Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Socioeconomic disparities in lung cancer mortality in Belgian men and women (2001-2011): does it matter who you live with?

Authors: Katrien Vanthomme, Hadewijch Vandenheede, Paulien Hagedoorn, Sylvie Gadeyne

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Ample studies have observed an adverse association between individual socioeconomic position (SEP) and lung cancer mortality. Moreover, the presence of a partner has shown to be a crucial determinant of health. Yet, few studies have assessed whether partner’s SEP affects health in addition to individual SEP. This paper will study whether own SEP (education), partner’s SEP (partner’s education) and own and partner’s SEP combined (housing conditions), are associated with lung cancer mortality in Belgium.

Methods

Data consist of the Belgian 2001 census linked to register data on cause-specific mortality for 2001–2011. The study population includes all married or cohabiting Belgian inhabitants aged 40–84 years. Age-standardized lung cancer mortality rates (direct standardization) and mortality rate ratios (Poisson regression) were computed for the different SEP groups.

Results

In men, we observed a clear inverse association between all SEP indicators (own and partner’s education, and housing conditions) and lung cancer mortality. Men benefit from having a higher educated partner in terms of lower lung cancer mortality rates. These observations hold for both middle-aged and older men.
For women, the picture is less uniform. In middle-aged and older women, housing conditions is inversely associated with lung cancer mortality. As for partner’s education, for middle-aged women, the association is rather weak whereas for older women, there is no such association. Whereas the educational level of middle-aged women is inversely associated with lung cancer mortality, in older women this association disappears in the fully adjusted model.

Conclusions

Both men and women benefit from being in a relationship with a high-educated partner. It seems that for men, the educational level of their partner is of great importance while for women the housing conditions is more substantial. Both research and policy interventions should allow for the family level as well.
Literature
1.
Vanthomme K, Vandenheede H, Hagedoorn P, Deboosere P, Gadeyne S. Trends in site- and sex-specific cancer mortality between 1979 and 2010 in Belgium compared with Europe using WHO data. J Public Health. 2015 Jun 11. doi:10.​1093/​pubmed/​fdv078. [Epub ahead of print]
2.
Phelan JC, Link BG. Controlling disease and creating disparities: a fundamental cause perspective. Journals Gerontol Ser B. 2005;60B Special(II):27–33.CrossRef
3.
Phelan JC, Link BG, Diez-roux A, Kawachi I, Levin B. “Fundamental causes” of social inequalities in mortality: a test of the theory *. J Health Soc Behav. 2004;45(3):265–85.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Schmidlin K, Spoerri A, Egger M, Zwahlen M, Stuck A, Clough-Gorr KM. Cancer, a disease of aging (part 2)–risk factors for older adult cancer mortality in Switzerland 1991–2008. Swiss Med Wkly. 2012;142(August):w13607.PubMed
5.
Kohler IV, Martikainen P, Smith KP, Elo IT. Educational differences in All-cause mortality by marital status–EVidence from Bulgaria, Finland and the united states. Demogr Res. 2008;19(10):2011–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Huijts T, Monden CWS, Kraaykamp G. Education, educational heterogamy, and self-assessed health in Europe: a multilevel study of spousal effects in 29 European countries. Eur Sociol Rev. 2009;26(3):261–76.CrossRef
7.
8.
Martelin T. Mortality by indicators of socioeconomic status among the Finnish elderly. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(9):1257–78.CrossRefPubMed
9.
NÆss Ø, Claussen B, Thelle DS, Smith GD. Four indicators of socioeconomic position : relative ranking across causes of death. Scand J Public Health. 2005;33:215–21.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Kravdal Ø. A broader perspective on education and mortality: are we influenced by other people’s education? Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(3):620–36.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Monden CW, van Lenthe F, De Graaf ND, Kraaykamp G. Partner’s and own education: does who you live with matter for self-assessed health, smoking and excessive alcohol consumption? Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(10):1901–12.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Harvei S, Kravdal Ø. The importance of marital and socioeconomic status in incidence and survival of prostate cancer. Prev Med (Baltim). 1997;26:623–32.CrossRef
13.
Vandenheede H, Vanroelen C, Gadeyne S, De Grande H, Deboosere P. Household-based socioeconomic position and diabetes-related mortality among married and cohabiting persons: findings from a census-based cohort study (Flanders, 2001–2010). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;0:1–7.
14.
Hart CL, Hole DJ, Gillis CR, Smith GD, Watt CM, Hawtorne VM. Social class differences in lung cancer mortality : risk factor explanations using two Scottish cohort studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30:268–74.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Soerjomataram I, Barendregt JJ, Gartner C, Kunst A, Møller H, Avendano M. Reducing inequalities in lung cancer incidence through smoking policies. Lung Cancer. 2011;73(3):268–73.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Wagenaar KP, de Boer MR, Luce D, Menvielle G. Time trends in educational differences in lung and upper aero digestive tract cancer mortality in France between 1990 and 2007. Cancer Epidemiol. 2012;36(4):329–34.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Rubin MS, Clouston S, Link BG. A fundamental cause approach to the study of disparities in lung cancer and pancreatic cancer mortality in the United States. Soc Sci Med. 2014;100:54–61.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Mackenbach JP, Huisman M, Andersen O, Bopp M, Borgan J-K, Borrell C, et al. Inequalities in lung cancer mortality by the educational level in 10 European populations. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40:126–35.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Lopez AD, Collishaw NE, Piha T. A descriptive model of the cigarette epidemic in developed countries. Tob Control. 1994;3:242–7.CrossRefPubMedCentral
20.
Jaffe DH, Eisenbach Z, Neumark YD, Manor O. Effects of husbands’ and wives’ education on each other’s mortality. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(8):2014–23.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Floud S, Balkwill A, Canoy D, Wright FL, Reeves GK, Green J, et al. Marital status and ischemic heart disease incidence and mortality in women : a large prospective study. BMC Med. 2014;12(42):1–9.
22.
Kravdal Ø. The poorer cancer survival among the unmarried in Norway: is much explained by comorbidities? Soc Sci Med. 2013;81:42–52.CrossRefPubMed
23.
24.
Johnson NJ, Backlund E, Sorlie PD, Loveless CA. Marital status and mortality: the national longitudinal mortality study. Ann Epidemiol. 2000;10:224–38.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Manzoli L, Villari P, Pirone GM, Boccia A. Marital status and mortality in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(1):77–94.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Goldman N, Korenman S, Weinstein R. Marital status and health among the elderly. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40(12):1717–30.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Lund R, Due P, Modvig J, Holstein BE, Damsgaard MT, Andersen PK. Cohabitation and marital status as predictors of mortality–an eight year follow-up study. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55:673–9.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Waldron I, Hughes ME, Brooks TL. Marriage protection and marriage selection–prospective evidence for reciprocal effects of marital status and health. Soc Sci Med. 1996;43(I):113–23.CrossRefPubMed
29.
30.
Pinquart M, Duberstein PR. Associations of social networks with cancer mortality: a meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2010;75(2):122–37.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Skalická V, Kunst AE. Effects of spouses’ socioeconomic characteristics on mortality among men and women in a Norwegian longitudinal study. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(9):2035–47.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Brown DC, Hummer RA, Hayward MD. The importance of spousal education for the self-rated health of married adults in the United States. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2014;33(1):127–51.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Lyssens-Danneboom V, Mortelmans D. Living apart together and money: new partnerships, traditional gender roles. J Marriage Fam. 2014;76(5):949–66.CrossRef
34.
Van Imhoff E, Keilman N. Lipro 2.0: an application of a dynamic demographic projection model to household structure in the Netherlands. vol. 23. Amsterdam: NIDI, CBGS; 1991. p. 255.
35.
Deboosere P, Willaert D. Codebook Algemene Socio-economische enquête 2001. Brussel; 2004. Report No.: Working Paper 2004–1
36.
Belgian Cancer Registry. Cancer survival in Belgium. Brussels; 2012
37.
Gisle L, Hesse E, Drieskens S, Demarest S, Van der Heyden J, Tafforeau J. Gezondheidsenquête België, 2008. Rapport II - Leefstijl en preventie. Brussel; 2010
38.
Gisle L. Het gebruik van tabak. In: Gisle L, Demarest S, editors. Gezondheidsenquête 2013 Rapport 2: Gezondheidsgedrag en leefstijl. Brussel: WIV-ISP; 2014.
39.
IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Volume 83. Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking. Lyon: World Health Organization; 2004. p. 1452.
40.
Bossuyt N, Gadeyne S, Deboosere P, Van Oyen H. Socio-economic inequalities in health expectancy in Belgium. Public Health. 2004;118(1):3–10.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Koskinen S, Martelin T. Why are socioeconomic mortality differences smaller among women than among men? Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(10):1385–96.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Jaffe DH, Eisenbach Z, Neumark YD, Manor O. Does one’s own and one’s spouse’s education affect overall and cause-specific mortality in the elderly? Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34(6):1409–16.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Metadata
Title
Socioeconomic disparities in lung cancer mortality in Belgian men and women (2001-2011): does it matter who you live with?
Authors
Katrien Vanthomme
Hadewijch Vandenheede
Paulien Hagedoorn
Sylvie Gadeyne
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3139-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Public Health 1/2016 Go to the issue

Erratum

Erratum to: ‘Point-of-sale cigarette marketing and smoking-induced deprivation in smokers: results from a population-based survey’

Research article

An evaluation of the impact of a restrictive retail food environment intervention in a rural community pharmacy setting

Research article

Effectiveness of a smartphone app in increasing physical activity amongst male adults: a randomised controlled trial

Research article

Intimate partner violence against married rural-to-urban migrant workers in eastern China: prevalence, patterns, and associated factors

Research article

The effectiveness bundling of zinc with Oral Rehydration Salts (ORS) for improving adherence to acute watery diarrhea treatment in Ethiopia: cluster randomised controlled trial

Research article

Integrating acute malnutrition interventions into national health systems: lessons from Niger