Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

How to characterize the public health workforce based on essential public health operations? environmental public health workers in the Netherlands as an example

Authors: M. Jambroes, R. van Honschooten, J. Doosje, K. Stronks, M. L. Essink-Bot

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Public health workforce planning and policy development require adequate data on the public health workforce and the services provided. If existing data sources do not contain the necessary information, or apply to part of the workforce only, primary data collection is required. The aim of this study was to develop a strategy to enumerate and characterize the public health workforce and the provision of essential public health operations (EPHOs), and apply this to the environmental public health workforce in the Netherlands as an example.

Methods

We specified WHO’s EPHOs for environmental public health and developed an online questionnaire to assess individual involvement in these. Recruitment was a two-layered process. Through organisations with potential involvement in environmental public health, we invited environmental public health workers (n = 472) to participate in a national survey. Existing benchmark data and a group of national environmental public health experts provided opportunities for partial validity checks.

Results

The questionnaire was well accepted and available benchmark data on physicians supported the results of this study regarding the medical part of the workforce. Experts on environmental public health recognized the present results on the provision of EPHOs as a reasonable reflection of the actual situation in practice.
All EPHOs were provided by an experienced, highly educated and multidisciplinary workforce. 27 % of the total full-time equivalents (FTEs) was spent on EPHO ‘assuring governance for health’. Only 4 % was spent on ‘health protection’. The total FTEs were estimated as 0.66 /100,000 inhabitants.

Conclusions

Characterisation of the public health workforce is feasible by identification of relevant organisations and individual workers on the basis of EPHOs, and obtaining information from those individuals by questionnaire. Critical factors include the operationalization of the EPHOS into the field of study, the selection and recruitment of eligible organisations and the response rate within organisations.. When existing professional registries are incomplete or do not exist, this strategy may provide a start to enumerate the quantity and quality of the public health within or across countries.
Literature
1.
Aluttis C, Chiotan C, Michelsen M, Costongs C, Brand H. Review of Public Health Capacity in the EU. In: Luxembourg: Published by the European Commission Directorate General for Health and Consumers. 2013.
2.
3.
Goodman J, Overall J, Tulchinsky T: Public health workforce capacity building. In. Paris: ASPHER; 2008.
4.
Paccaud F, Weihofen A, Frank M. Public Health Workforce in Switzerland: are public health workers lacking? Int J Public Health. 2013;58(6):799–800.CrossRefPubMed
5.
WHO Regional Committee for Europe resolution EUR/RC61/R2 on strengthening public health capacities and services in Europe: a framework for action. In. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2011.
6.
Crawford CA, Summerfelt WT, Roy K, Chen ZA, Meltzer DO, Thacker SB. Perspectives on public health workforce research. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2009;15(6 Suppl):S5–15.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Gebbie KM, Turnock BJ. The public health workforce, 2006: new challenges. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25(4):923–33.CrossRef
8.
Rowitz L. The mystery of public health workforce development. J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999;5(3):101–4.CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
Hilliard TM, Boulton ML. Public health workforce research in review: a 25-year retrospective. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(5 Suppl 1):S17–28.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Gebbie K, Merrill J, Sanders L, Gebbie EN, Chen DW. Public health workforce enumeration: beware the “quick fix”. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007;13(1):72–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Jambroes M, Essink-Bot ML, Plochg T, Stronks K. [Public healthcare occupations-insight into size and composition is limited]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2012;156(31):A4529.PubMed
13.
Coronado F, Polite M, Glynn MK, Massoudi MS, Sohani MM, Koo D. Characterization of the federal workforce at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014;20(4):432–41.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Strategies for Enumerating the U.S. Governmental Public Health Workforce. Rev. ed. In. Washington, DC: University of Michigan/Center of Excellence in Public Health Workforce Studies, University of Kentucky/Center of Excellence in Public Health Workforce Research and Policy; 2012.
15.
Gebbie K, Merrill J, Hwang I, Gebbie EN, Gupta M. The public health workforce in the year 2000. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2003;9(1):79–86.CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
Massoudi M, Blake R, Marcum L. Enumerating the environmental public health workforce-challenges and opportunities. J Environ Health. 2012;75(4):34–6.PubMed
18.
19.
Gebbie K, Merrill J, Tilson HH. The public health workforce. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002;21(6):57–67.CrossRef
20.
European Action Plan for Strengthening Public Health Capacities and Services. In. Copenhagen: World Health Organisation Regional Office for Europe; 2012.
21.
The 2010 Recommendations for Public Health physicians (Sociaal Geneeskundigen). In. Utrecht: the Advisory Committee on Medical Manpower Planning; 2013.
22.
23.
24.
Bjegovic-Mikanovic V, Vukovic D, Otok R, Czabanowska K, Laaser U. Education and training of public health professionals in the European Region: variation and convergence. Int J Public Health. 2013;58(6):801–10.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Vukovic D, Bjegovic-Mikanovic V, Otok R, Czabanowska K, Nikolic Z, Laaser U. Which level of competence and performance is expected? A survey among European employers of public health professionals. Int J Public Health. 2014;59(1):15–30.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
How to characterize the public health workforce based on essential public health operations? environmental public health workers in the Netherlands as an example
Authors
M. Jambroes
R. van Honschooten
J. Doosje
K. Stronks
M. L. Essink-Bot
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2095-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Public Health 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research article

Assessment of water, sanitation, and hygiene practices and associated factors in a Buruli ulcer endemic district in Benin (West Africa)

Research article

Prevalence of tuberculosis and treatment outcome among university students in Northwest Ethiopia: a retrospective study

Research article

A telephone survey of factors affecting willingness to participate in health research surveys

Research article

Training Sri Lankan public health midwives on intimate partner violence: a pre- and post-intervention study

Research article

Factors associated with appropriate home management of uncomplicated malaria in children in Kassena-Nankana district of Ghana and implications for community case management of childhood illness: a cross-sectional study

Research article

Associations between the prevalence of influenza vaccination and patient’s knowledge about antibiotics