Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

Jet fuel exposure and auditory outcomes in Australian air force personnel

Authors: Adrian Fuente, Louise Hickson, Thais C. Morata, Warwick Williams, Asaduzzaman Khan, Eduardo Fuentes-Lopez

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Animal data suggest that jet fuels such as JP-8 are associated with hearing deficits when combined with noise and that the effect is more pronounced than with noise exposure alone. Some studies suggest peripheral dysfunction while others suggest central auditory dysfunction. Human data are limited in this regard. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible chronic adverse effects of JP-8 combined with noise exposure on the peripheral and central auditory systems in humans.

Methods

Fifty-seven participants who were current personnel from the Royal Australian Air Force were selected. Based on their levels of exposure to jet fuels, participants were divided into three exposure groups (low, moderate, high). Groups were also categorised based on their noise exposure levels (low, moderate, high). All participants were evaluated by tympanometry, pure-tone audiometry (1–12 kHz), distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), auditory brainstem response (ABR), words-in-noise, compressed speech, dichotic digit test, pitch pattern sequence test, duration pattern sequence test and adaptive test of temporal resolution. All auditory tests were carried out after the participants were away from the Air Force base for a minimum of two weeks, thus two weeks without jet fuel and noise exposure.

Results

Jet fuel exposure was significantly associated with hearing thresholds at 4 and 8 kHz; average hearing thresholds across frequencies in the better ear; DPOAEs at 2.8, 4 and 6 kHz; ABR wave V latency in the right ear; compressed speech and words-in-noise. Further analyses revealed that participants with low exposure level to jet fuels showed significantly better results for the aforementioned procedures than participants with moderate and high exposure levels. All results were controlled for the covariates of age and noise exposure levels.

Conclusions

The results suggest that jet fuel exposure, when combined with noise exposure, has an adverse effect on audibility in humans. Taking all the test results into consideration, jet fuel exposure combined with noise exposure specifically seems to affect the peripheral hearing system in humans.
Literature
1.
Ritchie GD, Still KR, Alexander WK, Nordholm AF, Wilson CL, Rossi J 3rd, et al. A review of the neurotoxicity risk of selected hydrocarbons fuels. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2001; 4: 223–312.CrossRef
2.
Guthrie OW, Wong BA, McInturf SM, Reboulet JE, Ortiz PA, Mattie DR. Inhalation of hydrocarbon jet fuel suppress central auditory nervous system function. J Toxicol Environ Health. 2015;78:1154–69.CrossRef
3.
Heaton KJ, Maule AL, Smith KW, Rodrigues EG, McClean MD, Proctor SP. JP8 exposure and neurocognitive performance among US air force personnel. Neurotoxicol. 2017;62:170–80.CrossRef
4.
Ritchie G, Still K, Rossi J 3rd, Bekkedal M, Bobb A, Arfsten D. Biological and health effects of exposure to kerosene-based jet fuels and performance additives. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 2003; 64: 357–451.CrossRef
5.
Kaufman LR, LeMasters GK, Olsen DM, Succop P. Effects of concurrent noise and jet fuel exposure on hearing loss. J Occup Environ Med. 2005;47:212–8.CrossRef
6.
Mattie DR, Sterner TR. Past, present and emerging toxicity issues for jet fuel. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2011;254:127–32.CrossRef
7.
Fife TD, Robb MJA, Steenerson KK, Saha KC. Bilateral vestibular dysfunction associated with chronic exposure to military jet propellant type-eight jet fuel. Front Neurol. 2018;9:351.CrossRef
8.
Long RJ, Charles RA. Aviation fuel exposure resulting in otitis externa with vertigo. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2018;89:661–3.CrossRef
9.
Fechter LD, Gearhart C, Fulton S, Campbell J, Fisher J, Na K, et al. JP-8 jet fuel can promote auditory impairment resulting from subsequent noise exposure in rats. Toxicol Sci. 2007;98:510–25.CrossRef
10.
Fechter LD, Gearhart CA, Fulton S. Ototoxic potential of JP-8 and a Fischer-Tropsch synthetic jet fuel following subacute inhalation exposure in rats. Toxicol Sci. 2010;116:239–48.CrossRef
11.
Fechter LD, Fisher JW, Chapman GD, Mokashi VP, Ortiz PA, Reboulet JE, et al. Subchronic JP-8 jet fuel exposure enhances vulnerability to noise-induced hearing loss in rats. J Toxicol Environ Health. 2012;75:299–317.CrossRef
12.
Guthrie OW, Xu H, Wong BA, McInturf SM, Reboulet JE, Ortiz PA, et al. Exposure to low levels of jet-propulsion fuel impairs brainstem encoding of stimulus intensity. J Toxicol Environ Health. 2014;77:261–80.CrossRef
13.
Moen BE, Riise T, Kyvik KR. P300 brain potential among workers exposed to organic solvents. Norsk Epidemiologi. 1999;9:27–31.
14.
Jerger J. Clinical experience with impedance audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol. 1970;92:311–24.CrossRef
15.
National Acoustic Laboratories, Noise Survey RAAF Base Amberley, Commissioned Report No. 86.. National Acoustic Laboratories, Chatswood, Australia. ISBN O 642 19830 6; ISSN 0812 8677. December 1993.
16.
Risk Management JTA. Hazard identification baseline survey - RAAF Amberley. JTA Risk Management, Elwood, Australia July. 2010.
17.
RAAF V. Base Amberley- occupational noise survey, Vipac engineers and scientists ltd; December 2011.
18.
Donaldson F.. Nature and extent of health complaints, report to the F111 Deseal/reseal Board of Inquiry. 2000; Vol. 2. Part I, Appendix B. Amberley: RAAF. P Volume 2, Part 1, Chapter 13 AnnexB.
19.
Wilson RH, Preece JP, Salamon DL, Sperry JL, Bornstein SP. Effects of time compression and time compression plus reverberation on the intelligibility of Northwestern University auditory test no. 6. J Am Acad Audiol. 1994;5:269–77.PubMed
20.
Wilson RH. Development of a speech-in-multitalker-babble paradigm to assess word-recognition performance. J Am Acad Audiol. 2003;14:453–70.PubMed
21.
Pinheiro M. Tests of central auditory function in children with learning disabilities. In: Keith R, editor. Central auditory dysfunction. New York: Grune & Stratton. 1977;1977:223–56.
22.
Fuente A, McPherson B, Hickson L. Central auditory dysfunction associated with exposure to a mixture of solvents. Int J Audiol. 2011;50:857–65.CrossRef
23.
Wilson RH, Jaffe MS. Interactions of age, ear, and stimulus complexity on dichotic digit recognition. J Am Acad Audiol. 1996;7:358–64.PubMed
24.
Musiek FE, Baran J, Pinheiro ML. Duration pattern recognition in normal subjects and patients with cerebral and cochlear lesions. Audiology. 1990;29:304–13.CrossRef
25.
Lister JJ, Roberts RA, Shackelford J, Rogers CL. An adaptive clinical test of temporal resolution. Am J Audiol. 2006;15:133–40.CrossRef
26.
Alvarez W, Fuente A, Coloma CJ, Quezada C. Association between temporal resolution and specific language impairment: the role of nonsensory processing. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;79:1702–7.CrossRef
27.
Guest M, Boggess M, Attia J. SHOAMP study team and scientific advisory committee. Relative risk of elevated hearing threshold compared to ISO1999 normative populations for Royal Australian air Force male personnel. Hear Res. 2012;285:65–76.CrossRef
28.
Prasher D, Al-Hajjaj H, Aylott S, Aksentijevic A. Effect of exposure to a mixture of solvents and noise on hearing and balance in aircraft maintenance workers. Noise Health. 2005;7:31–9.CrossRef
29.
Hughes H, Hunting KL. Evaluation of the effects of exposure to organic solvents and hazardous noise among US air force reserve personnel. Noise Health. 2013;15:379–87.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Jet fuel exposure and auditory outcomes in Australian air force personnel
Authors
Adrian Fuente
Louise Hickson
Thais C. Morata
Warwick Williams
Asaduzzaman Khan
Eduardo Fuentes-Lopez
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7038-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Public Health 1/2019 Go to the issue

Research article

Barriers of persistent long-lasting insecticidal nets utilization in villages around Lake Tana, Northwest Ethiopia: a qualitative study

Research article

Effect of an equipment-behavior change intervention on handwashing behavior among primary school children in Kenya: the Povu Poa school pilot study

Research article

Association of recommended food score with depression, anxiety, and quality of life in Korean adults: the 2014–2015 National Fitness Award Project

Research article

Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of the treatment of uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition by lady health workers as compared to an outpatient therapeutic feeding programme in Sindh Province, Pakistan

Research article

Young internal migrants’ major health issues and health seeking barriers in Shanghai, China: a qualitative study

Research article

What’s for lunch? The content and quality of lunches consumed by Dutch primary schoolchildren and the differences between lunches consumed at home and at school