Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Finding the keys to successful adult-targeted advertisements on obesity prevention: an experimental audience testing study

Authors: Helen Dixon, Maree Scully, Sarah Durkin, Emily Brennan, Trish Cotter, Sarah Maloney, Blythe J. O’Hara, Melanie Wakefield

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Mass media communications are an important component of comprehensive interventions to address population levels of overweight and obesity, yet we have little understanding of the effective characteristics of specific advertisements (ads) on this topic. This study aimed to quantitatively test audience reactions to existing adult-focused public health television ads addressing overweight and obesity to determine which ads have the highest levels of message acceptance, argument strength, personalised perceived effectiveness and negative emotional impact.

Methods

1116 Australian adults aged 21-55 years recruited from a national online panel participated in this web-based study. Quotas were applied to achieve even numbers of males and females, those aged 21-29 years and 30-55 years, and those with a healthy weight (BMI = 18.5-24.9) and overweight/obesity (BMI = 25+). Participants were randomly assigned to view and rate four of eight ads that varied in terms of message content (health consequences, supportive/encouraging or social norms/acceptability) and execution style (graphic, simulation/animation, positive or negative testimonial, or depicted scene).

Results

Toxic fat (a graphic, health consequences ad) was the top performing ad on all four outcome measures and was significantly more likely than the other ads tested to promote strong responses in terms of message acceptance, argument strength and negative emotional impact. Measure up (a negative testimonial, health consequences ad) performed comparably on personalised perceived effectiveness. Most ads produced stronger perceptions of personalised perceived effectiveness among participants with overweight/obesity compared to participants with healthy weight. Some ads were more likely to promote strong negative emotions among participants with overweight/obesity.

Conclusions

Findings provide preliminary evidence of the most promising content and executional styles of ads that could be pursued as part of obesity prevention campaigns. Ads emphasising the negative health consequences of excess weight appear to elicit stronger cognitive and emotional responses from adults with overweight/obesity. However, careful pre-testing of these types of ads is needed prior to their inclusion in actual campaigns to ensure they do not have unintended negative impacts such as increased stigmatisation of vulnerable individuals and increased levels of body dissatisfaction and/or eating-disordered behaviour among at-risk population sub-groups.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Stevens GA, Singh GM, Lu Y, Danaei G, Lin JK, Finucane MM, et al. National, regional, and global trends in adult overweight and obesity prevalences. Popul Health Metr. 2012;10(1):22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2000.
3.
4.
International Agency for Research on Cancer. Weight control and physical activity. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2002.
5.
Durkin S, Brennan E, Wakefield M. Mass media campaigns to promote smoking cessation among adults: An integrative review. Tob Control. 2012;21:127–38.CrossRefPubMed
6.
National Cancer Institute. The role of the media in promoting and reducing tobacco use, NIH Pub No 07-6242. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 2008.
7.
Montague M, Borland R, Sinclair C. Slip! Slop! Slap! and SunSmart, 1980-2000: Skin cancer control and 20 years of population-based campaigning. Health Educ Behav. 2001;28(3):290–305.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Saraiya M, Glanz K, Briss PA, Nichols P, White C, Das D, et al. Interventions to prevent skin cancer by reducing exposure to ultraviolet radiation: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27(5):422–66.PubMed
9.
King EL, Grunseit AC, O’Hara BJ, Bauman AE. Evaluating the effectiveness of an Australian obesity mass-media campaign: how did the ‘Measure-Up’ campaign measure up in New South Wales? Health Educ Res. 2013;28(6):1029–39.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Morley B, Wakefield M, Dunlop S, Hill D. Impact of a mass media campaign linking abdominal obesity and cancer: a natural exposure evaluation. Health Educ Res. 2009;24(6):1069–79.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Stewart H, Bowden JA, Bayly M, Sharplin G, Durkin S, Miller CL, et al. Potential effectiveness of specific anti-smoking mass media advertisements among Australian Indigenous smokers. Health Educ Res. 2011;26(6):961–75.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Durkin S, Bayly M, Cotter T, Mullin S, Wakefield M. Potential effectiveness of anti-smoking advertisement types in ten low and middle income countries: Do demographics, smoking characteristics and cultural differences matter? Soc Sci Med. 2013;98:204–13.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Wakefield M, Bayly M, Durkin S, Cotter T, Mullin S, Warne C, et al. Smokers’ responses to television advertisements about the serious harms of tobacco use: pre-testing results from 10 low- to middle-income countries. Tob Control. 2013;22:24-31.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Davis KC, Nonnemaker J, Duke J, Farrelly MC. Perceived effectiveness of cessation advertisements: the importance of audience reactions and practical implications for media campaign planning. Health Commun. 2013;28(5):461–72.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Davis KC, Nonnemaker JM, Farrelly MC, Niederdeppe J. Exploring differences in smokers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of cessation media messages. Tob Control. 2011;20(1):26–33.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Dixon H, Scully M, Cotter T, Maloney S, Wakefield M. Healthy weight and lifestyle advertisements: an assessment of their persuasive potential. Health Educ Res. 2015;30(4):569–79.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Dillard JP, Shen L, Vail RG. Does perceived message effectiveness cause persuasion or vice versa? 17 consistent answers. Hum Commun Res. 2007;33:467–88.CrossRef
18.
Brennan E, Durkin S, Wakefield M, Kashima Y. Assessing the effectiveness of antismoking television advertisements: do audience ratings of perceived effectiveness predict changes in quitting intentions and smoking behaviours? Tob Control. 2014;23:412–8.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Bigsby E, Cappella JN, Seitz HH. Efficiently and effectively evaluating public service announcements: additional evidence for the utility of perceived effectiveness. Commun Monogr. 2013;80(1):1–23.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Southwell BG, Yzer MC. The roles of interpersonal communication in mass media campaigns. Communication Yearbook. 2007;31:419–62.
21.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. 3101.0 - Australian demographic statistics, Sep 2014. Canberra, Australia: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2015.
22.
Farrelly MC, Duke J, Davis KC, Nonnemaker J, Kamyab K, Willett J, et al. Promotion of smoking cessation with emotional and/or graphic antismoking advertisments. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(5):475–82.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Durkin S, Biener L, Wakefield M. Effects of different types of antismoking ads on reducing disparities in smoking cessation among socioeconomic subgroups. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(12):2217–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Duke JC, Nonnemaker JM, Davis KC, Watson KA, Farrelly MC. The impact of cessation media messages on cessation-related outcomes: results from a national experiment of smokers. Am J Health Promot. 2014;28(4):242–50.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Irving LM, Neumark-Sztainer D. Integrating the prevention of eating disorders and obesity: feasible or futile? Prev Med. 2002;34(3):299–309.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Macpherson-Sanchez AE. Integrating fundamental concepts of obesity and eating disorders: implications for the obesity epidemic. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(4):e71–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Dillard JP, Weber KM, Vail RG. The relationship between the perceived and actual effectiveness of persuasive messages: A meta-analysis with implications for formative campaign research. J Commun. 2007;57(4):613–31.CrossRef
28.
Lupton D. The pedagogy of disgust: the ethical, moral and political implications of using disgust in public health campaigns. Critical Public Health. 2014;25(1):4–14.CrossRef
29.
Carter SM, Rychetnik L, Lloyd B, Kerridge IH, Baur L, Bauman A, et al. Evidence, ethics, and values: a framework for health promotion. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(3):465–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Hastings G, Stead M, Webb J. Fear appeals in social marketing: strategic and ethical reasons for concern. Psychol Market. 2004;21(11):961–86.CrossRef
31.
Guttman N, Ressler WH. On being responsible: ethical issues in appeals to personal responsibility in health campaigns. J Health Commun. 2001;6(2):117–36.CrossRefPubMed
32.
33.
Puhl R, Peterson JL, Luedicke J. Fighting obesity or obese persons? Public perceptions of obesity-related health messages. Int J Obes. 2013;37(6):774–82.CrossRef
34.
Puhl R, Luedicke J, Peterson JL. Public reactions to obesity-related health campaigns: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45(1):36–48.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Anderson J, Mullins R, Siahpush M, Spittal M, Wakefield M. Mass media campaign improves cervical screening across all socio-economic groups. Health Educ Res. 2009;24(5):867–75.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Dobbinson SJ, Wakefield MA, Jamsen KM, Herd NL, Spittal MJ, Lipscomb JE, et al. Weekend sun protection and sunburn in Australia: Trends (1987-2002) and association with SunSmart television advertising. Am J Prev Med. 2008;34(2):94–101.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Farrelly MC, Davis KC, Nonnemaker JM, Kamyab K, Jackson C. Promoting calls to a quitline: quantifying the influence of message theme, strong negative emotions and graphic images in television advertisements. Tob Control. 2011;20(4):279–84.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Finding the keys to successful adult-targeted advertisements on obesity prevention: an experimental audience testing study
Authors
Helen Dixon
Maree Scully
Sarah Durkin
Emily Brennan
Trish Cotter
Sarah Maloney
Blythe J. O’Hara
Melanie Wakefield
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2159-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Public Health 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research article

Social cognitive determinants of HIV voluntary counselling and testing uptake among married individuals in Dar es Salaam Tanzania: Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB)

Study protocol

Cultural adaptation of a brief motivational intervention for heavy drinking among Hispanics in a medical setting

Research article

Associations between the prevalence of influenza vaccination and patient’s knowledge about antibiotics

Research article

Temporal patterns of physical activity and sedentary behavior in 10–14 year-old children on weekdays

Research article

A cost-effectiveness analysis of three components of a syndromic surveillance system for the early warning of epidemics in rural China

Study protocol

The effect of a sit-stand workstation intervention on daily sitting, standing and physical activity: protocol for a 12 month workplace randomised control trial