Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Accuracy of clinical neurological examination in diagnosing lumbo-sacral radiculopathy: a systematic literature review

Authors: Nassib Tawa, Anthea Rhoda, Ina Diener

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Lumbar radiculopathy remains a clinical challenge among primary care clinicians in both assessment and diagnosis. This often leads to misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment of patients resulting in poor health outcomes, exacerbating this already debilitating condition. This review evaluated 12 primary diagnostic accuracy studies that specifically assessed the performance of various individual and grouped clinical neurological tests in detecting nerve root impingement, as established in the current literature.

Methods

Eight electronic data bases were searched for relevant articles from inception until July 2016. All primary diagnostic studies which investigated the accuracy of clinical neurological test (s) in diagnosing lumbar radiculopathy among patients with low back and referred leg symptoms were screened for inclusion. Qualifying studies were retrieved and independently assessed for methodological quality using the ‘Quality Assessment of Diagnostic tests Accuracy Studies’ criteria.

Results

A total of 12 studies which investigated standard components of clinical neurological examination of (sensory, motor, tendon reflex and neuro-dynamics) of the lumbo-sacral spine were included. The mean inter-observer agreement on quality assessment by two independent reviewers was fair (k = 0.3 – 0.7).
The diagnostic performance of sensory testing using MR imaging as a reference standard demonstrated a sensitivity (confidence interval 95%) 0.61 (0.47-0.73) and a specificity of 0.63 (0.38-0.84). Motor tests sensitivity was poor to moderate, ranging from 0.13 (0.04-0.31) to 0.61 (0.36-0.83). Generally, the diagnostic performance of reflex testing was notably good with specificity ranging from (confidence interval 95%) 0.60 (0.51-0.69) to 0.93 (0.87-0.97) and sensitivity ranging from 0.14 (0.09-0.21) to 0.67 (0.21-0.94). Femoral nerve stretch test had a high sensitivity of (confidence interval 95%) 1.00 (0.40-1.00) and specificity of 0.83 (0.52-0.98) while SLR test recorded a mean sensitivity of 0.84 (0.72-0.92) and specificity of 0.78 (0.67-0.87).

Conclusions

There is a scarcity of studies on the diagnostic accuracy of clinical neurological examination testing. Furthermore there seem to be a disconnect among researchers regarding the diagnostic utility of lower limb neuro-dynamic tests which include the Straight Leg Raise and Femoral Nerve tests for sciatic and femoral nerve respectively. Whether these tests are able to detect the presence of disc herniation and subsequent nerve root compression or hyper-sensitivity of the sacral and femoral plexus due to mechanical irritation still remains debatable.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Scharfer A, Hall T, Briffa K. Classification of low back-related leg pain—A proposed patho-mechanism-based approach. Man Ther. 2007;14(2):222-30. Scharfer A, Hall T, Briffa K. Classification of low back-related leg pain—A proposed patho-mechanism-based approach. Man Ther. 2007;14(2):222-30.
2.
go back to reference Lee-Robinson A, Lee AT. Clinical and Diagnostic Findings in Patients with Lumbar Radiculopathy and Polyneuropathy. Am J Clin Med. 2010;7(2):80-5. Lee-Robinson A, Lee AT. Clinical and Diagnostic Findings in Patients with Lumbar Radiculopathy and Polyneuropathy. Am J Clin Med. 2010;7(2):80-5.
3.
go back to reference Van Boxem K, Cheng J, Patijn J, van Kleef M, Lataster M, Mekhail N, Van Zundert J. Lumbosacral Radicular Pain. Pain Pract. 2010;10(4):339–58.CrossRefPubMed Van Boxem K, Cheng J, Patijn J, van Kleef M, Lataster M, Mekhail N, Van Zundert J. Lumbosacral Radicular Pain. Pain Pract. 2010;10(4):339–58.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Tachihara H, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Sekiguchi M. Does Facet Joint Inflammation Induce Radiculopathy? An Investigation Using a Rat Model of Lumbar Facet Joint Inflammation. Spine. 2007;32(4):406–12.CrossRefPubMed Tachihara H, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Sekiguchi M. Does Facet Joint Inflammation Induce Radiculopathy? An Investigation Using a Rat Model of Lumbar Facet Joint Inflammation. Spine. 2007;32(4):406–12.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N, Modic MT, Malkasian D, and Ross JS. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Lumbar Spine in People without Back Pain. Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N, Modic MT, Malkasian D, and Ross JS. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Lumbar Spine in People without Back Pain.
6.
go back to reference Weiner BK, Patel R. The accuracy of MRI in the Detection of Lumbar Disc Containment. J Orthop Surg Res. 2008;3(2):46-50. Weiner BK, Patel R. The accuracy of MRI in the Detection of Lumbar Disc Containment. J Orthop Surg Res. 2008;3(2):46-50.
7.
go back to reference Coster S, de Bruijn FTM, Tavy TLJ. Diagnostic value of history, physical examination and needle electromyography in diagnosing lumbosacral radiculopathy. 2010. J Neurol. 2010;257:332–7. Coster S, de Bruijn FTM, Tavy TLJ. Diagnostic value of history, physical examination and needle electromyography in diagnosing lumbosacral radiculopathy. 2010. J Neurol. 2010;257:332–7.
8.
go back to reference Manchikanti L, et al. Are diagnostic lumbar medial branch blocks valid? Results of 2-year follow-up. Pain Physician. 2003;6(2):147–53. {D2898}. Manchikanti L, et al. Are diagnostic lumbar medial branch blocks valid? Results of 2-year follow-up. Pain Physician. 2003;6(2):147–53. {D2898}.
9.
go back to reference Cochrane Style Guide Working Group. Cochrane Style Guide Basics [updated September 2009]. Cochrane Style Guide Working Group. Cochrane Style Guide Basics [updated September 2009].
10.
go back to reference Vroomen PCAJ, de Krom MCTFM, Wilmink JT, Kester ADM, Knottnerus JA. Diagnostic value of history and physical examination inpatients suspected of sciatica due to disc herniation: A systematic review. J Neurol. 1999;246:899–906.CrossRefPubMed Vroomen PCAJ, de Krom MCTFM, Wilmink JT, Kester ADM, Knottnerus JA. Diagnostic value of history and physical examination inpatients suspected of sciatica due to disc herniation: A systematic review. J Neurol. 1999;246:899–906.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Al Nezari NH, Schneiders AG, Hendrick PA. Neurological examination of the peripheral nervous system to diagnose lumbar spinal disc herniation with suspected radiculopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J. 2013;13(657–674). Al Nezari NH, Schneiders AG, Hendrick PA. Neurological examination of the peripheral nervous system to diagnose lumbar spinal disc herniation with suspected radiculopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J. 2013;13(657–674).
12.
go back to reference Van der Windt DA, Simons E, Riphagen E, Ammendolia C, Verhagen AP, Laslett M, Devillé W, Deyo RA, Bouter LM, de Vet HC, Aertgeerts B. Physical examination for lumbar radiculopathy due to disc herniation in patients with low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;2:CD007431. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007431.pub2. Van der Windt DA, Simons E, Riphagen E, Ammendolia C, Verhagen AP, Laslett M, Devillé W, Deyo RA, Bouter LM, de Vet HC, Aertgeerts B. Physical examination for lumbar radiculopathy due to disc herniation in patients with low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;2:CD007431. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD007431.​pub2.
13.
go back to reference Albeck MJ. A critical assessment of clinical diagnosis of disc herniation in patients with monoradicular sciatica. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1996;138(1):40–4.CrossRef Albeck MJ. A critical assessment of clinical diagnosis of disc herniation in patients with monoradicular sciatica. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1996;138(1):40–4.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bertilson BC, Brosjo E, Strender L. Assessment of nerve involvement in the lumbar spine: agreement between magnetic resonance imaging, physical examination and pain drawing findings. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord. 2010. 11(202). Bertilson BC, Brosjo E, Strender L. Assessment of nerve involvement in the lumbar spine: agreement between magnetic resonance imaging, physical examination and pain drawing findings. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord. 2010. 11(202).
15.
go back to reference Suri P, Hunter DJ, Katz JN, Li L, Rainville J. Bias in the physical examination of patients with lumbar radiculopathy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11(275):1471–2474. Suri P, Hunter DJ, Katz JN, Li L, Rainville J. Bias in the physical examination of patients with lumbar radiculopathy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11(275):1471–2474.
16.
go back to reference Trainor K, Pinnington M. Reliability and diagnostic validity of the slump knee bend neurodynamic test for upper/mid lumbar nerve root compression: a pilot study. Physiotherapy. 2011;97:59–64.CrossRefPubMed Trainor K, Pinnington M. Reliability and diagnostic validity of the slump knee bend neurodynamic test for upper/mid lumbar nerve root compression: a pilot study. Physiotherapy. 2011;97:59–64.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Boyssut PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: A tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res. 2004;3(1):25.CrossRef Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Boyssut PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: A tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res. 2004;3(1):25.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Haldeman S, Shouka M, Robboy S. Computed tomography, electrodiagnostic and clinical findings in chronic workers' compensation patients with back and leg pain. Spine. 1998;13(3):345–50.CrossRef Haldeman S, Shouka M, Robboy S. Computed tomography, electrodiagnostic and clinical findings in chronic workers' compensation patients with back and leg pain. Spine. 1998;13(3):345–50.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rabin A, Gerszten PC, Karausky P, Bunker CH, Potter DM, Welch WC. The sensitivity of the seated straight-leg raise test compared with the supine straight-leg raise test in patients presenting with magnetic resonance imaging evidence of lumbar nerve root compression. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2007;88(7):840–3.CrossRef Rabin A, Gerszten PC, Karausky P, Bunker CH, Potter DM, Welch WC. The sensitivity of the seated straight-leg raise test compared with the supine straight-leg raise test in patients presenting with magnetic resonance imaging evidence of lumbar nerve root compression. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2007;88(7):840–3.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Majlesi J, Togay H, Unalan H, Toprak S. The sensitivity and specificity of the Slump and the Straight Leg Raising tests in patients with lumbar disc herniation. J Clin Rheumatol. 2008;14(2):87–91.CrossRefPubMed Majlesi J, Togay H, Unalan H, Toprak S. The sensitivity and specificity of the Slump and the Straight Leg Raising tests in patients with lumbar disc herniation. J Clin Rheumatol. 2008;14(2):87–91.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Suri P, Rainville J, Katz JN, Jouve C, Hartigan C, Limke J, Pena E, Li L, Swaim B, Hunter DJ. The accuracy of the physical examination for the diagnosis of midlumbar and low lumbar nerve root impingement. Spine. 2011;36(1):63–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Suri P, Rainville J, Katz JN, Jouve C, Hartigan C, Limke J, Pena E, Li L, Swaim B, Hunter DJ. The accuracy of the physical examination for the diagnosis of midlumbar and low lumbar nerve root impingement. Spine. 2011;36(1):63–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Petty NJ and Moore AP. Neuromusculoskeletal examination and assessment. A handbook for therapists. 5th Edition. Churchill Livingstone. 2008. Petty NJ and Moore AP. Neuromusculoskeletal examination and assessment. A handbook for therapists. 5th Edition. Churchill Livingstone. 2008.
Metadata
Title
Accuracy of clinical neurological examination in diagnosing lumbo-sacral radiculopathy: a systematic literature review
Authors
Nassib Tawa
Anthea Rhoda
Ina Diener
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1383-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2017 Go to the issue