Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Network analysis of global tobacco control collaboration: data from the World Conference on Tobacco or Health (WCTOH)

Authors: Scott J. Leischow, Janet Okamoto, Scott McIntosh, Deborah J. Ossip, Harry A. Lando

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The World Conference on Tobacco or Health (WCTOH) is held every three years to foster communication and collaboration on global tobacco control. Very little is known about the nature of interactions between WCTOH attendees and their linkages to tobacco control organizations, so knowing this information could help improve tobacco control efforts.

Methods

At the 2015 WCTOH, we implemented an online survey to assess barriers to global tobacco control activities, which information sources they use for tobacco control information, and with whom they interact regarding tobacco control.

Results

A total of 169 respondents completed the survey, with responses from all six World Health Organization (WHO) regions. Respondents worked in all areas of tobacco control; the most common were research (29.2%) and patient care/treatment (23.3%). The top barriers faced regarding tobacco control activities were: funding is weak (56.8%), government commitment (45.0%), tobacco industry interference (43.8%), and lack of coordination (34.3%). The network analysis identified Framework Convention Alliance (FCA) and Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT) as the two most prominent groups that people belonged to and where they went to exchange information and best practices. Important regional and country specific groups also appear to be growing, such as the African Tobacco Control Alliance (ATCA) and the Argentinian Association of Tabacology (ASAT).

Discussion

Mapping and better understanding the global tobacco control network is important for informing knowledge exchange and best practices, particularly as increasing attention is being focused on global tobacco control efforts in low- and middle-income countries in particular.

Conclusions

The present study demonstrates that even a subsample of the WCTOH shows considerable collaboration. The full WCTOH network should be mapped in order to foster greater collaboration that has the the potential to improve global tobacco control efforts.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wipfli, H., The Global War on Tobacco: Mapping the World's First Public Health Treaty. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2015. Wipfli, H., The Global War on Tobacco: Mapping the World's First Public Health Treaty. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2015.
4.
go back to reference Giovino GA, et al. Research priorities for FCTC articles 20, 21, and 22: surveillance/evaluation and information exchange. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15(4):847–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Giovino GA, et al. Research priorities for FCTC articles 20, 21, and 22: surveillance/evaluation and information exchange. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15(4):847–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Leischow SJ, Ayo-Yusuf O, Backinger CL. Converging research needs across framework convention on tobacco control articles: making research relevant to global tobacco control practice and policy. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15(4):761–6.CrossRefPubMed Leischow SJ, Ayo-Yusuf O, Backinger CL. Converging research needs across framework convention on tobacco control articles: making research relevant to global tobacco control practice and policy. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15(4):761–6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Mercken L, et al. Coevolution of information sharing and implementation of evidence-based practices among North American tobacco cessation quitlines. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(9):1814–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mercken L, et al. Coevolution of information sharing and implementation of evidence-based practices among North American tobacco cessation quitlines. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(9):1814–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Provan KG, et al. Awareness of evidence-based practices by organizations in a publicly funded smoking cessation network. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2013;23(1):133–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Provan KG, et al. Awareness of evidence-based practices by organizations in a publicly funded smoking cessation network. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2013;23(1):133–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Bonito JA, et al. Assessing the preconditions for communication influence on decision making: the North American Quitline consortium. Health Commun. 2013;28(3):248–59.CrossRefPubMed Bonito JA, et al. Assessing the preconditions for communication influence on decision making: the North American Quitline consortium. Health Commun. 2013;28(3):248–59.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Harris JK, et al. Interpersonal influence among public health leaders in the United States Department of Health and Human Services. Journal of Public Health Research. 2012;1(1):67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Harris JK, et al. Interpersonal influence among public health leaders in the United States Department of Health and Human Services. Journal of Public Health Research. 2012;1(1):67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
11.
go back to reference Harris JK, et al. Drawbacks and benefits associated with inter-organizational collaboration along the discovery-development-delivery continuum: a cancer research network case study. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):1.CrossRef Harris JK, et al. Drawbacks and benefits associated with inter-organizational collaboration along the discovery-development-delivery continuum: a cancer research network case study. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):1.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Provan KG, et al. Research collaboration in the discovery, development, and delivery networks of a statewide cancer coalition. Evaluation and program planning. 2010;33(4):349–55.CrossRefPubMed Provan KG, et al. Research collaboration in the discovery, development, and delivery networks of a statewide cancer coalition. Evaluation and program planning. 2010;33(4):349–55.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference StataCorp, L. Stata version 11.0. College Station: StataCorp LP; 2009. StataCorp, L. Stata version 11.0. College Station: StataCorp LP; 2009.
15.
go back to reference Borgatti, S.P., M.G. Everett, and L.C. Freeman, Ucinet for windows: software for social network analysis. 2002. Borgatti, S.P., M.G. Everett, and L.C. Freeman, Ucinet for windows: software for social network analysis. 2002.
16.
go back to reference Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. ICWSM. 2009;8:361–2. Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. ICWSM. 2009;8:361–2.
17.
go back to reference National Cancer Institute. Greater than the sum: systems thinking in tobacco control. In: Tobacco Control Monograph. Bethesda: Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 2007. National Cancer Institute. Greater than the sum: systems thinking in tobacco control. In: Tobacco Control Monograph. Bethesda: Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 2007.
19.
go back to reference Krygiel, A.J., Behind the Wizard's curtain. An integration environment for a system of systems, 1999, DTIC Document. Krygiel, A.J., Behind the Wizard's curtain. An integration environment for a system of systems, 1999, DTIC Document.
Metadata
Title
Network analysis of global tobacco control collaboration: data from the World Conference on Tobacco or Health (WCTOH)
Authors
Scott J. Leischow
Janet Okamoto
Scott McIntosh
Deborah J. Ossip
Harry A. Lando
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4234-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Public Health 1/2017 Go to the issue