Top

BMC Public Health

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Lifetime utilization of mammography among Maltese women: a cross-sectional survey

Authors: Danika Marmarà, Vincent Marmarà, Gill Hubbard

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2018

Abstract

Background

The knowledge of Maltese women not attending the Maltese Breast Screening Programme (MBSP) for mammography screening is scarce. Previous research has identified two distinct groups of non-attendees: those who do not attend because a mammogram was taken elsewhere and those who never attended for mammography anywhere. It is however unknown which determinants are predictive of lifetime attendance ‘anywhere’ and ‘real’ non-attendance. The present study examines the relationship between ever-using (Lifetime attendees) or never using mammography (Lifetime non-attendees) and psychosocial - as well as sociodemographic factors, with the aim to identify predictors that can inform practice.

Methods

Women’s characteristics, knowledge, health beliefs and illness perceptions were compared, based on prior data of 404 women, aged 50–60 years at the time of their first MBSP invitation. The main variable of interest described women’s attendance to mammography (LIFETIME ATTENDEES) and no mammography (LIFETIME NON-ATTENDEES). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, Mann Whitney test, Independent Samples t-test, Shapiro Wilk test and logistic regression.

Results

During their lifetime, 86.1% of Maltese women (n = 348) were attendees, while 13.9% (n = 56) were non-attendees. Non-attendees were more likely to be women with a lower family income (χ2 = 13.1, p = 0.011), widowers (χ2 = 9.0, p = 0.030), non-drivers (χ2 = 7.7, p = 0.006), without a breast condition (χ2 = 14.2, p < 0.001), who had no relatives or close friends with cancer (χ2 = 8.3, p = 0.016), and who were less encouraged by a physician (χ2 = 4.9, p = 0.027), unsure of the screening frequency (χ2 = 28.5, p < 0.001), more anxious (p = 0.040) and fearful (p = 0.039). Perceived benefits, barriers, cues to action, self-efficacy and emotional representations were the most significant variables to describe the differences between lifetime attendees and non-attendees. Perceived barriers and cues to action were the strongest predictors for lifetime non-attendance (p < 0.05 respectively).

Conclusions

The health beliefs of women who have never attended for mammography during their lifetime should be targeted, particularly perceived barriers and cues to action. Further research should focus on understanding knowledge gaps, attitudinal barriers and emotional factors among ‘real’ non-attendees who require a more targeted approach.

Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, Rosso S, Coebergh JWW, Comber H, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:1374–403.CrossRefPubMed

Malta National Cancer Registry. Department of Health Information and Research. 2015. www.tinyurl.com/cancers-malta. Accessed 27 Apr 2017.

Elias N, Bou-Orm IR, Adib SM. Patterns and determinants of mammography screening in Lebanese women. Prev Med Rep. 2017;5:187–93.CrossRefPubMed

Barth RJ Jr, Gibson GR, Carney PA, Mott LA, Becher RD, Poplack SP. Detection of breast cancer on screening mammography allows patients to be treated with less-toxic therapy. Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:324–9.CrossRef

Feig SA. Screening mammography controversies: resolved, partly resolved, and unresolved. Breast J. 2005;11(Suppl 1):S3–6.CrossRefPubMed

White E, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, Geller BM, Rosenberg RD, Kerlikowske K, et al. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(24):1832–9.CrossRefPubMed

Rauscher GH, O’Malley MS, Earp JAL. How consistently do women report lifetime mammograms at successive interviews? Am J Prev Med. 2002;22(1):8–14.CrossRefPubMed

NHS Breast Screening Programme. Annual Review, 2012. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20150505144711/http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/breastscreen/publications/nhsbsp-annualreview2012.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.

Törnberg S, Kemetli L, Svane G, Rosén M, Stenbeck M, Nyström L. Pattern of participation in a cohort aged 50-60 at first invitation to the service-screening programme with mammography in Stockholm county, Sweden. Prev Med. 2005;41:728–33.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Greif J. Mammographic screening for breast cancer: an invited review of the benefits and costs. Breast. 2010;19:268–72.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Mai V, Sullivan T, Chiarelli AM. Breast cancer screening program in Canada: successes and challenges. Salud Publica Mex. 2009;51(Suppl 2):s228–35.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Schopper D, de Wolf C. How effective are breast cancer screening programmes by mammography? Review of the current evidence. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:1916–23.CrossRefPubMed

13.

European Commission. Breast cancer screening statistics. 2014. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Breast_cancer_screening_statistics. Accessed 02 Feb 2016.

14.

Johansson I, Berterö CM. Getting no respect: barriers to mammography for a group of Swedish women. Health Care Women Int. 2003;24(1):8–17.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Aro AR, de Koning HJ, Absetz P, Schreck M. Two distinct groups of non-attenders in an organized mammography screening program. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001;70(2):145–53.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Lagerlund M, Sontrop JM, Zackrisson S. Psychosocial factors and attendance at a population-based mammography screening program in a cohort of Swedish women. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14:33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Adib SM, Sabbah MA, Hlais S, Hanna P. Research in action: mammography utilization following breast cancer awareness campaigns in Lebanon 2002–05. East Mediterr Health J. 2009;15(1):6–18.PubMed

18.

Jensen LF, Pedersen AF, Andersen B, Vedsted P. Identifying specific nonattending groups in breast cancer screening-population-based registry study of participation and socio-demography. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:518.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Marmarà D, Marmarà V, Hubbard G. Health beliefs, illness perceptions and determinants of breast screening uptake in Malta: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:416. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4324-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Jahanlou AS, Lotfizade M, Karami NA. A New Behavioral Model (Health Belief Model Combined with Two Fear Models): Design, Evaluation and Path Analysis of the Role of Variables in Maintaining Behavior. InTech. 2013. https://doi.org/10.5772/52966. Accessed 19 Sep 2017.

21.

Zhang Y. Using a Mixed Design Study to Develop a Breast Screening Intervention among Chinese Women in the UK. Doctor of Philosophy. Aston University, June 2014. http://publications.aston.ac.uk/27195/1/Zhang_Ying_2015.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.

22.

Secginli S, Nahcivan N. Factors associated with breast cancer screening behaviours in a sample of Turkish women: a questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006;43:161–71.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Anagnostopoulos F, Dimitrakaki C, Fitzsimmons D, Potamianos G, Niakas D, Tountas Y. Health beliefs and illness perceptions as related to mammography uptake in randomly selected women in Greece. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2012;19:147–64.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Champion VL, Monahan PO, Springston JK, Russell K, Zollinger TW, Saywell RM Jr, et al. Measuring mammography and breast cancer beliefs in African American women. J Health Psychol. 2008;13:827–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Hale ED, Treharne GJ, Kitas GD. The common-sense model of self-regulation of health and illness: how can we use it to understand and respond to our patients' needs? Rheumatology. 2007;46(6):904–6.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Sutton S. The contribution of behavioural science to primary care research: development and evaluation of behaviour change interventions. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2011;12(4):284–92.CrossRefPubMed

27.

von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335:806–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Marmarà D, Marmarà V, Hubbard G. Predicting reattendance to the second round of the Maltese National Breast Screening Programme: a prospective cohort pilot study. BMC Women’s Health. 2017. in press.

29.

Hersch J, Barratt A, Jansen J, Houssami N, Irwig L, Jacklyn G, et al. The effect of information about overdetection of breast cancer on women’s decision-making about mammography screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e004990. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004990.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Chambers JA, O’Carroll RE, Cook A, Cavanagh J, Archibald D, Millar R. A pilot telephone intervention to increase uptake of breast cancer screening in socially deprived areas in Scotland (TELBRECS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:824. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-824.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Sturges JE, Hanrahan KJ. Comparing telephone and face-to-face qualitative interviewing: a research note. Qual Res. 2004;4:107–18.CrossRef

32.

Moss-Morris R, Weinman J, Petrie KJ, Horne R, Cameron LD, Buick D. The revised illness perception questionnaire (IPQ-R). Psychol Health. 2002;17:1–16.CrossRef

33.

Champion VL. Revised susceptibility, benefits, and barriers scale for mammography screening. Res Nurs Health. 1999;22(4):341–8.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Marmarà D, Marmarà V, Hubbard G. Maltese translation and adaptation of Champion's Health Belief Model Scale and the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire for breast screening among Maltese women. J Nurs Meas. 2017;25(3):486-503. https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.25.3.486.

35.

Kinnear H, Rosato M, Mairs A, Hall C, O’Really D. The low uptake of breast screening in cities is a major public health issue and may be due to organisational factors: a census-based record linkage study. Breast. 2011;20:460–3.CrossRefPubMed

36.

McDonald JT, Sherman A. Determinants of mammography use in rural and urban regions of Canada. Can J Rural Med. 2010;15:52–60.PubMed

37.

Doescher MP, Jackson JE. Trends in cervical and breast cancer screening practices among women in rural and urban areas of the United States. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2009;15:200–9.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Staniscia T, Manzoli LM, Di Giovanni P, Dragani V, Testa P, Cavaliere D, et al. Factors related to the uptake of breast cancer screening (mammography and breast ultrasound): a retrospective survey on a sample of resident women, 50-70 years aged, from Abruzzo region. Ann Ig. 2003;15(6):1063–75.PubMed

39.

Barr JK, Franks AL, Lee NC, Herther P, Schachter M. Factors associated with continued participation in mammography screening. Prev Med. 2001;33:661–7.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Steadman L, Rutter DR. Belief importance and the theory of planned behaviour: comparing modal and ranked modal beliefs in predicting attendance at breast screening. Br J Health Psychol. 2004;9(4):447–63.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Moser K, Patnick J, Beral V. Inequalities in reported use of breast and cervical screening in great Britain: analysis of cross sectional survey data. BMJ. 2009;338:b2025. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2025.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Moodi M, Rezaeian M, Mostafavi F, Sharifirad GR. Determinants of mammography screening behavior in Iranian women: a population-based study. J Res Med Sci. 2012;17(8):750–9.PubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Allen J, Stoddard AM, Sorensen GC. Do social network characteristics predict mammography screening practices? Health Educ Behav. 2008;35(6):763–76.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Jepson R, Clegg A, Forbes C, Lewis R, Sowden A, Kleijnen J. The determinants of screening uptake and interventions for increasing uptake: a systematic review. Health Technology Assessment. 2000;4(14):i-vii, 1–133.

45.

Lagerlund M. Factors affecting attendance at population-based mammography screening. 2002. http://publications.ki.se/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10616/38622/thesis.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 25 Aug 2017.

46.

Tejeda S, Thompson B, Coronado GD, Martin DP. Barriers and facilitators related to mammography use among lower educated Mexican women in the USA. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68:832–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.12.023.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

47.

Willis K. “I come because I am called”: recruitment and participation in mammography screening in Uppsala, Sweden. Health Care Women Intl. 2008;29:135–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399330701738143.CrossRef

48.

Manjer AR, Emilsson UM, Zackrisson S. Non-attendance in mammography screening and women’s social network: a cohort study on the influence of family composition, social support, attitudes and cancer in close relations. World J Surg Oncol. 2015;13:211. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0623-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Dundar PE, Ozyurt BC, Erdurak K. Sociodemographic determinants of nonattendance in a population-based mammography screening program in the City of Manisa, Turkey. Sci World J. 2012;816903. doi:https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/816903.

50.

Luengo S, Lazaro P, Azcona B, Madero R, Fitch K. Use of mammography among women residing in Spanish provinces with breast cancer screening programmes. Eur J Cancer Prev. 1999;8:517–24.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Marton C, Choo CW. A review of theoretical models of health information seeking on the web. J Doc. 2012;68(3):330–52.CrossRef

52.

Young R. The household context for women's health care decisions: impacts of UK policy changes. Soc Sci Med. 1996;42(6):949–63.CrossRefPubMed

53.

Yoo E-Y, Robbins LS. Understanding middle-aged women's health information seeking on the web: a theoretical approach. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 2008;59(4):577–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20766.CrossRef

54.

Bidmon S, Terlutter R. Gender differences in searching for health information on the internet and the virtual patient-physician relationship in Germany: exploratory results on how men and women differ and why. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(6):e156. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4127.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

55.

Fleming P, O’Neill S, Owens M, Mooney T, Fitzpatrick P. Intermittent attendance at breast cancer screening. J Public Health Res. 2013;2(2):e14. https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2013.e14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

56.

Zackrisson S, Andersson I, Manjer J, Janzon L. Non-attendance in breast cancer screening is associated with unfavourable socio-economic circumstances and advanced carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2004;108(5):754–60.CrossRefPubMed

57.

Jansen E, Daniels LA, Nicholson JM. The dynamics of parenting and early feeding–constructs and controversies: a viewpoint. Early Child Dev Care. 2012;182(8):967–81.CrossRef

58.

Australian Government. Research Report – Campaign Developmental Research for Breast Screening. Department of Health. 2014. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/screening/publishing.nsf/Content/D2F8355B3C9C3107CA257E1A007D9F71/$File/Breast%20Screening%20Developmental%20Report.pdf. Accessed 15 Jul 2017.

59.

Consedine NS, Magai C, Krivoshekova YS, Ryzewicz L, Neugut AI. Fear, anxiety, worry, and breast cancer screening behavior: a critical review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2004;13(4):501–10.

60.

Marmarà D, Marmarà V, Hubbard G. A National Cross-Sectional Study of Adherence to Timely Mammography Use in Malta. BMC Cancer. 2017; in press.

61.

Fayanju OM, Kraenzle S, Drake BF, Oka M, Goodman MS. Perceived barriers to mammography among underserved women in a breast health center outreach program. Am J Surg. 2014;208(3):425–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

62.

Kee F, Telford AM, Donaghy P, O’Doherty A. Attitude or access: reasons for not attending mammography in Northern Ireland. Eur J Cancer Prev. 1992;1:311–5.CrossRefPubMed

63.

Passanisi N, Prout M, Holm LJ. The New England division tell a friend program implementation evaluation. Cancer Pract. 2001;9(Suppl 1):S64–71.PubMed

64.

Kiger H. Outreach to multiethnic, multicultural, and multilingual women for breast cancer and cervical cancer education and screening: a model using professional and volunteer staffing. Fam Community Health. 2003;26:307–18.CrossRefPubMed

65.

Bencivenga M, DeRubis S, Leach P, Lotito L, Shoemaker C, Lengerich EJ. Community partnerships, food pantries, and an evidence-based intervention to increase mammography among rural women. J Rural Health. 2008;24:91–5.CrossRefPubMed

66.

Lostao L, Joiner TE, Pettit JW, Chorot P, Sandin B. Health beliefs and illness attitudes as predictors of breast cancer screening attendance. Eur J Pub Health. 2001;11:247–79.CrossRef

67.

Witte K, Allen M. A meta-analysis of fear appeals: implications of effective public health campaigns. Health Educ Behav. 2000;27:591–615.CrossRefPubMed

68.

Baron-Epel O, Friedman N, Lernau O. Reducing disparities in mammography-use in a multicultural population in Israel. Int J Equity Health. 2009;8:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-8-19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

69.

Austin L, Ahmad F, McNally MJ, Steward D. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women: a literature review using the health belief model. Womens Health Issues. 2002;12:122–8.CrossRefPubMed

70.

Whelehan P, Evans A, Wells M, MacGillivray S. The effect of mammography pain on repeat participation in breast cancer screening: a systematic review. Breast. 2013;22:389–94.CrossRefPubMed

71.

Paul M. Factors that influence the uptake of Breast Cancer Screening among women of reproductive age in Mosocho division, KISII Central District, Kenya. 2012. http://ir-library.ku.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/123456789/6874/Macheneri%20Paul.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 10 Sep 2017.

72.

Magai C, Consedine N, Neugut AL, Hershman DL. Common psychosocial factors underlying breast cancer screening and breast cancer treatment adherence; a conceptual review and synthesis. J Women's Health. 2007;16(1):11–23.CrossRef

73.

Miller LY, Hailey BJ. Cancer anxiety and breast cancer screening in African American women: a preliminary study. Women's Health Int. 1994;4:170–4.

74.

Edwards NI, Jones DA. Uptake of breast cancer screening in older women. Age Ageing. 2000;29:131–5.CrossRefPubMed

75.

Lagerlund M, Sparén P, Thurfjell E, Ekbom A, Lambe M. Predictors of non-attendance in a population-based mammography screening programme; socio-demographic factors and aspects of health behaviour. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2000;9(1):25–33.CrossRefPubMed

76.

Rakowski W, Meissner H, Vernon SW, Breen N, Rimer B, Clark MA. Correlates of repeat and recent mammography for women ages 45 to 75 in the 2002 to 2003 health information National Trends Survey (HINTS 2003). Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2006;15(11):2093–101. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.CrossRef

77.

Boyer BA, Cantor RK. Posttraumatic stress among women with breast cancer and their daughters: relationship with daughters’ breast cancer screening. Am J Fam Ther. 2005;33:443–60.CrossRef

78.

Friedman LC, Webb JA, Weinberg AD, Lane M, Cooper HP, Woodruff A. Breast cancer screening: racial/ethnic differences in behaviors and beliefs. J Cancer Educ. 1995;10:213–6.PubMed

79.

Shelby RA, Scipio CD, Somers TJ, Scott Soo M, Weinfurt KP, Keefe FJ. Prospective study of factors predicting adherence to surveillance mammography in women treated for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(8):813–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.34.4333.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

80.

Soler-Michel P, Courtial I, Bremond A. Reattendance of women for breast cancer screening programs. A review. Participation Secondaire Femmes Dépistage Organisé Cancer Revue Litt. 2005;53(5):549–67.

81.

Dolan NC, Feinglass J, Priyanath A, Haviley C, Sorensen AV, Venta LA. Measuring satisfaction with mammography results reporting. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(3):157–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

82.

Marmarà DM, Curtis J, Marmarà VA. Women’s satisfaction of the Maltese breast screening Programme: a cross-sectional survey. Malta Med J. 2015;27(4):13–21.

83.

Miller D, Livingstone V, Herbison P. Interventions for relieving the pain and discomfort of screening mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;23(1):CD002942. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002942.pub2.

Title: Lifetime utilization of mammography among Maltese women: a cross-sectional survey
Authors: Danika Marmarà
Vincent Marmarà
Gill Hubbard
Publication date: 01-12-2018
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5093-6

ACC 2024 Congress

Springer Medicine

Lifetime utilization of mammography among Maltese women: a cross-sectional survey

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

ACC 2024 Congress

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

The effect of contextual factors on unintentional injury hospitalization: from the Korea National Hospital Discharge Survey

Intentional tanning behaviors among undergraduates on the United States’ Gulf Coast

Know where to go: evidence from a controlled trial of a healthcare system information intervention among immigrants

Exploiting routinely collected severe case data to monitor and predict influenza outbreaks

The relationship between depression, daytime napping, daytime dysfunction, and snoring in 0.5 million Chinese populations: exploring the effects of socio-economic status and age

Associations between childhood overweight, obesity, abdominal obesity and obesogenic behaviors and practices in Australian homes