Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

Risk perception in the population living near the Turin municipal solid waste incineration plant: survey results before start-up and communication strategies

Authors: Antonella Bena, Martina Gandini, Ennio Cadum, Enrico Procopio, Giuseppe Salamina, Manuela Orengia, Elena Farina

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The start-up of the Turin municipal solid waste incineration plant (2013) was accompanied by surveillance of health effects, which included a human biomonitoring campaign. Here we present the results of the risk perception survey of local residents before the plant went into operation.

Methods

The survey sample was 394 local residents: 198 residing near the plant (exposed group) and 196 residing in an area distant from the plant site (unexposed group). The survey questionnaire investigated awareness of environmental and health issues, including a section on the perception of environmental health risks. Multivariate Poisson regressions were performed to determine the differences in risk perception between the two groups (exposed vs. unexposed).

Results

The exposed group was more concerned about natural hazards (prevalence ratio [PR] 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99–2.61), anthropogenic hazards (PR 1.35; 95% CI 1.03–1.77), and waste management (PR 1.19; 95% CI 0.94–1.50). There were no significant differences in opinions about environmental pollution-related diseases between the two groups, though the exposed considered themselves to be at risk for developing these diseases. The survey population placed its trust more in health care providers than in any other category.

Conclusions

The risk perception survey questionnaire yielded data that enabled a better understanding and interpretation of the social context: residents living near the incineration plant were more concerned than those living distant from it, especially about anthropogenic hazards. This information was subsequently incorporated into the design the communication tools.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Special Eurobarometer 416 “Attitudes of European citizens towards the environment”. European Union 2014. Special Eurobarometer 416 “Attitudes of European citizens towards the environment”. European Union 2014.
2.
go back to reference De Marchi B. I rischi della comunicazione. Costruire su quarant’anni di esperienza. Epidemiol Prev. 2010;34(5–6):87–90.PubMed De Marchi B. I rischi della comunicazione. Costruire su quarant’anni di esperienza. Epidemiol Prev. 2010;34(5–6):87–90.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Keune H, Morrens B, Loots I. Risk communication and human biomonitoring: which practical lessons from the belgian experience are o fuse for the EU perspective? Environ Health. 2008;7(Suppl 1):S11.CrossRef Keune H, Morrens B, Loots I. Risk communication and human biomonitoring: which practical lessons from the belgian experience are o fuse for the EU perspective? Environ Health. 2008;7(Suppl 1):S11.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Coi A, Minichilli F, Bustaffa E, Carone S, Santoro M, Bianchi F, et al. Risk perception and access to environmental information in four areas in Italy affected by natural or anthropogenic pollution. Environ Int. 2016;95:8–15.CrossRef Coi A, Minichilli F, Bustaffa E, Carone S, Santoro M, Bianchi F, et al. Risk perception and access to environmental information in four areas in Italy affected by natural or anthropogenic pollution. Environ Int. 2016;95:8–15.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cori L. Finalità e criticità del processo di comunicazione. In Bianchi F, Comba P (a cura di). Indagini epidemiologiche nei siti inquinati: basi scientifiche, procedure metodologiche e gestionali, prospettive di equità Rapporti ISTISAN 06/19 2006; pagg. 85–114. Cori L. Finalità e criticità del processo di comunicazione. In Bianchi F, Comba P (a cura di). Indagini epidemiologiche nei siti inquinati: basi scientifiche, procedure metodologiche e gestionali, prospettive di equità Rapporti ISTISAN 06/19 2006; pagg. 85–114.
6.
go back to reference Cavazza N, Rubichi S. Ways of thinking about the incinerator: a typology of citizens’ mindsets. Soc Sci J. 2014;51:422–30.CrossRef Cavazza N, Rubichi S. Ways of thinking about the incinerator: a typology of citizens’ mindsets. Soc Sci J. 2014;51:422–30.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bobbio L. Smaltimento dei rifiuti e democrazia deliberativa. Working paper n.1, Dipartimento di studi politici. Torino: Università degli Studi; 2002. Bobbio L. Smaltimento dei rifiuti e democrazia deliberativa. Working paper n.1, Dipartimento di studi politici. Torino: Università degli Studi; 2002.
8.
go back to reference Tipaldo G. La costruzione del consenso intorno a un inceneritore di rifiuti: il caso di Torino. Relazione presentata al Congresso annuale della Società Italiana di Scienza Politica Bologna, 12–14 settembre 2006. Tipaldo G. La costruzione del consenso intorno a un inceneritore di rifiuti: il caso di Torino. Relazione presentata al Congresso annuale della Società Italiana di Scienza Politica Bologna, 12–14 settembre 2006.
9.
go back to reference Bena A, Orengia M, Cadum E, Farina E, Alimonti A, Bocca B, et al. Biomonitoring and exposure assessment of the general population living near an Italian incinerator: methodology of SPoTT study. Environ Monit Assess. 2016;188:607.CrossRef Bena A, Orengia M, Cadum E, Farina E, Alimonti A, Bocca B, et al. Biomonitoring and exposure assessment of the general population living near an Italian incinerator: methodology of SPoTT study. Environ Monit Assess. 2016;188:607.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lima ML. On the influence of risk perception on mental health: living near an incinerator. J Environ Psycol. 2004;24:71–84.CrossRef Lima ML. On the influence of risk perception on mental health: living near an incinerator. J Environ Psycol. 2004;24:71–84.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Khammaneechan P, Okanurak K, Sithisarankul P, Tantrakarnapa K, Norramit P. Community concern about a healthcare-waste incinerator. J Risk Res. 2011;14(7):847–58.CrossRef Khammaneechan P, Okanurak K, Sithisarankul P, Tantrakarnapa K, Norramit P. Community concern about a healthcare-waste incinerator. J Risk Res. 2011;14(7):847–58.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bustaffa E, Stoccoro A, Bianchi F, Migliore L. Genotoxic and epigenetic mechanisms in arsenic carcinogenicity. Arch Toxicol. 2014;88(5):1043–67.CrossRef Bustaffa E, Stoccoro A, Bianchi F, Migliore L. Genotoxic and epigenetic mechanisms in arsenic carcinogenicity. Arch Toxicol. 2014;88(5):1043–67.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Salvati P, Bianchi C, Fiorucci F, Giostrella P, Marchesini I, Guzzetti F. Perception of flood and landslide risk in Italy: a preliminary analysis. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 2014;14:2589–603.CrossRef Salvati P, Bianchi C, Fiorucci F, Giostrella P, Marchesini I, Guzzetti F. Perception of flood and landslide risk in Italy: a preliminary analysis. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 2014;14:2589–603.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lima ML. Predictors of attitudes towards the construction of a waste incinerator: two case studies. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2006;36(2):441–66.CrossRef Lima ML. Predictors of attitudes towards the construction of a waste incinerator: two case studies. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2006;36(2):441–66.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Porta D, Milani S, Lazzarino AI, Perucci CA, Forastiere F. Systematic review of epidemiological studies on health effects associated with management of solid waste. Environ Health. 2009;8:60.CrossRef Porta D, Milani S, Lazzarino AI, Perucci CA, Forastiere F. Systematic review of epidemiological studies on health effects associated with management of solid waste. Environ Health. 2009;8:60.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ashworth DC, Elliott P, Toledano MB. Waste incineration and adverse birth and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review. Environ Int. 2014;69:120–32.CrossRef Ashworth DC, Elliott P, Toledano MB. Waste incineration and adverse birth and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review. Environ Int. 2014;69:120–32.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Candela S, Ranzi A, Bonvicini L, Baldacchini F, Marzaroli P, Evangelista A, et al. Air pollution from incinerators and reproductive outcomes: a multisite study. Epidemiology. 2013;24(6):863–70.CrossRef Candela S, Ranzi A, Bonvicini L, Baldacchini F, Marzaroli P, Evangelista A, et al. Air pollution from incinerators and reproductive outcomes: a multisite study. Epidemiology. 2013;24(6):863–70.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Santoro M, Minichilli F, Linzalone N, Coi A, Maurello MT, Sallese D, Bianchi F. Adverse reproductive outcomes associated with exposure to a municipal solid waste incinerator. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2016;52(4):576–81.PubMed Santoro M, Minichilli F, Linzalone N, Coi A, Maurello MT, Sallese D, Bianchi F. Adverse reproductive outcomes associated with exposure to a municipal solid waste incinerator. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2016;52(4):576–81.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Golini MN, Ancona C, Badaloni C, Forastiere F. Morbidity in a population living close to urban waste incinerator plants in Lazio region (Central Italy): a retrospective cohort study using a before-after design. Epidemiol Prev. 2014;38(5):323–34.PubMed Golini MN, Ancona C, Badaloni C, Forastiere F. Morbidity in a population living close to urban waste incinerator plants in Lazio region (Central Italy): a retrospective cohort study using a before-after design. Epidemiol Prev. 2014;38(5):323–34.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Collins C, Thunhurst C, Crowley D, Staines A. Public views on sources of knowledge for decisions about waste management. In: Population health and waste management: scientific data and policy options. Report of a WHO workshop, Rome, Italy 29-30 March 2007. p. 43–5. Collins C, Thunhurst C, Crowley D, Staines A. Public views on sources of knowledge for decisions about waste management. In: Population health and waste management: scientific data and policy options. Report of a WHO workshop, Rome, Italy 29-30 March 2007. p. 43–5.
21.
go back to reference Trettin L, Musham C. Is trust a realistic goal of environmental risk communication? Environ Behav. 2000;32(3):410–26.CrossRef Trettin L, Musham C. Is trust a realistic goal of environmental risk communication? Environ Behav. 2000;32(3):410–26.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference LaKind JS, Aylward LL, Brunk C, DiZio S. Guidelines for the communication of biomonitoring equivalents: report from the biomonitoring equivalents expert workshop. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008;51(Suppl 3):S16–26.CrossRef LaKind JS, Aylward LL, Brunk C, DiZio S. Guidelines for the communication of biomonitoring equivalents: report from the biomonitoring equivalents expert workshop. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008;51(Suppl 3):S16–26.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Risk perception in the population living near the Turin municipal solid waste incineration plant: survey results before start-up and communication strategies
Authors
Antonella Bena
Martina Gandini
Ennio Cadum
Enrico Procopio
Giuseppe Salamina
Manuela Orengia
Elena Farina
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6808-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Public Health 1/2019 Go to the issue