Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Use of autogenous onlay bone graft for uncontained tibial bone defects in primary total knee arthroplasty

Authors: Jung-Ro Yoon, In-Wook Seo, Young-Soo Shin

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The use of autogenous bone graft is a well–known technique for reconstruction of tibial bone defects in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In cases where the size of the bone graft is inappropriate, the stability of bone graft fixation and subsequent bone graft to host bone incorporation may be compromised. We describe a simple and reliable technique of reconstruction in a proximal tibia bone defect at the time of primary TKA by using autogenous onlay bone graft (AOBG).

Methods

Records were reviewed of 19 patients (mean age, 72 years) who underwent primary TKA using AOBG without the additional allogenous bone or metal augments, between August 2013 and August 2014.

Results

Mean Knee Society score (KSS) in the 22 knees was significantly higher postoperatively than preoperatively (92 ± 4 vs. 30 ± 7, P < 0.001). The mean range of motion (ROM) in the 22 knees, which was 106 ± 12° preoperatively, improved to 112 ± 10° at last follow-up, but this this difference was not significant (P = 0.32). No migration of implants and presence of radiolucent lines at the bone cement-prosthesis interface were observed. Furthermore, the serial radiographs of 19 patients had a mean time of 3.2 months (range, 2.7–4.4 months) for solid union with cross trabeculation between the proximal tibial bone and graft.

Conclusions

This simple AOBG supplement technique may biologically promote graft to host bone healing by enhancing fixation stability without the additional fixatives and assist the surgeon in managing the varying nature of uncontained bone defects.

Trial registration

Trial registration number: KCT0002328, May 15, 2017.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kharbanda Y, Sharma M. Autograft reconstructions for bone defects in primary total knee replacement in severe varus knees. Indian J Orthop. 2014;48:313–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kharbanda Y, Sharma M. Autograft reconstructions for bone defects in primary total knee replacement in severe varus knees. Indian J Orthop. 2014;48:313–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Dennis DA. Repairing minor bone defects: augmentation & autograft. Orthopedics. 1998;21:1036–8.PubMed Dennis DA. Repairing minor bone defects: augmentation & autograft. Orthopedics. 1998;21:1036–8.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Huten D. Femorotibial bone loss during revision total knee arthroplasty. OrthopTraumatol Surg Res. 2013;99:S22–33.CrossRef Huten D. Femorotibial bone loss during revision total knee arthroplasty. OrthopTraumatol Surg Res. 2013;99:S22–33.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Schmitz HC, Klauser W, Citak M, Al-Khateeb H, Gehrke T, Kendoff D. Three-year follow up utilizing tantal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2013;28:1556–60.CrossRef Schmitz HC, Klauser W, Citak M, Al-Khateeb H, Gehrke T, Kendoff D. Three-year follow up utilizing tantal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2013;28:1556–60.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chockalingam S, Scott G. The outcome of cemented vs. cementless fixation of a femoral component in total knee replacement (TKR) with the identification of radiological signs for the prediction of failure. Knee. 2000;7:233–8.CrossRefPubMed Chockalingam S, Scott G. The outcome of cemented vs. cementless fixation of a femoral component in total knee replacement (TKR) with the identification of radiological signs for the prediction of failure. Knee. 2000;7:233–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Shannon BD, Klassen JF, Rand JA, Berry DJ, Trousdale RT. Revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented components and uncemented intramedullary stems. J Arthroplast. 2003;18:27–32.CrossRef Shannon BD, Klassen JF, Rand JA, Berry DJ, Trousdale RT. Revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented components and uncemented intramedullary stems. J Arthroplast. 2003;18:27–32.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lee SY, Yang JH, Lee YI, et al. A novel medial soft tissue release method for varus deformity during total knee arthroplasty: femoral origin release of the medial collateral ligament. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2016;28:153–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee SY, Yang JH, Lee YI, et al. A novel medial soft tissue release method for varus deformity during total knee arthroplasty: femoral origin release of the medial collateral ligament. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2016;28:153–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Lonner JH, Lotke PA, Kim J, Nelson C. Impaction grafting and wire mesh for uncontained defects in revision knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:145–51.CrossRef Lonner JH, Lotke PA, Kim J, Nelson C. Impaction grafting and wire mesh for uncontained defects in revision knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:145–51.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dorr LD, Ranawat CS, Sculco TA, McKaskill B, Orisek BS. THE CLASSIC: bone graft for Tibial defects in Total knee Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;446:4–9.CrossRefPubMed Dorr LD, Ranawat CS, Sculco TA, McKaskill B, Orisek BS. THE CLASSIC: bone graft for Tibial defects in Total knee Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;446:4–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lee KJ, Bae KC, Cho CH, et al. Radiological stability after revision of infected total knee arthroplasty using modular metal augments. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2016;28:55–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee KJ, Bae KC, Cho CH, et al. Radiological stability after revision of infected total knee arthroplasty using modular metal augments. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2016;28:55–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Whittaker JP, Dharmarajan R, Toms AD. The management of bone loss in revision total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:981–7.CrossRefPubMed Whittaker JP, Dharmarajan R, Toms AD. The management of bone loss in revision total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:981–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ahmed I, Logan M, Alipour F, et al. Autogenous bone grafting of uncontained bony defects of tibia during total knee arthroplasty a 10-year follow up. J Arthroplast. 2008;23:744–50.CrossRef Ahmed I, Logan M, Alipour F, et al. Autogenous bone grafting of uncontained bony defects of tibia during total knee arthroplasty a 10-year follow up. J Arthroplast. 2008;23:744–50.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Watanabe W, Sato K, Itoi E. Autologous bone grafting without screw fixation for tibial defects in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci. 2001;6:481–6.CrossRefPubMed Watanabe W, Sato K, Itoi E. Autologous bone grafting without screw fixation for tibial defects in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci. 2001;6:481–6.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hosaka K, Saito S, Oyama T, et al. Union, knee alignment, and clinical outcomes of patients treated with autologous bone grafting for medial tibial defects in primary total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2017;40:e604–8.CrossRefPubMed Hosaka K, Saito S, Oyama T, et al. Union, knee alignment, and clinical outcomes of patients treated with autologous bone grafting for medial tibial defects in primary total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2017;40:e604–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Use of autogenous onlay bone graft for uncontained tibial bone defects in primary total knee arthroplasty
Authors
Jung-Ro Yoon
In-Wook Seo
Young-Soo Shin
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1826-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2017 Go to the issue