Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

A content analysis of popular media reporting regarding increases in minimum ages of legal access for tobacco

Authors: Jocelyn Huey, Dorie E. Apollonio

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In the late 20th century, US localities began increasing the minimum age of legal access (MLA) for tobacco from 18 to 21 years by enacting “Tobacco 21” ordinances. Although these policies have a strong evidence base and broad popular support, popular media coverage of tobacco control laws has not always been accurate. This study sought to determine if contemporaneous popular media reporting accurately reflected the scientific findings regarding increased tobacco MLAs.

Methods

We searched LexisNexis for popular media reports that (1) addressed proposed or enacted Tobacco 21 ordinances and were (2) published in English, (3) drawn from a US news source, and (4) written after January 2004. We conducted a content analysis for quality based on a validated measure of accuracy of reporting, the Index of Scientific Quality (ISQ), which allows assessment of articles by assigning scores ranging from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest).

Results

Searches yielded 378 articles; after screening for relevance and duplicates, 98 were included in the review. All studies identified through the keyword searches addressed Tobacco 21 policies. The average global score identifying the scientific quality of the articles was 2.98 of 5. Over three-quarters of the popular media articles addressing Tobacco 21 laws were written after a systematic review of these policies was released by the Institute of Medicine and approximately 4 in 10 cited findings from that review.

Conclusions

Popular media reports on Tobacco 21 laws demonstrated average overall quality and relied on both anecdotal and scientific evidence, in contrast to previous studies found that popular media reports on tobacco issues demonstrated low overall quality and relied primarily on anecdotal evidence. The systematic review of increased MLAs for tobacco written by the Institute of Medicine diffused quickly into popular reporting, suggesting that this type of evidence might improve research translation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The health consequences of smoking—50 years of progress: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2014.
2.
Singh T. Tobacco use among middle and high school students—United States, 2011–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65:361-367.CrossRef
3.
Apollonio DE, Glantz SA. Minimum ages of legal access for tobacco in the United States from 1863 to 2015. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(7):1200.CrossRef
4.
Institute of Medicine. In: Bonnie RJ, Stratton K, Kwan LY, editors. Public Health Implications of Raising the Minimum Age of Legal Access to Tobacco Products. Washington: National Academies Press (US); 2015.
5.
Ling PM, Glantz SA. Why and how the tobacco industry sells cigarettes to young adults: evidence from industry documents. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(6):908.CrossRef
6.
7.
Kessel Schneider S, Buka SL, Dash K, Winickoff JP, O'Donnell L. Community reductions in youth smoking after raising the minimum tobacco sales age to 21. Tob Control. 2016;25(3):355.CrossRef
8.
King BA, Jama AO, Marynak KL, Promoff GR. Attitudes toward raising the minimum age of Sale for tobacco among U.S. adults. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(4):583–8.CrossRef
9.
Lavis JN, Posada FB, Haines A, Osei E. Use of research to inform public policymaking. Lancet. 2004;364(9445):1615.CrossRef
10.
Lavis JN, Oxman AD, Lewin S, Fretheim A. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP). Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;7 Suppl 1:I1.CrossRef
11.
Cartwright N, Hardie J. Evidence-based policy: a practical guide to doing it better. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.CrossRef
12.
Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM. Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. Jama. 2003;290(12):1624–32.CrossRef
13.
Hunink MGM, Weinstein MC, Wittenberg E, Drummond MF, Pliskin JS, Wong JB, Glasziou PP. Decision making in health and medicine: integrating evidence and values. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014.
14.
Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(Suppl 1):6–20.CrossRef
15.
Jacobs JA, Jones E, Gabella BA, Spring B, Brownson RC. Tools for implementing an evidence-based approach in public health practice. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E116.PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Brownson RC, Fielding JE, Maylahn CM. Evidence-based decision making to improve public health practice. Front Public Health Serv Syst Res. 2013;2(2):2.
17.
Lavis JN, Ross SE, Hurley JE. Examining the role of health services research in public policymaking. Milbank Q. 2002;80(1):125.CrossRef
18.
Lavis JN, Robertson D, Woodside JM, McLeod CB, Abelson J. How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers? Milbank Q. 2003;81(2):221.CrossRef
19.
Elliott H, Popay J. How are policy makers using evidence? Models of research utilisation and local NHS policy making. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000;54(6):461–8.CrossRef
20.
Innvær S, Vist G, Trommald M, Oxman A. Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002;7(4):239.CrossRef
21.
Lima JC, Siegel M. The tobacco settlement: an analysis of newspaper coverage of a national policy debate, 1997-98. Tob Control. 1999;8(3):247–53.CrossRef
22.
Happer C, Philo G. The role of the media in the construction of public belief and social change. J Soc Pol Psychol. 2013;1(1):321.CrossRef
23.
Jamieson AM. The messenger as policy maker: thinking about the press and policy networks in the Washington community. Democratization. 1996;3(1):114.CrossRef
24.
Schwitzer G. How the media left the evidence out in the cold. Bmj. 2003;326(7403):1403.CrossRef
25.
Lee ST, Basnyat I. From press release to news: mapping the framing of the 2009 H1N1 a influenza pandemic. Health Commun. 2013;28(2):119–32.CrossRef
26.
Hooker C, King C, Leask J. Journalists' views about reporting avian influenza and a potential pandemic: a qualitative study. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2012;6(3):224–9.CrossRef
27.
Selvaraj S, Borkar DS, Prasad V. Media coverage of medical journals: do the best articles make the news? PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e85355.CrossRef
28.
Grilli R, Ramsay C, Minozzi S. Mass media interventions: effects on health services utilization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;4:CD000389.
29.
Winsten JA. Science and the media: the boundaries of truth. Health Aff (Project Hope). 1985;4(1):5.CrossRef
30.
Long M, Slater MD, Lysengen L. US news media coverage of tobacco control issues. Tob Control. 2006;15(5):367–72.CrossRef
31.
Nelson DE, Pederson LL, Mowery P, Bailey S, Sevilimedu V, London J, Babb S, Pechacek T. Trends in US newspaper and television coverage of tobacco. Tob Control. 2015;24(1):94–9.CrossRef
32.
Krauth D, Apollonio D. Accuracy of popular media reporting on tobacco cessation therapy in substance abuse and mental health populations. BMJ Open. 2015;5(3):e007169.CrossRef
33.
Eckler P, Rodgers S, Everett K. Characteristics of community newspaper coverage of tobacco control and its relationship to the passage of tobacco ordinances. J Community Health. 2016;41(5):953–61.CrossRef
34.
Oxman AD, Guyatt GH, Cook DJ, Jaeschke R, Heddle N, Keller J. An index of scientific quality for health reports in the lay press. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(9):987.CrossRef
35.
Altman D. Practical statistics for medical research. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press; 1990.
36.
Apollonio DE, Bero LA. Challenges to generating evidence-informed policy and the role of systematic reviews and (perceived) conflicts of interest. J Commun Healthcare. 2016;9(2):135.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A content analysis of popular media reporting regarding increases in minimum ages of legal access for tobacco
Authors
Jocelyn Huey
Dorie E. Apollonio
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6020-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Public Health 1/2018 Go to the issue

Research article

Health profile for Danish adults with activity limitation: a cross-sectional study

Research article

Volunteers in Ethiopia’s women’s development army are more deprived and distressed than their neighbors: cross-sectional survey data from rural Ethiopia

Research article

The effects of exercise referral schemes in the United Kingdom in those with cardiovascular, mental health, and musculoskeletal disorders: a preliminary systematic review

Research article

Cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention to reduce children’s exposure to second-hand smoke in the home

Research article

Hypertension, overweight/obesity, and diabetes among immigrants in the United States: an analysis of the 2010–2016 National Health Interview Survey

Research article

Objectively measured physical activity patterns, sedentary time and parent-reported screen-time across the day in four-year-old Swedish children