Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Obesity-related health impacts of fuel excise taxation- an evidence review and cost-effectiveness study

Authors: V. Brown, M. Moodie, L. Cobiac, A. M. Mantilla Herrera, R. Carter

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Reducing automobile dependence and improving rates of active transport may reduce the impact of obesogenic environments, thereby decreasing population prevalence of obesity and other diseases where physical inactivity is a risk factor. Increasing the relative cost of driving by an increase in fuel taxation may therefore be a promising public health intervention for obesity prevention.

Methods

A scoping review of the evidence for obesity or physical activity effect of changes in fuel price or taxation was undertaken. Potential health benefits of an increase in fuel excise taxation in Australia were quantified using Markov modelling to simulate obesity, injury and physical activity related health impacts of a fuel excise taxation intervention for the 2010 Australian population. Health adjusted life years (HALYs) gained and healthcare cost savings from diseases averted were estimated. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were reported and results were tested through sensitivity analysis.

Results

Limited evidence on the effect of policies such as fuel taxation on health-related behaviours currently exists. Only three studies were identified reporting associations between fuel price or taxation and obesity, whilst nine studies reported associations specifically with physical activity, walking or cycling. Estimates of the cross price elasticity of demand for public transport with respect to fuel price vary, with limited consensus within the literature on a probable range for the Australian context. Cost-effectiveness modelling of a AUD0.10 per litre increase in fuel excise taxation using a conservative estimate of cross price elasticity for public transport suggests that the intervention would be cost-effective from a limited societal perspective (237 HALYs gained, AUD2.6 M in healthcare cost savings), measured against a comparator of no additional increase in fuel excise. Under “best case” assumptions, the intervention would be more cost-effective (3181 HALYs gained, AUD34.2 M in healthcare cost savings).

Conclusions

Exploratory analysis suggests that an intervention to increase fuel excise taxation may deliver obesity and physical activity related benefits. Whilst such an intervention has significant potential for cost-effectiveness, potential equity and acceptability impacts would need to be minimised. A better understanding of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a range of transport interventions is required in order to achieve more physically active transport environments.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Swinburn BA, Sacks G, Hall KD, McPherson K, Finegood DT, Moodie ML, et al. The global obesity pandemic: shaped by global drivers and local environments. Lancet. 2011;378(9793):804–14.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Reis RS, Salvo D, Ogilvie D, Lambert EV, Goenka S, Brownson RC. Scaling up physical activity interventions worldwide: stepping up to larger and smarter approaches to get people moving. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1337–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Vos T, Carter R, Barendregt J, Mihalopoulos C, Veerman L, Magnus A, et al. Assessing Cost-Effectiveness in Prevention, ACE-Prevention Final Report. Melbourne: University of Queensland and Deakin University; 2010.
4.
Sacks G, Swinburn B, Lawrence M. Obesity Policy Action framework and analysis grids for a comprehensive policy approach to reducing obesity. Obes Rev. 2009;10(1):76–86.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Ananthapavan J, Sacks G, Moodie M, Carter R. Economics of Obesity—Learning from the Past to Contribute to a Better Future. Int J Env Res Pub He. 2014;11(4):4007–25.CrossRef
6.
Turrell G, Oldenburg BF, McGuffog I, Dent R. Socioeconomic determinants of health: towards a national research program and a policy and intervention agenda. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology; 1999.
7.
Kelly P, Kahlmeier S, Götschi T, Orsini N, Richards J, Roberts N, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of reduction in all-cause mortality from walking and cycling and shape of dose response relationship. Int J Behav Nutr Phy. 2014;11(1):132.CrossRef
8.
Hamer M, Chida Y. Active commuting and cardiovascular risk: a meta-analytic review. Prev Med. 2008;46(1):9–13.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Mueller N, Rojas-Rueda D, Cole-Hunter T, de Nazelle A, Dons E, Gerike R, et al. Health impact assessment of active transportation: A systematic review. Prev Med. 2015;76:103–14.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
Bassett Jr DR, Pucher J, Buehler R, Thompson DL, Crouter SE. Walking, cycling, and obesity rates in Europe, North America, and Australia. J Phys Act & Heal. 2008;5(6):795–814.CrossRef
12.
Martin A, Panter J, Suhrcke M, Ogilvie D. Impact of changes in mode of travel to work on changes in body mass index: Evidence from the British household panel survey. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015;69(8).
13.
Pucher J, Buehler R, Bassett DR, Dannenberg AL. Walking and cycling to health: a comparative analysis of city, state, and international data. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(10):1986-92.
14.
Wanner M, Götschi T, Martin-Diener E, Kahlmeier S, Martin BW. Active transport, physical activity, and body weight in adults a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(5):493–502.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Saunders LE, Green JM, Petticrew MP, Steinbach R, Roberts H. What Are the Health Benefits of Active Travel? A Systematic Review of Trials and Cohort Studies. PLoS One. 2013;8(8).
16.
Brown V, Moodie M, Mantilla Herrera AM, Veerman JL, Carter R. Active transport and obesity prevention – A transportation sector obesity impact scoping review and assessment for Melbourne. Australia Prev Med. 2017;96:49–66.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Di Ciommo F, Comendador J, López-Lambas ME, Cherchi E, Ortúzar JDD. Exploring the role of social capital influence variables on travel behaviour. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract. 2014;68:46–55.
18.
Scheepers CE, Wendel-Vos GCW, den Broeder JM, van Kempen EEMM, van Wesemael PJV, Schuit AJ. Shifting from car to active transport: A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract. 2014;70(0):264-280.
19.
Cavill N, Kahlmeier S, Rutter H, Racioppi F, Oja P. Economic analyses of transport infrastructure and policies including health effects related to cycling and walking: a systematic review. Transp Policy. 2008;15(5):291–304.CrossRef
20.
Brown V, Diomedi BZ, Moodie M, Veerman JL, Carter R. A systematic review of economic analyses of active transport interventions that include physical activity benefits. Transp Policy. 2016;45:190–208.CrossRef
21.
Mozaffarian D, Afshin A, Benowitz NL, Bittner V, Daniels SR, Franch HA, et al. Population Approaches to Improve Diet, Physical Activity, and Smoking Habits A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;126(12):1514–63.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Martin A, Suhrcke M, Ogilvie D. Financial Incentives to Promote Active Travel: An Evidence Review and Economic Framework. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(6):e45–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Dhondt S, Kochan B, Beckx C, Lefebvre W, Pirdavani A, Degraeuwe B, et al. Integrated health impact assessment of travel behaviour: model exploration and application to a fuel price increase. Environ Int. 2013;51:45–58.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development. Who's using the roads: variations in usage by drivers, Information Sheet 53. Canberra: BITRE; 2014.
25.
Song Y, Preston J. Brand CWetbEfcsitUEaPA, 45(12), 2980–2998.. What explains travel behaviour? Evidence from case studies in the UK. Environment and Planning A. 2013;45(12):2980–98.CrossRef
26.
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. Monitoring of the Australian petroleum industry, Report of the ACCC into the prices, costs and profits of unleaded petrol in Australia. ACCC: Canberra; 2014.
27.
Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surgery. 2014;12(12):1495–9.CrossRef
28.
Lubans DR, Boreham CA, Kelly P, Foster CE. The relationship between active travel to school and health-related fitness in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8(5).
29.
Daniels R, Mulley C, editors. Explaining walking distance to public transport: the dominance of public transport supply. World Symposium on Transport and Land Use Research; 2011 Whistler.
30.
Rissel C, Curac N, Greenaway M, Bauman A. Physical activity associated with public transport use-a review and modelling of potential benefits. Int J Env Res Pub He. 2012;9(7):2454–78.CrossRef
31.
Rutherford D. Routledge Dictionary of Economics. Scotland: Taylor & Francis; 2013.
32.
Nijkamp P, Rietveld P, Spierdijk L. A meta-analytic comparison of determinants of public transport use: methodology and application. Environ Planning B: Planning Design. 2000;27(6):893–903.CrossRef
33.
34.
35.
Office of the Chief Economist. Australian Petroleum Statistics, Issue 237. Canberra: Office of the Chief Economist; 2016.
36.
Breunig R, Gisz C. An exploration of Australian petrol demand: unobservable habits, irreversibility, and some updated estimates. Canberra: Australian Treasury; 2008.
37.
Li Z, Rose JM, Hensher DA. Forecasting automobile petrol demand in Australia: An evaluation of empirical models. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract. 2010;44(1):16–38.
38.
39.
Bhalla K, Ezzati M, Mahal A, Salomon J, Reich M. A risk-based method for modeling traffic fatalities. Risk Anal. 2007;27(1):125–36.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Woodcock J, Edwards P, Tonne C, Armstrong BG, Ashiru O, Banister D, et al. Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: urban land transport. Lancet. 2009;374(9705):1930–43.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Xia T, Nitschke M, Zhang Y, Shah P, Crabb S, Hansen A. Traffic-related air pollution and health co-benefits of alternative transport in Adelaide, South Australia. Environ Int. 2015;74:281–90.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Maizlish N, Woodcock J, Co S, Ostro B, Fanai A, Fairley D. Health cobenefits and transportation-related reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in the San Francisco Bay area. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(4):703–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
44.
Hall KD, Sacks G, Chandramohan D, Chow CC, Wang YC, Gortmaker SL, et al. Quantification of the effect of energy imbalance on bodyweight. Lancet. 2011;378(9793):826–37.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Health system expenditure on disease and injury in Australia, 2000–01. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2004.
46.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Health expenditure 2012–13. Canberra: AIHW; 2014.
47.
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. Petrol prices and Australian consumers; Report of the ACCC inquiry into the price of unleaded petrol. ACCC: Canberra; 2007.
48.
Australian Treasury. Regulation impact statement: CPI indexation of fuel excise and excise-equivalent customs duty. Canberra: Australian Treasury; 2016.
49.
Lal A, Mantilla-Herrera A, Veerman L, Backholer K, Sacks G, Moodie M, et al. Equity and cost-effectiveness of a sugar sweetened beverage tax across socioeconomic groups. PLoS Med. In press
50.
51.
52.
Transport and Infrastructure Council. Australian Transport Assessment and Planning Guidelines Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development; 2016 [Available from: http://​atap.​gov.​au/​about/​index.​aspx. Accessed 7 Nov 2016.
53.
54.
George B, Harris A, Mitchell A. Cost-effectiveness analysis and the consistency of decision making: evidence from pharmaceutical reimbursement in Australia (1991 to 1996). PharmacoEconomics. 2001;19(11):1103–9.CrossRefPubMed
55.
56.
Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 3rd ed. United States: Oxford University Press; 2005.
57.
Courtemanche C. A silver lining? The connection between gasoline prices and obesity. Econ Inq. 2011;49(3):935–57.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Rabin BA, Boehmer TK, Brownson RC. Cross-national comparison of environmental and policy correlates of obesity in Europe. European J Public Health. 2007;17(1):53–61.CrossRef
59.
Sun LY, Lee EW, Zahra A, Park JH. Risk Factors of Cardiovascular Disease and Their Related Socio-Economical, Environmental and Health Behavioral Factors: Focused on Low-Middle Income Countries- A Narrative Review Article. Iranian J Public Health. 2015;44(4):435–44.
60.
Hou N, Popkin BM, Jacobs Jr DR, Song Y, Guilkey DK, He K, et al. Longitudinal trends in gasoline price and physical activity: The CARDIA study. Prev Med. 2011;52(5):365–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
61.
Sen B. Is there an association between gasoline prices and physical activity? Evidence from American time use data. J Policy Analysis and Management. 2012;31(2):338–66.CrossRef
62.
Sen B, Patidar N, Thomas S. A silver lining to higher prices at the pump? Gasoline prices and teen driving behaviors. Am J Health Promotion. 2014;28(3):146–54.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Buehler R, Pucher J. Cycling to work in 90 large American cities: new evidence on the role of bike paths and lanes. Transportation. 2012;39(2):409–32.CrossRef
64.
Rashad I. Associations of Cycling With Urban Sprawl and the Gasoline Price. Am J Health Promotion. 2009;24(1):27–36.CrossRefPubMed
65.
Smith MS, Kauermann G. Bicycle commuting in Melbourne during the 2000s energy crisis: A semiparametric analysis of intraday volumes. Transp Research Part B-Methodological. 2011;45(10):1846–62.CrossRef
66.
Ryley TJ. The propensity for motorists to walk for short trips: Evidence from West Edinburgh. Transp Res Part A-Policy Practice. 2008;42(4):620–8.CrossRef
67.
Pucher J, Buehler R. Why Canadians cycle more than Americans: A comparative analysis of bicycling trends and policies. Transp Policy. 2006;13(3):265–79.CrossRef
68.
Dill J, Carr T. Bicycle commuting and facilities in major US cities: if you build them, commuters will use them. Transp Research Record. 2003;1828(1):116–23.CrossRef
69.
Götschi T, Garrard J, Giles-Corti B. Cycling as a Part of Daily Life: A Review of Health Perspectives. Transp Rev. 2015;36(1)
70.
Petticrew M, Cummins S, Ferrell C, Findlay A, Higgins C, Hoy C, et al. Natural experiments: an underused tool for public health? Public Health. 2005;119(9):751–7.CrossRefPubMed
71.
Craig P, Cooper C, Gunnell D, Haw S, Lawson K, Macintyre S, et al. Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new Medical Research Council guidance. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66(12):1182–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
72.
Nowak WP, Savage I. The cross elasticity between gasoline prices and transit use: Evidence from Chicago. Transp Policy. 2013;29:38–45.CrossRef
73.
Litman T. Transit Price Elasticities and Cross-Elasticities. Canada: Victoria Transport Policy Institute; 2016.
74.
Currie G, Phung J. Exploring the impacts of fuel price increases on public transport use in Melbourne. 29th Australasian Transport Research Conference2006.
75.
Currie G, Phung J. Understanding Links Between Transit Ridership and Gasoline Prices Evidence from the United States and Australia. Transp Research Record. 2008;2063:133–42.CrossRef
76.
Kennedy D, Wallis I. Impact of fuel price changes on New Zealand transport. Wellington: Booz Allen Hamilton; 2007.
77.
Luk J, Hepburn S. New review of Australian travel demand elasticities. Melbourne: Australian Road Research Board; 1993.
78.
Holmgren J. Meta-analysis of public transport demand. Transp Res Part A-Policy Practice. 2007;41(10):1021–35.CrossRef
79.
Daniels R, Mulley C. Explaining walking distance to public transport: The dominance of public transport supply. J Transp Land Use. 2013;6(2):5–20.CrossRef
80.
Burke M, Brown AL. Distances people walk for transport. Road and Transp Research. 2007;16(3):16–29.
81.
Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, Meckes N, Bassett Jr DR, Tudor-Locke C, et al. 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Medic Science Sports Exercise. 2011;43(8):1575–81.CrossRef
82.
Royal Automobile Club of Queensland. Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne CBD Off-street Parking Prices. Brisbane: RACQ; 2014.
83.
84.
Flint E, Cummins S. Does active commuting protect against obesity in mid-life? Cross-sectional, observational evidence from UK Biobank. Lancet. 2015;386(Supplement 2):S8.CrossRef
85.
Bastian A, Börjesson M. Peak car? Drivers of the recent decline in Swedish car use. Transp Policy. 2015;42:94–102.CrossRef
86.
Buehler R. Transport Policies, Automobile Use, and Sustainable Transport: A Comparison of Germany and the United States. J Planning Education Research. 2010;30(1):76–93.CrossRef
87.
Buehler R. Daily Travel and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Passenger Transport Comparison of Germany and the United States. Transp Research Record. 2014;2454:36–44.CrossRef
88.
89.
90.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. Survey of motor vehicle use, 12 months ended 31 October 2010. Canberra: ABS; 2010.
91.
Redman L, Friman M, Gärling T, Hartig T. Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: A research review. Transp Policy. 2013;25:119–27.CrossRef
92.
Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Khreis H, Verlinghieri E, Rojas-Rueda D. Transport And Health: A Marriage Of Convenience Or An Absolute Necessity. Environ Int. 2016;88:150–2.CrossRefPubMed
93.
Anderson P, Chisholm D, Fuhr DC. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies and programmes to reduce the harm caused by alcohol. Lancet. 373(9682):2234–46.
94.
Brownell KD, Farley T, Willett WC, Popkin BM, Chaloupka FJ, Thompson JW, et al. The Public Health and Economic Benefits of Taxing Sugar-Sweetened Beverages. N E J Med. 2009;361(16):1599–605.CrossRef
95.
Veerman JL, Sacks G, Antonopoulos N, Martin J. The Impact of a Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages on Health and Health Care Costs: A Modelling Study. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0151460.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
96.
97.
Ranson MK, Jha P, Chaloupka FJ, Nguyen SN. Global and regional estimates of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of price increases and other tobacco control policies. Nicotine Tobacco Res. 2002;4(3):311–9.CrossRef
98.
99.
Henley G, Harrison JE. Serious injury due to land transport accidents, Australia 2008–09. Canberra: AIHW; 2012.
100.
Henley G, Harrison JE. Serious injury due to land transport accidents, Australia 2007–08. Canberra: AIHW; 2012.
101.
Goodwin PB. A review of new demand elasticities with special reference to short and long run effects of price changes. J Transp Econ Policy. 1992;6(2):155–69.
102.
103.
Götschi T, Tainio M, Maizlish N, Schwanen T, Goodman A, Woodcock J. Contrasts in active transport behaviour across four countries: How do they translate into public health benefits? Prev Med. 2015;74:42–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
104.
Department for Planning and Community Development. Victorian Planning Provisions. Melbourne: Department for Planning and Community Development; 2006.
105.
Badland H, Roberts R, Butterworth I, Giles-Corti B. How liveable is Melbourne? Conceptualising and testing urban liveability indicators: Progress to date. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne; 2015.
106.
Bohannon RW. Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: Reference values and determinants. Age Ageing. 1997;26(1):15–9.CrossRefPubMed
107.
108.
Australian Government Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development. Australia's commuting distance: cities and regions. Canberra: BITRE; 2015.
109.
Metadata
Title
Obesity-related health impacts of fuel excise taxation- an evidence review and cost-effectiveness study
Authors
V. Brown
M. Moodie
L. Cobiac
A. M. Mantilla Herrera
R. Carter
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4271-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Public Health 1/2017 Go to the issue

Research article

The unhealthy food environment does not modify the association between obesity and participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) in Los Angeles County

Research article

Poor dietary diversity, wealth status and use of un-iodized salt are associated with goiter among school children: a cross-sectional study in Ethiopia

Research article

HCV screening in a cohort of HIV infected and uninfected homeless and marginally housed women in San Francisco, California

Research article

A pilot and feasibility study to assess children’s consumption in quick-service restaurants using plate waste methodology

Research article

Sustainability via Active Garden Education (SAGE): results from two feasibility pilot studies

Research article

The risk of HIV transmission at each step of the HIV care continuum among people who inject drugs: a modeling study