Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

Disability-related inequalities in the prevalence of loneliness across the lifespan: trends from Australia, 2003 to 2020

Authors: Glenda M. Bishop, Gwynnyth Llewellyn, Anne M. Kavanagh, Hannah Badland, Jodie Bailie, Roger Stancliffe, Eric Emerson, Nicola Fortune, Zoe Aitken

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Experiencing loneliness can be distressing and increasing evidence indicates that being lonely is associated with poor physical and mental health outcomes. Cross-sectional studies have demonstrated that people with disability have increased risk of experiencing loneliness compared to people without disability. However, we do not know if these inequalities have changed over time. This study investigated the prevalence of loneliness for people with disability in Australia annually from 2003 to 2020 to examine whether disability-related inequalities in loneliness have changed over time, and disaggregated results for subgroups of people with disability by age group, sex, and disability group.

Methods

We used annual data (2003–2020) from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey. Loneliness was measured by a single question assessing the subjective experience of loneliness. For each wave, we calculated population-weighted age-standardised estimates of the proportion of people experiencing loneliness for people with and without disability. We then calculated the absolute and relative inequalities in loneliness between people with and without disability for each wave. Analyses were stratified by 10-year age groups, sex, and disability group (sensory or speech, physical, intellectual or learning, psychological, brain injury or stroke, other).

Results

From 2003 to 2020, the prevalence of loneliness was greater for people with disability, such that people with disability were 1.5 to 1.9 times more likely to experience loneliness than people without disability. While the prevalence of loneliness decreased for people without disability between 2003 and 2020, the prevalence of loneliness did not decrease for people with disability during this period. Inequalities in loneliness were more substantial for people with intellectual or learning disabilities, psychological disability, and brain injury or stroke.

Conclusion

This study confirms that people with disability have increased risk of loneliness compared to people without disability. We add to the existing evidence by demonstrating that disability-related inequalities in loneliness have persisted for two decades in Australia without improvement. Our findings indicate that addressing inequalities in loneliness for people with disability is a critical public health concern given that loneliness is associated with a wide range of poor health outcomes.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Peplau LA, Perlman D. Perspective on loneliness. In: P LA, Perlman D, editors. Loneliness: a sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy. New York: Wiley; 1982. pp. 1–18. Peplau LA, Perlman D. Perspective on loneliness. In: P LA, Perlman D, editors. Loneliness: a sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy. New York: Wiley; 1982. pp. 1–18.
15.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Global report on health equity for persons with disabilities. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. World Health Organization. Global report on health equity for persons with disabilities. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
24.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: WHO; 2002. World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: WHO; 2002.
26.
go back to reference Summerfield M, Garrard B, Hahn M, Jin Y, Kamath R, Macalalad N, Watson N, Wilkins R, Wooden M. HILDA user manual– release 20. Melbourne Institute: Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne; 2021. Summerfield M, Garrard B, Hahn M, Jin Y, Kamath R, Macalalad N, Watson N, Wilkins R, Wooden M. HILDA user manual– release 20. Melbourne Institute: Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne; 2021.
27.
go back to reference Watson N, Wooden M. The HILDA Survey: a Case Study in the design and development of a successful Household Panel Study. Longitud Life Course Stud. 2012;3(3):369–81. Watson N, Wooden M. The HILDA Survey: a Case Study in the design and development of a successful Household Panel Study. Longitud Life Course Stud. 2012;3(3):369–81.
28.
32.
go back to reference Butterworth P, Crosier T. The validity of the SF-36 in an Australian National Household Survey: demonstrating the applicability of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey to examination of health inequalities. BMC Public Health. 2004;4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-4-44. Butterworth P, Crosier T. The validity of the SF-36 in an Australian National Household Survey: demonstrating the applicability of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey to examination of health inequalities. BMC Public Health. 2004;4. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​1471-2458-4-44.
34.
go back to reference Freak-Poli R, Kung CSJ, Ryan J, Shields MA. (2022) Social isolation, Social Support, and loneliness profiles before and after Spousal Death and the Buffering Role of Financial resources. Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 77 (5):956–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbac039. Freak-Poli R, Kung CSJ, Ryan J, Shields MA. (2022) Social isolation, Social Support, and loneliness profiles before and after Spousal Death and the Buffering Role of Financial resources. Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 77 (5):956–71. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​geronb/​gbac039.
38.
go back to reference Thurber KA, Thandrayen J, Maddox R, Barrett EM, Walker J, Priest N, Korda RJ, Banks E, Williams DR, Lovett R. Reflection on modern methods: statistical, policy and ethical implications of using age-standardized health indicators to quantify inequities. Int J Epidemiol. 2022;51(1):324–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyab132.CrossRefPubMed Thurber KA, Thandrayen J, Maddox R, Barrett EM, Walker J, Priest N, Korda RJ, Banks E, Williams DR, Lovett R. Reflection on modern methods: statistical, policy and ethical implications of using age-standardized health indicators to quantify inequities. Int J Epidemiol. 2022;51(1):324–33. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​ije/​dyab132.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Hayes C. HILDA Standard errors: user guide. HILDA Project Technical Paper Series, No. 2/08. Melbourne: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne; 2008. Hayes C. HILDA Standard errors: user guide. HILDA Project Technical Paper Series, No. 2/08. Melbourne: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne; 2008.
44.
go back to reference Emerson E, Stancliffe RJ, Aitken Z, Bailie J, Bishop GM, Badland H, Llewellyn G, Kavanagh AM. Disability and loneliness in the United Kingdom: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of trends and transitions. BMC Public Health, 2023;23:2537. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17481-y Emerson E, Stancliffe RJ, Aitken Z, Bailie J, Bishop GM, Badland H, Llewellyn G, Kavanagh AM. Disability and loneliness in the United Kingdom: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of trends and transitions. BMC Public Health, 2023;23:2537. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12889-023-17481-y
Metadata
Title
Disability-related inequalities in the prevalence of loneliness across the lifespan: trends from Australia, 2003 to 2020
Authors
Glenda M. Bishop
Gwynnyth Llewellyn
Anne M. Kavanagh
Hannah Badland
Jodie Bailie
Roger Stancliffe
Eric Emerson
Nicola Fortune
Zoe Aitken
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17936-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Public Health 1/2024 Go to the issue