Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

Reprocessing and reuse of single-use medical devices in China: a pilot survey

Authors: Duojin Wang, Jing Wu

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In China, reprocessing and reuse of single-use medical devices (SUDs) are banned. However, the actual situation has not been reported so far. The study aims to clarify the perceptions and concerns of various sectors of the community on the reuse of SUDs, and whether such practice exists. In addition, we are also wondering how acceptable the respondents are on this matter.

Methods

A cross-sectional study based on a national survey which was conducted on the professional online questionnaire survey platform (www.​wjx.​cn) from July 26 to August 4, 2015. We analyzed the data according to the work fields, sex, age, education level, professional background and participants’ answers to 49 other questions.

Results

Five hundred forty-four nationwide respondents belong to nine different work fields. In general, participants had positive attitudes towards the reprocessing and reuse of SUDs. However, many respondents doubted the hygienic and functional safety of the reprocessed SUDs. They also tended to think that the reuse of SUDs should have lower prices and more technical training as well as patient advocacy. Further analysis demonstrated the work fields, education level and professional background of respondents were statistically associated with their responses to certain questions.

Conclusions

The research indicated that although the reuse of SUDs is prohibited legally in China, there were extensive reprocessing and reuse in hospitals. Most responses tended to accept reprocessed SUDs if safety and low prices were guaranteed. These existing contradictions and the lack of relevant research led to policy makers in China will confront numerous challenges in building and improving this use system of medical devices to meet escalating demands of social sectors.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tessarolo F, Caola I, Nollo G. Critical issues in reprocessing single-use medical devices for interventional cardiology. In: Komorowska MA, Olsztynska-Janus S, editors. Biomedical engineering, trends, research and technologies. Rijeka: InTech; 2011. p. 619–44. Tessarolo F, Caola I, Nollo G. Critical issues in reprocessing single-use medical devices for interventional cardiology. In: Komorowska MA, Olsztynska-Janus S, editors. Biomedical engineering, trends, research and technologies. Rijeka: InTech; 2011. p. 619–44.
2.
go back to reference Luijt DS, Schirm J, Savelkoul PHM, Hoekstra A. Risk of infection by reprocessed and resterilized virus-contaminated catheters: an in-vitro study. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:378–84.CrossRef Luijt DS, Schirm J, Savelkoul PHM, Hoekstra A. Risk of infection by reprocessed and resterilized virus-contaminated catheters: an in-vitro study. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:378–84.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Port FK, Wolfe RA, Hulbert-Shearon TE, Daugirdas JT, Agodoa LYC, Jones C, Orzol SM, Held PJ. Mortality risk by hemodialyzer reuse practice and dialyzer membrane characteristics: results from the USRDS dialysis morbidity and mortality study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;37:276–86.CrossRef Port FK, Wolfe RA, Hulbert-Shearon TE, Daugirdas JT, Agodoa LYC, Jones C, Orzol SM, Held PJ. Mortality risk by hemodialyzer reuse practice and dialyzer membrane characteristics: results from the USRDS dialysis morbidity and mortality study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;37:276–86.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hakansson MA. Reuse versus single-use catheters for intermittent catheterization: what is safe and preferred? Review of current status. Spinal Cord. 2014;52:511–6.CrossRef Hakansson MA. Reuse versus single-use catheters for intermittent catheterization: what is safe and preferred? Review of current status. Spinal Cord. 2014;52:511–6.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Day P. What is the evidence on the safety and effectiveness of the reuse of medical devices labelled as single-use only? Christchurch: New Zealand Health Technology Assessment (NZHTA); 2004:53. Day P. What is the evidence on the safety and effectiveness of the reuse of medical devices labelled as single-use only? Christchurch: New Zealand Health Technology Assessment (NZHTA); 2004:53.
6.
go back to reference United States Government Accountability Office. Report to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, House of Representatives. Reprocessed single-use medical devices. FDA oversight has increased, and available information does not indicate that use presents an elevated health risk. 2008. GAO-08-147. United States Government Accountability Office. Report to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, House of Representatives. Reprocessed single-use medical devices. FDA oversight has increased, and available information does not indicate that use presents an elevated health risk. 2008. GAO-08-147.
7.
go back to reference Kwakye G, Pronovost PJ, Makary MA. Commentary: a call to go green in health care by reprocessing medical equipment. Acad Med. 2010;85:398–400.CrossRef Kwakye G, Pronovost PJ, Makary MA. Commentary: a call to go green in health care by reprocessing medical equipment. Acad Med. 2010;85:398–400.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Popp W, Rasslan O, Unahalekhaka A, Brenner P, Fischnaller E, Fathy M, Goldman C, Gillespie E. What is the use? An international look at reuse of single-use medical devices. Int J Hyg Envir Heal. 2010;213:302–7.CrossRef Popp W, Rasslan O, Unahalekhaka A, Brenner P, Fischnaller E, Fathy M, Goldman C, Gillespie E. What is the use? An international look at reuse of single-use medical devices. Int J Hyg Envir Heal. 2010;213:302–7.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hussain M, Balsara KP, Nagral S. Reuse of single-use devices: looking back, looking forward. Natl Med J India. 2012;25:151–5.PubMed Hussain M, Balsara KP, Nagral S. Reuse of single-use devices: looking back, looking forward. Natl Med J India. 2012;25:151–5.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Tessarolo F, Disertori M, Guarrera GM, Capri S, Nollo G. Reprocessing single-use cardiac catheters for interventional cardiology. A cost-minimization model for estimating potential saving at departmental scale and national level. Italian Journal of Public Health. 2009;6:140–9. Tessarolo F, Disertori M, Guarrera GM, Capri S, Nollo G. Reprocessing single-use cardiac catheters for interventional cardiology. A cost-minimization model for estimating potential saving at departmental scale and national level. Italian Journal of Public Health. 2009;6:140–9.
11.
go back to reference Alfa MJ, Castillo J. Impact of FDA policy change on the reuse of single-use medical devices in Michigan hospitals. Am J Infect Control. 2004;32:337–41.CrossRef Alfa MJ, Castillo J. Impact of FDA policy change on the reuse of single-use medical devices in Michigan hospitals. Am J Infect Control. 2004;32:337–41.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Noble M. Interventions to allow the reuse of single-use devices: Brief review. In: prepared by RAND Corporation, University of California, Johns Hopkins University & ECRI Institute. Making Health Care Safer II: An Updated Critical Analysis of the Evidence for Patient Safety Practices. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment, No. 211; 2013. 117–121. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK133363/. (Accessed 27 June 2017). Noble M. Interventions to allow the reuse of single-use devices: Brief review. In: prepared by RAND Corporation, University of California, Johns Hopkins University & ECRI Institute. Making Health Care Safer II: An Updated Critical Analysis of the Evidence for Patient Safety Practices. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment, No. 211; 2013. 117–121. Available at https://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​books/​NBK133363/​. (Accessed 27 June 2017).
16.
go back to reference Hailey D, Jacobs PD, Ries NM, Polisena J. Reuse of single use medical devices in Canada: clinical and economic outcomes, legal and ethical issues, and current hospital practice. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24:430–6.CrossRef Hailey D, Jacobs PD, Ries NM, Polisena J. Reuse of single use medical devices in Canada: clinical and economic outcomes, legal and ethical issues, and current hospital practice. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24:430–6.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Polisena J, Hailey D, Moulton K, Noorani HZ, Jocobs P, Ries N, Normandin S, Gardam M. Reprocessing and reuse of single-use medical devices: a National Survey of Canadian acute-care hospitals. Infect Cont Hosp Ep. 2008;29:437–9.CrossRef Polisena J, Hailey D, Moulton K, Noorani HZ, Jocobs P, Ries N, Normandin S, Gardam M. Reprocessing and reuse of single-use medical devices: a National Survey of Canadian acute-care hospitals. Infect Cont Hosp Ep. 2008;29:437–9.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ischinger TA, Neubauer G, Ujlaky R, Schätzl H, Bock M. Wiederverwendung von medizinischen Einwegprodukten nach qualitätsgesicherter Wiederaufbereitung: ein Modell zur Kostendämpfung? Z Kardiol. 2002;91:889–98.CrossRef Ischinger TA, Neubauer G, Ujlaky R, Schätzl H, Bock M. Wiederverwendung von medizinischen Einwegprodukten nach qualitätsgesicherter Wiederaufbereitung: ein Modell zur Kostendämpfung? Z Kardiol. 2002;91:889–98.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Christensen M, Meyer M, Jensen OB. Reuse of single-use sterile medical devices in Danish hospitals decreased after report discouraged it. Euro Surveill. 1999;4:101–2.CrossRef Christensen M, Meyer M, Jensen OB. Reuse of single-use sterile medical devices in Danish hospitals decreased after report discouraged it. Euro Surveill. 1999;4:101–2.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Koh A, Kawahara K. Current practices and problems in the reuse of single-use devices in Japan. J Med Dent Sci. 2005;52:81–9.PubMed Koh A, Kawahara K. Current practices and problems in the reuse of single-use devices in Japan. J Med Dent Sci. 2005;52:81–9.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Jang Y-C, Lee C, Yoon O-S, Kim H. Medical waste management in Korea. J Environ Manag. 2006;80:107–15.CrossRef Jang Y-C, Lee C, Yoon O-S, Kim H. Medical waste management in Korea. J Environ Manag. 2006;80:107–15.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hutin YJF, Hauri AM, Armstrong GL. Use of injections in healthcare settings worldwide, 2000: literature review and regional estimates. BMJ. 2003;327:1075–8.CrossRef Hutin YJF, Hauri AM, Armstrong GL. Use of injections in healthcare settings worldwide, 2000: literature review and regional estimates. BMJ. 2003;327:1075–8.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Janjua NZ, Akhtar S, Hutin YJF. Injection use in two districts of Pakistan: implications for disease prevention. Int J Qual Health Care. 2005;17:401–8.CrossRef Janjua NZ, Akhtar S, Hutin YJF. Injection use in two districts of Pakistan: implications for disease prevention. Int J Qual Health Care. 2005;17:401–8.CrossRef
29.
30.
go back to reference WHO. Single Use of Injection Devices. Patient Safety Solutions. 2007;1. WHO. Single Use of Injection Devices. Patient Safety Solutions. 2007;1.
31.
go back to reference Buchdid Amarante JM, Toscano CM, Pearson ML, Roth V, Jarvis WR, Levin AS. Reprocessing and reuse of single-use medical devices used during hemodynamic procedures in Brazil: a widespread and largely overlooked problem. Infect Cont Hosp Ep. 2008;29:854–8.CrossRef Buchdid Amarante JM, Toscano CM, Pearson ML, Roth V, Jarvis WR, Levin AS. Reprocessing and reuse of single-use medical devices used during hemodynamic procedures in Brazil: a widespread and largely overlooked problem. Infect Cont Hosp Ep. 2008;29:854–8.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Wu J, Zhou D. Discussion on reprocessing expensive single use medical devices. Chinese Hospitals. 2011;15:74–6. Wu J, Zhou D. Discussion on reprocessing expensive single use medical devices. Chinese Hospitals. 2011;15:74–6.
Metadata
Title
Reprocessing and reuse of single-use medical devices in China: a pilot survey
Authors
Duojin Wang
Jing Wu
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6835-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Public Health 1/2019 Go to the issue