Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Smoking and Nicotine Detoxification | Research article

Support for e-cigarette regulations among Australian young adults

Authors: Michelle I. Jongenelis, Caitlin Kameron, Daniel Rudaizky, Simone Pettigrew

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Surveying support for various regulatory options relating to e-cigarettes can assist policymakers to identify those that have broad support and are therefore likely to be easier to implement. However, data on support for potential e-cigarette regulations in Australia are limited. To inform regulatory efforts, the present study assessed attitudes to the regulation of e-cigarettes among Australian young adults, the most prevalent users of e-cigarettes and therefore the most likely population segment to be affected by e-cigarette regulations.

Methods

A total of 1116 Australians aged 18 to 25 years (59% female) completed an online survey where they were presented with various statements relating to the regulation of e-cigarettes and asked to report on the extent to which they agreed or disagreed with each. Statements presented either a restrictive or non-restrictive approach to e-cigarette regulation.

Results

Across all statements, 10–22% of respondents responded “don’t know” while 23–35% neither agreed nor disagreed, indicating general ambivalence. There was a moderate level of support (33–37%) for regulating e-cigarette sales/use and treating e-cigarettes like tobacco products. Only 20% of respondents were in favour of allowing the use of e-cigarettes in smoke-free areas. Smokers, e-cigarette users, and those who did not believe in the harms associated with e-cigarettes were typically less likely than other respondents to support restrictive approaches.

Conclusions

The young Australian adults surveyed were somewhat supportive of restrictions around the sale and use of e-cigarettes, but generally opposed outright bans and any need for a prescription from a medical practitioner. Increasing awareness of the harms associated with the use of e-cigarettes represents a potential strategy to gaining regulatory support.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: Public health consequences of e-cigarettes. In. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2018. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: Public health consequences of e-cigarettes. In. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2018.
2.
3.
go back to reference Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. National Drug Strategy Household Survey 2016, online data tables, vol. 2017. Canberra: AIHW. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. National Drug Strategy Household Survey 2016, online data tables, vol. 2017. Canberra: AIHW.
7.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Backgrounder on WHO report on regulation of e-cigarettes and similar products. Geneva: WHO; 2014. World Health Organization. Backgrounder on WHO report on regulation of e-cigarettes and similar products. Geneva: WHO; 2014.
10.
go back to reference Yong HH, Borland R, Balmford J, McNeill A, Hitchman S, Driezen P, Thompson ME, Fong GT, Cummings KM. Trends in e-cigarette awareness, trial, and use under the different regulatory environments of Australia and the United Kingdom. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(10):1203–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu231.CrossRefPubMed Yong HH, Borland R, Balmford J, McNeill A, Hitchman S, Driezen P, Thompson ME, Fong GT, Cummings KM. Trends in e-cigarette awareness, trial, and use under the different regulatory environments of Australia and the United Kingdom. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(10):1203–11. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​ntr/​ntu231.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference NSW Department of Health: Are electronic cigarettes and e-liquids safe?; 2018. NSW Department of Health: Are electronic cigarettes and e-liquids safe?; 2018.
19.
20.
go back to reference House of Representatives Standing Committee on Health Aged Care and Sport. Report on the Inquiry into the Use and Marketing of Electronic Cigarettes and Personal Vaporisers in Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2018. House of Representatives Standing Committee on Health Aged Care and Sport. Report on the Inquiry into the Use and Marketing of Electronic Cigarettes and Personal Vaporisers in Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2018.
21.
go back to reference Borland R, Yong HH, Siahpush M, Hyland A, Campbell S, Hastings G, Cummings KM, Fong GT. Support for and reported compliance with smoke-free restaurants and bars by smokers in four countries: findings from the international tobacco control (ITC) four country survey. Tob Control. 2006;15(suppl 3):iii34–41.PubMedPubMedCentral Borland R, Yong HH, Siahpush M, Hyland A, Campbell S, Hastings G, Cummings KM, Fong GT. Support for and reported compliance with smoke-free restaurants and bars by smokers in four countries: findings from the international tobacco control (ITC) four country survey. Tob Control. 2006;15(suppl 3):iii34–41.PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Brose LS, Partos TR, Hitchman SC, McNeill A. Support for e-cigarette policies: a survey of smokers and ex-smokers in Great Britain. Tob Control. 2017;26(e1):e7–e15.CrossRef Brose LS, Partos TR, Hitchman SC, McNeill A. Support for e-cigarette policies: a survey of smokers and ex-smokers in Great Britain. Tob Control. 2017;26(e1):e7–e15.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Finney Rutten LJ, Blake KD, Agunwamba AA, Grana RA, Wilson PM, Ebbert JO, Okamoto J, Leischow SJ. Use of e-cigarettes among current smokers: associations among reasons for use, quit intentions, and current tobacco use. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(10):1228–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntv003.CrossRef Finney Rutten LJ, Blake KD, Agunwamba AA, Grana RA, Wilson PM, Ebbert JO, Okamoto J, Leischow SJ. Use of e-cigarettes among current smokers: associations among reasons for use, quit intentions, and current tobacco use. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(10):1228–34. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​ntr/​ntv003.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Green SH, Bayer R, Fairchild AL. Evidence, policy, and e-cigarettes-will England reframe the debate? N Engl J Med. 2016;374(14):1301–3.CrossRef Green SH, Bayer R, Fairchild AL. Evidence, policy, and e-cigarettes-will England reframe the debate? N Engl J Med. 2016;374(14):1301–3.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: Electronic nicotine delivery systems. 2014. World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: Electronic nicotine delivery systems. 2014.
50.
52.
go back to reference World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems and Electronic Non-Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS/ENNDS). 2016. World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems and Electronic Non-Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS/ENNDS). 2016.
53.
go back to reference Sanders-Jackson A, Tan AS, Bigman CA, Mello S, Niederdeppe J. To regulate or not to regulate? Views on electronic cigarette regulations and beliefs about the reasons for and against regulation. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0161124.CrossRef Sanders-Jackson A, Tan AS, Bigman CA, Mello S, Niederdeppe J. To regulate or not to regulate? Views on electronic cigarette regulations and beliefs about the reasons for and against regulation. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0161124.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Support for e-cigarette regulations among Australian young adults
Authors
Michelle I. Jongenelis
Caitlin Kameron
Daniel Rudaizky
Simone Pettigrew
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6410-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Public Health 1/2019 Go to the issue