Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Auditing the socio-environmental determinants of motivation towards physical activity or sedentariness in work-aged adults: a qualitative study

Authors: Richard Keegan, Geoff Middleton, Hannah Henderson, Mica Girling

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is a lack of understanding of work aged adults’ (30–60 years old) perspectives on the motivation of physical activity versus sedentariness. This study aims to: (1) identify which socio-environmental factors motivate physical activity and/or sedentary behavior, in adults aged 30–60 years; and (2) explore how these motivators interact and combine.

Method

Fifteen work-aged adults who, were able to engage in physical activity (Mean age = 43.9 years; SD 9.6, range 31–59), participated in semi-structured interviews. Inductive content analysis was used to generate an inventory of socio-environmental factors and their specific influences on motivation towards physical activity or sedentariness.

Results

Key socio-environmental agents found to influence motivation included: Spouse/partner, parents, children, siblings, whole family, grandchildren, friends, work-mates, neighbors, strangers, team-mates and class-mates, instructors, health care professionals, employers, gyms and health companies, governments, media and social media, cultural norms, and the physical environment. Mechanisms fell into five broad themes of socio-environmental motivation for both physical activity and sedentariness: (1) competence and progress; (2) informational influences, (3) emotional influences, (4) pragmatics and logistics, and (5) relationships. Similar socio-environmental factors were frequently reported as able to motivate both activity and sedentariness. Likewise, individual categories of influence could also motivate both behaviors, depending on context.

Conclusion

The findings of this paper ‘unpack’ theoretical concepts into specific and targeted behavioral recommendations. The data suggested no simple solutions for promoting physical activity or reducing sedentariness, but rather complex and interacting systems surrounding work-aged adults. Findings also suggest that health professionals should be encouraged to support adults’ health by examining the socio-environmental motivational influences, or ‘motivational atmosphere’.
Literature
1.
World Health Organization. World Health Statistics 2011. WHO Libr Cat Data. 2011. doi: 978 92 4 156419 9.
2.
World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva: World Heal Organ; 2010. p. 60.
3.
Dumith SC, Hallal PC, Reis RS, Kohl HW. Worldwide prevalence of physical inactivity and its association with human development index in 76 countries. Prev Med (Baltim). 2011;53:24–8.CrossRef
4.
Kohl HW, Craig CL, Lambert EV, et al. The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. Lancet. 2012;380:294–305.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zhang J, Chaaban J. The economic cost of physical inactivity in China. Prev Med (Baltim). 2013;56:75–8.CrossRef
6.
Carlson SA, Fulton JE, Pratt M, Yang Z, Adams EK. Inadequate physical activity and health care expenditures in the United States. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;57:315–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Yee SL, Williams-Piehota P, Sorensen A, Roussel A, Hersey J, Hamre R. The nutrition and physical activity program to prevent obesity and other chronic diseases: monitoring progress in funded states. Prev Chronic Dis. 2006;3:A23.PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Physical Activity and the Environment. NICE Public Heal Guid; 2008. 56
9.
British Heart Foundation National Centre (BHFNC) for Physical Activity and Health, BHF National Centre. Economic costs of physical inactivity. 2013. p. 8.
10.
McCormick B, Stone I. Economic costs of obesity and the case for government intervention. Obes Rev. 2007;8:161–4.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Mâsse LC, Tilert T, Mcdowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40:181–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Sisson SB, Katzmarzyk PT. International prevalence of physical activity in youth and adults. Obes Rev. 2008;9:606–14.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, et al. Global physical activity levels: Surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet. 2012;380:247–57.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;380:219–29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Koeneman MA, Verheijden MW, Chinapaw MJM, Hopman-Rock M. Determinants of physical activity and exercise in healthy older adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:142.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
17.
Kohl HW, Cook HD. Approaches to Physical Education in Schools. US: National Academies Press; 2013.
18.
Horne M, Tierney S. What are the barriers and facilitators to exercise and physical activity uptake and adherence among South Asian older adults: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Prev Med (Baltim). 2012;55:276–84.CrossRef
19.
Van Cauwenberg J, De Bourdeaudhuij I, De Meester F, Van Dyck D, Salmon J, Clarys P, et al. Relationship between the physical environment and physical activity in older adults: a systematic review. Health Place. 2011;17:458–69.
20.
Chogahara M, O’Brien Cousins S, Wankel M. Social influences on physical activity in older adults: a review. J Ageing Phys Act. 1998;6:1–17.
21.
22.
Keegan RJ, Biddle JH, Lavallee DE. It’s not how old you are, it’s where you’re at in life : application of a life-span interventions framework to physical activity in examining community and environmental interventions. Sport Exerc Psychlogy Rev. 2010;6:18–34.
23.
Goldberg JH, King AC. Physical activity and weight management across the lifespan. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:145–70.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Kirk SFL, Penney TL, McHugh TLF. Characterizing the obesogenic environment: the state of the evidence with directions for future research. Obes Rev. 2010;11:109–17.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Epstein LH, Roemmich JN. Reducing sedentary behavior: role in modifying physical activity. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2001;29:103–8.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Vallerand R, Thill E. Introduction au concept de motivation. In: Vallerand RJ, Thill EE, editors. Introd. à la Psychol. la Motiv. Editions études vivantes – Vigot, Quebec. 1993. p. 533–81.
27.
Roberts GC. Motivation in sport: Understanding and enhancing the motivation and achievement of children. In: Singer R, Murphy M, Tennant K, editors. Handb. Res. Sport Psychol. New York MacMillan. 1993.
28.
Ames C. Achievement goals and the classroom motivational climate. In: Student Perceptions Classr. 1992. p. 327–48.
29.
Keegan R, Spray C, Harwood C, Lavallee D. The motivational atmosphere in youth sport: coach, parent, and peer influences on motivation in specializing sport participants. 2010. p. 37–41.
30.
Keegan R, Spray C, Harwood C, Lavallee D. From “motivational climate” to “motivational atmosphere”: a review of research examining the social and environmental influences on athlete motivation in sport. In: Geranto BD, editor. Sport Psychol. Hauppauge: Nova Science; 2011. p. 1–52.
31.
Keegan RJ, Spray CM, Harwood CG, Lavallee DE. A qualitative synthesis of research into social motivational influences across the athletic career span. Qual Res Sport Exerc Heal. 2014;6:537–67.CrossRef
32.
33.
Tilley N, Pawson R. Realistic evaluation: an overview. Br J Sociol. 2000;49:331.
34.
Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Basics Qual Res Tech Proced Dev Grounded Theory. 2008. doi:10.​4135/​9781452230153.
35.
Henwood K, Pidgeon N. Grounded theory in psychological research. Qual Res Psychol Expand Perspect Methodol Des. 2003. doi:10.​1037/​10595-008.
36.
Sandelowski M. Theory unmasked: the uses and guises of theory in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health. 1993;16:213–8.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Dey I. Grounding grounded theory: guidelines for qualitative inquiry. 1999.CrossRef
38.
Keegan RJ, Harwood CG, Spray CM, Lavallee D. A qualitative investigation of the motivational climate in elite sport. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2014;15:97–107.CrossRef
39.
Keegan RJ, Harwood CG, Spray CM, Lavallee DE. A qualitative investigation exploring the motivational climate in early career sports participants: coach, parent and peer influences on sport motivation. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2009;10:361–72.CrossRef
40.
Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NLD (2015) The Trans-Contextual Model of Autonomous Motivation in Education: Conceptual and Empirical Issues and Meta-Analysis. Rev Educ Res 0034654315585005–
41.
Salmon J, Owen N, Crawford D, Bauman A, Sallis JF. Physical activity and sedentary behavior: a population-based study of barriers, enjoyment, and preference. Health Psychol. 2003;22:178–88.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Hagger MS, Keatley DA, Chan DCK, Chatzisarantis NLD, Dimmock JA, Jackson B, et al. The goose is (half) cooked: a consideration of the mechanisms and interpersonal context is needed to elucidate the effects of personal financial incentives on health behaviour. Int J Behav Med. 2014;21:197–201.
43.
Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NLD, Harris J. The process by which relative autonomous motivation affects intentional behavior: comparing effects across dieting and exercise behaviors. Motiv Emot. 2006;30:307–21.CrossRef
44.
Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NLD. An integrated behavior change model for physical activity. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2014;42:62–9.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Lincoln G. How can the naturalist meet these trustworthiness criteria. In: Nat. Inq. 1985. p. 301–19.
46.
Morgan DL. Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: applications to health research. Qual Health Res. 1998;8:362–76.CrossRefPubMed
47.
48.
49.
Pope C. Qualitative research methods: a health focus: PL Rice, D Ezzy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, pp. 291. ISBN: 0 195 50610 3. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30:185.CrossRef
50.
Liamputtong P, Ezzy D. Qualitative research methods: a health focus. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 1999.
51.
Dew K. A health researcher’s guide to qualitative methodologies. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007;31:433–7.CrossRefPubMed
52.
53.
Goulding C. Grounded theory, ethnography and phenomenology: a comparative analysis of three qualitative strategies for marketing research. Eur J Mark. 2005;39:294–308.CrossRef
54.
Cook KE. Using critical ethnography to explore issues in health promotion. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:129–38.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Roberts GC. Motivation in sport and exercise from an achievement goal theory perspective: after 30 years, where are we? In: Roberts GC, Treasure DC, editors. Adv. Motiv. Sport Exerc. 3rd ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2012. p. 465.
56.
Strauss A, Corbin J. Grounded Theory Designs. Basics Qual Res Tech Proced Dev. 1998. grounded theory
57.
Tracy SJ. Qualitative quality: eight “Big-Tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq. 2010;16:837–51.CrossRef
58.
Côté J, Salmela JH, Baria A, Russell SJ. Organizing and interpreting unstructured qualitative data. Sport Psychol. 1993;7:127–37.
59.
60.
LeCompte MD, Goetz JP. Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Rev Educ Res. 1982;52:31–60.CrossRef
61.
Biddle SJH, Markland D, Gilbourne D, Nikos LD, Sparkes AC, Chatzisarantis NLD. Research methods in sport and exercise psychology: quantitative and qualitative issues. J Sports Sci. 2011;19(10):37–41.
62.
Pawson R, Tilley N. An introduction to scientific realist evaluation. In: Eval. 21st century A Handb. 1997. p. 542.
63.
Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55:68–78.CrossRefPubMed
64.
Seeman TE, Berkman LF. Structural characteristics of social networks and their relationship with social support in the elderly: who provides support. Soc Sci Med. 1988;26:737–49.CrossRefPubMed
65.
Cohen S, Mermelstein R, Kamarck T, Hoberman HM. Measuring the functional components of social support. In: Soc. Support Theory, Res. Appl. 1985. p. 73–94.CrossRef
66.
Rees T, Hardy L. Matching social support with stressors: effects on factors underlying performance in tennis. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2004;5:319–37.CrossRef
67.
Peters G-JY, Ruiter R a C, Kok G. Threatening communication: a critical re-analysis and a revised meta-analytic test of fear appeal theory. Health Psychol Rev. 2012;7:1–24.
68.
Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Heal Promot. 1997;12:38–48.CrossRef
69.
Deci EL, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory: a macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Can Psychol Can. 2008;49:182–5.CrossRef
70.
Maitland C, Stratton G, Foster S, Braham R, Rosenberg M. The Dynamic Family Home: a qualitative exploration of physical environmental influences on children’s sedentary behaviour and physical activity within the home space. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11:157.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
71.
72.
Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Read MA AddisonWesley. 1975. p. 480.
73.
74.
75.
Johnson L, Chen T-A, Hughes SO, O’Connor TM. The association of parent’s outcome expectations for child TV viewing with parenting practices and child TV viewing: an examination using path analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
76.
Li B, Adab P, Cheng KK. The role of grandparents in childhood obesity in China - evidence from a mixed methods study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
77.
Henderson KE, Grode GM, O’Connell ML, Schwartz MB. Environmental factors associated with physical activity in childcare centers. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
78.
Smith AL, Troped PJ, McDonough MH, DeFreese JD. Youth perceptions of how neighborhood physical environment and peers affect physical activity: a focus group study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
79.
Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory. Int J Qual Methods. 1967;5:1–10.
80.
Glaser BG. Conceptualization: on theory and theorizing using grounded theory. Int J Qual Methods. 2008;1:23–38.
81.
Chatzisarantis NLD, Hagger MS, Smith B. Influences of perceived autonomy support on physical activity within the theory of planned behavior. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2007;37:934–54.CrossRef
82.
Miller JH, Page SE. Complex adaptive systems: an introduction to computational models of social life: an introduction to computational models of social life. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2009.CrossRef
83.
Eagle N, Pentland A. Reality mining: sensing complex social systems. Pers Ubiquitous Comput. 2005;10:255–68.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Auditing the socio-environmental determinants of motivation towards physical activity or sedentariness in work-aged adults: a qualitative study
Authors
Richard Keegan
Geoff Middleton
Hannah Henderson
Mica Girling
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3098-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Public Health 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

Gaps in awareness of peripheral arterial disease in Sri Lanka: a cross sectional study

Research article

Characterization of urinary cotinine in non-smoking residents in smoke-free homes in the Korean National Environmental Health Survey (KoNEHS)

Research article

Unravelling the effect of the Dutch school-based nutrition programme Taste Lessons: the role of dose, appreciation and interpersonal communication

Study protocol

‘Let’s Move It’ – a school-based multilevel intervention to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour among older adolescents in vocational secondary schools: a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial

Research article

Maternal tea consumption and the risk of preterm delivery in urban China: a birth cohort study

Erratum

Erratum to: ‘Current and future economic burden of diabetes among working-age adults in Asia: conservative estimates for Singapore from 2010-2050’