Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Breast Cancer | Study protocol

From prospective clinical trial to reducing social inequalities in health: The DESSEIN trial, concept and design of a multidisciplinary study in precarious patients with breast cancer

Authors: Charlotte Ngô, Aurélia Dinut, Audrey Bochaton, Hélène Charreire, Caroline Desprès, Sandrine Baffert, Fabrice Lécuru, Gilles Chatellier

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In France during the last 15 years, precariousness among women has increased. In breast cancer, precariousness has been associated with an increase in mortality, but the links between precariousness, stage at diagnosis and care pathway are little explored. Our study aims to evaluate the impact of precariousness on care pathways, treatment and recovery phase according to a multidisciplinary analysis.

Methods and design

Comparative prospective observational multicenter study of exposed / unexposed category. Patients with breast cancer are recruited in the Ile de France area. Three scores are used to identify precarious patients. Precarious patients are matched to non-precarious patients by age group. Questionnaires are distributed to patients at different times of care. The main objective is to compare the stage of the disease at diagnosis between two groups. The secondary objectives are: comparison of socio-economic and geographical characteristics, direct and indirect costs, personal trajectories of care and health. Analysis include multidisciplinary approaches. A geographical information systems method will evaluate the accessibility to health facilities and the characteristics of the places of residence of the patients. An anthropological analysis will be conducted through observation of consultations and semi-directed interviews with patients. These methods will allow to analyze the diagnostic and therapeutic routes, placing it in a life history and an economic, socio-cultural and health environment. The economic analysis will include a comparison of direct, indirect costs and out-off pocket costs, from the patient’s point of view and from the societal perspective.

Discussion

Conducted in a clinical setting and coupled with a qualitative study, this study will provide a better understanding of how contextual factors, combined with individual factors, can influence the course of health and thus the stage of the disease at diagnosis. The multidisciplinary approach, involving clinicians, geographers, an anthropologist, an economist and a health epidemiologist, will allow a multidimensional approach to the impact of precariousness on breast cancer.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02948478 registered October 28, 2016. ID RCB: 2016-A00589–42. protocol version: 2.1. decembre 13, 2018.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Grillo FVJ, Chauvin P. Inequalities in cervical cancer screening for women with or without a regular consulting in primary care for gynaecological health, in Paris, France. Prev Med. 2012;54(3–4):259–65.CrossRef Grillo FVJ, Chauvin P. Inequalities in cervical cancer screening for women with or without a regular consulting in primary care for gynaecological health, in Paris, France. Prev Med. 2012;54(3–4):259–65.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kaminski M L.T., Les inégalités sociales de santé. Recherches, 2000. Paris. Kaminski M L.T., Les inégalités sociales de santé. Recherches, 2000. Paris.
3.
go back to reference Albano JD, Ward E, Jemal A, et al. Cancer mortality in the United States by education level and race. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(18):1384–94.CrossRef Albano JD, Ward E, Jemal A, et al. Cancer mortality in the United States by education level and race. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(18):1384–94.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mackenbach JP, Stirbu I, Roskam AJ, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(23):2468–81.CrossRef Mackenbach JP, Stirbu I, Roskam AJ, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(23):2468–81.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bouchardy C, Verkooijen HM, Fioretta G. Social class is an important and independent prognostic factor of breast cancer mortality. Int J Cancer. 2006;119(5):1145–51.CrossRef Bouchardy C, Verkooijen HM, Fioretta G. Social class is an important and independent prognostic factor of breast cancer mortality. Int J Cancer. 2006;119(5):1145–51.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Menvielle GLA, Chastang JF, Luce D. Social inequalities in breast cancer mortality among French women: disappearing educational disparities from 1968 to 1996. Br J Cancer. 2006;94(1):152–5.CrossRef Menvielle GLA, Chastang JF, Luce D. Social inequalities in breast cancer mortality among French women: disappearing educational disparities from 1968 to 1996. Br J Cancer. 2006;94(1):152–5.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference INCA, Survie attendue des patients atteints de cancer en France: état des lieux. Rapports et synthèses, 2010. INCA, Survie attendue des patients atteints de cancer en France: état des lieux. Rapports et synthèses, 2010.
8.
go back to reference Cases C M.L., Mermiliod C, Evolution des ressources et difficultés économiques à la suite d'un cancer. Collection Etudes et Statistiques DREES 2008: p. 271–286. Cases C M.L., Mermiliod C, Evolution des ressources et difficultés économiques à la suite d'un cancer. Collection Etudes et Statistiques DREES 2008: p. 271–286.
9.
10.
go back to reference publique H.C.d.l.s., La progression de la précarité en France et ses effets sur la santé. 1998. publique H.C.d.l.s., La progression de la précarité en France et ses effets sur la santé. 1998.
11.
go back to reference Menvielle G, Rey G. Jougla E, Luce D. Diverging trends in educational inequalities in cancer mortality between men and women in the 2000s in France. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:823.CrossRef Menvielle G, Rey G. Jougla E, Luce D. Diverging trends in educational inequalities in cancer mortality between men and women in the 2000s in France. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:823.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Unger JM, Hershman DL, Albain KS, et al. Patient income level and cancer clinical trial participation. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(5):536–42.CrossRef Unger JM, Hershman DL, Albain KS, et al. Patient income level and cancer clinical trial participation. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(5):536–42.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mathy C, Bensadon M. Le surcoût de l'hospitalisation des patients précaires. Journal d'économie médicale. 2012;20:263–78. Mathy C, Bensadon M. Le surcoût de l'hospitalisation des patients précaires. Journal d'économie médicale. 2012;20:263–78.
15.
go back to reference Bradley CJ, Dahman B, Bear HD. Insurance and inpatient care: differences in length of stay and costs between surgically treated cancer patients. Cancer. 2012;118(20):5084–91.CrossRef Bradley CJ, Dahman B, Bear HD. Insurance and inpatient care: differences in length of stay and costs between surgically treated cancer patients. Cancer. 2012;118(20):5084–91.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Benoist, Soigner au pluriel. Essai sur le pluralisme médical. Ed Nathan, 1996. Benoist, Soigner au pluriel. Essai sur le pluralisme médical. Ed Nathan, 1996.
17.
go back to reference Desprès C., Négocier ses besoins en univers contraint: le renoncement aux soins en situation de précarité. Anthropologie et santé, 2013. 6. Desprès C., Négocier ses besoins en univers contraint: le renoncement aux soins en situation de précarité. Anthropologie et santé, 2013. 6.
18.
go back to reference Desprès C., Mettre sa santé en péril comme outil politique face aux franchises médicales: analyse anthropologique des renoncements aux soins autour de deux récits. Dans: Se raconter entre violence et résistance. Enjeux sociaux et politiques de la recherche biographique. Le sujet dans la cité, 2015. Hors série Actuel 4. Desprès C., Mettre sa santé en péril comme outil politique face aux franchises médicales: analyse anthropologique des renoncements aux soins autour de deux récits. Dans: Se raconter entre violence et résistance. Enjeux sociaux et politiques de la recherche biographique. Le sujet dans la cité, 2015. Hors série Actuel 4.
19.
go back to reference Aïach P, La question des inégalités sociales de santé dans le Nord-Pas-de-Calais. ENSP ed. Pourquoi ce lourd tribut payé au cancer? Le cas exemplaire du Nord-Pas-De-Calais 2004, Paris. Aïach P, La question des inégalités sociales de santé dans le Nord-Pas-de-Calais. ENSP ed. Pourquoi ce lourd tribut payé au cancer? Le cas exemplaire du Nord-Pas-De-Calais 2004, Paris.
20.
go back to reference Fainzang, La relation médecin-malades : information et mensonge. Paris: PUF, 2010. Fainzang, La relation médecin-malades : information et mensonge. Paris: PUF, 2010.
21.
go back to reference Sass C Moulin JJ and Gueguen R Le score EPICES: un score individuel de précarité. Construction du score et mesure des relations avec des données de santé, dans une population de 197389 personnes. INVS, 2006. 14. Sass C Moulin JJ and Gueguen R Le score EPICES: un score individuel de précarité. Construction du score et mesure des relations avec des données de santé, dans une population de 197389 personnes. INVS, 2006. 14.
22.
go back to reference Pascal J. Elaboration d'un outil de repérage des usagers en situation de vulnérabilité sociale consultant à l'hôpital. Presse Med. 2004;33:710–5.CrossRef Pascal J. Elaboration d'un outil de repérage des usagers en situation de vulnérabilité sociale consultant à l'hôpital. Presse Med. 2004;33:710–5.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pornet C, Delpierre C, Dejardin O, et al. Construction of an adaptable European transnational ecological deprivation index: the French version. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66(11):982–9.CrossRef Pornet C, Delpierre C, Dejardin O, et al. Construction of an adaptable European transnational ecological deprivation index: the French version. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66(11):982–9.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference McLafferty SL. GIS and health care. Annu Rev Public Health. 2003;24:25–42.CrossRef McLafferty SL. GIS and health care. Annu Rev Public Health. 2003;24:25–42.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Gold M. Panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Med Care. 1996;34(12 Suppl):DS197–9.PubMed Gold M. Panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Med Care. 1996;34(12 Suppl):DS197–9.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Drummond MF Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programms. Third edition. Oxford University Press ed. 2004. Drummond MF Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programms. Third edition. Oxford University Press ed. 2004.
27.
go back to reference Hanly P, Timmons A. Walsh PM, Sharp L. Breast and prostate cancer productivity costs: a comparison of the human capital approach and the friction cost approach. Value Health. 2012;15(3):429–36.CrossRef Hanly P, Timmons A. Walsh PM, Sharp L. Breast and prostate cancer productivity costs: a comparison of the human capital approach and the friction cost approach. Value Health. 2012;15(3):429–36.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Lidgren M, Wilking N, Jonsson B. Cost of breast cancer in Sweden in 2002. Eur J Health Econ. 2007;8(1):5–15.CrossRef Lidgren M, Wilking N, Jonsson B. Cost of breast cancer in Sweden in 2002. Eur J Health Econ. 2007;8(1):5–15.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
From prospective clinical trial to reducing social inequalities in health: The DESSEIN trial, concept and design of a multidisciplinary study in precarious patients with breast cancer
Authors
Charlotte Ngô
Aurélia Dinut
Audrey Bochaton
Hélène Charreire
Caroline Desprès
Sandrine Baffert
Fabrice Lécuru
Gilles Chatellier
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7611-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Public Health 1/2019 Go to the issue