Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research Article

Application of the varying coefficient model to the behaviour risk factor surveillance data in Italy: a study of changing smoking prevalence among sub-populations

Authors: Shireen Assaf, Stefano Campostrini

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Behaviour risk factor surveillance (BRFS) data can be an important source of information for studying changes in various health outcomes and risk factors. Results obtained from surveillance data analysis are vital for informing health policy interventions, particularly with regards to evolutionary aspects. The objective of this analysis was to recommend a method that can be used for analysing trends in the association among variables from large public health data sets. This was demonstrated by examining the changing effects of various covariates, representing different sub-populations, on smoking status over time.

Methods

In our work, we propose the use of varying coefficient models (VCM) with non-parametric techniques to catch the dynamics of the evolutionary processes under study. This is a useful method, which allows coefficients to vary with time using smooth functions. Italian BRFS data from 2008-2012 was used with a sample size of 185,619 observations. In the application, a time VCM is fit for a smoking status binary outcome variable using the P-spline estimation method. The model includes ten independent variables comprising socio-demographic, health risk and behaviour variables.

Results

The VCM fit for the data indicates that the coefficients for some of the categories for the age and the alcohol consumption variables varied with time. The main results show that Italians aged 18-29 and 40-49 had higher odds of being smokers compared to those aged 60-69; however, these odds significantly decreased in the period 2008-2012. In addition, those who do not drink had lower odds for being a smoker compared to high risk drinkers and these odds decreased further during the observation period.

Conclusion

The application of the VCM to the BRFS data in Italy has shown that this method can be useful in detecting which sub-populations require interventions. Although the results have shown a decrease in the odds of being a smoker for certain age groups and non-drinkers, other sub-populations have not decreased their odds and health inequalities remain. This observation indicates that efforts and interventions are still required to target these non-changing sub-populations in order to modify their smoking behaviour.

Literature
  1. Lee L, Thacker S. Principles and Practice of Public Health Surveillance. USA: Oxford University Press; 2010.View Article
  2. Campostrini S, McQueen D, Taylor A, Daly A. World alliance for risk factor surveillance white paper on surveillance and health promotion. Aims Public Health. 2015; 2:10–26.View Article
  3. Mokdad A. The behavioral risk factors surveillance system: Past, present, and future. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009; 30:43–54.View ArticlePubMed
  4. Campostrini S. Surveillance systems and data analysis: continuously collected behavioural data In: McQueen D, Puska P, editors. Global Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance. New York: Springer: 2003. p. 47–56.
  5. Campostrini S. Surveillance for NCDs and Health promotion: an issue of theory and method In: McQueen D, editor. Global Handbook on Non-communicable Diseases and Health Promotion. New York: Springer: 2013.
  6. Huang J, Wu C, Zhou L. Polynomial spline estimation and inference for varying coefficient models with longitudinal data. Statistica Sinica. 2004; 14(3):763–88.
  7. Hoover D, Rice J, Wu C, Yang L. Nonparametric smoothing estimates of time-varying coefficient models with longitudinal data. Biometrika. 1998; 85(4):809–22.View Article
  8. Wang L, Li H, Huang J. Variable selection in nonparametric varying-coefficient models for analysis of repeated measurements. J Am Stat Assoc. 2008; 103(484):1556–69.View ArticlePubMedPubMed Central
  9. Wu C, Yu K, Chiang C. A two-step smoothing method for varying-coefficient models with repeated measurements. Ann Inst Stat Mathematics. 2000; 52(3):519–43.View Article
  10. Wu C, Chiang C. Kernel smoothing on varying coefficient models with longitudinal dependent variable. Statistica Sinica. 2000; 10(2):433–56.
  11. Zhang D. Generalized linear mixed models with varying coefficients for longitudinal data. Biometrics. 2004; 60(1):8–15.View ArticlePubMed
  12. Young L, Gotway C, Yang J, Kearney G, DuClos C. Assessing the association between environmental impacts and health outcomes: A case study from florida. Stat Med. 2008; 27(20):3998–4015.View ArticlePubMed
  13. PASSI - Coordinating technical group of the behavioural risk factor system. PASSI (Progressi Delle Aziende Sanitarie per la Salute in Italia) - The Italian behavioral risk factor surveillance system. 2013. Available at: http://​www.​epicentro.​iss.​it/​passi/​en/​english.​asp. Rome. Retrieved on: 27 June 2013.
  14. Baldissera S, Campostrini S, Binkin N, Minardi V, Minelli G, Ferrante G, et al. Features and initial assessment of the Italian Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (PASSI), 2007-2008. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2011; 8(1):A24. http://​www.​cdc.​gov/​pcd/​issues/​2011/​jan/​10_​0030.​htm.PubMed
  15. Minardi V, Campostrini S, Carrozzi G, Minelli G, Salmaso S. Social determinants effects from the italian risk factor surveillance system passi. Int J Public Health. 2011; 56(4):359–66.View ArticlePubMed
  16. Binkin N, Gigantesco A, Ferrante G, Baldissera S. Depressive symptoms among adults 18–69 years in italy: results from the italian behavioural risk factor surveillance system, 2007. Int J Public Health. 2010; 55(5):479–88.View ArticlePubMed
  17. Chandola T, Head J, Bartley M. Socio-demographic predictors of quitting smoking: how important are household factors?. Addiction. 2004; 99(6):770–7.View ArticlePubMed
  18. Hiscock R, Bauld L, Amos A, Fidler J, Munafò M. Socioeconomic status and smoking: a review. Ann New York Acad Sci. 2012; 1248(1):107–23.View Article
  19. Levy D, Romano E, Mumford E. The relationship of smoking cessation to sociodemographic characteristics, smoking intensity, and tobacco control policies. Nicotine Tobacco Res. 2005; 7(3):387–96.View Article
  20. Siahpush M, Borland R. Socio-demographic variations in smoking status among australians aged ≥18: multivariate results from the 1995 national health survey. Aust New Zealand J Public Health. 2001; 25(5):438–42.View Article
  21. Tramacere I, Gallus S, Zuccaro P, Colombo P, Rossi S, Boffetta P, et al. Socio-demographic variation in smoking habits: Italy, 2008. Preventive Med. 2009; 48(3):213–7.View Article
  22. Cook J, Fucito L, Piasecki T, Piper M, Schlam T, Berg K, et al. Relations of alcohol consumption with smoking cessation milestones and tobacco dependence. J Consulting Clin Psychology. 2012; 80(6):1075.View Article
  23. Boden J, Fergusson D, Horwood L. Cigarette smoking and depression: tests of causal linkages using a longitudinal birth cohort. Br J Psychiatry. 2010; 196(6):440–6.View ArticlePubMed
  24. Pratt L, Brody D. Depression and smoking in the US household population aged 20 and over, 2005-2008. NCHS Data Brief. 2010; 34:1.
  25. Trost S, Owen N, Bauman A, Sallis J, Brown W. Correlates of adults’ participation in physical activity: review and update. Med Sci Sports Exercise. 2002; 34(12):1996–2001.View Article
  26. Eilers P, Marx B. Generalized linear additive smooth structures. J Comput Graphical Stat. 2002; 11(4):758–83.View Article
  27. Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Varying-coefficient models. J R Stat Soc. Ser B (Methodological). 1993; 55(5):757–96.
  28. Cheng M, Zhang W, Chen L. Statistical estimation in generalized multiparameter likelihood models. J Am Stat Assoc. 2009; 104(487):1179–91.View Article
  29. Cai Z, Fan J, Li R. Generalized Varying-coefficient models. UC Los Angeles: Department of Statistics, UCLA. 1999. Available at: http://​escholarship.​org/​uc/​item/​7n0494s4, Department of Statistics, UCLA, Los Angeles.
  30. Cai Z, Fan J, Li R. Efficient estimation and inferences for varying-coefficient models. J Am Stat Assoc. 2000; 95(451):888–902.View Article
  31. Chiang C, Rice J, Wu C. Smoothing spline estimation for varying coefficient models with repeatedly measured dependent variables. J Am Stat Assoc. 2001; 96(454):605–19.View Article
  32. Huang J, Wu C, Zhou L. Varying-coefficient models and basis function approximations for the analysis of repeated measurements. Biometrika. 2002; 89(1):111–28.View Article
  33. Marx B. P-spline varying coefficient models for complex data In: Kneib T, Tutz G, editors. Statistical Modelling and Regression Structures. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer: 2010. p. 19–43.
  34. Fan J, Zhang W. Statistical methods with varying coefficient models. Stat Its Interface. 2008; 1(1):179–95.View Article
  35. Eilers P, Marx B. Flexible smoothing with b-splines and penalties. Stat Sci. 1996; 11(2):89–102.View Article
  36. Wasserman L. All of Nonparametric Statistics. New York: Springer; 2006.
  37. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The Elements of Statistical Learning, 2nd. New York: Springer; 2009.View Article
  38. Wood S. Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. J R Stat Soc: Ser B (Stat Methodology). 2011; 73(1):3–36.View Article
  39. Wood S. Generalized Additive Models: an Introduction with R. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall; 2006.
  40. Campostrini S. Measurement and effectiveness: methodological considerations, issues and possible solutions. In: Global Perspectives on Health Promotion Effectiveness. New York: Springer: 2007. p. 305–25.
  41. La Vecchia C, Bosetti C, Lucchini F, Bertuccio P, Negri E, Boyle P, et al. Cancer mortality in europe, 2000–2004, and an overview of trends since 1975. Ann Oncol. 2010; 21(6):1323–60.View ArticlePubMed
  42. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://​www.​R-project.​org/​.
  43. Wood S. Mgcv: Mixed GAM Computation Vehicle with GCV/AIC/REML Smoothness Estimation. 2007. R package version 1.7-22.
Metadata
Title
Application of the varying coefficient model to the behaviour risk factor surveillance data in Italy: a study of changing smoking prevalence among sub-populations
Authors
Shireen Assaf
Stefano Campostrini
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1805-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Public Health 1/2015 Go to the issue