Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Study protocol

Stress Prevention@Work: a study protocol for the evaluation of a multifaceted integral stress prevention strategy to prevent employee stress in a healthcare organization: a cluster controlled trial

Authors: Rianne J. A. Hoek, Bo M. Havermans, Irene L. D. Houtman, Evelien P. M. Brouwers, Yvonne F. Heerkens, Moniek C. Zijlstra-Vlasveld, Johannes R. Anema, Allard J. van der Beek, Cécile R. L. Boot

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Adequate implementation of work-related stress management interventions can reduce or prevent work-related stress and sick leave in organizations. We developed a multifaceted integral stress-prevention strategy for organizations from several sectors that includes a digital platform and collaborative learning network. The digital platform contains a stepwise protocol to implement work-related stress-management interventions. It includes stress screeners, interventions and intervention providers to facilitate access to and the selection of matching work-related stress-management interventions. The collaborative learning network, including stakeholders from various organizations, plans meetings focussing on an exchange of experiences and good practices among organizations for the implementation of stress prevention measures. This paper describes the design of an integral stress-prevention strategy, Stress Prevention@Work, and the protocol for the evaluation of: 1) the effects of the strategy on perceived stress and work-related outcomes, and 2) the barriers and facilitators for implementation of the strategy.

Methods

The effectiveness of Stress Prevention@Work will be evaluated in a cluster controlled trial, in a large healthcare organization in the Netherlands, at six and 12 months. An independent researcher will match teams on working conditions and size and allocate the teams to the intervention or control group. Teams in the intervention group will be offered Stress Prevention@Work. For each intervention team, one employee is responsible for applying the strategy within his/her team using the digital platform and visiting the collaborative learning network. Using a waiting list design, the control group will be given access to the strategy after 12 months. The primary outcome is the employees’ perceived stress measured by the stress subscale of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21). Secondary outcome measures are job demands, job resources and the number of preventive stress measures implemented at the team level. Alongside the trial, a process evaluation, including barriers and facilitators of the implementation of Stress Prevention@Work, will be conducted in one healthcare organisation.

Discussion

If Stress Prevention@Work is found to be effective in one healthcare organisation, further implementation on a broader scale might lead to increased productivity and decreased stress and sick leave in other organizations. Results are expected in 2018.

Trial registration

NTR5527. Registered 7 Dec 2015.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Eurofound and EU-OSHA. Psychosocial risks in Europe: Prevalence and strategies for prevention. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union; 2014. Eurofound and EU-OSHA. Psychosocial risks in Europe: Prevalence and strategies for prevention. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union; 2014.
2.
go back to reference Dewa C, Loong D, Bonato S, Hees H. Incidence rates of sickness absence related to mental disorders: a systematic literature review. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:205.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dewa C, Loong D, Bonato S, Hees H. Incidence rates of sickness absence related to mental disorders: a systematic literature review. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:205.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Douwes M, Van Genabeek J, Van den Bossche S. Arbobalans 2016. Kwaliteit van de arbeid, effecten en maatregelen in Nederland. Leiden: TNO. p. 2016. Douwes M, Van Genabeek J, Van den Bossche S. Arbobalans 2016. Kwaliteit van de arbeid, effecten en maatregelen in Nederland. Leiden: TNO. p. 2016.
5.
go back to reference von Thiele SU, Hasson H. Employee self-rated productivity and objective organizational production levels: effects of worksite health interventions involving reduced work hours and physical exercise. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53:838–44.CrossRef von Thiele SU, Hasson H. Employee self-rated productivity and objective organizational production levels: effects of worksite health interventions involving reduced work hours and physical exercise. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53:838–44.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mills PR, Kessler RC, Cooper J, Sullivan S. Impact of a health promotion program on employee health risks and work productivity. Am J Health Promot. 2007;22:45–53.CrossRefPubMed Mills PR, Kessler RC, Cooper J, Sullivan S. Impact of a health promotion program on employee health risks and work productivity. Am J Health Promot. 2007;22:45–53.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Landstad BJ, Ekholm J, Broman L, Schuldt K. Working environmental conditions as experienced by women working despite pain. Work. 2000;15:141–52.PubMed Landstad BJ, Ekholm J, Broman L, Schuldt K. Working environmental conditions as experienced by women working despite pain. Work. 2000;15:141–52.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Richardson KM, Rothstein HR. Effects of occupational stress management intervention programs: a meta-analysis. J Occup Health Psychol. 2008;13:69–93.CrossRefPubMed Richardson KM, Rothstein HR. Effects of occupational stress management intervention programs: a meta-analysis. J Occup Health Psychol. 2008;13:69–93.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kuoppala J, Lamminpaa A, Liira J, Vainio H. Leadership, job well-being, and health effects--a systematic review and a meta-analysis. J Occup Environ Med. 2008;50:904–15.CrossRefPubMed Kuoppala J, Lamminpaa A, Liira J, Vainio H. Leadership, job well-being, and health effects--a systematic review and a meta-analysis. J Occup Environ Med. 2008;50:904–15.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ruotsalainen J, Serra C, Marine A, Verbeek J. Systematic review of interventions for reducing occupational stress in health care workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2008;34:169–78.CrossRefPubMed Ruotsalainen J, Serra C, Marine A, Verbeek J. Systematic review of interventions for reducing occupational stress in health care workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2008;34:169–78.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ebert DD, Heber E, Berking M, Riper H, Cuijpers P, Funk B, Lehr D. Self-guided internet-based and mobile-based stress management for employees: results of a randomised controlled trial. Occup Environ Med. 2016;73:315–23.CrossRefPubMed Ebert DD, Heber E, Berking M, Riper H, Cuijpers P, Funk B, Lehr D. Self-guided internet-based and mobile-based stress management for employees: results of a randomised controlled trial. Occup Environ Med. 2016;73:315–23.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Westgaard RH, Winkel J. Occupational musculoskeletal and mental health: Significance of rationalization and opportunities to create sustainable production systems - A systematic review. Appl Ergon. 2011;42:261–96.CrossRefPubMed Westgaard RH, Winkel J. Occupational musculoskeletal and mental health: Significance of rationalization and opportunities to create sustainable production systems - A systematic review. Appl Ergon. 2011;42:261–96.CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
go back to reference Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PA, Rubin HR. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282:1458–65.CrossRefPubMed Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PA, Rubin HR. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282:1458–65.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference RPTM G, Wensing M. Implementatie: Effectieve verbetering van de patiëntenzorg. Maarsen: Elsevier gezondheidszorg; 2011. RPTM G, Wensing M. Implementatie: Effectieve verbetering van de patiëntenzorg. Maarsen: Elsevier gezondheidszorg; 2011.
16.
go back to reference Kompier MAJ, Marcelissen FHG. Handboek werkstress: systematische aanpak voor de bedrijfspraktijk. Amsterdam: Nederlands Instituut voor Arbeidsomstandigheden (NIA); 1990. Kompier MAJ, Marcelissen FHG. Handboek werkstress: systematische aanpak voor de bedrijfspraktijk. Amsterdam: Nederlands Instituut voor Arbeidsomstandigheden (NIA); 1990.
17.
go back to reference MAJ K. Aan de slag!: tien praktijkvoorbeelden van succesvol verzuimmanagement. Alphen aan den Rijn: Samsom BedrijfsInformatie; 2006. MAJ K. Aan de slag!: tien praktijkvoorbeelden van succesvol verzuimmanagement. Alphen aan den Rijn: Samsom BedrijfsInformatie; 2006.
18.
go back to reference Leka S, Jain A, Cox T, Kortum E. The development of the European framework for psychosocial risk management: PRIMA-EF. J Occup Health. 2011;53:137–43.CrossRefPubMed Leka S, Jain A, Cox T, Kortum E. The development of the European framework for psychosocial risk management: PRIMA-EF. J Occup Health. 2011;53:137–43.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Houtman I, Kok L, van der Klauw M, Lammers M, Jansen Y, van Ginkel W. Waarom werkgevers bewezen effectieve maatregelen niet nemen: een kwalitatief onderzoek. Hoofddorp: TNO. 2012. Houtman I, Kok L, van der Klauw M, Lammers M, Jansen Y, van Ginkel W. Waarom werkgevers bewezen effectieve maatregelen niet nemen: een kwalitatief onderzoek. Hoofddorp: TNO. 2012.
20.
go back to reference Nielsen K, Abildgaard JS. Organizational interventions: A research-based framework for the evaluation of both process and effects. Work Stress. 2013;27:278–97.CrossRef Nielsen K, Abildgaard JS. Organizational interventions: A research-based framework for the evaluation of both process and effects. Work Stress. 2013;27:278–97.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Steckler AB, Linnan L, Israel BA. Process Evaluation for Public Health Interventions and Research. 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey Bass; 2002. Steckler AB, Linnan L, Israel BA. Process Evaluation for Public Health Interventions and Research. 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey Bass; 2002.
22.
24.
go back to reference Bolier L, Haverman M, Kramer J, Westerhof GJ, Riper H, Walburg JA, Boon B, Bohlmeijer E. An Internet-based intervention to promote mental fitness for mildly depressed adults: randomized controlled trial. Med Internet Res. 2013;15:9.CrossRef Bolier L, Haverman M, Kramer J, Westerhof GJ, Riper H, Walburg JA, Boon B, Bohlmeijer E. An Internet-based intervention to promote mental fitness for mildly depressed adults: randomized controlled trial. Med Internet Res. 2013;15:9.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference De Beurs E, Van Dyck R, Marquenie LA, Lange A, Blonk RWB. De DASS: een vragenlijst voor het meten van depressie, angst en stress. Gedragstherapie. 2001;34:35–53. De Beurs E, Van Dyck R, Marquenie LA, Lange A, Blonk RWB. De DASS: een vragenlijst voor het meten van depressie, angst en stress. Gedragstherapie. 2001;34:35–53.
26.
go back to reference Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B. The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998;3:322–55.CrossRefPubMed Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B. The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998;3:322–55.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Hall GB, Dollard MF, Coward J. Psychosocial Safety Climate: Development of the PSC-12. Int J Stress Manag. 2010;17:353–83.CrossRef Hall GB, Dollard MF, Coward J. Psychosocial Safety Climate: Development of the PSC-12. Int J Stress Manag. 2010;17:353–83.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Bouwmans C, De Jong K, Timman R, Zijlstra-Vlasveld M, Van der Feltz-Cornelis C, Tan Swan S, et al. Feasibility, reliability and validity of a questionnaire on healthcare consumption and productivity loss in patients with a psychiatric disorder (TiC-P). BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:217.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bouwmans C, De Jong K, Timman R, Zijlstra-Vlasveld M, Van der Feltz-Cornelis C, Tan Swan S, et al. Feasibility, reliability and validity of a questionnaire on healthcare consumption and productivity loss in patients with a psychiatric disorder (TiC-P). BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:217.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Sinclair SJ, Siefert CJ, Slavin-Mulford JM, Stein MB, Renna M, Blais MA. Psychometric evaluation and normative data for the depression, anxiety, and stress scales-21 (DASS-21) in a nonclinical sample of U.S. adults. Eval Health Prof. 2012;35:259–79.CrossRefPubMed Sinclair SJ, Siefert CJ, Slavin-Mulford JM, Stein MB, Renna M, Blais MA. Psychometric evaluation and normative data for the depression, anxiety, and stress scales-21 (DASS-21) in a nonclinical sample of U.S. adults. Eval Health Prof. 2012;35:259–79.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Stress Prevention@Work: a study protocol for the evaluation of a multifaceted integral stress prevention strategy to prevent employee stress in a healthcare organization: a cluster controlled trial
Authors
Rianne J. A. Hoek
Bo M. Havermans
Irene L. D. Houtman
Evelien P. M. Brouwers
Yvonne F. Heerkens
Moniek C. Zijlstra-Vlasveld
Johannes R. Anema
Allard J. van der Beek
Cécile R. L. Boot
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4585-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Public Health 1/2018 Go to the issue