Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

The effects of narrative versus non-narrative information in school health education about alcohol drinking for low educated adolescents

Authors: Simon Zebregs, Bas van den Putte, Anneke de Graaf, Jeroen Lammers, Peter Neijens

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Traditionally most health education materials are written in an expository non-narrative format. Scholars have argued that the effectiveness of materials may increase when these texts are replaced by narrative texts, and that the non-narrative texts should be replaced by narrative texts. However, no previous studies have tested these claims in the context of school health education for low educated adolescents. This study aims to do so for an existing preventive health education intervention about alcohol for low educated adolescents. Based on the empirical findings of previous studies, it is expected that the claims about narratives being more effective than non-narrative texts are not true for effects on knowledge. Instead non-narrative texts are expected to have a stronger impact on this outcome variable. For attitude towards alcohol and intention to drink alcohol the claims are expected to be true, because participants are expected to be less aware of the persuasive intent of the narrative texts, which would make them less resistant. As a result, narrative texts are expected to have a stronger effect on attitude and intention.

Methods

This study compares the effects on knowledge, attitude towards alcohol, and intention to drink alcohol of both information formats in a two-condition (non-narrative vs. narrative information) experiment with repeated measures (pre-measurement, immediate post-measurement, and delayed post-measurement). The experiment was conducted amongst 296 students of the two lowest levels of the Dutch secondary education system.

Results

The results showed immediate effects on knowledge and attitude towards alcohol, which did not differ between conditions and school levels. These effects did not persist over time. There were no effects on intention to drink alcohol.

Conclusion

It is concluded non-narrative and narrative information are equally effective in the context of school health education, suggesting the claims that scholars have made about the superior effects of narrative texts are not true. Given the fact that narrative texts are more expensive to develop, policy makers may not be advised to prefer these types of texts over the traditionally used non-narrative texts.
Literature
1.
Montez JK, Zajacova A. Trends in mortality risk by education level and cause of death among US White women from 1986–2006. Am J Public Health. 2013;103:473–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Bernabé E, Suominen AL, Nordblad A, Vehkalahti MM, Hausen H, Knuuttila M, et al. Education level and oral health in Finnish adults: evidence from different lifecourse models. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38:25–32.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Braveman PA, Cubbin C, Egerter S, Williams DR, Pamuk E. Socioeconomic disparities in health in the United States: what the patterns tell us. Am J Public Health. 2011;100:s186–96.CrossRef
4.
Kepper A, Monshouwer K, Van Dorsselaer S, Vollebergh W. Middelengebruik door jongeren. TSG. 2012;90:287–94.CrossRef
5.
Neiss M, Rowe DC, Rodgers JL. Does education mediate the relationship between IQ and age of first birth? A behavioural genetic analysis. J Biosoc Sci. 2002;34:259–75.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Van Dijk H, Tellegen P. Nederlands intelligentietest voor onderwijsniveau: Handleiding en verantwoording. Amsterdam, NL: Boom test uitgevers; 2004.
7.
Hunt E. Information processing and intelligence: Where we are and where we are going. In: Sternberg RJ, Pretz JE, editors. Cognition and intelligence: Identifying the mechanisms of the mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2005. p. 1–25.
8.
Kreuter MW, Green MC, Cappella JN, Slater MD, Wise ME, Storey D, et al. Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: a framework to guide research and application. Ann Behav Med. 2007;33:221–35.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Murphy ST, Frank LB, Chatterjee JS, Baezconde-Garbanati L. Narrative versus nonnarrative: The role of identification, transportation, and emotion in reducing health disparities. J Commun. 2013;63:116–37.CrossRef
10.
Lemal M, Van den Bulck J. Testing the effectiveness of a skin cancer narrative in promoting positive health behaviour: A pilot study. Prev Med. 2010;51:178–81.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Kopfman JE, Smith SW, Ah Yun JK, Hodges A. Affective and cognitive reactions to narrative versus statistical evidence organ donation messages. J Appl Commun Res. 1998;26:279–300.CrossRef
12.
Green MC, Brock TC, Kaufman GF. Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Commun Theory. 2004;14:311–27.CrossRef
13.
14.
Vaughan PW, Rogers EM, Singhal A, Swalehe RM. Entertainment-education and HIV/AIDS prevention: A field experiment in Tanzania. Journal of Health Education. 2000;5 Suppl 1:81–100.
15.
Volk RJ, Jibaja-Weiss ML, Hawley ST, Kneuper S, Spann SJ, Miles BJ, et al. Entertainment education for prostate cancer screening: A randomized trial among primary care patients with low health literacy. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:482–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Land J, Sanders T, Van den Bergh H. Effectieve tekststructuur voor het VMBO: Een corpus-analytisch en experimenteel onderzoek naar tekstbegrip en tekstwaardering van vmbo-leerlingen voor studieteksten. Pedagogische Studiën. 2008;85:76–94.
17.
Alvermann DE, Hynd CE, Qian G. Effects of interactive discussion and text type on learning counterintuitive science concepts. J Educ Res. 1995;88:146–54.CrossRef
18.
De Vries H, Kremers SPJ, Smeets T, Brug J, Eijmael K. The effectiveness of tailored feedback and action plans in an intervention addressing multiple health behaviors. American J Health Promot. 2008;22:417–25.CrossRef
19.
Cuijpers P, Jonkers R, De Weerdt I, De Jong A. The effects of drug abuse prevention at school: The “Healthy School and Drugs” project. Addiction. 2002;97:67–73.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Murphy ST, Frank LB, Moran MB, Patnoe-Woodley P. Involved, transported, or emotional? Exploring the determinants of change in knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour in entertainment-education. J Commun. 2011;61:407–31.CrossRef
21.
Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychol. 2001;3:265–99.CrossRef
22.
Green MC. Research challenges in narrative persuasion. Information Design Journal. 2008;16:47–52.CrossRef
23.
Nisbett RE, Ross L. Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1980.
24.
Radvansky GA. Human memory. Boston, MA: Pearson Education; 2011.
25.
Klimesch W. The structure of long-term memory: A connectivity model of semantic processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1994.
26.
Garner R, Gillingham MG, White CS. Effects of “seductive details” on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cogn Instr. 1989;6:41–57.CrossRef
27.
Mayer RE. Multimedia learning. In: Ross B, editor. Psychology of learning and motivation. San Diego, CA: Academic; 2002. p. 85–139.
28.
Mayer RE. Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In: Mayer RE, editor. Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005. p. 147–58.CrossRef
29.
Wolfe MB, Mienko JA. Learning and memory of factual content from narrative and expository text. Br J Educ Psychol. 2007;77:541–64.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Wolfe MB, Woodwyk JM. Processing and memory of information presented in narrative or expository texts. Br J Educ Psychol. 2010;80:341–62.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Hovland CI, Janis IL, Kelley HH. Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1953.
32.
Slater MD, Rouner D. Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Commun Theory. 2002;12:173–91.
33.
Moyer-Gusé E. Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Commun Theory. 2008;18:407–25.CrossRef
34.
Janssen E, Van Osch L, De Vries H, Lechner L. The influence of narrative risk communication on feelings of cancer risk. Br J Health Psychol. 2013;18:407–19.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Ajzen I. Theory of planned behaviour. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50:179–211.CrossRef
36.
Van Dinteren R, Droste J. De verpakking bij leren. In: Lazeron N, Van Dinteren R, editors. Brein@ work. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2010. p. 379–85.CrossRef
37.
O’Keefe DJ. The relative persuasiveness of different message types does not vary as a function of the persuasive outcome assessed. Communication Yearbook. 2013;37:221–50.
38.
Krank MD, Ames SL, Grenard JL, Schoenfeld T, Stacy AW. Paradoxical effects of alcohol information on alcohol outcome expectancies. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010;34:1193–200.PubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Fulton HG, Krank MD, Stewart SH. Outcome expectancy liking: A self-generated, self-coded measure predicts adolescent substance use trajectories. Psychol Addict Behav. 2012;26:870–9.CrossRefPubMed
40.
41.
Sagan A. Market research and preference data. In: Scott M, Simonoff J, Marx B, editors. The SAGE handbook of multilevel modeling. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2013. p. 581–99.CrossRef
42.
Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1979;37:1915–26.CrossRef
43.
Petty RE, Haugtvedt C, Smith SM. Elaboration as a determinant of attitude strength: Creating attitudes that are persistent, resistant, and predictive of behaviour. In: Petty RE, Krosnick JA, editors. Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1995. p. 1–24.
44.
Krosnick JA, Petty RE. Attitude strength: An overview. In: Petty RE, Krosnick JA, editors. Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1995. p. 1–24.
45.
Zebregs S, Van den Putte B, Neijens P, De Graaf A. The differential impact of statistical and narrative evidence on beliefs, attitude, and intention: A meta-analysis. Health Commun. 2015;30:282–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The effects of narrative versus non-narrative information in school health education about alcohol drinking for low educated adolescents
Authors
Simon Zebregs
Bas van den Putte
Anneke de Graaf
Jeroen Lammers
Peter Neijens
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2425-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Public Health 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research article

Consumption and drinking frequency of alcoholic beverage among women in Ghana: a cross-sectional study

Research article

Prevalence of use of non-prescription analgesics in the Norwegian HUNT3 population: Impact of gender, age, exercise and prescription of opioids

Study protocol

The EPIC Kids Study: a randomized family-focused YMCA-based intervention to prevent type 2 diabetes in at-risk youth

Research article

Rates of motorcycle helmet use and reasons for non-use among adults and children in Luang Prabang, Lao People’s Democratic Republic

Research article

Dietary sodium and iodine in remote Indigenous Australian communities: will salt-reduction strategies increase risk of iodine deficiency? A cross-sectional analysis and simulation study

Research article

Malaria, anaemia and nutritional status among schoolchildren in relation to ecosystems, livelihoods and health systems in Kilosa District in central Tanzania