Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Role of working conditions in the explanation of occupational inequalities in work injury: findings from the national French SUMER survey

Authors: Isabelle Niedhammer, Thomas Lesuffleur, Géraldine Labarthe, Jean-François Chastang

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Social inequalities in work injury have been observed but explanations are still missing. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the contribution of working conditions in the explanation of social inequalities in work injury in a national representative sample of employees.

Methods

The study was based on the cross-sectional sample of the national French survey SUMER 2010 including 46,962 employees, 26,883 men and 20,079 women. The number of work injuries within the last 12 months was studied as the outcome. Occupation was used as a marker of social position. Psychosocial work factors included various variables related to the classical job strain model, psychological demands, decision latitude, social support, and other understudied variables related to reward, job insecurity, job promotion, esteem, working time and hours and workplace violence. Occupational exposures of chemical, biological, physical and biomechanical nature were also studied. Weighted age-adjusted Poisson regression analyses were performed.

Results

Occupational gradients were observed in the exposure of most psychosocial work factors and occupational exposures. Strong occupational differences in work injury were found, blue-collar workers being more likely to have work injury. Chemical, biological, physical and biomechanical exposures contributed to explain the occupational differences in work injury substantially. Noise, thermic constraints, manual materials handling, postural/articular constraints and vibrations had significant contributions. Psychosocial work factors also contributed to explain the differences especially among women.

Conclusion

Prevention policies oriented toward chemical, biological, physical, biomechanical and psychosocial work exposures may contribute to reduce the magnitude of occupational differences in work injury.
Literature
1.
Concha-Barrientos M, Nelson DI, Fingerhut M, Driscoll T, Leigh J. The global burden due to occupational injury. Am J Ind Med. 2005;48(6):470–81.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Eurostat. Health and safety at work in Europe (1999–2007) - a statistical portrait. Luxembourg: European Commission Statistical books; 2010.
3.
Oh JH, Shin EH. Inequalities in nonfatal work injury: the significance of race, human capital, and occupations. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(11):2173–82.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Piha K, Laaksonen M, Martikainen P, Rahkonen O, Lahelma E. Socio-economic and occupational determinants of work injury absence. Eur J Pub Health. 2013;23(4):693–8.CrossRef
5.
Lundberg I, Hemmingsson T, Hogstedt C. Work and social inequalities in health in Europe. Brussells: P.I.E. Peter Lang SA; 2007.
6.
Laflamme L, Burrows S, Hasselberg M. Socioeconomic differences in injury risks: a review of findings and a discussion of potential countermeasures. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2009.
7.
Niedhammer I, Chastang JF, David S, Kelleher C. The contribution of occupational factors to social inequalities in health: findings from the national French SUMER survey. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(11):1870–81.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Dembe AE, Erickson JB, Delbos R. Predictors of work-related injuries and illnesses: national survey findings. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2004;1(8):542–50.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Melamed S, Yekutieli D, Froom P, Kristal-Boneh E, Ribak J. Adverse work and environmental conditions predict occupational injuries. The Israeli cardiovascular occupational risk factors determination in Israel (CORDIS) study. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150(1):18–26.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Cantley LF, Galusha D, Cullen MR, Dixon-Ernst C, Rabinowitz PM, Neitzel RL. Association between ambient noise exposure, hearing acuity, and risk of acute occupational injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015;41(1):75–83.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Yoon JH, Hong JS, Roh J, Kim CN, Won JU. Dose - response relationship between noise exposure and the risk of occupational injury. Noise Health. 2015;17(74):43–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Morabito M, Cecchi L, Crisci A, Modesti PA, Orlandini S. Relationship between work-related accidents and hot weather conditions in Tuscany (Central Italy). Ind Health. 2006;44(3):458–64.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Wagstaff AS, Sigstad Lie JA. Shift and night work and long working hours--a systematic review of safety implications. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2011;37(3):173–85.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B. The job content questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998;3(4):322–55.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Siegrist J, Starke D, Chandola T, Godin I, Marmot M, Niedhammer I, Peter R. The measurement of effort-reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(8):1483–99.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Hinkka K, Kuoppala J, Vaananen-Tomppo I, Lamminpaa A. Psychosocial work factors and sick leave, occupational accident, and disability pension: a cohort study of civil servants. J Occup Environ Med. 2013;55(2):191–7.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Julia M, Catalina-Romero C, Calvo-Bonacho E, Benavides FG. The impact of job stress due to the lack of organisational support on occupational injury. Occup Environ Med. 2013;70(9):623–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Kim HC, Min JY, Min KB, Park SG. Job strain and the risk for occupational injury in small- to medium-sized manufacturing enterprises: a prospective study of 1,209 Korean employees. Am J Ind Med. 2009;52(4):322–30.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Lesuffleur T, Chastang JF, Sandret N, Niedhammer I. Psychosocial factors at work and occupational injury: results from the French national SUMER survey. J Occup Environ Med. 2015;57(3):262–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Nakata A, Ikeda T, Takahashi M, Haratani T, Hojou M, Fujioka Y, Swanson NG, Araki S. Impact of psychosocial job stress on non-fatal occupational injuries in small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises. Am J Ind Med. 2006;49(8):658–69.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Niedhammer I, Chastang JF, David S. Importance of psychosocial work factors on general health outcomes in the national French SUMER survey. Occup Med (Lond). 2008;58(1):15–24.CrossRef
22.
Swaen GM, van Amelsvoort LP, Bultmann U, Slangen JJ, Kant IJ. Psychosocial work characteristics as risk factors for being injured in an occupational accident. J Occup Environ Med. 2004;46(6):521–7.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Sabbath EL, Hurtado DA, Okechukwu CA, Tamers SL, Nelson C, Kim SS, Wagner G, Sorenson G. Occupational injury among hospital patient-care workers: what is the association with workplace verbal abuse? Am J Ind Med. 2014;57(2):222–32.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Kristensen TS, Borg V, Hannerz H. Socioeconomic status and psychosocial work environment: results from a Danish national study. Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2002;59:41–8.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Lesuffleur T, Chastang JF, Sandret N, Niedhammer I. Psychosocial factors at work and sickness absence: results from the French national SUMER survey. Am J Ind Med. 2014;57(6):695–708.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Lesuffleur T, Chastang JF, Cavet M, Niedhammer I. Psychosocial work factors and self-reported health in the French national SUMER survey. Sante Publique. 2015;27(2):177–86.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Niedhammer I, Lesuffleur T, Algava E, Chastang JF. Classic and emergent psychosocial work factors and mental health. Occup Med (Lond). 2015;65(2):126–34.CrossRef
28.
Niedhammer I, Lesuffleur T, Coutrot T, Chastang JF. Contribution of working conditions to occupational inequalities in depressive symptoms: results from the national French SUMER survey. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016;89(6):1025–37.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Niedhammer I, Lesuffleur T, Memmi S, Chastang JF. Working conditions in the explanation of occupational inequalities in sickness absence in the French SUMER study. Eur J Pub Health. 2017;
30.
Niedhammer I. Psychometric properties of the French version of the Karasek job content questionnaire: a study of the scales of decision latitude, psychological demands, social support, and physical demands in the GAZEL cohort. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2002;75(3):129–44.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Niedhammer I, Chastang J, Gendrey L, David S, Degioanni S. Propriétés psychométriques de la version française des échelles de la demande psychologique, de la latitude décisionnelle et du soutien social du "Job Content Questionnaire" de Karasek : résultats de l'enquête nationale SUMER. Santé Publique. 2006;18(3):413–27.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Niedhammer I, Siegrist J, Landre MF, Goldberg M, LeClerc A. Psychometric properties of the French version of the effort-reward imbalance model. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2000;48(5):419–37.PubMed
33.
34.
35.
Karlson KB, Holm A, Breen R. Comparing regression coefficients between same-sample nested models using logit and probit: a new method. Sociol Methodol. 2012;42:286–313.CrossRef
36.
Kohler U, Karlson KB, Holm A. Comparing coefficients of nested nonlinear probability models. Stata J. 2011;11(3):420–38.
37.
Karlson KB, Anders H. Decomposing primary and secondary effects: a new decomposition method. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility. 2011;29:221–37.CrossRef
38.
Niedhammer I, Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Piciotti M, Bonenfant S. How is sex considered in recent epidemiological publications on occupational risks? Occup Environ Med. 2000;57(8):521–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Dohrenwend BP, Levav I, Shrout PE, Schwartz S, Naveh G, Link BG, Skodol AE, Stueve A. Socioeconomic status and psychiatric disorders: the causation-selection issue. Science. 1992;255(5047):946–52.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Burdorf A, Post W, Bruggeling T. Reliability of a questionnaire on sickness absence with specific attention to absence due to back pain and respiratory complaints. Occup Environ Med. 1996;53(1):58–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Monden CW. Current and lifetime exposure to working conditions. Do they explain educational differences in subjective health? Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(11):2465–76.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Benavides FG, Benach J, Muntaner C, Delclos GL, Catot N, Amable M. Associations between temporary employment and occupational injury: what are the mechanisms? Occup Environ Med. 2006;63(6):416–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Palmer KT, Harris EC, Coggon D. Chronic health problems and risk of accidental injury in the workplace: a systematic literature review. Occup Environ Med. 2008;65(11):757–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Role of working conditions in the explanation of occupational inequalities in work injury: findings from the national French SUMER survey
Authors
Isabelle Niedhammer
Thomas Lesuffleur
Géraldine Labarthe
Jean-François Chastang
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5254-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Public Health 1/2018 Go to the issue

Research article

Epidemiology of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs consumption in Spain. The MCC-Spain study

Research article

Self-reported oral and general health in relation to socioeconomic position

Study protocol

Risk assessment of occupational exposure to heavy metal mixtures: a study protocol

Research article

“His mind will work better with both of us”: a qualitative study on fathers’ roles and coparenting of young children in rural Pakistan

Research article

Evaluation of a population-level strategy to promote tobacco treatment use among insured smokers: a pragmatic, randomized trial

Research article

Determinants of childhood stunting in the Democratic Republic of Congo: further analysis of Demographic and Health Survey 2013–14