Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Arthroscopic suture retrievers and shuttles: a biomechanical investigation of the force required for tendon penetration and defect size

Authors: Christopher G. Lenz, Karl Wieser, Georg Lajtai, Dominik C. Meyer

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To compare instruments designed for arthroscopic suture handling during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, to assess the force needed to penetrate the tendon, and to evaluate the residual defect size.

Methods

Twenty-one instruments were each tested ten times on thawed sheep infraspinatus tendons. The force needed to pierce the tendon with each instrument was measured using a custom setup. Bone wax plates were used to make the perforation marks visible and to quantify the lesions each instrument created.

Results

The force to pierce a tendon had a range of 5.6–18.5 N/mm. Within the group of suture retrievers, the angled instruments required in average 85 % higher forces than straight instruments. The lesion area had a range of 2–7 mm2. Suture retrievers produced significantly larger lesion sizes compared with suture shuttles.

Conclusion

For the identical task of passing a suture through a tendon, differences exist regarding the ease of tendon penetration and potential damage to the tendon for different tools. The design, function, and resulting lesion size may be relevant and important for surgical handling and to avoid excess structural damage to the tendon. These results suggest that choosing the most appropriate tools for arthroscopic suture stitching influences the ease of handling and final integrity of the tissue.

Level of evidence

Mechanical evaluation of surgical devices.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ozbaydar M, Chung S, Diller D, Warner JJ. Arthroscopic reconstruction of the rotator cuff. The current gold standard? Orthopade. 2007;36(9):825–33.CrossRefPubMed Ozbaydar M, Chung S, Diller D, Warner JJ. Arthroscopic reconstruction of the rotator cuff. The current gold standard? Orthopade. 2007;36(9):825–33.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Via AG, De Cupis M, Spoliti M, Oliva F. Clinical and biological aspects of rotator cuff tears. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2013;3(2):70–9. Erratum in: Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 2014, 3(4):359.PubMed Via AG, De Cupis M, Spoliti M, Oliva F. Clinical and biological aspects of rotator cuff tears. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2013;3(2):70–9. Erratum in: Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 2014, 3(4):359.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Murray TFJ, Lajtai G, Mileski RM. Arthroscopic repair of medium to large full-thickness rotator cuff tears: Outcome at 2- to 6-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:19–24.CrossRefPubMed Murray TFJ, Lajtai G, Mileski RM. Arthroscopic repair of medium to large full-thickness rotator cuff tears: Outcome at 2- to 6-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:19–24.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cho NS, Yi JW, Lee BG, Rhee YG. Retear patterns after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: single-row versus suture bridge technique. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(4):664–71.CrossRefPubMed Cho NS, Yi JW, Lee BG, Rhee YG. Retear patterns after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: single-row versus suture bridge technique. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(4):664–71.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Cho NS, Lee BG, Rhee YG. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a suture bridge technique: is the repair integrity actually maintained? Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(10):2108–16.CrossRefPubMed Cho NS, Lee BG, Rhee YG. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a suture bridge technique: is the repair integrity actually maintained? Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(10):2108–16.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Rawson S, Cartmell S, Wong J. Suture techniques for tendon repair; a comparative review. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2013;3(3):220–8.PubMedPubMedCentral Rawson S, Cartmell S, Wong J. Suture techniques for tendon repair; a comparative review. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2013;3(3):220–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Chokshi BV, Kubiak EN, Jazrawi LM, Ticker JB, Zheng N, Kummer FJ, et al. The effect of arthroscopic suture passing instruments on rotator cuff damage and repair strength. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2006;63(3–4):123–5.PubMed Chokshi BV, Kubiak EN, Jazrawi LM, Ticker JB, Zheng N, Kummer FJ, et al. The effect of arthroscopic suture passing instruments on rotator cuff damage and repair strength. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2006;63(3–4):123–5.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Cummins CA, Murrell GAC. Mode of failure for rotator cuff repair with suture anchors identified at revision surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12(2):128–33.CrossRefPubMed Cummins CA, Murrell GAC. Mode of failure for rotator cuff repair with suture anchors identified at revision surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12(2):128–33.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Wieser K, Rahm S, Farshad M, Ek ET, Gerber C, Meyer DC. Stitch positioning influences the suture hold in supraspinatus tendon repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(7):1587–92.CrossRefPubMed Wieser K, Rahm S, Farshad M, Ek ET, Gerber C, Meyer DC. Stitch positioning influences the suture hold in supraspinatus tendon repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(7):1587–92.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Trantalis JN, Boorman RS, Pletsch K, Lo IK. Medial rotator cuff failure after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:727–31.CrossRefPubMed Trantalis JN, Boorman RS, Pletsch K, Lo IK. Medial rotator cuff failure after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:727–31.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Arthroscopic suture retrievers and shuttles: a biomechanical investigation of the force required for tendon penetration and defect size
Authors
Christopher G. Lenz
Karl Wieser
Georg Lajtai
Dominik C. Meyer
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0794-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2015 Go to the issue