Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Popularity and impact of using smart devices in medicine: experiences in Saudi Arabia

Author: Sameer Al-Ghamdi

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The present study aimed to investigate smart device medical apps currently preferred by physicians in Saudi Arabia and the perceived impact of the apps on patient care.

Methods

Questionnaires for this cross-sectional study on smart device medical apps were randomly emailed to 384 physicians registered in the Saudi Commission of Health Specialists database. A total of 300 physicians returned completed questionnaires, with a response rate of 78.5%. Physician demographics and their perceptions of medical apps were assessed, including questions on the purpose, impact, and types of medical apps used. Questions were answered using a Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = not sure, 4 = agree, and 5 = strongly agree).

Results

Study subjects had a median age of 39 years (57.7% male). Most respondents (88.3%) had smart devices, and 86.3% had at least one medical app installed. Just over half used an app at least once a day (53.0%). Medical apps were positively perceived, with physicians reporting increased dependency on the apps (Likert score: 4.7 ± 0.5).

Conclusion

Medical apps were perceived to positively impact education, physician efficiency, and patient care.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mosa ASM, Yoo I, Sheets L. A systematic review of healthcare applications for smartphones. BMC Med Inform Dec Mak. 2012;12:67.CrossRef Mosa ASM, Yoo I, Sheets L. A systematic review of healthcare applications for smartphones. BMC Med Inform Dec Mak. 2012;12:67.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Thomairy NA, Mummaneni M, Alsalamah S, et al. Use of smartphones in hospitals. Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2015;34:297–307. Thomairy NA, Mummaneni M, Alsalamah S, et al. Use of smartphones in hospitals. Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2015;34:297–307.
3.
go back to reference Ventola MS. Mobil devices and apps for health care professionals: uses and benefits. Pharm Ther. 2014;39:356–64. Ventola MS. Mobil devices and apps for health care professionals: uses and benefits. Pharm Ther. 2014;39:356–64.
4.
go back to reference Ozdalga E, Ozdalga A, Ahuja N. The smartphone in medicine: a review of current and potential use among physicians and students. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(5):e128.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ozdalga E, Ozdalga A, Ahuja N. The smartphone in medicine: a review of current and potential use among physicians and students. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(5):e128.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Kiser K. 25 ways to use your smartphone. Physicians share their favorite uses and apps. Minn Med. 2011;94(4):22–9.PubMed Kiser K. 25 ways to use your smartphone. Physicians share their favorite uses and apps. Minn Med. 2011;94(4):22–9.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Mickan S, Tilson JK, Atherton H, et al. Evidence of effectiveness of health care professionals using handheld computers; a scoping review of systematic reviews. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(10):e212.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mickan S, Tilson JK, Atherton H, et al. Evidence of effectiveness of health care professionals using handheld computers; a scoping review of systematic reviews. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(10):e212.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Nogueira RG, Silva GS, Lima FO, et al. The FAST-ED app: a smartphone platform for the field triage of patients with stroke. Stroke. 2017;48:1278–84.CrossRefPubMed Nogueira RG, Silva GS, Lima FO, et al. The FAST-ED app: a smartphone platform for the field triage of patients with stroke. Stroke. 2017;48:1278–84.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Divali P, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Baker R. Use of personal digital assistants in clinical decision making by health care professionals: a systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2013;19:16–28.CrossRef Divali P, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Baker R. Use of personal digital assistants in clinical decision making by health care professionals: a systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2013;19:16–28.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Payne KB, Wharrad H, Watts K. Smartphone and medical related app use among medical students and junior doctors in the United Kingdom (UK): a regional survey. BMC Med Inform Dec Mak. 2012;12:121.CrossRef Payne KB, Wharrad H, Watts K. Smartphone and medical related app use among medical students and junior doctors in the United Kingdom (UK): a regional survey. BMC Med Inform Dec Mak. 2012;12:121.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference West DM. Improving health care through mobile medical devices and sensors. Center for Technology Innovation at Brookings October. 2013; West DM. Improving health care through mobile medical devices and sensors. Center for Technology Innovation at Brookings October. 2013;
11.
go back to reference Boulos MNK, Brewer AC, Karimkhani C, et al. Mobile medical and health apps: state of the art, concerns, regulatory control and certification. Online J Public Health Inform. 2014;5:229.PubMedPubMedCentral Boulos MNK, Brewer AC, Karimkhani C, et al. Mobile medical and health apps: state of the art, concerns, regulatory control and certification. Online J Public Health Inform. 2014;5:229.PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference O'Neill S, Brady RR. Clinical involvement and transparency in medical apps; not all apps are equal. Color Dis. 2013;15:122.CrossRef O'Neill S, Brady RR. Clinical involvement and transparency in medical apps; not all apps are equal. Color Dis. 2013;15:122.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Visvanathan A, Hamilton A, Brady RR. Smartphone apps in microbiology--is better regulation required? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:E218–20.CrossRefPubMed Visvanathan A, Hamilton A, Brady RR. Smartphone apps in microbiology--is better regulation required? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:E218–20.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ferrero NA, Morrell DS, Burkhart CN. Skin scan: a demonstration of the need for FDA regulation of medical apps on iPhone. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;68:515–6.CrossRefPubMed Ferrero NA, Morrell DS, Burkhart CN. Skin scan: a demonstration of the need for FDA regulation of medical apps on iPhone. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;68:515–6.CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
go back to reference Robson Y, Blackford S, Roberts D. Caution in melanoma risk analysis with smartphone application technology. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167:703–4.CrossRefPubMed Robson Y, Blackford S, Roberts D. Caution in melanoma risk analysis with smartphone application technology. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167:703–4.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Subhi Y, Bube SH, Rolskov Bojsen S, et al. Expert involvement and adherence to medical evidence in medical mobile phone apps: a systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3:e79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Subhi Y, Bube SH, Rolskov Bojsen S, et al. Expert involvement and adherence to medical evidence in medical mobile phone apps: a systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3:e79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Kamel Boulos MN. Social media and mobile health (chapter 13, under part B: taking action to create and strengthen health literacy-friendly settings). In: Kickbusch I, Pelikan J, Apfel F, Tsouros A, editors. THE SOLID FACTS - health literacy. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2013. p. 63–7. Kamel Boulos MN. Social media and mobile health (chapter 13, under part B: taking action to create and strengthen health literacy-friendly settings). In: Kickbusch I, Pelikan J, Apfel F, Tsouros A, editors. THE SOLID FACTS - health literacy. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2013. p. 63–7.
19.
go back to reference Murfin M. Know your apps: an evidence-based approach to the evaluation of mobile clinical applications. J Physician Assist Educ. 2013;24:38–40.CrossRefPubMed Murfin M. Know your apps: an evidence-based approach to the evaluation of mobile clinical applications. J Physician Assist Educ. 2013;24:38–40.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Prgomet M, Georgiou A, Westbrook J. The impact of mobile handheld technology on hospital physicians’ work practices and patient care: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16:792–801.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Prgomet M, Georgiou A, Westbrook J. The impact of mobile handheld technology on hospital physicians’ work practices and patient care: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16:792–801.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Patel RK, Sayers AE, Patrick NL, et al. A UK perspective on smartphone use amongst doctors within the surgical profession. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2015;4:107–12.CrossRef Patel RK, Sayers AE, Patrick NL, et al. A UK perspective on smartphone use amongst doctors within the surgical profession. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2015;4:107–12.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference O’Neill KM, Holmer H, Greenberg SL, Meara JG. Applying surgical apps: smartphone and tablet apps prove useful in clinical practice. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2013;98:10–8.PubMed O’Neill KM, Holmer H, Greenberg SL, Meara JG. Applying surgical apps: smartphone and tablet apps prove useful in clinical practice. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2013;98:10–8.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Franko OI, Tirrell TF. Smartphone app use among medical providers in ACGME training programs. J Med Syst. 2012;36:3135–9.CrossRefPubMed Franko OI, Tirrell TF. Smartphone app use among medical providers in ACGME training programs. J Med Syst. 2012;36:3135–9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Katz-Sidlow RJ, Lindenbaum Y, Sidlow R. Residents’ attitudes toward a smartphone policy for inpatient attending rounds. J Hosp Med. 2013;8:541–2.CrossRefPubMed Katz-Sidlow RJ, Lindenbaum Y, Sidlow R. Residents’ attitudes toward a smartphone policy for inpatient attending rounds. J Hosp Med. 2013;8:541–2.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Kim B, Ball M. Mobile use in medicine: taking a cue from specialized resources and devices. Ref Lib. 2010;52:57–67. Kim B, Ball M. Mobile use in medicine: taking a cue from specialized resources and devices. Ref Lib. 2010;52:57–67.
27.
go back to reference Buchholtz A, Perry B, et al. Smartphone use and perceptions among medical students and practicing physicians. J Mob Technol Med. 2016;5:27–32.CrossRef Buchholtz A, Perry B, et al. Smartphone use and perceptions among medical students and practicing physicians. J Mob Technol Med. 2016;5:27–32.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Jamal A, Temsah M-H, Khan SA, et al. Mobile phone use among medical residents: a cross-sectional multicenter survey in Saudi Arabia. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016;4:e61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jamal A, Temsah M-H, Khan SA, et al. Mobile phone use among medical residents: a cross-sectional multicenter survey in Saudi Arabia. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016;4:e61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Patel RK, Sayers AE, Patrick NL, Hughes K, Armitage J, Hunter IA. UK perspective on smartphone use amongst doctors within the surgical profession. Ann Med Surg. 2015;4:107–12.CrossRef Patel RK, Sayers AE, Patrick NL, Hughes K, Armitage J, Hunter IA. UK perspective on smartphone use amongst doctors within the surgical profession. Ann Med Surg. 2015;4:107–12.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Buijink AW, Visser BJ, Marshall L. Medical apps for smartphones: lack of evidence undermines quality and safety. Evid Based Med. 2013;18:90–2.CrossRefPubMed Buijink AW, Visser BJ, Marshall L. Medical apps for smartphones: lack of evidence undermines quality and safety. Evid Based Med. 2013;18:90–2.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Popularity and impact of using smart devices in medicine: experiences in Saudi Arabia
Author
Sameer Al-Ghamdi
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5465-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Public Health 1/2018 Go to the issue