Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Development of a framework for the co-production and prototyping of public health interventions

Authors: Jemma Hawkins, Kim Madden, Adam Fletcher, Luke Midgley, Aimee Grant, Gemma Cox, Laurence Moore, Rona Campbell, Simon Murphy, Chris Bonell, James White

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Existing guidance for developing public health interventions does not provide information for researchers about how to work with intervention providers to co-produce and prototype the content and delivery of new interventions prior to evaluation. The ASSIST + Frank study aimed to adapt an existing effective peer-led smoking prevention intervention (ASSIST), integrating new content from the UK drug education resource Talk to Frank (www.​talktofrank.​com) to co-produce two new school-based peer-led drug prevention interventions. A three-stage framework was tested to adapt and develop intervention content and delivery methods in collaboration with key stakeholders to facilitate implementation.

Methods

The three stages of the framework were: 1) Evidence review and stakeholder consultation; 2) Co-production; 3) Prototyping. During stage 1, six focus groups, 12 consultations, five interviews, and nine observations of intervention delivery were conducted with key stakeholders (e.g. Public Health Wales [PHW] ASSIST delivery team, teachers, school students, health professionals). During stage 2, an intervention development group consisting of members of the research team and the PHW ASSIST delivery team was established to adapt existing, and co-produce new, intervention activities. In stage 3, intervention training and content were iteratively prototyped using process data on fidelity and acceptability to key stakeholders. Stages 2 and 3 took the form of an action-research process involving a series of face-to-face meetings, email exchanges, observations, and training sessions.

Results

Utilising the three-stage framework, we co-produced and tested intervention content and delivery methods for the two interventions over a period of 18 months involving external partners. New and adapted intervention activities, as well as refinements in content, the format of delivery, timing and sequencing of activities, and training manuals resulted from this process. The involvement of intervention delivery staff, participants and teachers shaped the content and format of the interventions, as well as supporting rapid prototyping in context at the final stage.

Conclusions

This three-stage framework extends current guidance on intervention development by providing step-by-step instructions for co-producing and prototyping an intervention’s content and delivery processes prior to piloting and formal evaluation. This framework enhances existing guidance and could be transferred to co-produce and prototype other public health interventions.

Trial registration

ISRCTN14415936, registered retrospectively on 05 November 2014.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Conrad KJ, Randolph FL, Kirby MW Jr, Bebout RR. Creating and using logic models: four perspectives. Alcoholism Treat Q. 1999;17(1–2):17–31.CrossRef Conrad KJ, Randolph FL, Kirby MW Jr, Bebout RR. Creating and using logic models: four perspectives. Alcoholism Treat Q. 1999;17(1–2):17–31.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hardeman W, Sutton S, Griffin S, Johnston M, White A, Wareham NJ, Kinmonth AL. A causal modelling approach to the development of theory-based behaviour change programmes for trial evaluation. Health Educ Res. 2005;20(6):676–87.CrossRefPubMed Hardeman W, Sutton S, Griffin S, Johnston M, White A, Wareham NJ, Kinmonth AL. A causal modelling approach to the development of theory-based behaviour change programmes for trial evaluation. Health Educ Res. 2005;20(6):676–87.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Collins LM, Murphy SA, Strecher V. The multistage optimization strategy (MOST) and the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): new methods for more potent eHealth interventions. Am J of Prev Med. 2007;32(5):S112–8.CrossRef Collins LM, Murphy SA, Strecher V. The multistage optimization strategy (MOST) and the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): new methods for more potent eHealth interventions. Am J of Prev Med. 2007;32(5):S112–8.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference NICE. Behaviour Change: The principles for effective interventions. NICE Public Health Guidance 6. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2007. NICE. Behaviour Change: The principles for effective interventions. NICE Public Health Guidance 6. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2007.
5.
go back to reference Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb NH. Planning health promotion programs: an intervention mapping approach. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2011. Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb NH. Planning health promotion programs: an intervention mapping approach. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
6.
go back to reference French SD, Green SE, O’Connor DA, McKenzie JE, Francis JJ, Michie S, et al. Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral French SD, Green SE, O’Connor DA, McKenzie JE, Francis JJ, Michie S, et al. Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference De Silva MJ, Breuer E, Lee L, Asher L, Chowdhary N, Lund C, et al. Theory of change: a theory-driven approach to enhance the Medical Research Council’s framework for complex interventions. Trials. 2014;15(1):267.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral De Silva MJ, Breuer E, Lee L, Asher L, Chowdhary N, Lund C, et al. Theory of change: a theory-driven approach to enhance the Medical Research Council’s framework for complex interventions. Trials. 2014;15(1):267.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Wight D, Wimbush E, Jepson R, Doi L. Six steps in quality intervention development (6SQuID). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016;70:520–5.CrossRefPubMed Wight D, Wimbush E, Jepson R, Doi L. Six steps in quality intervention development (6SQuID). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016;70:520–5.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Stokols D. Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research. Am J Community Psychol. 2006;38(1–2):63–77.PubMed Stokols D. Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research. Am J Community Psychol. 2006;38(1–2):63–77.PubMed
13.
go back to reference MRC. Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance. Medical Research Council; 2008. MRC. Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance. Medical Research Council; 2008.
14.
go back to reference Kessler R, Glasgow RE. A proposal to speed translation of healthcare research into practice: dramatic change is needed. Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jun 30;40(6):637–44.CrossRefPubMed Kessler R, Glasgow RE. A proposal to speed translation of healthcare research into practice: dramatic change is needed. Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jun 30;40(6):637–44.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kaulio MA. Customer, consumer and user involvement in product development: a framework and a review of selected methods. Total Qual Manag. 1998;9(1):141–9.CrossRef Kaulio MA. Customer, consumer and user involvement in product development: a framework and a review of selected methods. Total Qual Manag. 1998;9(1):141–9.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lewin K. In: Cartright D, editor. Field theory in social science: selected theoretical papers. Oxford, England: Harpers; 1951. Lewin K. In: Cartright D, editor. Field theory in social science: selected theoretical papers. Oxford, England: Harpers; 1951.
18.
go back to reference Aventin Á, Lohan M, O’Halloran P, Henderson M. Design and development of a film-based intervention about teenage men and unintended pregnancy: applying the medical research council framework in practice. Eval Program Plann. 2015;49:19–30.CrossRefPubMed Aventin Á, Lohan M, O’Halloran P, Henderson M. Design and development of a film-based intervention about teenage men and unintended pregnancy: applying the medical research council framework in practice. Eval Program Plann. 2015;49:19–30.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Williams A, Moore SC, Shovelton C, Moore L, Murphy S. An all-Wales licensed premises intervention: a process evaluation of an environmental health intervention to reduce alcohol related violence in licensed premises. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:455.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Williams A, Moore SC, Shovelton C, Moore L, Murphy S. An all-Wales licensed premises intervention: a process evaluation of an environmental health intervention to reduce alcohol related violence in licensed premises. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:455.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Cargo M, Mercer SL. The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:325–50.CrossRefPubMed Cargo M, Mercer SL. The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:325–50.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Campbell R, Starkey F, Holliday J, Audrey S, Bloor M, Parry-Langdon N, et al. An informal school-based peer-led intervention for smoking prevention in adolescence (ASSIST): a cluster randomised trial. Lancet. 2008;371(9624):1595–602.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Campbell R, Starkey F, Holliday J, Audrey S, Bloor M, Parry-Langdon N, et al. An informal school-based peer-led intervention for smoking prevention in adolescence (ASSIST): a cluster randomised trial. Lancet. 2008;371(9624):1595–602.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference NICE. Smoking prevention in schools. NICE Public Health Guidance 23. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2010. NICE. Smoking prevention in schools. NICE Public Health Guidance 23. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2010.
25.
go back to reference MacArthur GJ, Harrison S, Caldwell DM, Hickman M, Campbell R. Peer-led interventions to prevent tobacco, alcohol and/or drug use among young people aged 11–21 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. 2015;111:391–407. MacArthur GJ, Harrison S, Caldwell DM, Hickman M, Campbell R. Peer-led interventions to prevent tobacco, alcohol and/or drug use among young people aged 11–21 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. 2015;111:391–407.
26.
go back to reference Faggiano F, Vigna-Taglianti F, Burkhart G, Bohrn K, Cuomo L, Gregori D, et al. The effectiveness of a school-based substance abuse prevention program: 18-month follow-up of the EU-dap cluster randomized controlled trial. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;108(1):56–64.CrossRefPubMed Faggiano F, Vigna-Taglianti F, Burkhart G, Bohrn K, Cuomo L, Gregori D, et al. The effectiveness of a school-based substance abuse prevention program: 18-month follow-up of the EU-dap cluster randomized controlled trial. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;108(1):56–64.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Valente TW, Ritt-Olson A, Stacy A, Unger JB, Okamoto J, Sussman S. Peer acceleration: effects of a social network tailored substance abuse prevention program among high-risk adolescents. Addiction. 2007;102(11):1804–15.CrossRefPubMed Valente TW, Ritt-Olson A, Stacy A, Unger JB, Okamoto J, Sussman S. Peer acceleration: effects of a social network tailored substance abuse prevention program among high-risk adolescents. Addiction. 2007;102(11):1804–15.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. New York: Free Press; 1995. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. New York: Free Press; 1995.
30.
go back to reference Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Method. 2006;5(1):80–92.CrossRef Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Method. 2006;5(1):80–92.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Foster-Fishman PG, Berkowitz SL, Lounsbury DW, Jacobsen S, Allen NA. Building collaborative capacity in community coalitions: a review and integrative framework. Am J Commun Psychol. 2001;29(2):241–61.CrossRef Foster-Fishman PG, Berkowitz SL, Lounsbury DW, Jacobsen S, Allen NA. Building collaborative capacity in community coalitions: a review and integrative framework. Am J Commun Psychol. 2001;29(2):241–61.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Whyte WFE. Participatory action research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications Inc; 1991. Whyte WFE. Participatory action research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications Inc; 1991.
35.
go back to reference Nelson EC, Batalden PB, Godfrey MM, Lazar JS. Value by design: developing clinical microsystems to achieve organizational excellence. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons; 2011. Nelson EC, Batalden PB, Godfrey MM, Lazar JS. Value by design: developing clinical microsystems to achieve organizational excellence. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
Metadata
Title
Development of a framework for the co-production and prototyping of public health interventions
Authors
Jemma Hawkins
Kim Madden
Adam Fletcher
Luke Midgley
Aimee Grant
Gemma Cox
Laurence Moore
Rona Campbell
Simon Murphy
Chris Bonell
James White
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4695-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Public Health 1/2017 Go to the issue