Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Time to ‘re-think’ physical activity promotion for young people? Results from a repeated cross-sectional study

Authors: Paul Best, Mark A. Tully, Rekesh Corepal, Frank Kee, Ruth F. Hunter

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between knowledge of the current UK physical activity (PA) guidelines and amount of daily PA using a sample population of 11–16 year olds in Northern Ireland.

Methods

Cross-sectional survey data from the 2010 and 2013 Young Persons’ Behaviour and Attitudes Survey of 10,790 young people provided information on PA, knowledge of guidelines and socio-demographic characteristics. Multinomial logistic regression was used to investigate the associations between knowledge and amount of daily PA.

Results

Results from 2013 showed 67.0% of respondents were aware of PA guidelines with 15.4% reporting meeting them. Males were more likely to meet PA guidelines than females (OR 3.36, 95% CI 2.47, 4.59). Males who were active for 60 min or more, 7 days per week were less likely to be aware of guidelines (OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.02, 2.24). For females, knowledge of PA guidelines had no significant association with amount of daily PA (OR = 1.74, 95% CI 0.99, 3.07). Those who did not enjoy being active were less likely to meet the guidelines (OR = 0.05, 95% CI 0.02, 0.12).

Conclusions

Knowledge did not appear to be an important predictor of PA in young people. Consequently, threshold based messaging containing recommended minimum PA guideline information may not be appropriate for this age group. Re-branding PA promotion to include the use of humour may offer a new direction for public health messaging based around fun and enjoyment.
Literature
1.
World Health Organisation. Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2009.
2.
Kohl HW, Craig CL, Lamber EV, Inoue S, Alkandari JR, Leetongin G, Kahlmeier S. The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. Lancet. 2012;380:294–305.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Van Sluijs EMF, McMinn AM, Griffin SJ. Effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity in children and adolescents: systematic review of controlled trials. Brit Med J. 2007;335:1–13.CrossRef
4.
Dumith SC, Gigante DP, Domingue MR, Kohl HW. Physical activity change during adolescence: a systematic review and a pooled analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40:685–98.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Kriemler S, Meyer U, Martin E, van Sluijs EMF, Andersen LB, Martin BW. Effect of school-based interventions on physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents: a review of reviews and systematic update. Brit J Sports Med. 2011;45:923–30.CrossRef
6.
Rachele JN, Cuddihy TF, Washington TL, et al. The association between adolescent self-reported physical activity and wellness : the missing piece for youth wellness programs. J Adol Health. 2014;55:281–6.CrossRef
7.
World Health Organisation. ‘Physical activity and young people’, global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2014.
8.
Ekelund U, Tomkinson G, Armstrong N. What proportion of youth are physically active? Measurement issues, levels and recent time trends. Brit J of Sports Med. 2011;45:859–65.CrossRef
9.
Townsend N, Wickramasinghe K, Williams J, Bhatnagar P, Rayner M. Physical activity statistics. London: British Heart Foundation; 2015.
10.
Brown DR, Soares J, Epping JM, Lankford TJ, Wallace JS, Hopkins D, Orleans CT. Stand-alone mass media campaigns to increase physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43:551–61.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Bauman A, McLean G, Hurdle D, Walker S, Boyd J, Van Aalst I, Carr H. Evaluation of the national “push play” campaign in New Zealand - creating population awareness of physical activity. New Zeal Med J. 2003;116:1–11.
12.
Huhman M, Potter LD, Wong FL, Banspach SW, Duke JC, Heitzler CD. Effects of a mass media campaign to increase physical activity among children: year-1 results of the VERB campaign. Pediatrics. 2005;116:277–84.CrossRef
13.
Faulkner GEJ, Kwan MYW, MacNeill M, Brownrigg M. The long live kids campaign: awareness of campaign messages. J Health Comun. 2011;16:519–32.CrossRef
14.
Chalkley A, Milton K, Foster C. Change4Life evidence review: rapid evidence review on the effect of physical activity participation among children aged 5–11 years. London: Public Health England; 2015.
15.
16.
Craig CL, Bauman A, Gauvin L, Robertson J, Murumets K. ParticipACTION: A mass media campaign targeting parents of inactive children; knowledge, saliency, and trialing behaviours. Int J of Behav Nut Phys Act. 2009;6:88.CrossRef
17.
Leavy JE, Bull FC, Rosenberg M, Bauman A. Physical activity mass media campaigns and their evaluation: a systematic review of the literature 2003–2010. Health Educ Res. 2011;26:1060–85.CrossRefPubMed
18.
DeBastiani SD, Carroll DD, Cunningham M, Lee S, Fulton J. Awareness and knowledge of the youth 2008 physical activity guidelines for Americans. J Phys Act Health. 2014;11:495–501.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Marques A, Martins J, Sarmento H, Rocha L, Carreiro da Costa F. Do students know the physical activity recommendations for health promotion? J Phys Act Health. 2015;12:253–6.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Lavidge RJ, Steiner GA. A model for predictive measurements of advertising effectiveness. J Marketing. 1961;25:59–62.CrossRef
21.
Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psych. 1983;51:390–5.CrossRef
22.
Ajzen I. From intention to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Bechmand J, editors. Action control: from cognition to behavior. New York: Springer; 1985.
23.
Locke EA, Latham GP. Goal setting theory. In: O’Neil Jr HF, Drillings M, editors. Motivation: theory and research. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1994.
24.
Brawley LR, Latimer AE. Physical activity guides for Canadians: messaging strategies, realistic expectations for change, and evaluation. Can J Pub Health. 2007;98:170–84.
25.
Hunter RF, Tully MA, Donnelly P, Stevenson M, Kee F. Knowledge of UK physical activity guidelines: Implications for better targeted health promotion. Prev Med. 2014;65:33–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
De Cocker KA, De Bourdeaudhuij IM, Brown WJ, Cardon GM. Effects of “10,000 Steps Ghent”. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33:455–63.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Knox ECL, Webb OJ, Esliger DW, Biddle SJH, Sherar LB. Using threshold messages to promote physical activity: Implications for public perceptions of health effects. Eur J Pub Health. 2014;24:195–9.CrossRef
28.
Knox ECL, Esliger DW, Biddle SJH, Sherar LB. Lack of knowledge of physical activity guidelines: can physical activity promotion campaigns do better ? BMJ Open. 2013;3:1–6.CrossRef
29.
Balbernie R. Circuits and circumstances: the neurobiological consequences of early relationship experiences and how they shape later behaviour. J Child Psych. 2001;27:237–55.CrossRef
30.
Moore LV, Fulton J, Kruger J, McDivitt J. Knowledge of physical activity guidelines among adults in the United States, healthstyles 2003–2005. J Phys Act Health. 2010;7:141–9.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency. Central Survey Unit. (2015). Young Persons’ Behaviour and Attitudes Survey, 2013. [data collection]. UK Data Service. SN: 7624, [Accessed 5th July 2016]
32.
33.
34.
Scott JJ, Morgan PJ, Plotnikoff RC, Lubans DR. Reliability and validity of a single-item physical activity measure for adolescents. J Paediatr Child Health. 2015;51:787–93. doi:10.​1111/​jpc.​12836.
35.
Gill DP, Jones GR, Zou G, Speechley M. Using a single question to assess physical activity in older adults: a reliability and validity study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:1–10.CrossRef
36.
37.
Sterdt E, Liersch S, Walter U. Correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents: a systematic review of reviews. Health Educ J. 2014;73:72–89.CrossRef
38.
Corder K, van Sluijs EMF, Goodyer I, Ridgway CL, Steele RM, Bamber D, et al. Physical activity awareness of british adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165:603–9.
39.
Martins J, Marques A, Sarmento H, Carreiro da Costa F. Adolescents’ perspectives on the barriers and facilitators of physical activity: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Health Educ Res. 2015;30:742–55.CrossRefPubMed
40.
41.
Lister C, Royne M, Payne HE, Cannon B, Hanson C, Barnes M. The laugh model: reframing and rebranding public health through social media. Am J Pub Health. 2015;105:2245–51.CrossRef
42.
Gold J, Lim MS, Hellard ME, Hocking JS, Keogh L. What’s in a message? Delivering sexual health promotion to young people in Australia via text messaging. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:792.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, Wells JC, Loos RJF, Martin BW. Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet. 2012;380:258–71.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Sniehotta FF, Presseau J, Araújo-Soares V. Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour. Health Psych Rev. 2014;8:1–7.CrossRef
45.
Worsley A. Nutrition knowledge and food consumption: can nutrition knowledge change food behaviour? Asia Pacific J Clin Nutr. 2002;11:S579–85.CrossRef
46.
Olson JM, Zanna MP. Understanding and promoting exercise: a social psychological perspective. Can J Pub Health. 1987;78:S1–7. 1.
47.
Adams SA, Matthews CE, Ebbeling CB, Moore CG, Cunningham JE, Fulton J, Hebert JR. The effect of social desirability and social approval on self-reports of physical activity. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161:389–98.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Time to ‘re-think’ physical activity promotion for young people? Results from a repeated cross-sectional study
Authors
Paul Best
Mark A. Tully
Rekesh Corepal
Frank Kee
Ruth F. Hunter
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4136-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Public Health 1/2017 Go to the issue

Research article

Perspectives of Aboriginal women on participation in mammographic screening: a step towards improving services

Research article

The epidemiology of drowning in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Research article

Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of dyslipidemia in older persons in urban and rural population in the Astana region, Kazakhstan

Research article

The risk of HIV transmission at each step of the HIV care continuum among people who inject drugs: a modeling study

Research article

Association between length of residence and overweight among adult immigrants in Portugal: A nationwide cross-sectional study

Research article

Distinct association between educational attainment and overweight/obesity in unmarried and married women: evidence from a population-based study in Japan