Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

"Quality of life of patients after surgical treatment of cervical spine metastases"

Author: Grzegorz Guzik

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Metastases of malignant neoplasms to the cervical spine are relatively rare. The most common symptom of metastatic disease is pain. Symptoms associated with roots damage or spinal cord compression indicate locally advanced disease. In a large number of patients, surgical treatment brings benefits such as pain reduction and improvement of the quality of life. Pain intensity, neurological status, and quality of patients’ lives are measured with the VAS, Frankel, and Karnofsky scales.

Methods

Symptoms of the disease, morphology of the metastasis and treatment outcomes were evaluated in 57 patients treated surgically because of metastases to the cervical spine over the period 2010–2014 in Brzozów. The morphology of the metastases was assessed on the basis of CT and MR examinations. Pre- and postoperative functional status of the patients was evaluated using Karnofsky scale. The intensity of pain was assessed with VAS and the neurological status was evaluated by using Frankel’s grades. Anterior approach was employed in 16 patients, posterior approach in 30 patients, and postero-anterior approach in 11 patients. The inter-group differences were evaluated using the U Mann–Whitney and Wilcoxon Matched Pairs test. All statistical analyses were performed by using Statistica 10. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The majority of patients suffered from pain associated with instability of the spine. Multi-level metastases were noted in 40 patients, while in 17 patients 1 vertebra was involved. In 51 patients the metastases caused pathological fractures of the vertebrae. The most common neurological complications was observed in patients with multi-level tumors and with pedicles involvement. After surgery patients functional status improved and pain intensity decreased. The best results (statistically significant) were observed in patients operated with anterolateral approach. Complications were scarce. Two patients required reoperation due to infection.

Conclusions

Surgical treatment of metastases to the cervical spine gives good outcomes and it ought to be a treatment of choice. Proper and multifaceted qualification of the patients for different treatments is of vital importance.
Literature
1.
Asdourian PL. Metastatic disease of the spine. W: H. Bridwell, RL De Wald, The textbook of spinal surgery. II wyd. Philadelphia: Lippincott – Raven Publishers; 1997. p. 2007–50.
2.
Guzik G. Przerzuty do kręgosłupa – diagnostyka i leczenie. Bielsko Biała: Alfa Medica Press; 2015.
3.
Ecker RT, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of vertebral column metastases. Mayo Clinic Proc. 2005;80(9):1177–86.CrossRef
4.
Dickman CA, Fehlings MG, Gokaslan ZL. Spinal Cord and Spinal Column Tumors Principles and Practise. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2006. p.303–333.
5.
Kim DH, Chang UK, Kim SH, Bilsky MH. Tumors of the spine. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2008.
6.
Wise JJ, Fischgrund JS, Herkowitz HN, Montgomery D, Kurz LT. Complication, survival rates, and risk factors of surgery for metastatic disease of the spine. Spine. 1999;24:1943–51.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H, Toriyama S, Kawano H, Ohsaka S. Scoring system for the preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis. Spine. 1990;15:1110–3.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Weigel B, Maghsudi M, Neumann C, Kretschmer R, Muller FJ, Nerlich M. Surgical management of symptomatic spinal metastases. Postoperative outcome and quality of life. Spine. 1999;21:2240–6.CrossRef
9.
Mazurkiewicz T. Taktyka postępowania operacyjnego w przerzutach nowotworów do kręgosłupa. Ortho Trauma. 2006;1(1):17–23.
10.
Wewers ME, Lowe NK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health. 1990;13:227–36.CrossRefPubMed
11.
McCormack HM, Horne DJ, Sheather S. Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med. 1988;18:1007–19.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986;27:117–26.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Jensen MP, Chen C, Brugger AM. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. J Pain. 2003;4:407–14.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Crooks V, Waller S. The use of the karnofsky performance scale in determining outcomes and risk in geriatric outpatients. J Gerontol. 1991;46:139–44.CrossRef
15.
Schag CC, Heinrich RL, Ganz PA. Karnofsky performance status revisited: reliability, validity, and guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 1984;2:187–93.PubMed
16.
Furlan JC, Fehlings MG, Tator CH, Davis AM. Motor and sensory assessment of patients in clinical trials for pharmacological therapy of acute spinal cord injury: psychometric properties of the ASIA Standards. J Neurotrauma. 2008;25:1273–301.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Ditunno Jr JF, Young W, Donovan WH, Creasey G. The international standards booklet for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. American spinal injury association. Paraplegia. 1994;32(2):70–80.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Harrigton KD. Metastatic disease of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg. 1986;68(A):1110–5.CrossRef
19.
Tomita K, Kawahara N, Kobayashi T, Yoshida A, Murakami H, Akamaru T. Srgical strategy for spinal metastases. Spine. 2001;26:298–306.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Bauer HCF, Wedin R. Survival after surgery for spinal and extremity metastases. Acta Orthop Scand. 1995;66:143–6.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Kaloostian PE, Yurter A, Zadnik PL, et al. Current paradigms for metastatic spinal disease: an evidence-based review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(1):248–62.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Rose SP, et al. Metastatic disease in the thoracic and lumbar spine: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19:37–48.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Ulmar B, Richter M, Cakir B, Muche R, Puhl W, Huch K. The tokuhashi score: significant predictive value for the life expectancy of patients with breast cancer with spinal metastases. Spine. 2005;30:2222–6.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Jang JS, Lee SH. Efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty combined with radiotherapy in osteolytic metastatic spinal tumors. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2(3):243–8.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Lu DC, Roeser AC, Mummaneni VP, et al. Nuances of occipitocervical fixation. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(3):141–6.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Uribe JS, Ramos E, Youssef AS, et al. Craniocervical fixation with occipital condyle screws: biomechanical analysis of a novel technique. Spine. 2010;35(9):931–8.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Metcalfe S, Gbejuade H, Patel NR. The posterior transpedicular approach for circumferential decompression and instrumented stabilization with titanium cage vertebrectomy reconstruction for spinal tumors: consecutive case series of 50 patients. Spine. 2012;37(16):1375–83.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
"Quality of life of patients after surgical treatment of cervical spine metastases"
Author
Grzegorz Guzik
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1175-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

Weak outcome predictors of multimodal rehabilitation at one-year follow-up in patients with chronic pain—a practice based evidence study from two SQRP centres

Research article

Evaluation of focal cartilage lesions of the knee using MRI T2 mapping and delayed Gadolinium Enhanced MRI of Cartilage (dGEMRIC)

Study protocol

Cemented compared to uncemented femoral stems in total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: study protocol for a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial (CHANCE-trial)

Research article

Inpatient gradual diagnostics and its relevance for determining treatment strategies in lumbar back pain

Study protocol

The PLE2NO self-management and exercise program for knee osteoarthritis: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Research article

Addressing obesity in the management of knee and hip osteoarthritis – weighing in from an economic perspective