Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Public Health | Research article

Workplace health promotion and safety in state and territorial health departments in the United States: a national mixed-methods study of activity, capacity, and growth opportunities

Authors: Laura A. Linnan, Maija S. Leff, Marisa C. Martini, AnnMarie L. Walton, Sherry Baron, Peggy A. Hannon, Jean Abraham, Melanie Studer

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

State and Territorial Health Departments (SHDs) have a unique role in protecting and promoting workers’ health. This mixed-methods study presents the first systematic investigation of SHDs’ activities and capacity in both Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) and Workplace Health Promotion (WHP) in the United States (US).

Methods

National survey of OSH and WHP practitioners from each of 56 SHDs, followed by in-depth interviews with a subset of survey respondents. We calculated descriptive statistics for survey variables and conducted conventional content analysis of interviews.

Results

Seventy percent (n = 39) of OSH and 71% (n = 40) of WHP contacts responded to the survey. Twenty-seven (n = 14 OSH, n = 13 WHP) participated in follow-up interviews. Despite limited funding, staffing, or organizational support, SHDs reported a wide array of activities. We assessed OSH and WHP surveillance activities, support that SHDs provided to employers to implement OSH and WHP interventions (implementation support), OSH and WHP services provided directly to workers, OSH follow-back investigations, and OSH standard and policy development. Each of the categories we asked about (excluding OSH standard and policy development) were performed by more than half of responding SHDs. Surveillance was the area of greatest OSH activity, while implementation support was the area of greatest WHP activity. Respondents characterized their overall capacity as low. Thirty percent (n = 9) of WHP and 19% (n = 6) of OSH respondents reported no funds at all for OSH/WHP work, and both groups reported a median 1.0 FTEs working on OSH/WHP at the SHD. Organizational support for OSH and WHP was characterized as “low” to “moderate”.
To increase SHDs’ capacity for OSH and WHP, interview respondents recommended that OSH and WHP approaches be better integrated into other public health initiatives (e.g., infectious disease prevention), and that federal funding for OSH and WHP increase. They also discussed specific recommendations for improving the accessibility and utility of existing funding mechanisms, and the educational resources they desired from the CDC.

Conclusions

Results revealed current activities and specific strategies for increasing capacity of SHDs to promote the safety and health of workers and workplaces – an important public health setting for reducing acute injury and chronic disease.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
The CDC defines bona fide agents as: “organizations designated by the health department as eligible to submit a grant application in lieu of the health department. These organizations may simply apply for the grant and funnel money to the health department, or may undertake more of the grant activities, depending on the local situation.” (https://​www.​cdc.​gov/​stltpublichealth​/​grantsfunding/​expediting.​html#Q7)
 
2
In 2016, 26 of 50 states were funded through the NIOSH State Occupational Health and Safety Surveillance Program (https://​www.​cdc.​gov/​niosh/​oep/​statesurv.​html). State Health Departments in these states collect data on 15–20 Occupational Health Indicators, develop partnerships with other OSH stakeholders in their state, develop prevention recommendations, and carry out targeted surveillance on emerging and priority issues.
 
Literature
6.
go back to reference Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Employer-reported workplace injuries and illnesses - 2015 (USDL 16–2056). 2016. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Employer-reported workplace injuries and illnesses - 2015 (USDL 16–2056). 2016.
8.
go back to reference Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2017. Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2017.
15.
go back to reference Hanusaik N, O’Loughlin JL, Kishchuk N, Eyles J, Robinson K, Cameron R. Building the backbone for organisational research in public health systems: development of measures of organisational capacity for chronic disease prevention. J Epidemiol & Community Heal. 2007;61:742–749. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2006.054049. Hanusaik N, O’Loughlin JL, Kishchuk N, Eyles J, Robinson K, Cameron R. Building the backbone for organisational research in public health systems: development of measures of organisational capacity for chronic disease prevention. J Epidemiol & Community Heal. 2007;61:742–749. doi:https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​jech.​2006.​054049.
Metadata
Title
Workplace health promotion and safety in state and territorial health departments in the United States: a national mixed-methods study of activity, capacity, and growth opportunities
Authors
Laura A. Linnan
Maija S. Leff
Marisa C. Martini
AnnMarie L. Walton
Sherry Baron
Peggy A. Hannon
Jean Abraham
Melanie Studer
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Public Health
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6575-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Public Health 1/2019 Go to the issue