Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Measuring health literacy among low literate people: an exploratory feasibility study with the HLS-EU questionnaire

Authors: Hannelore Storms, Neree Claes, Bert Aertgeerts, Stephan Van den Broucke

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Health literacy (HL) is defined as necessary competencies to make well-informed decisions. As patients’ decision making is a key element of patient-centered health care, insight in patients’ HL might help healthcare professionals to organize their care accordingly. This is particularly true for people in a vulnerable situation, potentially with limited HL, who are, for instance, at greater risk of having limited access to care [1, 2].
As HL correlates with education, instruments should allow inclusion of low literate people. To that end, the relatively new instrument, HLS-EU-Q47, was subjected to a comprehensibility test, its shorter version, HLS-EU-Q16, was not. Therefore, the goal of this study was to examine feasibility of HLS-EU-Q16 (in Dutch) for use in a population of people with low literacy.

Methods

Purposive sampling of adults with low (yearly) income (< €16,965.47) and limited education (maximum high school), with Dutch language proficiency. Exclusion criteria were: psychiatric, neurodegenerative diseases or impairments. To determine suitability (length, comprehension and layout) participants were randomly distributed either HLS-EU-Q16 or a modified version and were interviewed directly afterwards by one researcher. To determine feasibility a qualitative approach was chosen: cognitive interviews were carried out using the verbal probing technique.

Results

Thirteen participants completed HLS-EU-Q16 (n = 7) or the modified version (n = 6). Questions about ‘disease prevention’ or ‘appraisal’ of information are frequently reported to be incomprehensible. Difficulties are attributed to vocabulary, sentence structure and the decision process (abstraction, distinguishing ‘appraising’ from ‘applying’ information, indecisive on the appropriate response).

Conclusions

HLS-EU-Q16 is a suitable instrument to determine HL in people with limited literacy. However, to facilitate the use and interpretation, some questions would benefit from minor adjustments: by simplifying wording or providing explanatory, contextual information.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Médecins du monde - Doctors of the World in Europe. Access to health care for vulnerable groups in the European Union in 2012. An overview of the condition of persons excluded from healthcare systems in the EU. 2012. Médecins du monde - Doctors of the World in Europe. Access to health care for vulnerable groups in the European Union in 2012. An overview of the condition of persons excluded from healthcare systems in the EU. 2012.
2.
go back to reference Sørensen K, Peilikan JM, Röthlin F, Ganahl K, Slonska Z, Doyle G, et al. Health literacy in Europe: comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU). Eur J Pub Health. 2015;25:1053–8.CrossRef Sørensen K, Peilikan JM, Röthlin F, Ganahl K, Slonska Z, Doyle G, et al. Health literacy in Europe: comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU). Eur J Pub Health. 2015;25:1053–8.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2004. Institute of Medicine. Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2004.
5.
go back to reference Nutbeam D. Advancing health literacy : a global challenge for the 21st century. Health Promot Int. 2000;15:183–4.CrossRef Nutbeam D. Advancing health literacy : a global challenge for the 21st century. Health Promot Int. 2000;15:183–4.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kickbush I. Health literacy: the solid facts. Kickbusch, I. (ed) et al. Health literacy: the solid facts. Copenhagen: World Health Organization (WHO), Regional Office for Europe.; 2013. Kickbush I. Health literacy: the solid facts. Kickbusch, I. (ed) et al. Health literacy: the solid facts. Copenhagen: World Health Organization (WHO), Regional Office for Europe.; 2013.
8.
go back to reference Kaufman H, Skipper B, Small L, Terry T, McGrew M. Effect of literacy on breast-feeding outcomes. South Med J. 2001;94:293–6.CrossRefPubMed Kaufman H, Skipper B, Small L, Terry T, McGrew M. Effect of literacy on breast-feeding outcomes. South Med J. 2001;94:293–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Dolan NC, Ferreira MR, Davis TC, Fitzgibbon ML, Rademaker A, Liu D, et al. Colorectal cancer screening knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs among Veterans : does literacy make a Difference ? J Clin Oncol. 2014;22:2617–22.CrossRef Dolan NC, Ferreira MR, Davis TC, Fitzgibbon ML, Rademaker A, Liu D, et al. Colorectal cancer screening knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs among Veterans : does literacy make a Difference ? J Clin Oncol. 2014;22:2617–22.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Scott TL, Gazmararian JA, Williams MV, Baker DW. Health literacy and preventive health care use among Medicare enrollees in a managed care organization. Med Care. 2002;40:395–404.CrossRefPubMed Scott TL, Gazmararian JA, Williams MV, Baker DW. Health literacy and preventive health care use among Medicare enrollees in a managed care organization. Med Care. 2002;40:395–404.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Davis T, Long S, Jackson R, Mayeaux E, George R, Murphy P, et al. Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Fam Med. 1993;25:391–5.PubMed Davis T, Long S, Jackson R, Mayeaux E, George R, Murphy P, et al. Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Fam Med. 1993;25:391–5.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Davis TC, Gazmararian J, Kennen EM. Approaches to improving health Literacy : lessons from the field. Joural Heal Commun. 2006;11:551–4.CrossRef Davis TC, Gazmararian J, Kennen EM. Approaches to improving health Literacy : lessons from the field. Joural Heal Commun. 2006;11:551–4.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Steckelberg A, Hülfenhaus C, Kasper J, Rost J, Mühlhauser I. How to measure critical health competences : development and validation of the critical health competence test (CHC test). Adv Heal Sci Educ theory Pract. 2009;14:11–22.CrossRef Steckelberg A, Hülfenhaus C, Kasper J, Rost J, Mühlhauser I. How to measure critical health competences : development and validation of the critical health competence test (CHC test). Adv Heal Sci Educ theory Pract. 2009;14:11–22.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Jordan JE, Buchbinder R, Briggs AM, Elsworth GR, Busija L, Batterham R, et al. The health literacy management scale (HeLMS): a measure of an individual’s capacity to seek, understand and use health information within the healthcare setting. Patient Educ. Couns. [Internet]. Elsevier Ireland Ltd; 2013 [cited 2014 Aug 14];91:228–35. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23419326. Jordan JE, Buchbinder R, Briggs AM, Elsworth GR, Busija L, Batterham R, et al. The health literacy management scale (HeLMS): a measure of an individual’s capacity to seek, understand and use health information within the healthcare setting. Patient Educ. Couns. [Internet]. Elsevier Ireland Ltd; 2013 [cited 2014 Aug 14];91:228–35. Available from: http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​23419326.
20.
go back to reference Osborne RH, Batterham RW, Elsworth GR, Hawkins M, Buchbinder R. The grounded psychometric development and initial validation of the health literacy questionnaire ( HLQ ). BMC Public Health. 2013;13:658.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Osborne RH, Batterham RW, Elsworth GR, Hawkins M, Buchbinder R. The grounded psychometric development and initial validation of the health literacy questionnaire ( HLQ ). BMC Public Health. 2013;13:658.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Halbach SM, Enders A, Kowalski C, Pförtner T, Pfaff H, Wesselmann S, et al. Health literacy and fear of cancer progression in elderly women newly diagnosed with breast cancer — A longitudinal analysis. Patient Educ. Couns. [Internet]. Elsevier Ireland Ltd; 2015; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.12.012. Halbach SM, Enders A, Kowalski C, Pförtner T, Pfaff H, Wesselmann S, et al. Health literacy and fear of cancer progression in elderly women newly diagnosed with breast cancer — A longitudinal analysis. Patient Educ. Couns. [Internet]. Elsevier Ireland Ltd; 2015; Available from: http://​dx.​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​pec.​2015.​12.​012.
33.
go back to reference Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Annex: taxing wages. Methodology and limitations. 2015. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Annex: taxing wages. Methodology and limitations. 2015.
34.
go back to reference De Smet A, Poppe A, Hermans K, Willems S, Verlinde E, DeMaeseneer J, et al. KANS: Theoretische achtergronden en onderzoeksopzet. 2011. De Smet A, Poppe A, Hermans K, Willems S, Verlinde E, DeMaeseneer J, et al. KANS: Theoretische achtergronden en onderzoeksopzet. 2011.
35.
go back to reference Poppe A, De Smet A, Verlinde E, Hermans K, Willems S, Van Audenhove C, et al. KANS Cijferrapport Beschrijvende analyse van de gegevens uit de eerste bevraging. 2012. Poppe A, De Smet A, Verlinde E, Hermans K, Willems S, Van Audenhove C, et al. KANS Cijferrapport Beschrijvende analyse van de gegevens uit de eerste bevraging. 2012.
36.
go back to reference Willis GB. Cognitive interviewing: a tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2005.CrossRef Willis GB. Cognitive interviewing: a tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2005.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Doak L, Doak C, Root J. Teaching patients with low literacy skills. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1996. Doak L, Doak C, Root J. Teaching patients with low literacy skills. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1996.
38.
go back to reference Neuhauser L, Paul K. Readability, comprehension and usability. In: Fischhauf B, Brewer N, Downs J, editors. Commun. Risks benefits an evidence-based User’s Guid. Silver Spring: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2011. p. 129–49. Neuhauser L, Paul K. Readability, comprehension and usability. In: Fischhauf B, Brewer N, Downs J, editors. Commun. Risks benefits an evidence-based User’s Guid. Silver Spring: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2011. p. 129–49.
40.
go back to reference Starfield B. Primary care: an increasingly important contributor to effectiveness, equity, and efficiency of health services. SESPAS report 2012. Gac Sanit. 2012;26:20–6. Starfield B. Primary care: an increasingly important contributor to effectiveness, equity, and efficiency of health services. SESPAS report 2012. Gac Sanit. 2012;26:20–6.
41.
go back to reference Shi L, Starfield B, Politzer R, Regan J. Primary care, self-rated health, and reductions in social disparities in health. Health Serv Res. 2002;37:529–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shi L, Starfield B, Politzer R, Regan J. Primary care, self-rated health, and reductions in social disparities in health. Health Serv Res. 2002;37:529–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
go back to reference Foddy W. Constructing questions for interviews and questionnaires: Theory and practice in social research. Cambridge: Cambridge university press; 1994. Foddy W. Constructing questions for interviews and questionnaires: Theory and practice in social research. Cambridge: Cambridge university press; 1994.
44.
go back to reference Johnson A, Sandford J. Written and verbal information versus verbal information only for patients being discharged from acute hospital settings to home : systematic review. Health Educ Res. 2005;20:423–9.CrossRefPubMed Johnson A, Sandford J. Written and verbal information versus verbal information only for patients being discharged from acute hospital settings to home : systematic review. Health Educ Res. 2005;20:423–9.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Tomlinson D, Isitt JJ, Barron RL, Doyle J, Judd P, Gassas A, et al. Determining the understandability and acceptability of an oral mucositis daily questionnaire. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2008;25:107–11.CrossRefPubMed Tomlinson D, Isitt JJ, Barron RL, Doyle J, Judd P, Gassas A, et al. Determining the understandability and acceptability of an oral mucositis daily questionnaire. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2008;25:107–11.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Nielsen J. Designing web usability: the practice of simplicity. Indianapolis: New Riders Publishing; 2000. Nielsen J. Designing web usability: the practice of simplicity. Indianapolis: New Riders Publishing; 2000.
47.
go back to reference Meppelink CS, Smit EG, Buurman BM, van Weert JCM. Should we be afraid of simple messages? The effects of text difficulty and illustrations in people with low or high health literacy. Health Commun. 2015;30:1181–9.CrossRefPubMed Meppelink CS, Smit EG, Buurman BM, van Weert JCM. Should we be afraid of simple messages? The effects of text difficulty and illustrations in people with low or high health literacy. Health Commun. 2015;30:1181–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Measuring health literacy among low literate people: an exploratory feasibility study with the HLS-EU questionnaire
Authors
Hannelore Storms
Neree Claes
Bert Aertgeerts
Stephan Van den Broucke
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4391-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Public Health 1/2017 Go to the issue