Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Challenges of implementing the integrated disease surveillance and response strategy in Zambia: a health worker perspective

Authors: Chomba Brian Mandyata, Linda Kampata Olowski, Wilbroad Mutale

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite advances in medical technology and public health practice at the global level over the past millennia, infectious diseases are still the leading causes of death in most resource limited countries. Stronger infectious disease surveillance and response systems in developed countries facilitated the near elimination of infectious disease related deaths in those countries. Today, low-income countries are following this path by strengthening disease surveillance and response strategies that would help reverse the trend in infectious disease associated morbidity and mortality cases. In 2000, Zambia adopted the World Health Organisation Regional Office for Africa’s (WHO-AFRO) Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response Strategy (IDSR) to monitor, prevent and control priority notifiable infectious diseases in the country. Through this strategy, activities pertaining to disease surveillance are coordinated and streamlined to take advantage of similar surveillance functions, skills, resources and targeted populations. The purpose of the study was to investigate and report on the existing challenges in the implementation of the IDSR strategy in a resource limited country from a health worker perspective.

Methods

A qualitative study approach was used to achieve the study aim. Data was collected through key informant interviews with selected persons at the Lusaka Province Health Office (LPHO); Lusaka and Chongwe District Health Management Team Offices; and four selected health facilities in the two districts (two from each). Thematic analysis approach was used to analyse the qualitative data.

Results

The major successes included operationalised response and epidemic preparedness at all levels (National to district); full-time staff and budget dedicated to disease surveillance at all levels and adoption of the 2010 World Health Organisations’ Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response Strategy technical guidelines to the Zambian context. Several challenges hampered effective implementation. These include inadequate trained human resources, poor infrastructure and coordination challenges.

Conclusion

The implementation of IDSR strategy in Zambia has recorded some successes. However, several gaps hinder effective implementation. It is imperative that these gaps are addressed for Zambia to have a robust surveillance system that could inform policy in a comprehensive and timely manner.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brownson RC, Elizabeth AB, Leet TL, Gillespie KN, William R. True, Evidence Based Public Health. 2nd ed. Cape Town: Oxford University Press; 2011. Brownson RC, Elizabeth AB, Leet TL, Gillespie KN, William R. True, Evidence Based Public Health. 2nd ed. Cape Town: Oxford University Press; 2011.
2.
go back to reference Thacker SB, Berkelman RL. Public Health Surveillance in the United States. Epidemiol Rev. 1988;10:164–90.CrossRefPubMed Thacker SB, Berkelman RL. Public Health Surveillance in the United States. Epidemiol Rev. 1988;10:164–90.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Buehler JW. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL, editors. Surveillance, in Modern Epidemiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. Buehler JW. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL, editors. Surveillance, in Modern Epidemiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
4.
go back to reference Elida M. Evaluation of Surveillance Systems of Infectious Diseases and Vaccination Coverage in Albania. Milan Universita Degli Studi Di Milano; 2011. p. 219. Elida M. Evaluation of Surveillance Systems of Infectious Diseases and Vaccination Coverage in Albania. Milan Universita Degli Studi Di Milano; 2011. p. 219.
5.
go back to reference Serrano PEM. Spatial and Spatiotemporal Methods for Public Health Surveillance. Valencia: University of Valencia; 2012. p. 157. Serrano PEM. Spatial and Spatiotemporal Methods for Public Health Surveillance. Valencia: University of Valencia; 2012. p. 157.
6.
go back to reference Calain P. From the Field Side of the Binoculars: A different view on global public health surveillance. Health Policy Plan. 2007;22(1):13–20.CrossRefPubMed Calain P. From the Field Side of the Binoculars: A different view on global public health surveillance. Health Policy Plan. 2007;22(1):13–20.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Franco LM, Setzer J, Banke K. Improving Performance of IDSR at District and Facility Levels: Experiences in Tanzania and Ghana in Making IDSR Operational. Maryland: Abt Associate, Inc; 2006. Franco LM, Setzer J, Banke K. Improving Performance of IDSR at District and Facility Levels: Experiences in Tanzania and Ghana in Making IDSR Operational. Maryland: Abt Associate, Inc; 2006.
8.
go back to reference Lukwago L, et al. The Implementation of Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response in Uganda: a review of progress and challenges between 2001 and 2007. Health Policy Plan. 2012;28(1):30–40. Lukwago L, et al. The Implementation of Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response in Uganda: a review of progress and challenges between 2001 and 2007. Health Policy Plan. 2012;28(1):30–40.
9.
go back to reference Nsubuga P, et al. Structure and Performance of Infectious Disease Surveillance and Response, United Republic of Tanzania, 1998. Bull World Health Organisation. 2002;80(3):196–203. Nsubuga P, et al. Structure and Performance of Infectious Disease Surveillance and Response, United Republic of Tanzania, 1998. Bull World Health Organisation. 2002;80(3):196–203.
10.
go back to reference Nsubuga P, et al. Public Health Surveillance: A tool for targeting and monitoring interventions. In: Jamison DT, et al., editors. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. Washington (DC): Oxford University Press and The World Bank; 2006. p. 1394. Nsubuga P, et al. Public Health Surveillance: A tool for targeting and monitoring interventions. In: Jamison DT, et al., editors. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. Washington (DC): Oxford University Press and The World Bank; 2006. p. 1394.
11.
go back to reference Phalkey RK, et al. Assessment of the Core and Support Functions of the Integrated Disease Surveillance System in Maharashtra, India. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(575):575.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Phalkey RK, et al. Assessment of the Core and Support Functions of the Integrated Disease Surveillance System in Maharashtra, India. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(575):575.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference WHO and CDC. Technical Guideline for Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response in the African Region. Brazzaville: World Health Organisation; 2010. WHO and CDC. Technical Guideline for Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response in the African Region. Brazzaville: World Health Organisation; 2010.
13.
go back to reference WHO. International Health Regulations (2005). Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2005. WHO. International Health Regulations (2005). Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2005.
15.
go back to reference MoH. Annual Health Statistical Bulletin. Lusaka: Ministry of Health, Zambia; 2012. MoH. Annual Health Statistical Bulletin. Lusaka: Ministry of Health, Zambia; 2012.
16.
go back to reference Parliament of Zambia. Public Health Act. Lusaka: National Assembly of Zambia; 1995. Parliament of Zambia. Public Health Act. Lusaka: National Assembly of Zambia; 1995.
17.
go back to reference MoH. Technical Guidelines for Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response in Zambia. Lusaka: Ministry of Health, Zambia; 2011. MoH. Technical Guidelines for Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response in Zambia. Lusaka: Ministry of Health, Zambia; 2011.
18.
go back to reference Mutale W, et al. Improving Health Information Systems for Decision Making Across Five sub-Saharan African Countries: Implementation strategies from the African Health Initiative. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S9.CrossRefPubMed Mutale W, et al. Improving Health Information Systems for Decision Making Across Five sub-Saharan African Countries: Implementation strategies from the African Health Initiative. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S9.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Central-Statistical-Office. In: C.S. Office, editor. Zambia 2010 Census of Population and Housing. Lusaka: Central Statistical Office; 2012. p. 406. Central-Statistical-Office. In: C.S. Office, editor. Zambia 2010 Census of Population and Housing. Lusaka: Central Statistical Office; 2012. p. 406.
20.
go back to reference WHO. Protocol for the Assessment of National Communicable Disease Surveillance and Response Systems. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2001. WHO. Protocol for the Assessment of National Communicable Disease Surveillance and Response Systems. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2001.
21.
go back to reference WHO. Communicable Disease Surveillance and Response Systems: Guide to Monitoring and Evaluating. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2006. WHO. Communicable Disease Surveillance and Response Systems: Guide to Monitoring and Evaluating. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2006.
22.
go back to reference Williams AC, Bower EJ, Newton TJ. Research in Primary Dental Care Part 6: Data Analysis. Br Dent J. 2004;197(2):67–73. Williams AC, Bower EJ, Newton TJ. Research in Primary Dental Care Part 6: Data Analysis. Br Dent J. 2004;197(2):67–73.
23.
go back to reference USAID and T.O. Deliver Project. Digging into Malaria Data: Comparing HMIS and LMIS Data to Improve Program Management in Zambia. Arlington: USAID & Deliver Project; 2011. USAID and T.O. Deliver Project. Digging into Malaria Data: Comparing HMIS and LMIS Data to Improve Program Management in Zambia. Arlington: USAID & Deliver Project; 2011.
24.
go back to reference MMWR. In: E.P. Office, editor. Updated Guidelines for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance Systems: Recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), U.S. Department of Health; 2001. p. 51. MMWR. In: E.P. Office, editor. Updated Guidelines for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance Systems: Recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), U.S. Department of Health; 2001. p. 51.
25.
go back to reference Gueye D, Senkoro KP, Rumisha SF. Baseline Monitoring and Evaluation of Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response in Tanzania, October - December 2003. Bethesda, MA: The Partners for Health Reformplus Project and Abt Associates Inc; 2005. Gueye D, Senkoro KP, Rumisha SF. Baseline Monitoring and Evaluation of Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response in Tanzania, October - December 2003. Bethesda, MA: The Partners for Health Reformplus Project and Abt Associates Inc; 2005.
26.
go back to reference Mtemba ZJ. Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response Systems in Resource-limited Settings. Glasgow: University of Glasgow; 2013. p. 124. Mtemba ZJ. Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response Systems in Resource-limited Settings. Glasgow: University of Glasgow; 2013. p. 124.
27.
go back to reference Huaman MA, et al. Impact of two Interventions on Timeliness and Data Quality of an Electronic Disease Surveillance System in a Resource Limited Setting (Peru): A prospective evaluation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009;9(16) Huaman MA, et al. Impact of two Interventions on Timeliness and Data Quality of an Electronic Disease Surveillance System in a Resource Limited Setting (Peru): A prospective evaluation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009;9(16)
28.
go back to reference Mavimbe JC, Braa J, Bjune G. Assessing Immunization Data Quality From Routine Reports in Mozambique. BMC Public Health. 2005;5 Mavimbe JC, Braa J, Bjune G. Assessing Immunization Data Quality From Routine Reports in Mozambique. BMC Public Health. 2005;5
29.
go back to reference Phalkey RK, et al. Challenges with the Implementation of an Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) System: A systematic review of the lessons learned. Health Policy Plan. 2013;30(1):131–43.CrossRefPubMed Phalkey RK, et al. Challenges with the Implementation of an Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) System: A systematic review of the lessons learned. Health Policy Plan. 2013;30(1):131–43.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Pond B, et al. Mid-Term of the Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response Project. Washington DC: USAID and Management Systems International; 2011. Pond B, et al. Mid-Term of the Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response Project. Washington DC: USAID and Management Systems International; 2011.
31.
go back to reference Sow I, et al. Trained District Health Personnel and the Performance of Integrated Disease Surveillance in the WHO African Region. East Afr J Public Health. 2010;7(1):16–19. Sow I, et al. Trained District Health Personnel and the Performance of Integrated Disease Surveillance in the WHO African Region. East Afr J Public Health. 2010;7(1):16–19.
32.
go back to reference Narasimhan V, et al. Responding to the Global Human Resources Crisis. Lancet. 2004;363(9419):1469–72.CrossRefPubMed Narasimhan V, et al. Responding to the Global Human Resources Crisis. Lancet. 2004;363(9419):1469–72.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Challenges of implementing the integrated disease surveillance and response strategy in Zambia: a health worker perspective
Authors
Chomba Brian Mandyata
Linda Kampata Olowski
Wilbroad Mutale
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4791-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Public Health 1/2017 Go to the issue