Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Air pollution, neighbourhood and maternal-level factors modify the effect of smoking on birth weight: a multilevel analysis in British Columbia, Canada

Authors: Anders C. Erickson, Aleck Ostry, Hing Man Chan, Laura Arbour

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Maternal smoking during pregnancy negatively impacts fetal growth, but the effect is not homogenous across the population. We sought to determine how the relationship between cigarette use and fetal growth is modified by the social and physical environment.

Methods

Birth records with covariates were obtained from the BC Perinatal Database Registry (N = 232,291). Maternal smoking status was self-reported as the number of cigarettes smoked per day usually at the first prenatal care visit. Census dissemination areas (DAs) were used as neighbourhood-level units and linked to individual births using residential postal codes to assign exposure to particulate air pollution (PM2.5) and neighbourhood-level attributes such as socioeconomic status (SES), proportion of post-secondary education, immigrant density and living in a rural place. Random coefficient models were used with cigarettes/day modeled with a random slope to estimate its between-DA variability and test cross-level interactions with the neighbourhood-level variables on continuous birth weight.

Results

A significant negative and non-linear association was found between maternal smoking and birth weight. There was significant between-DA intercept variability in birth weight as well as between-DA slope variability of maternal smoking on birth weight of which 68 and 30 % respectively was explained with the inclusion of DA-level variables and their cross-level interactions. High DA-level SES had a strong positive association with birth weight but the effect was moderated with increased cigarettes/day. Conversely, heavy smokers showed the largest increases in birth weight with rising neighbourhood education levels. Increased levels of PM2.5 and immigrant density were negatively associated with birth weight, but showed positive interactions with increased levels of smoking. Older maternal age and suspected drug or alcohol use both had negative interactions with increased levels of maternal smoking.

Conclusion

Maternal smoking had a negative and non-linear dose-response association with birth weight which was highly variable between neighbourhoods and evidence of effect modification with neighbourhood-level factors. These results suggest that focusing exclusively on individual behaviours may have limited success in improving outcomes without addressing the contextual influences at the neighbourhood-level. Further studies are needed to corroborate our findings and to understand how neighbourhood-level attributes interact with smoking to affect birth outcomes.
Literature
1.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Reproductive and Developmental Effects. How Tobacco Smoke Causes Disease: The Biology and Behavioural Basis for Smoking Attributable Disease. Atlanta: A Report of the Surgeon General; 2010. p. 521–701.
2.
Burstyn I, Kuhle S, Allen AC, Veugelers P. The role of maternal smoking in effect of fetal growth restriction on poor scholastic achievement in elementary school. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012;9(2):408–20. Molecular Diversity Preservation International.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
Behl M, Rao D, Aagaard K, Davidson TL, Levin ED, Slotkin TA, et al. Evaluation of the association between maternal smoking, childhood obesity, and metabolic disorders: a national toxicology program workshop review. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121(2):170–81.PubMed
4.
Erickson AC, Arbour LT. Heavy smoking during pregnancy as a marker for other risk factors of adverse birth outcomes: a population-based study in British Columbia Canada. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):102.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
Mohsin M, Bauman AE. Socio-demographic factors associated with smoking and smoking cessation among 426,344 pregnant women in New South Wales Australia. BMC Public Health. 2005;5:138.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
Al-Sahab B, Saqib M, Hauser G, Tamim H. Prevalence of smoking during pregnancy and associated risk factors among Canadian women: a national survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10:24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
7.
Cnattingius S. Does age potentiate the smoking-related risk of fetal growth retardation? Early Hum Dev. 1989;20(3–4):203–11.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Aliyu MH, Wilson RE, Zoorob R, Brown K, Alio AP, Clayton H, et al. Prenatal alcohol consumption and fetal growth restriction: potentiation effect by concomitant smoking. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009;11(1):36–43.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Blumenshine P, Egerter S, Barclay CJ, Cubbin C, Braveman PA. Socioeconomic disparities in adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39(3):263–72.PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
Cubbin C, Sundquist K, Ahlén H, Johansson S-E, Winkleby MA, Sundquist J. Neighborhood deprivation and cardiovascular disease risk factors: protective and harmful effects. Scand J Public Health. 2006;34(3):228–37.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Stieb DM, Chen L, Eshoul M, Judek S. Ambient air pollution, birth weight and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Res. 2012;117:100–11.PubMedCrossRef
13.
HEI Review Panel on Ultrafine Particles. Understanding the Health Effects of Ambient Ultrafine Particles. HEI Perspectives 3. Boston, MA: Health Effects Institute; 2013.
14.
Erickson AC, Arbour L. The shared pathoetiological effects of particulate air pollution and the social environment on fetal-placental development. J Environ Public Health. 2014;2014:901017.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
Al-Gubory KH. Environmental pollutants and lifestyle factors induce oxidative stress and poor prenatal development. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(1):17–31.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Valavanidis A, Vlachogianni T, Fiotakis K. Tobacco smoke: involvement of reactive oxygen species and stable free radicals in mechanisms of oxidative damage, carcinogenesis and synergistic effects with other respirable particles. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009;6(2):445–62.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
Jauniaux E, Burton GJ. Morphological and biological effects of maternal exposure to tobacco smoke on the feto-placental unit. Early Hum Dev. 2007;83(11):699–706.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Joseph KS, Liston RM, Dodds L, Dahlgren L, Allen AC. Socioeconomic status and perinatal outcomes in a setting with universal access to essential health care services. CMAJ. 2007;177(6):583–90.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
Mortensen LH, Lauridsen JT, Diderichsen F, Kaplan GA, Gissler M, Andersen A-MN. Income-related and educational inequality in small-for-gestational age and preterm birth in Denmark and Finland 1987–2003. Scand J Public Health. 2010;38(1):40–5.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Kramer MS, Seguin L, Lydon J, Goulet L. Socio-economic disparities in pregnancy outcome: why do the poor fare so poorly? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2000;14(3):194–210.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Meng G, Thompson ME, Hall GB. Pathways of neighbourhood-level socio-economic determinants of adverse birth outcomes. Int J Health Geogr. 2013;12(1):32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
Cubbin C, Winkleby MA. Protective and harmful effects of neighborhood-level deprivation on individual-level health knowledge, behavior changes, and risk of coronary heart disease. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162(6):559–68.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Merlo J, Yang M, Chaix B, Lynch J, Råstam L. A brief conceptual tutorial on multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: investigating contextual phenomena in different groups of people. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59(9):729–36.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
Auger N, Giraud J, Daniel M. The joint influence of area income, income inequality, and immigrant density on adverse birth outcomes: a population-based study. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:237.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
Kramer MS. Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 1987;65(5):663–737.PubMedPubMedCentral
26.
27.
DMTI Spatial. GeoPinpoint 6.4. Markham, Ont; 2009.
28.
ESRI. ArcGIS 10.2. Redlands: Environmental Systems Research Institute; 2010.
29.
Gauvin L, Robitaille E, Riva M, McLaren L, Dassa C, Potvin L. Conceptualizing and operationalizing neighbourhoods: the conundrum of identifying territorial units. Can J public Heal. 2007;98 Suppl 1:S18–26.
30.
Holowaty EJ, Norwood T a, Wanigaratne S, Abellan JJ, Beale L. Feasibility and utility of mapping disease risk at the neighbourhood level within a Canadian public health unit: an ecological study. Int J Health Geogr. 2010;9:21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
du Plessis V, Beshiri R, Bollman RD, Clemenson H. Definitions of “Rural”. Agriculture and Rural Working Paper Series, No.: 61. Ottawa ON: Statistics Canada, Agriculture Division; 2002.
32.
Hystad P, Setton E, Cervantes A, Poplawski K, Deschenes S, Brauer M, et al. Creating national air pollution models for population exposure assessment in Canada. Env Heal Perspect. 2011;119(8):1123–9.CrossRef
33.
Chan E, Serrano J, Chen L, Stieb DM, Jerrett M, Osornio-Vargas A. Development of a Canadian socioeconomic status index for the study of health outcomes related to environmental pollution. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):714.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
Shiono PH, Klebanoff MA, Graubard BI, Berendes HW, Rhoads GG. Birth weight among women of different ethnic groups. JAMA. 1986;255(1):48–52.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Janssen P, Thiessen P, Klein M, Whitfield MF, Macnab YC, Cullus-Kuhl SC. Standards for the measurement of birth weight, length and head circumfrence at term in neonates of European, Chinese and south Asian ancestry. Open Med. 2007;1(2):E74–88.PubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Graham MH. Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology. 2003;84(11):2809–15.CrossRef
37.
Statistics Canada. Census of Canada. Topic-based Tabulations, 2006. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2006.
38.
Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ. Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2012.
39.
StataCorp LP. Stata 13. College Station: StataCorp LP; 2014.
40.
England LJ, Kendrick JS, Gargiullo PM, Zahniser C, Hannon WH. Measures of maternal tobacco exposure and infant birth weight at term. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153(10):954–60.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Secker-Walker RH, Vacek PM, Flynn BS, Mead PB. Estimated gains in birth weight associated with reductions in smoking during pregnancy. J Reprod Med. 1998;43(11):967–74.PubMed
42.
43.
Buka S, Brennan RT, Rich-Edwards JW, Raudenbush SW, Earls F. Neighborhood support and the birthweight of urban infants. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;157(1):1–8.CrossRef
44.
McCormick MC, Brooks-Gunn J, Shorter T, Holmes JH, Wallace CY, Heagarty MC. Factors associated with smoking in low-income pregnant women: relationship to birth weight, stressful life events, social support, health behaviors and mental distress. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(5):441–8.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Lumley J, Chamberlain C, Dowswell T, Oliver S, Oakley L, Watson L. Interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(3). Art.No.:CD001055. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.
46.
47.
Mitchell RE, Trickett EJ. Task force report: social networks as mediators of social support. Community Ment Health J. 1980;16(1):27–44.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Connor SK, McIntyre L. The sociodemographic predictors of smoking cessation among pregnant women in Canada. Can J public Heal. 1999;90(5):352–5.
49.
Lu Y, Tong S, Oldenburg B. Determinants of smoking and cessation during and after pregnancy. Health Promot Int. 2001;16(4):355–67.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Lisonkova S, Sheps SB, Janssen PA, Lee SK, Dahlgren L, Macnab YC. Birth outcomes among older mothers in rural versus urban areas: a residence-based approach. J Rural Health. 2011;27(2):211–9.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Borland T, Babayan A, Irfan S, Schwartz R. Exploring the adequacy of smoking cessation support for pregnant and postpartum women. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:472.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
52.
Auger N, Authier M-A, Martinez J, Daniel M. The association between rural-urban continuum, maternal education and adverse birth outcomes in Québec, Canada. J Rural Heal. 2009;25(4):342–51.CrossRef
53.
Sanders CL, Scott BR. Smoking and hormesis as confounding factors in radiation pulmonary carcinogenesis. Dose-response. 2008;6(1):53–79.CrossRef
54.
Calabrese EJ, Bachmann K a, Bailer a J, Bolger PM, Borak J, Cai L, et al. Biological stress response terminology: integrating the concepts of adaptive response and preconditioning stress within a hormetic dose-response framework. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2007;222(1):122–8.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Erickson AC, Ostry A, Chan LHM, Arbour L. The reduction of birth weight by fine particulate matter and its modification by maternal and neighbourhood-level factors: a multilevel analysis in British Columbia, Canada. Environmental Health; 2016;15:51.
56.
Windham GC, Fenster L, Hopkins B, Swan SH. The association of moderate maternal and paternal alcohol consumption with birthweight and gestational age. Epidemiology. 1995;6(6):591–7.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Fox SH, Koepsell TD, Daling JR. Birth weight and smoking during pregnancy—effect modification by maternal age. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;139(10):1008–15.PubMed
58.
Metcalfe A, Lail P, Ghali WA, Sauve RS. The association between neighbourhoods and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of multi-level studies. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2011;25(3):236–45.PubMedCrossRef
59.
England LJ, Grauman A, Qian C, Wilkins DG, Schisterman EF, Yu KF, et al. Misclassification of maternal smoking status and its effects on an epidemiologic study of pregnancy outcomes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007;9(10):1005–13.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Dietz PM, Homa D, England LJ, Burley K, Tong VT, Dube SR, et al. Estimates of nondisclosure of cigarette smoking among pregnant and nonpregnant women of reproductive Age in the united states. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(3):355–9.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Shipton D, Tappin DM, Vadiveloo T, Crossley JA, Aitken DA, Chalmers J. Reliability of self reported smoking status by pregnant women for estimating smoking prevalence: a retrospective, cross sectional study. BMJ. 2009;339(1):b4347.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
62.
Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. Canada-wide standards for particulate matter and ozone: five year report: 2000–2005. Report No.: PN 1374. Winnipeg; 2006.
63.
Nethery E, Brauer M, Janssen P. Time-activity patterns of pregnant women and changes during the course of pregnancy. J Expo Sci Env Epidemiol. 2009;19(3):317–24.CrossRef
64.
Bell ML, Belanger K. Review of research on residential mobility during pregnancy: consequences for assessment of prenatal environmental exposures. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2012;22(5):429–38.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
65.
Frosst G, Hutcheon J, Joseph KS, Kinniburgh B, Johnson C, Lee L. Validating the British Columbia perinatal data registry: a chart re-abstraction study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):123.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Air pollution, neighbourhood and maternal-level factors modify the effect of smoking on birth weight: a multilevel analysis in British Columbia, Canada
Authors
Anders C. Erickson
Aleck Ostry
Hing Man Chan
Laura Arbour
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3273-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Public Health 1/2016 Go to the issue

Study protocol

Using the Intervention Mapping protocol to develop a family-based intervention for improving lifestyle habits among overweight and obese children: study protocol for a quasi-experimental trial

Research article

Are distinctive risk indicators associated with different stages of caries in children? A cross-sectional study

Research article

Retrospective analysis of population-based causes of death and life expectancy in urban Western China from 2003 to 2012

Research article

Healthy Food Intake Index (HFII) – Validity and reproducibility in a gestational-diabetes-risk population

Research article

A retrospective analysis of real-world use of the eaTracker® My Goals website by adults from Ontario and Alberta, Canada

Research article

Understanding how perceptions of tobacco constituents and the FDA relate to effective and credible tobacco risk messaging: A national phone survey of U.S. adults, 2014–2015