of acute and subacute arthroscopic repair of the radial ulnohumeral ligament after elbow dislocation in the high-demand patient. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(6):679–87.CrossRefPubMed O'Brien MJ, Lee Murphy R, Savoie FH 3rd. A preliminary report of acute and subacute arthroscopic repair of the radial ulnohumeral ligament after elbow dislocation in the high-demand patient. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(6):679–87.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lee YC, Eng K, Keogh A, McLean JM, Bain GI. Repair of the acutely unstable elbow: use of tensionable anchors. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2012;16(4):225–9.CrossRefPubMed Lee YC, Eng K, Keogh A, McLean JM, Bain GI. Repair of the acutely unstable elbow: use of tensionable anchors. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2012;16(4):225–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Park MC, Cadet ER, Levine WN, Bigliani LU, Ahmad CS. Tendon-to-bone pressure distributions at a repaired rotator cuff footprint using transosseous suture and suture anchor fixation techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(8):1154–9.CrossRefPubMed Park MC, Cadet ER, Levine WN, Bigliani LU, Ahmad CS. Tendon-to-bone pressure distributions at a repaired rotator cuff footprint using transosseous suture and suture anchor fixation techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(8):1154–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kim DH, Elattrache NS, Tibone JE, Jun BJ, DeLaMora SN, Kvitne RS, et al. Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(3):407–14.CrossRefPubMed Kim DH, Elattrache NS, Tibone JE, Jun BJ, DeLaMora SN, Kvitne RS, et al. Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(3):407–14.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Park MC, Peterson AB, McGarry MH, Park CJ, Lee TQ. Knotless Transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair improves biomechanical self-reinforcement without diminishing footprint contact compared with medial knotted repair. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(8):1473–81.CrossRefPubMed Park MC, Peterson AB, McGarry MH, Park CJ, Lee TQ. Knotless Transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair improves biomechanical self-reinforcement without diminishing footprint contact compared with medial knotted repair. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(8):1473–81.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Millett PJ, Hussain ZB, Fritz EM, Warth RJ, Katthagen JC, Pogorzelski J. Rotator cuff tears at the musculotendinous junction: classification and surgical options for repair and reconstruction. Arthrosc Tech. 2017;6(4):e1075–e85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Millett PJ, Hussain ZB, Fritz EM, Warth RJ, Katthagen JC, Pogorzelski J. Rotator cuff tears at the musculotendinous junction: classification and surgical options for repair and reconstruction. Arthrosc Tech. 2017;6(4):e1075–e85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Hanypsiak BT, DeLong JM, Simmons L, Lowe W, Burkhart S. Knot strength varies widely among expert Arthroscopists. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(8):1978–84.CrossRefPubMed Hanypsiak BT, DeLong JM, Simmons L, Lowe W, Burkhart S. Knot strength varies widely among expert Arthroscopists. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(8):1978–84.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Pogorzelski J, Muckenhirn KJ, Mitchell JJ, Katthagen JC, Schon JM, Dahl KD, et al. Biomechanical comparison of 3 glenoid-side fixation techniques for superior capsular reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(4):801–8.CrossRefPubMed Pogorzelski J, Muckenhirn KJ, Mitchell JJ, Katthagen JC, Schon JM, Dahl KD, et al. Biomechanical comparison of 3 glenoid-side fixation techniques for superior capsular reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(4):801–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Sileo MJ, Ruotolo CR, Nelson CO, Serra-Hsu F, Panchal AP. A biomechanical comparison of the modified Mason-Allen stitch and massive cuff stitch in vitro. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(3):235–40.CrossRefPubMed Sileo MJ, Ruotolo CR, Nelson CO, Serra-Hsu F, Panchal AP. A biomechanical comparison of the modified Mason-Allen stitch and massive cuff stitch in vitro. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(3):235–40.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Reattachment of the flexor and extensor tendons at the epicondyle in elbow instability: a biomechanical comparison of techniques
Authors
Andreas Lenich
Christian Pfeifer
Philipp Proier
Roman Fleer
Coen Wijdicks
Martina Roth
Frank Martetschläger
Jonas Pogorzelski
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2341-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2018 Go to the issue