Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Study protocol

Evaluation of caregiver-friendly workplace policy (CFWPs) interventions on the health of full-time caregiver employees (CEs): implementation and cost-benefit analysis

Authors: Allison M. Williams, Emile Tompa, Donna S. Lero, Janet Fast, Amin Yazdani, Isik U. Zeytinoglu

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Current Canadian evidence illustrating the health benefits and cost-effectiveness of caregiver-friendly workplace policies is needed if Canadian employers are to adopt and integrate caregiver-friendly workplace policies into their employment practices. The goal of this three-year, three study research project is to provide such evidence for the auto manufacturing and educational services sectors. The research questions being addressed are: What are the impacts for employers (economic) and workers (health) of caregiver-friendly workplace policy intervention(s) for full-time caregiver-employees? What are the impacts for employers, workers and society of the caregiver-friendly workplace policy intervention(s) in each participating workplace? What contextual factors impact the successful implementation of caregiver-friendly workplace policy intervention(s)?

Methods

Using a pre-post-test comparative case study design, Study A will determine the effectiveness of newly implemented caregiver-friendly workplace policy intervention(s) across two workplaces to determine impacts on caregiver-employee health. A quasi-experimental pre-post design will allow the caregiver-friendly workplace policy intervention(s) to be tested with respect to potential impacts on health, and specifically on caregiver employee mental, psychosocial, and physical health. Framed within a comparative case study design, Study B will utilize cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis approaches to evaluate the economic impacts of the caregiver-friendly workplace policy intervention(s) for each of the two participating workplaces. Framed within a comparative case study design, Study C will undertake an implementation analysis of the caregiver-friendly workplace policy intervention(s) in each participating workplace in order to determine: the degree of support for the intervention(s) (reflected in the workplace culture); how sex and gender are implicated; co-workers’ responses to the chosen intervention(s), and; other nuances at play. It is hypothesized that the benefits of the caregiver-friendly workplace policy intervention(s) will include improvements in caregiver-employees’ mental, psychosocial and physical health, as well as evidence of cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness for the employer.

Discussion

The expected project results will provide the research evidence for extensive knowledge translation work, to be carried out in collaboration with our knowledge transition partners, to the employer/human resources and occupational health/safety target populations.

Trial registration

ISRCTN16187974 Registered August 25, 2016.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Juster R, Lupien S. Sex and gender in stress research: the metamorphosis of a field. Can Institutes Heal Res (CIHR), Inst Gend Heal What a Differ Sex Gend Make A Gender, Sex Heal Res Caseb. 2012:17–24. Juster R, Lupien S. Sex and gender in stress research: the metamorphosis of a field. Can Institutes Heal Res (CIHR), Inst Gend Heal What a Differ Sex Gend Make A Gender, Sex Heal Res Caseb. 2012:17–24.
4.
go back to reference Ho B, Friedland J, Rappolt S, Noh S. Caregiving for relatives with Alzheimer’s disease: feelings of Chinese-Canadian women. J Aging Stud. 2003;17:301–21.CrossRef Ho B, Friedland J, Rappolt S, Noh S. Caregiving for relatives with Alzheimer’s disease: feelings of Chinese-Canadian women. J Aging Stud. 2003;17:301–21.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kelly EL, Kossek EE, Hammer LB, Durham M, Bray J, Chermack K, et al. Getting there from here: research on the effects of work – family initiatives on work – family conflict and business outcomes. Acad Manag Ann. 2008;2:305–49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kelly EL, Kossek EE, Hammer LB, Durham M, Bray J, Chermack K, et al. Getting there from here: research on the effects of work – family initiatives on work – family conflict and business outcomes. Acad Manag Ann. 2008;2:305–49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Bernard M, Phillips JE. Working carers of older adults. Community. Work Fam. 2007;10:139–60.CrossRef Bernard M, Phillips JE. Working carers of older adults. Community. Work Fam. 2007;10:139–60.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Zeytinoglu IU, Denton M, Davies S, Plenderleith JM. Casualized employment and turnover intention: home care workers in Ontario. Canada Health Pol. 2009;91:258–68.CrossRef Zeytinoglu IU, Denton M, Davies S, Plenderleith JM. Casualized employment and turnover intention: home care workers in Ontario. Canada Health Pol. 2009;91:258–68.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Denton MA, Zeytinoglu IU. Editorial: an introduction to context, practice, and policy in caring for an aging population. Can J Aging/La Rev Can du Vieil. 2010;29:1–4. Denton MA, Zeytinoglu IU. Editorial: an introduction to context, practice, and policy in caring for an aging population. Can J Aging/La Rev Can du Vieil. 2010;29:1–4.
9.
go back to reference Zeytinoglu IU, Denton M, Plenderleith JM. Flexible employment and nurses’ intention to leave the profession: the role of support at work. Health Pol. 2011;99:149–57.CrossRef Zeytinoglu IU, Denton M, Plenderleith JM. Flexible employment and nurses’ intention to leave the profession: the role of support at work. Health Pol. 2011;99:149–57.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lundberg U, Frankenhaeuser M. Stress and workload of men and women in high-ranking positions. J Occup Health Psychol. 1999;4:142–51.CrossRefPubMed Lundberg U, Frankenhaeuser M. Stress and workload of men and women in high-ranking positions. J Occup Health Psychol. 1999;4:142–51.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Vuksan M, Williams AM. Crooks V a. The workplace perspective on supporting family caregivers at end of life: evaluating a new Canadian social program. Community Work Fam. 2012;15:317–33.CrossRef Vuksan M, Williams AM. Crooks V a. The workplace perspective on supporting family caregivers at end of life: evaluating a new Canadian social program. Community Work Fam. 2012;15:317–33.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Denton M, Hadjukowski-Ahmed M, O’Connor M, Zeytinoglu IU. Women’s Voices in health promotion. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press; 1999. Denton M, Hadjukowski-Ahmed M, O’Connor M, Zeytinoglu IU. Women’s Voices in health promotion. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press; 1999.
13.
go back to reference Zeytinoglu IU, Muteshi JK. Changing work relationships: enacting gender, race/ethnicity and economic class. In: Zeytinoglu IU, editor. Changing work relationships in industrialized economies. Philadelphia: John Benjamins North America; 1999. p. 1–20.CrossRef Zeytinoglu IU, Muteshi JK. Changing work relationships: enacting gender, race/ethnicity and economic class. In: Zeytinoglu IU, editor. Changing work relationships in industrialized economies. Philadelphia: John Benjamins North America; 1999. p. 1–20.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kelliher C, Gore J, Riley M. Functional flexibility: implementation and outcomes. In: Zeytinoglu IU, editor. Flexible work arrangements: conceptualizations and international experience. New York: Kluwer Law International; 2002. p. 65–76. Kelliher C, Gore J, Riley M. Functional flexibility: implementation and outcomes. In: Zeytinoglu IU, editor. Flexible work arrangements: conceptualizations and international experience. New York: Kluwer Law International; 2002. p. 65–76.
17.
go back to reference Golden L. The flexibility gap: employee access to flexibility in work schedules. In: Zeytinoglu IU, editor. Flexibility in workplaces: effects on workers, work environment and the unions. Geneva: IIRA/ILO; 2005. p. 38–56. Golden L. The flexibility gap: employee access to flexibility in work schedules. In: Zeytinoglu IU, editor. Flexibility in workplaces: effects on workers, work environment and the unions. Geneva: IIRA/ILO; 2005. p. 38–56.
18.
go back to reference Koerin B, Harrigan M, Secret M. Eldercare and employed caregivers: a public/private responsibility? J Gerontol Soc Work. 2008;51:143–61.CrossRefPubMed Koerin B, Harrigan M, Secret M. Eldercare and employed caregivers: a public/private responsibility? J Gerontol Soc Work. 2008;51:143–61.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Zeytinoglu I, Cooke G, Mann S. Employer offered family support programs, gender and voluntary and involuntary part-time work. Relations Ind. 2010;65:177.CrossRef Zeytinoglu I, Cooke G, Mann S. Employer offered family support programs, gender and voluntary and involuntary part-time work. Relations Ind. 2010;65:177.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Conference Board of Canada. Home and Community Care in Canada: an economic footprint. 2012. Conference Board of Canada. Home and Community Care in Canada: an economic footprint. 2012.
22.
go back to reference Tompa E, Scott-Marshall H, Dolinschi R, Trevithick S, Bhattacharyya S. Precarious employment experiences and their health consequences: towards a theoretical framework. Work. 2007;28:209–24.PubMed Tompa E, Scott-Marshall H, Dolinschi R, Trevithick S, Bhattacharyya S. Precarious employment experiences and their health consequences: towards a theoretical framework. Work. 2007;28:209–24.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Cook A, Minnotte KL. Occupational and industry sex segregation and the work-family Interface. Sex Roles. 2008;59:800–13.CrossRef Cook A, Minnotte KL. Occupational and industry sex segregation and the work-family Interface. Sex Roles. 2008;59:800–13.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kjeldstad R, Nymoen EH. Part-time work and gender: worker versus job explanations. Int Labour Rev. 2012;151:85–107.CrossRef Kjeldstad R, Nymoen EH. Part-time work and gender: worker versus job explanations. Int Labour Rev. 2012;151:85–107.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Grosswald B, Scharlach AE. Employee experiences with family and medical leave: a case study. Community Work Fam. 1999;2:187–203.CrossRef Grosswald B, Scharlach AE. Employee experiences with family and medical leave: a case study. Community Work Fam. 1999;2:187–203.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference JE S. Making it work: informal caregiving, cancer, and employment. J Psychosoc Oncol 2006; 24: 1–18. JE S. Making it work: informal caregiving, cancer, and employment. J Psychosoc Oncol 2006; 24: 1–18.
27.
go back to reference Lilly MB, Laporte A, Coyte PC. Labor market work and home care’s unpaid caregivers: a systematic review of labor force participation rates, predictors of labor market withdrawal, and hours of work. Milbank Q. 2007;85:641–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lilly MB, Laporte A, Coyte PC. Labor market work and home care’s unpaid caregivers: a systematic review of labor force participation rates, predictors of labor market withdrawal, and hours of work. Milbank Q. 2007;85:641–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Gautun H, Hagen K. How do middle-aged employees combine work with caring for elderly parents? Community Work Fam. 2010;13:393–409.CrossRef Gautun H, Hagen K. How do middle-aged employees combine work with caring for elderly parents? Community Work Fam. 2010;13:393–409.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Heymann SJ, Gerecke M, Chaussard M. Paid health and family leave: the Canadian experience in the global context. Can J Public Heal/Rev Can Sant Publique. 2010;(101 Suppl 1):S9–S15. Heymann SJ, Gerecke M, Chaussard M. Paid health and family leave: the Canadian experience in the global context. Can J Public Heal/Rev Can Sant Publique. 2010;(101 Suppl 1):S9–S15.
30.
go back to reference Earle A, Heymann J. Protecting the health of employees caring for family members with special health care needs. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73:68–78.CrossRefPubMed Earle A, Heymann J. Protecting the health of employees caring for family members with special health care needs. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73:68–78.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Mazanec SR, Daly BJ, Douglas SL, Lipson AR. Work productivity and health of informal caregivers of persons with advanced cancer. Res Nurs Health. 2011;34:483–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mazanec SR, Daly BJ, Douglas SL, Lipson AR. Work productivity and health of informal caregivers of persons with advanced cancer. Res Nurs Health. 2011;34:483–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Giesbrecht M, Crooks VA, Williams A, Hankivsky O. Critically examining diversity in end-of-life family caregiving: implications for equitable caregiver support and Canada’s compassionate care benefit. Int J Equity Health. 2012;11:65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Giesbrecht M, Crooks VA, Williams A, Hankivsky O. Critically examining diversity in end-of-life family caregiving: implications for equitable caregiver support and Canada’s compassionate care benefit. Int J Equity Health. 2012;11:65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Dembe AE, Partridge JS. The benefits of employer-sponsored elder care programs: case studies and policy recommendations. J Workplace Behav Health. 2011;26:252–70.CrossRef Dembe AE, Partridge JS. The benefits of employer-sponsored elder care programs: case studies and policy recommendations. J Workplace Behav Health. 2011;26:252–70.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Katz R, Lowenstein A, Prilutzky D, Halperin D. Employers’ knowledge and attitudes regarding organizational policy toward workers caring for aging family members. J Aging Soc Policy. 2011;23:159–81.CrossRefPubMed Katz R, Lowenstein A, Prilutzky D, Halperin D. Employers’ knowledge and attitudes regarding organizational policy toward workers caring for aging family members. J Aging Soc Policy. 2011;23:159–81.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Liddicoat L. Stakeholder perceptions of family-friendly workplaces: an examination of six New Zealand organisations. Asia Pacific J Hum Resour. 2003;41:354–70.CrossRef Liddicoat L. Stakeholder perceptions of family-friendly workplaces: an examination of six New Zealand organisations. Asia Pacific J Hum Resour. 2003;41:354–70.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Zacher H, Winter G. Eldercare demands, strain, and work engagement: the moderating role of perceived organizational support. J Vocat Behav. 2011;79:667–80.CrossRef Zacher H, Winter G. Eldercare demands, strain, and work engagement: the moderating role of perceived organizational support. J Vocat Behav. 2011;79:667–80.CrossRef
38.
39.
go back to reference Connell RW. Masculinities; 2005. p. 3–94. Connell RW. Masculinities; 2005. p. 3–94.
41.
go back to reference Tompa E, Dolinschi R, De Oliveira C. Practice and potential of economic evaluation of workplace-based interventions for occupational health and safety. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(3):375–400. Tompa E, Dolinschi R, De Oliveira C. Practice and potential of economic evaluation of workplace-based interventions for occupational health and safety. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(3):375–400.
42.
go back to reference Tompa E, Dolinschi R, Laing A. An economic evaluation of a participatory ergonomics process in an auto parts manufacturer. J Saf Res. 2009;40:41–7.CrossRef Tompa E, Dolinschi R, Laing A. An economic evaluation of a participatory ergonomics process in an auto parts manufacturer. J Saf Res. 2009;40:41–7.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Tompa E, Dolinschi R, De Oliveira C, Amick BC, Irvin E. A systematic review of workplace ergonomic interventions with economic analyses. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(2):220–34. Tompa E, Dolinschi R, De Oliveira C, Amick BC, Irvin E. A systematic review of workplace ergonomic interventions with economic analyses. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(2):220–34.
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of caregiver-friendly workplace policy (CFWPs) interventions on the health of full-time caregiver employees (CEs): implementation and cost-benefit analysis
Authors
Allison M. Williams
Emile Tompa
Donna S. Lero
Janet Fast
Amin Yazdani
Isik U. Zeytinoglu
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4722-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Public Health 1/2017 Go to the issue