Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Predictors of dieting and non-dieting approaches among adults living in Australia

Authors: Stuart Leske, Esben Strodl, Xiang-Yu Hou

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is a dearth of research comparing why dieting and non-dieting approaches are adopted. A greater understanding of reasons underlying dieting and non-dieting attempts will help to identify target beliefs for interventions to support and motivate adults to attempt whatever approach they are willing and/or able to pursue. We investigated the predictors of dieting and non-dieting approaches in Australian adults using predictors that were identified in a previous qualitative study.

Methods

We conducted a prospective study, with two waves of data collection occurring 4 weeks apart. At baseline, participants completed a questionnaire assessing constructs drawn from the theory of planned behaviour (attitude, subjective norm, and self-efficacy), past behaviour, non-planning, attributions for dieting failure, weight control beliefs, and dieting and non-dieting intentions. We used path modelling to analyse responses.

Results

At baseline, 719 adults (52.2% male) aged between 18 and 76 completed the questionnaire. Four weeks later, 64% of participants (n = 461) reported on their dieting and non-dieting behaviour in the past month. Past behaviour, attitude, subjective norm, and self-identity significantly predicted dieting intentions. Dieting intentions and past behaviour significantly predicted dieting behaviour, while non-planning and self-efficacy did not. The model explained 74.8% of the variance in intention and 52.9% of the variance in behaviour. While most findings were similar for the non-dieting model, subjective norms and self-identity did not predict intention, while self-efficacy and self-identity both predicted non-dieting behaviour directly. The non-dieting model explained 58.2% of the variance in intention and 37.5% of the variance in behaviour.

Conclusions

The findings from this study provide support for the application of TPB and identity theory constructs in the context of both dieting and non-dieting behaviour. Self-efficacy and self-identity appear more relevant to non-dieting behaviour than dieting behaviour, while subjective norms was more influential in predicting dieting. Practitioners wishing to encourage either approach in their clients should attempt to modify the constructs that influence each approach.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
Guh DP, Zhang W, Bansback N, Amarsi Z, Laird Birmingham C, Anis AH. The incidence of co-morbidities related to obesity and overweight: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:88–107.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
4.
National Task Force on the Prevention and Treatment of Obesity. Dieting and the development of eating disorders in overweight and obese adults. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2581–9.CrossRef
5.
Mann T, Tomiyama AJ, Westling E, Lew A-M, Samuels B, Chatman J. Medicare’s search for effective obesity treatments: diets are not the answer. Am Psychol. 2007;62:220–33.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Franz MJ, VanWormer JJ, Crain AL, Boucher JL, Histon T, Caplan W, Pronk NP. Weight-loss outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight-loss clinical trials with a minimum 1-year follow-up. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107:1755–67.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Brennan L, Murphy KD, de la Piedad Garcia X, Ellis ME, Metzendorf MI, McKenzie JE. Psychological interventions for adults who are overweight or obese. Cochrane Libr. 2016;3:CD012114.
8.
Stroebe W. Dieting, overweight and obesity: self-regulation in a food-rich environment. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2008.CrossRef
9.
Garner DM, Wooley SC. Confronting the failure of behavioral and dietary treatments for obesity. Clin Psychol Rev. 1991;11:729–80.CrossRef
10.
Goodrick GK, Foreyt JP. Why treatments for obesity don’t last. J Am Diet Assoc. 1991;91:1243–74.PubMed
11.
Bacon L. Health at every size: the surprising truth about your weight. Dallas: BenBella Books; 2010.
12.
13.
Keel PK, Baxter MG, Heatherton TF, Joiner TE. A 20-year longitudinal study of body weight, dieting, and eating disorder symptoms. J Abnorm Psychol. 2007;116(2):422.CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
Tribole E, Resch E. Intuitive eating: A revolutionary program that works. 3rd ed. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin; 2012.
16.
Siu J, Giskes K, Turrell G. Socio-economic differences in weight-control behaviours and barriers to weight control. Public Health Nutr. 2011;14:1768–78.CrossRefPubMed
17.
18.
Leske S, Strodl E, Hou X-Y. A qualitative study of the determinants of dieting and non-dieting approaches in overweight/obese Australian adults. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1086.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Dickins M, Thomas SL, King B, Lewis S, Holland K. The role of the fatosphere in fat adults’ responses to obesity stigma: A model of empowerment without a focus on weight loss. Qual Health Res. 2011;21:1679–91.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Thomas SL, Hyde J, Karunaratne A, Kausman R, Komesaroff PA. “They all work…when you stick to them”: a qualitative investigation of dieting, weight loss, and physical exercise, in obese individuals. Nutr J. 2008;7:34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Thomas SL, Karunaratne A, Lewis S, Castle D, Knoesen N, Honigman R, Hyde J, Kausman R, Komesaroff P. ‘Just bloody fat!’: A qualitative study of body image, self-esteem and coping in obese adults. Int J Ment Health Prom. 2010;12:39–49.CrossRef
22.
Thomas SL, Hyde J, Karunaratne A, Herbert D, Komesaroff PA. Being ‘fat’ in today’s world: a qualitative study of the lived experiences of people with obesity in Australia. Health Expect. 2008;11:321–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Laliberte M, Newton M, McCabe R, Mills JS. Controlling your weight versus controlling your lifestyle: how beliefs about weight control affect risk for disordered eating, body dissatisfaction and self-esteem. Cognit Ther Res. 2007;31:853–69.CrossRef
24.
Armitage CJ, Norman P, Alganem S, Conner M. Expectations are more predictive of behavior than behavioral intentions: Evidence from two prospective studies. Ann Behav Med. 2015;49(2):239–46.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Povey R, Conner M, Sparks P, James R, Shepherd R. Application of the theory of planned behaviour to two dietary behaviours: Roles of perceived control and self-efficacy. Br J Health Psychol. 2005;5:121–39.CrossRef
26.
Lash DN, Smith JE, Rinehart JK. Can the Theory of Planned Behavior predict dietary intention and future dieting in an ethnically diverse sample of overweight and obese veterans attending medical clinics? Appetite. 2016;99:185–92.CrossRefPubMed
27.
McDermott MS, Oliver M, Simnadis T, Beck EJ, Coltman T, Iverson D, Caputi P, Sharma R. The Theory of Planned Behaviour and dietary patterns: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2015;81:150–6.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Nejad LM, Wertheim EH, Greenwood K. Comparison of the health belief model and the theory of planned behavior in the prediction of dieting and fasting behavior. E-J Appl Psychol. 2007;1:63–74.CrossRef
29.
McEachan RRC, Conner M, Taylor NJ, Lawton RJ. Prospective prediction of health-related behaviours with the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. 2001;5:1–48.
30.
Rise J, Sheeran P, Hukkelberg S. The role of self-identity in the theory of planned behavior: a meta-analysis. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2010;40:1085–105.CrossRef
31.
Stryker S. Identity salience and role performance: The relevance of symbolic interaction theory for family research. J Marriage Fam. 1968;30:558–64.CrossRef
32.
Stryker S. Identity theory: Development and extensions. In: Yardley K, Honess T, editors. Self and identity: psychosocial perspectives. New York: Wiley; 1986. p. 89–104.
33.
Conner M, Armitage CJ. Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for future research. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1998;28:1429–64.CrossRef
34.
Van der Werff E, Steg L, Keizer K. I am what I am, by looking past the present the influence of biospheric values and past behavior on environmental self-identity. Environ Behav. 2014;46(5):626–57.CrossRef
35.
Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis N. Self-identity and the theory of planned behaviour: Between- and within-participants analyses. Br J Soc Psychol. 2006;45:731–57.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Case P, Sparks P, Pavey L. Identity appropriateness and the structure of the theory of planned behaviour. Br J Soc Psychol. 2016;55(1):109–25.CrossRefPubMed
37.
38.
Churchill S, Jessop DC. Reflective and non-reflective antecedents of health-related behaviour: exploring the relative contributions of impulsivity and implicit self-control to the prediction of dietary behaviour. Br J Health Psychol. 2011;16:257–72.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Churchill S, Jessop D, Sparks P. Impulsive and/or planned behaviour: can impulsivity contribute to the predictive utility of the theory of planned behaviour? Br J Soc Psychol. 2008;47:631–46.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Rotter JB. Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1954.CrossRef
41.
Rotter JB. The role of the psychological situation in determining the direction of human behavior. In: Jones MR, editor. Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press; 1955. p. 245–69.
42.
Rotter JB. Some implications of a social learning theory for the prediction of goal directed behavior from testing procedures. Psychol Rev. 1960;67:301–16.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Rotter JB. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychol Monogr. 1966;80:1–28.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Day AK, Wilson CJ, Hutchinson AD, Roberts RM. The role of skin cancer knowledge in sun-related behaviours: a systematic review. J Health Psychol. 2014;19(9):1143–62.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Hagger MS, Anderson M, Kyriakaki M, Darkings S. Aspects of identity and their influence on intentional behavior: Comparing effects for three health behaviors. Pers Individ Dif. 2007;42:355–67.CrossRef
46.
Gardner B. A review and analysis of the use of ‘habit’ in understanding, predicting and influencing health-related behaviour. Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(3):277–95.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Fields S, Edens JF, Smith ST, Rulseh A, Donnellan MB, Ruiz MA, McDermott BE, Douglas KS. Examining the psychometric properties of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-Brief Form in justice-involved samples. Psychol Assessment. 2015;27(4):1211–8.CrossRef
48.
Thomas SL, Lewis S, Hyde J, Castle D, Komesaroff PA. “The solution needs to be complex.” Obese adults’ attitudes about the effectiveness of individual and population based interventions for obesity. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:420.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
Lewis S, Thomas SL, Blood RW, Castle D, Hyde J, Komesaroff PA. ‘I’m searching for solutions’: why are obese individuals turning to the Internet for help and support with ‘being fat’? Health Expect. 2011;14:339–50.CrossRefPubMed
50.
King C. Health at every size approach to health management: the evidence is weighed. Top Clin Nutr. 2007;22:272–85.CrossRef
51.
Yaemsiri S, Slining MM, Agarwal SK. Perceived weight status, overweight diagnosis, and weight control among US adults: the NHANES 2003–2008 Study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011;35:1063–70.CrossRef
52.
Montano DE, Kasprzyk D. Theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, and the integrated behavior model. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008. p. 95–124.
53.
Neumark-Sztainer D. Preventing obesity and eating disorders in adolescents: what can health care providers do? J Adolesc Health. 2009;44:206–13.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Tribole E, Resch E. Intuitive eating: A revolutionary program that works. New York: St. Martin’s Press; 1995.
55.
Tribole E, Resch E. Intuitive eating: A revolutionary program that works. 2nd ed. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin; 2003.
56.
Satter E. Eating competence: Definition and evidence for the Satter Eating Competence model. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2007;39:S142–53.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Framson C, Kristal AR, Schenk JM, Littman AJ, Zeliadt S, Benitez D. Development and validation of the mindful eating questionnaire. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109:1439–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
58.
Cutler L, King B, McCarthy N, Hamilton G, Cook L. Appetite for life: an evaluation of a primary care lifestyle programme. J Prim Health Care. 2010;2:281–7.PubMed
59.
Spinella M. Normative data and a short form of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Int J Neurosci. 2007;117:359–68.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Conner ME, Sparks P. The theory of planned behavior and health behaviors. In: Conner M, Norman P, editors. Predicting health behaviour. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1996. p. 121–62.
61.
Arbuckle JL. Amos (Version 21.0.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago: SPSS; 2012.
62.
Iacobucci D. Structural equations modeling: Fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. J Consum Psychol. 2010;20:90–8.CrossRef
63.
Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2005.
64.
Hu L-t, Bentler P. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6:1–55.CrossRef
65.
Schreiber JB. Core reporting practices in structural equation modeling. Res Social and Adm Pharm. 2008;4:83–97.CrossRef
66.
Mardia KV. Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika. 1970;57:519–30.CrossRef
67.
Mardia KV. Applications of some measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis in testing normality and robustness studies. Sankhya. 1974;36:115–28.
68.
Bentler PM. EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino: Multivariate Software, Inc; 2006.
69.
Efron B, Tibshirani R. An introduction to the bootstrap. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 1993.CrossRef
70.
Weston R, Gore PA. A brief guide to structural equation modeling. Couns Psychol. 2006;34:719–51.CrossRef
71.
Conner ME, Martin E, Silverdale N, Grogan S. Dieting in adolescence: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Br J Health Psychol. 1996;1:315–25.CrossRef
72.
Sniehotta FF, Presseau J, Araujo-Soares V. Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour. Health Psychol Rev. 2014;8:1–7.CrossRefPubMed
73.
Yoong SL, Carey ML, Sanson-Fisher RW, D’Este CA. A cross-sectional study assessing Australian general practice patients’ intention, reasons and preferences for assistance with losing weight. BMC Fam Pract. 2013;14:187.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
74.
Webb T, Sheeran P. Mechanisms of implementation intention effects: the role of goal intentions, self-efficacy, and accessibility of plan components. Br J Soc Psychol. 2008;47(3):373–95.CrossRefPubMed
75.
O’Brien K, Venn BJ, Perry T, Green TJ, Aitken W, Bradshaw A, Thomson R. Reasons for wanting to lose weight: different strokes for different folks. Eat Behav. 2007;8:132–5.CrossRefPubMed
76.
Schwarzer R, Lippke S, Luszczynska A. Mechanisms of health behavior change in persons with chronic illness or disability: the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA). Rehabil Psychol. 2011;56(3):161–70.CrossRefPubMed
77.
Hagger M, Luszyzcynska A. Implementation intention and action planning interventions in health contexts: state of the research and proposals for the way forward. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2013;6:1–47.CrossRefPubMed
78.
Epiphaniou E, Ogden J. Successful weight loss maintenance and a shift in identity. J Health Psychol. 2010;15:887–96.CrossRefPubMed
79.
Ball K, Jeffery RW, Abbott G, McNaughton SA, Crawford D. Is healthy behavior contagious: associations of social norms with physical activity and healthy eating. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
80.
Malterud K, Ulriksen K. Obesity, stigma, and responsibility in health care: A synthesis of qualitative studies. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2011;6:8404.CrossRef
81.
Pagoto SL, Schneider KL, Oleski JL, Luciani JM, Bodenlos JS, Whited MC. Male inclusion in randomized controlled trials of lifestyle weight loss interventions. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012;20:1234–9.CrossRef
82.
Yoong SL, Mariko C, Sanson-Fisher R, D’Este C. A cross-sectional study assessing the self-reported weight loss strategies used by adult Australian general practice patients. BMC Fam Pract. 2012;13:48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Predictors of dieting and non-dieting approaches among adults living in Australia
Authors
Stuart Leske
Esben Strodl
Xiang-Yu Hou
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4131-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Public Health 1/2017 Go to the issue

Research article

Effects of integrated chronic care models on hypertension outcomes and spending: a multi-town clustered randomized trial in China

Research article

Neighborhood walk score and selected Cardiometabolic factors in the French RECORD cohort study

Research article

Process evaluation results of a cluster randomised controlled childhood obesity prevention trial: the WAVES study

Research article

Health and healthcare disparities among U.S. women and men at the intersection of sexual orientation and race/ethnicity: a nationally representative cross-sectional study

Research article

Alcohol screening and brief interventions for adults and young people in health and community-based settings: a qualitative systematic literature review

Research article

Perceptions of community-based field workers on the effect of a longitudinal biomedical research project on their sustainable livelihoods