Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Randomized evaluation and cost-effectiveness of HIV and sexual and reproductive health service referral and linkage models in Zambia

Authors: Paul C. Hewett, Mutinta Nalubamba, Fiammetta Bozzani, Jean Digitale, Lung Vu, Eileen Yam, Mary Nambao

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Provision of HIV prevention and sexual and reproductive health services in Zambia is largely characterized by discrete service provision with weak client referral and linkage. The literature reveals gaps in the continuity of care for HIV and sexual and reproductive health. This study assessed whether improved service delivery models increased the uptake and cost-effectiveness of HIV and sexual and reproductive health services.

Methods

Adult clients 18+ years of age accessing family planning (females), HIV testing and counseling (females and males), and male circumcision services (males) were recruited, enrolled and individually randomized to one of three study arms: 1) the standard model of service provision at the entry point (N = 1319); 2) an enhanced counseling and referral to add-on service with follow-up (N = 1323); and 3) the components of study arm two, with the additional offer of an escort (N = 1321). Interviews were conducted with the same clients at baseline, six weeks and six months. Uptake of services for HIV, family planning, male circumcision, and cervical cancer screening at six weeks and six months were the primary endpoints. Pairwise chi-square and multivariable logistic regression statistical tests assessed differences across study arms, which were also assessed for incremental cost-efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

Results

A total of 3963 clients, 1920 males and 2043 females, were enrolled; 82 % of participants at six weeks were tracked and 81 % at six months; follow-up rates did not vary significantly by study arm. The odds of clients accessing HIV testing and counseling, cervical cancer screening services among females, and circumcision services among males varied significantly by study arm at six weeks and six months; less consistent findings were observed for HIV care and treatment. Client uptake of family planning services did not vary significantly by study arm. Integrated services were found to be more efficiently provided than vertical service provision; the cost-effectiveness for HIV/AIDS and cervical cancer was high in the enhanced service models.

Conclusions

Study results provide evidence for increasing the linkages and integration of a selection of HIV and sexual and reproductive health services. The study provided cost-effective service delivery models that enhanced the likelihood of clients accessing some additional needed health services.

Trial registration

ISRCTN84228514 Retrospectively registered.
The study was retrospectively registered in the ISRCTN clinical trials registry on 06 October 2015. The first recruitment of participants occurred on 17 December 2013.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
USAID. Family planning/HIV integration: technical guidance for usaid-supported field programs. Washington, D.C.: USAID; 2003.
2.
WHO. Strengthening linkages between sexual and reproductive health and HIV. Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87(11):805–84.CrossRef
3.
Central Statistical Office (CSO) [Zambia], Ministry of Health (MOH) [Zambia], ICF International: Zambia demographic and health survey 2013-14. Rockville, MD: Central Statistical Office, Ministry of Health, and ICF International; 2014.
4.
Ministry of Health of Zambia. National health strategic plan 2012–2015. Lusaka: Ministry of Health of Zambia; 2011.
5.
Ministry of Health of Zambia. National HIV/AIDS prevention strategy 2012–2015. Lusaka: Ministry of Health of Zambia; 2011.
6.
Strachan M, Kwateng-Addo A, Harde K, Subramaniam S, Judice N, Agarwal K. An analysis of family planning content in HIV/AIDS, VCT, and PMTCT policies in 16 countries. Washington, D.C.: Futures Group International; 2004.
7.
Rutenberg N, Biddlecom A, Kaona F. Reproductive decision-making in the context of HIV and AIDS: a qualitative study in Ndola, Zambia. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2000;26(3):124–30.CrossRef
8.
9.
Stekelenburg JKS, Mukelabai M, Wolffers I, van Roosmalen J. Waiting too long: low use of maternal health services in Kalabo, Zambia. Trop Med Int Health. 2004;9(3):390–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
MacKeith N, Chinganya O, Ahmed Y, Murray S. Zambian women’s experiences of urban maternity care: results from a community survey in Lusaka. Afr J Reprod Health. 2003;7(1):92–102.CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
Mayhew S, Lush L, Cleland J, Walt G. Implementing the integration of component services for reproductive health. Stud Fam Plann. 2001;31(2):151–62.CrossRef
13.
Ministry of Health of Zambia. Workforce optimization analysis: optimal healthcare worker allocation for healthcare facilities across Zambia. Lusaka: Ministry of Health of Zambia; 2009.
14.
Central Statistical Office (CSO), Ministry of Health (MOH), Tropical Diseases Research Centre (TDRC), University of Zambia, Macro International Inc. Zambian demographic and health survey 2007. Calverton, MD: CSO and Macro International; 2009.
15.
ZNAC. Zambia HIV prevention response and modes of transmission analysis. Epi-synthesis final report July 2009. Lusaka: National HIV/AIDS/TB Council of Zambia, CDC Global HIV/AIDS Program, World Bank, and UNAIDS; 2009.
16.
WHO, UNFPA, UNAIDS, IPPF. Sexual and reproductive health and HIV/AIDS: A framework for priority linkages. WHO/HIV/2005.05. Geneva: WHO; 2005.
17.
Chikamata D, Chinganya O, Jones H, Ramarao S. Dual needs: contraceptive and sexually transmitted infection protection in Lusaka, Zambia. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2002;28(2):96–104.CrossRef
18.
Foreit K, Hardee K, Agarwal K. When does it make sense to consider integrating STI and HIV services with family planning services? Issues in perspective: integrating HIV/STI and family planning services. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2002;28(2):105–7.CrossRef
19.
Lush L, Walt G, Cleland J, Mayhew S. The role of MCH and family planning services in HIV/STD control: Is integration the answer? African Journal of Reproductive Health / La Revue Africaine de la Santé Reproductive. 2001;5(3):29–46.CrossRef
20.
Shelton J, Fuchs N. Opportunities and pitfalls in integration of family planning and HIV prevention efforts in developing countries. Public Health Rep. 2004;119:12–5.PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Mullick S, Khoza D, Askew I, Maluka T, Menziwa M. Integrating counseling and testing into family planning services: What happens to the existing quality of family planning when HIV services are integrated in South Africa? Presentation at Linking Reproductive Health, Family Planning, and HIV/AIDS in Africa Conference. Addis Ababa: Organized by Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Bill and Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health, and Department of Community Health at Addis Ababa University; 2006.
22.
Scott P, Becker J. HIV prevention and family planning: integration improves client services in Jamaica. Aidscaptions. 1995;2(3):15–8.PubMed
23.
Stover J, Fuchs N, Halperin D, Gibbons A, Gillespie D. Adding family planning to PMTCT sites increases the benefits of PMTCT. Population and reproductive health issue brief. USAID: Washington, D.C.; 2003.
24.
Peck R, Fitzgerald D, Liautaud B, Deschamps M, Verdier R, Beaulieu M. The feasibility, demand, and effect of integrating primary care services with HIV voluntary counseling and testing: evaluation of a 15-year experience in Haiti, 1985–2000. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;33:470–5.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Boonstra H. The role of reproductive health providers in preventing HIV. New York: Guttmacher report on public policy; 2006.
26.
Rasch V, Yambesi F, Massawe S. Post-abortion care and voluntary HIV counselling and testing: an example of integrating HIV prevention into reproductive health services. Trop Med Int Health. 2006;11(5):697–704.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Coyne KM, Hawkins F, Desmond N. Sexual and reproductive health in HIV-positive women: a dedicated clinic improves service. Int J STD AIDS. 2007;18(6):420–1.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Dilorio C, McCarty F, Resnicow K, McDonnell HM, Soet J, Yeager K, et al. Using motivational interviewing to promote adherence to antiretroviral medications: a randomized controlled study. AIDS Care. 2008;20(3):273–83.CrossRef
29.
Lundahl B, Kunz C, Brownell C, Tollefson D, Burke B. A meta-analysis of motivational interviewing: twenty-five years of empirical studies. Research on Social Work Practice. 2010;20(2):137–60.CrossRef
30.
Golin C, Earp J, Tien H, Stewart P, Porter C, Howie L. A 2-arm, randomized, controlled trial of a motivational interviewing-based intervention to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) among patients failing or initiating ART. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;42:1.CrossRef
31.
32.
StataCorp. Stata: Release 14. Statistical software. College Station: Stata Corp LP; 2015.
33.
Hewett PC, Mutinta N, Bozzanni F, Dennis M, Digitale J, Vu L, et al. REacH: randomized evaluation of HIV/FP service models final study report. New York: Population Council; 2015.
34.
Guinness L, Wiseman V. Introduction to health economics (understanding public health). 2nd ed. Maidenhead Berkshire: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press; 2011.
35.
Murray CJL, Lopez AD. Evidence-based health policy: lessons from the Global Burden of Disease Study. Science. 1996;274(5288):740–3.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Salmon JATV, Hogan DR, et al. Common values in assessing health outcomes from disease and injury: disability weights measurement study for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 2012. 2010;15(380):2129–43.
37.
Price JE, Phiri L, Mulenga D, Hewett PC, Topp SM, Shiliya N, et al. Behavior change pathways to voluntary medical male circumcision: Narrative interviews with circumcision clients in Zambia. PLoS ONE 9(11): e111602.
38.
Thirumurthy H, Masters SH, Rao S, Bronson MA, Lanham M, Omanga E, et al. Effect of providing conditional economic compensation on uptake of voluntary medical male circumcision in Kenya. JAMA. 2014;312(7):703–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Thirumurthy H, Masters SH, Rao S, Murray K, Omanga E, Agot K. The effect of conditional economic compensation and lottery-based rewards on uptake of medical male circumcision in Kenya: A randomized trial. Paper presented at 8th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment & Prevention: July 19–22, 2015. Vancouver; 2015.
40.
41.
42.
Obure CD, Guinness L, Sweeney S, Integra Initiative, Vassall A. Does integration of HIV and SRH services achieve economies of scale and scope in practice? A cost function analysis of the Integra Initiative. Sex Transm Infect. 2015;0:1–5.
43.
UNAIDS. Zambia country report monitoring the declaration of commitment on HIV and AIDS and the universal access. Washington, DC: UNAIDS; 2014.
44.
Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;280(9859):2095–128.CrossRef
45.
Allen S, Kilembe W, Inambao M, et al. Couples’ voluntary HIV counseling and testing (CVCT) followed by treatment as prevention (TasP) for discordant couples: The impact of each step. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2014;30(Suppl S1):A285–6.CrossRef
46.
Sankaranarayanan R, Ferlay J. Worldwide burden of gynaecological cancer: the size of the problem. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20(2):207–55.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Mandelblatt JS, Lawrence WF, Womack SM, Jacobson D, Yi B, Hwang YT, et al. Benefits and costs of using HPV testing to screen for cervical cancer. JAMA. 2002;287(18):2372–81.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Randomized evaluation and cost-effectiveness of HIV and sexual and reproductive health service referral and linkage models in Zambia
Authors
Paul C. Hewett
Mutinta Nalubamba
Fiammetta Bozzani
Jean Digitale
Lung Vu
Eileen Yam
Mary Nambao
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3450-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Public Health 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

Nationwide study of factors associated with public’s willingness to use home self-test kit for dengue fever in Malaysia

Research article

The prevalence and impact of childhood sexual abuse on HIV-risk behaviors among men who have sex with men (MSM) in India

Research article

Prevalence and factors associated with occupational burnout among HIV/AIDS healthcare workers in China: a cross-sectional study

Research article

An outbreak of norovirus gastroenteritis associated with asymptomatic food handlers in Kinmen, Taiwan

Research article

Predictors of incompletion of immunization among children residing in the slums of Kathmandu valley, Nepal: a case-control study

Study protocol

Research protocol for a digital intervention to reduce stigma among males with a personal experience of suicide in the Australian farming community