Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder | Research article

The English National Cohort Study of Flooding & Health: psychological morbidity at three years of follow up

Authors: Ranya Mulchandani, Ben Armstrong, Charles R. Beck, Thomas David Waite, Richard Amlôt, Sari Kovats, Giovanni Leonardi, G. James Rubin, Isabel Oliver

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Flooding is expected to increase due to climate change, population growth and urban development. The longer-term mental health impacts of flooding are not well understood. In 2015, the English National Study of Flooding and Health was established to improve understanding of the impact of flooding on health and inform future public health action.

Methods

We used 3 years of data from the English National Study of Flooding and Health. Participants who had consented to follow up were sent a questionnaire. Participants were classified into either “unaffected”, “disrupted” or “flooded” according to their exposure. Logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios for probable depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in each exposure group. The Wald test was used to assess the difference in probable mental health outcomes for those who did and did not experience “persistent damage” to their home. Conditional logistic regression was conducted to assess change in prevalence over the 3 years and to identify possible determinants of recovery.

Results

Eight hundred nineteen individuals were included in the final analysis – 119 were classified as unaffected, 421 disrupted and 279 flooded. Overall, 5.7% had probable depression, 8.1% had probable anxiety and 11.8% had probable PTSD, with higher prevalence in the flooded group compared with the unaffected group. After adjustment for potential confounders, probable mental health outcomes were higher in the flooded group compared to the unaffected group, significantly for probable depression (aOR 8.48, 95% CI 1.04–68.97) and PTSD (aOR 7.74, 95% CI 2.24–26.79). Seventy-seven (9.4%) participants reported experiencing persistent damage to their home, most commonly damp (n = 40) and visible mould (n = 26) in liveable rooms. Of the 569 participants who responded at all 3 years, a significant reduction in prevalence for all probable mental health outcomes was observed in the flooded group.

Conclusions

Flooding can have severe long-lasting consequences on mental health in affected populations. If these problems are not identified and treated early, they may persist for years. Further research is necessary to develop and evaluate interventions to increase resilience in at risk populations and to ensure timely access to support services following flooding.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
22.
go back to reference Liu A, Tan H, Zhou J, Li S. An epidemiologic study of posttraumatic stress in flood victims in Hunan China. Can J Psychiatry. 2006;51(6):350–4..CrossRef Liu A, Tan H, Zhou J, Li S. An epidemiologic study of posttraumatic stress in flood victims in Hunan China. Can J Psychiatry. 2006;51(6):350–4..CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The English National Cohort Study of Flooding & Health: psychological morbidity at three years of follow up
Authors
Ranya Mulchandani
Ben Armstrong
Charles R. Beck
Thomas David Waite
Richard Amlôt
Sari Kovats
Giovanni Leonardi
G. James Rubin
Isabel Oliver
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8424-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Public Health 1/2020 Go to the issue