Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Gender differences in walking (for leisure, transport and in total) across adult life: a systematic review

Authors: Tessa M. Pollard, Janelle M. Wagnild

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of this systematic review was to examine gender differences in walking for leisure, transport and in total in adults living in high-income countries, and to assess whether gender differences in walking practices change across the life-course.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted of publications dated 1995 to 2015. Papers providing quantitative data on participation in walking of both men and women aged at least 18 years in a high-income country were screened for the quality of the data on gender differences in walking. Data were extracted and results were synthesised using forest plots and narrative summary.

Results

Thirty-six studies were included in the review: 18 reported on walking for leisure, 16 on walking for transport (in total, or for particular purposes), and 14 on total walking. Most (33) studies provided data comparing the proportion of men and women who walked (at all or for a minimum duration) over a defined period, usually one week. There was consistent evidence that more women than men walk for leisure, although effect sizes were small. However, this effect varies by age: more younger women than younger men walk for leisure, but the gender difference diminishes with age and appears to reverse in the oldest age groups. Taking all ages together, there was no consistent gender difference in walking for transport or in total walking, although the small number of studies reporting on walking to undertake errands suggested that more women than men walk for this purpose.

Conclusions

While there is little evidence that levels of total walking consistently vary by gender, our findings suggest that there are consistent gender differences in participation in walking for some purposes, including for leisure, and that there are gender differences in the impact of age on walking. We conclude that more research is needed to improve our understanding of how walking fits into the lives of women and men across the life-course, especially in relation to gender differences in the impact of aging on walking.

Prospero registration

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42015025961.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Hamer M, Chida Y. Walking and primary prevention: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42:238–43.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Heesch K, Burton N, Brown WJ. Concurrent and prospective associations between physical activity, walking and mental health in older women. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;65:807–13.CrossRefPubMed
3.
de Nazelle A, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Antó JM, Brauer M, Briggs D, Braun-Fahrlander C, et al. Improving health through policies that promote active travel: a review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment. Environ Int. 2011;37:766–77.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Department for Transport, Department of Health. Active Travel Strategy. London: Department for Transport/Department of Health; 2010.
5.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Strategies to prevent obesity and other chronic diseases: the CDC guide to strategies to increase physical activity in the community. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2011.
6.
Department of Infrastructure and Transport. Walking, riding and access to public transport: supporting active travel in Australian communities. Canberra: Australian Government: Department of Infrastructure and Transport; 2013.
7.
Clifton KJ, Livi AD. Gender Differences in Walking Behavior, Attitudes About Walking, and Perceptions of the Environment in Three Maryland Communities. In: Transportation Research Board; 2005. p. 79–88.
8.
Kavanagh AM, Bentley R. Walking: A gender issue? Aust J Soc Issues. 2008;43:45–64.CrossRef
9.
Frank LD, Kerr J, Sallis JF, Miles R, Chapman J. A hierarchy of sociodemographic and environmental correlates of walking and obesity. Prev Med. 2008;47:172–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:297–322.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Michau L, Horn J, Bank A, Dutt M, Zimmerman C. Prevention of violence against women and girls: lessons from practice. Lancet. 2014;385:1672–85.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Law R. Beyond ‘women and transport’: towards new geographies of gender and daily mobility. Prog Hum Geogr. 1999;23:567–88.CrossRef
13.
Crane R. Is there a quiet revolution in women’s travel? Revisiting the gender gap in commuting. J Am Plan Assoc. 2007;73:298–316.CrossRef
14.
Scheiner J, Sicks K, Holz-Rau C. Gendered activity spaces: trends over three decades in Germany. Erdkunde. 2011;65:371–87.CrossRef
15.
Vaz de Almeida MD, Graca P, Afonso C, D’Amicis A, Lappalainen R, Damkjaer S. Physical activity levels and body weight in a national representative sample in the European Union. Pub Health Nutr. 1999;2:105–13.
16.
Deaner RO, Geary DC, Ham SA, Kruger J, Fles E, et al. A sex difference in the predisposition for physical competition: males play sports much more than females even in the contemporary US. PLoS One. 2012;7:11.CrossRef
17.
Armstrong T, Bauman A, Davies J. Physical activity patterns of Australian adults. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Canberra; 2000.
18.
Bates JH, Serdula M, Kettel Khan L, Jones DA, Gillespie C, Ainsworth BE. Total and leisure-time walking among US adults: should every step count. Am J Prev Med. 2005;29:46–50.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Beenackers MA, Kamphuis CBM, Mackenbach JP, Burdorf A, van Lenthe FJ. Why some walk and others don't: exploring interactions of perceived safety and social neighborhood factors with psychosocial cognitions. Health Educ Res. 2013;28:220–33.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Berrigan D, Carroll DD, Fulton JE, Galuska DA, Brown DR, Dorn JM, Paul P. Walking among adults - United States, 2005 and 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61:595–601.
21.
Christiansen LB, Madsen T, Schipperijn J, Ersbøll AK, Troelsen J. Variations in active transport behavior among different neighborhoods and across adult life stages. J Trans Health. 2014;1:316–25.CrossRef
22.
Cole R, Leslie E, Bauman A, Donald M, Owen N. Socio-demographic variations in walking for transport and for recreation or exercise among adults Australians. J Phys Act Health. 2006;3:164–78.CrossRef
23.
Duncan M, Mummery K. Psychosocial and environmental factors associated with physical activity among city dwellers in regional Queensland. Prev Med. 2005;40:363–72.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Eyler AA, Brownson RC, Bacak SJ, Housemann RA. The epidemiology of walking for physical activity in the United States. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1529–36.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Foster C, Hillsdon M, Jones A, Grundy C, Wilkinson P. White M, et al. Objective Measures of the Environment and Physical Activity-Results of the Environment and Physical Activity Study in English Adults. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6:S70–80.
26.
Fromel K, Mitas J, Kerr J. The associations between active lifestyle, the size of a community and SES of the adult population in the Czech Republic. Health Place. 2009;15:447–54.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Granner ML, Sharpe PA, Hutto B, Wilcox S, Addy CL. Perceived individual, social, and environmental factors for physical activity and walking. J Phys Act Health. 2007;4:278–93.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Hörder H, Skoog I, Frandin K. Health-related quality of life in relation to walking habits and fitness: a population-based study of 75-year-olds. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:1213–23.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Inoue S, Ohya Y, Odagiri Y, Takamiya T, Ishii K, Kitabayashi M, et al. Association between Perceived Neighborhood Environment and Walking among Adults in 4 Cities in Japan. J Epidemiol. 2010;20:277–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
King TL, Thornton LE, Bentley RJ, Kavanagh AM. Does parkland influence walking? The relationship between area of parkland and walking trips in Melbourne. Australia Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:115.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Kramer D, Maas J, Wingen M, Kunst AE. Neighbourhood safety and leisure-time physical activity among Dutch adults: a multilevel perspective. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10:11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Kruger J, Ham SA, Berrigan D, Ballard-Barbash R. Prevalence of Transportation and Leisure Walking Among U.S. Adults. Prev Med. 2008;47:329–34.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Lee JS, Zegras PC, Ben-Joseph E. Safely active mobility for urban baby boomers: The role of neighborhood design. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;61:153–66.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Liao Y, Wang IT, Hsu HH, Chang SH. Perceived environmental and personal factors associated with walking and cycling for transportation in Taiwanese adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:2105–19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Livingstone MB, Robson PJ. McCarthy S, Kiely M, Harrington K, Browne P, et al. Physical activity patterns in a nationally representative sample of adults in Ireland. Public Health Nutr. 2001;4:1107–16.
36.
Martin KR, Cooper R, Harris TB, Brage S, Hardy R, Kuh D, on behalf of the NSHD scientific and data collection team. Patterns of leisure-time physical activity participation in a British birth cohort at early old age. PLoS One. 2014;9:e98901.
37.
Mathews AE, Colabianchi N, Hutto B, Pluto DM, Hooker SP. Pedestrian Activity Among California Adults. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6:15–23.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Menai M, Charreire H, Feuillet T, Salze P, Weber C, Enaux C, et al. Walking and cycling for commuting, leisure and errands: relations with individual characteristics and leisure-time physical activity in a cross-sectional survey (the ACTI-Cités project). Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:150.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Oliver L, Schuurman N, Hall A, Hayes M. Assessing the influence of the built environment on physical activity for utility and recreation in suburban metro Vancouver. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:959.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Paul P, Carlson SA, Carroll DD, Berrigan D, Fulton JE. Walking for transportation and leisure among US adults - National Health Interview Survey 2010. J Phys Act Health. 2015;12(Suppl 1):S62–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Reis JP, Macera CA, Ainsworth BE, Hipp DA. Prevalence of Total Daily Walking Among US Adults, 2002-2003. J Phys Act Health. 2008;5:337–46.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Ryu SY, Park J, Choi SW, Han MA. Associations between socio-demographic characteristics and healthy lifestyles in Korean Adults: the result of the 2010 Community Health Survey. J Prev Med Public Health. 2014;47:113–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Saito Y, Oguma Y, Inoue S, Tanaka A, Kobori Y. Environmental and individual correlates of various types of physical activity among community-dwelling middle-aged and elderly Japanese. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10:2028–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
44.
Satariano WA, Ivey SL. Kurtovich E, Kealey M, Hubbard AE, Bayles CM et al. Lower-body function, neighborhoods, and walking in an older population. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38:419–28.
45.
Suminski RR, Poston WS, Petosa RL, Stevens E, Katzenmoyer LM. Features of the neighborhood environment and walking by U.S. adults. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28:149–55.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Sundquist K, Eriksson U, Kawakami N, Skog L, Ohlsson H, Arvidsson D. Neighborhood walkability, physical activity, and walking behavior: The Swedish Neighborhood and Physical Activity (SNAP) study. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72:1266–73.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Tudor-Locke C, Ham SA. Walking behaviors reported in the American Time Use Survey 2003-2005. J Phys Act Health. 2008;5:633–47.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Van Cauwenberg J, Cerin E, Timperio A, Salmon J, Deforche B, Veitch J. Park proximity, quality and recreational physical activity among mid-older aged adults: moderating effects of individual factors and area of residence. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
Van Cauwenberg J, Clarys P, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Van Holle V, Verte D, De Witte N, et al. Physical environmental factors related to walking and cycling in older adults: the Belgian aging studies. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:142.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
Van Dyck D, Cerin E, Conway TL, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Owen N, Kerr J, et al. Perceived neighborhood environmental attributes associated with adults’ transport-related walking and cycling: findings from the USA, Australia and Belgium. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:70.
51.
Van Dyck D, Cerin E, Conway TL, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Owen N, Kerr J, et al. Perceived neighborhood environmental attributes associated with adults’ leisure-time physical activity: Findings from Belgium. Australia and the USA Health Place. 2013;19:59–68.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Wen M, Kandula NR, Lauderdale DS. Walking for Transportation or Leisure: What Difference Does the Neighborhood Make? J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1674–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
53.
Miller YD, Brown WJ. Determinants of Active Leisure for Women with Young Children—an “Ethic of Care” Prevails. Leisure Sci. 2005;27:405–20.CrossRef
54.
Bittman M, Wajcman J. The rush hour: the character of leisure time and gender equity. Soc Forces. 2000;79:165–89.CrossRef
55.
Young IM. Throwing like a girl: A phenomenology of femining body comportment, motility and spatiality. Hum Stud. 1980;3:137–56.CrossRef
56.
Bélanger M, Townsend N, Foster C. Age-related differences in physical activity profiles of English adults. Prev Med. 2011;52:247–9.PubMed
57.
Watson KB, Frederick GM, Harris CD, Carlson SA, Fulton JE. US adults’ participation in specific activities: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System – 2011. J Phys Act Health. 2015;12:S3–S10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
58.
Mottram S, Peat G, Thomas E, Wilkie R, Croft P. Patterns of pain and mobility limitation in older people: cross-sectional findings from a population survey of 18,497 adults aged 50 years and over. Qual Life Res. 17:529–39.
59.
Arber S, Cooper S. Gender differences in later life: the new paradox. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:61–76.CrossRefPubMed
60.
61.
Murtagh KN, Hubert HB. Gender differences in physical disability among an elderly cohort. Am J Pub Health. 2004;94:1406–11.CrossRef
62.
Schmucki B. “If I walked on my own at night I stuck to well lit areas”: gendered spaces and urban transport in 20th century Britain. Res Transp Econom. 2012;34:74–85.CrossRef
63.
64.
Kwan MP. Gender differences in space-time constraints. Area. 2000;32:145–56.CrossRef
65.
Taylor BD, Ralph K, Smart M. What explains the gender gap in schlepping? Testing various explanations for gender differences in household-serving travel. Soc Sci Quarterly. 2015;96:1493–510.CrossRef
66.
67.
Guell C, Panter J, Jones NR, Ogilvie D. Towards a differentiated understanding of active travel behaviour: using social theory to explore everyday commuting. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75:233–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
68.
Blue S, Shove E, Carmona C, Kelly MP. Theories of practice and public health: understanding (un)healthy practices. Crit Public Health. 2016;26:36–50.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Gender differences in walking (for leisure, transport and in total) across adult life: a systematic review
Authors
Tessa M. Pollard
Janelle M. Wagnild
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4253-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Public Health 1/2017 Go to the issue

Research article

Comparing national infectious disease surveillance systems: China and the Netherlands

Research article

Risk of disability pension in first and second generation immigrants: the role of age and region of birth in a prospective population-based study from Sweden

Research article

Built environment and physical activity: domain- and activity-specific associations among Brazilian adolescents

Study protocol

Study protocol for “MOVEdiabetes”: a trial to promote physical activity for adults with type 2 diabetes in primary health care in Oman

Research article

How participants report their health status: cognitive interviews of self-rated health across race/ethnicity, gender, age, and educational attainment

Research article

Evaluation of a peer education program on student leaders’ energy balance-related behaviors