Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Health promotion in primary and secondary schools in Denmark: time trends and associations with schools’ and students’ characteristics

Authors: Kirsten Nabe-Nielsen, Rikke Krølner, Laust Hvas Mortensen, Marie Birk Jørgensen, Finn Diderichsen

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Schools are important arenas for interventions among children as health promoting initiatives in childhood is expected to have substantial influence on health and well-being in adulthood. In countries with compulsory school attention, all children could potentially benefit from health promotion at the school level regardless of socioeconomic status or other background factors. The first aim was to elucidate time trends in the number and types of school health promoting activities by describing the number and type of health promoting activities in primary and secondary schools in Denmark. The second aim was to investigate which characteristics of schools and students that are associated with participation in many (≥3) versus few (0–2) health promoting activities during the preceding 2–3 years.

Methods

We used cross-sectional data from the 2006- and 2010-survey of the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study. The headmasters answered questions about the school’s participation in health promoting activities and about school size, proportion of ethnic minorities, school facilities available for health promoting activities, competing problems and resources at the school and in the neighborhood. Students provided information about their health-related behavior and exposure to bullying which was aggregated to the school level. A total of 74 schools were available for analyses in 2006 and 69 in 2010. We used chi-square test, t-test, and binary logistic regression to analyze time trends and differences between schools engaging in many versus few health promoting activities.

Results

The percentage of schools participating in ≥3 health promoting activities was 63% in 2006 and 61% in 2010. Also the mean number of health promoting activities was similar (3.14 vs. 3.07). The activities most frequently targeted physical activity (73% and 85%) and bullying (78% and 67%). Schools’ participation in anti-smoking activities was significantly higher in 2006 compared with 2010 (46% vs. 29%). None of the investigated variables were associated with schools’ participation in health promoting activities.

Conclusion

In a Danish context, schools’ participation in health promotion was rather stable from 2006 to 2010 and unrelated to the measured characteristics of the schools and their students.
Literature
1.
Forrest CB, Riley AW. Childhood origins of adult health: A basis for life-course health policy - A plea for policy attention to the way child health problems affect a person’s entire lifespan. Health Aff. 2004;23:155–64.CrossRef
2.
Due P, Krølner R, Rasmussen M, Andersen A, Damsgaard MT, Graham H, et al. Pathways and mechanisms in adolescence contribute to adult health inequalities. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39:62–78.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Bremberg S. Health promotion in school age children. Scand J Soc Med. 1998;26:81–4.PubMed
4.
Lister-Sharp D, Chapman S, Stewart-Brown S, Sowden A. Health promoting schools and health promotion in schools: two systematic reviews. Health Technol Assess. 1999;3:1–207.PubMed
5.
Langford R, Bonell CP, Jones HE, Pouliou T, Murphy SM, Waters E, Komro KA, Gibbs LF, Magnus D, Campbell R. The WHO Health Promoting School framework for improving the health and well-being of students and their academic achievement. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD008958. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008958.pub2
6.
Burström B, Haglund BJA, Tillgren P, Berg L, Wallin E, Ullen H, et al. Health Promotion in Schools - Policies and Practices in Stockholm County, 1990. Scand J Soc Med. 1995;23:39–46.PubMed
7.
Lissau I, Poulsen J. Nutrition policy, food and drinks at school and after school care. Int J Obesity. 2005;29:S58–61.CrossRef
8.
French SA, Story M, Fulkerson JA. School food policies and practices: A state-wide survey of secondary school principals. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102:1785–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Vereecken CA, Bobelijn K, Maes L. School food policy at primary and secondary schools in Belgium-Flanders: does it influence young people’s food habits? Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005;59:271–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Scholtens S, Middelbeek L, Rutz SI, Buijs G, Bemelmans WJE. Differences in school environment, school policy and actions regarding overweight prevention between Dutch schools. A nationwide survey. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Jones SE, Brener ND, McManus T. Prevalence of school policies, programs, and facilities, that promote a healthy physical school environment. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1570–5.CrossRef
12.
Balaji AB, Brener ND, McManus T. Variation in School Health Policies and Programs by Demographic Characteristics of US Schools, 2006. J School Health. 2010;80:599–613.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Denman S. Health promoting schools in England - a way forward in development. J Public Health Med. 1999;21:215–20.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Deschesnes M, Martin C, Hill AJ. Comprehensive approaches to school health promotion: how to achieve broader implementation? Health Promot Int. 2003;18:387–96.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Currie C, Gabhainn SN, Godeau E. The Health Behaviour in School-aged Children: WHO Collaborative Cross-National (HBSC) Study: origins, concept, history and development 1982–2008. Int J Public Health. 2009;54:131–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Roberts C, Freeman J, Samdal O, Schnohr CW, de Looze ME, Gabhainn SN, et al. The Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: methodological developments and current tensions. Int J Public Health. 2009;54:140–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
18.
Botvin GJ, Schinke S, Orlandi MA. School-Based Health Promotion - Substance-Abuse and Sexual-Behavior. Appl Prev Psychol. 1995;4:167–84.CrossRef
19.
Lynagh M, Schofield MJ, SansonFisher RW. School health promotion programs over the past decade: A review of the smoking, alcohol and solar protection literature. Health Promot Int. 1997;12:43–60.CrossRef
20.
Salmon J, Booth ML, Phongsavan P, Murphy N, Timperio A. Promoting physical activity participation among children and adolescents. Epidemiol Rev. 2007;29:144–59.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Klakk H, Andersen LB, Heidemann M, Moller NC, Wedderkopp N. Six physical education lessons a week can reduce cardiovascular risk in school children aged 6–13 years: A longitudinal study. Scand J Public Health. 2014;42:128–36.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Peters LWH, Kok G, Ten Dam GTM, Buijs GJ, Paulussen TGWM. Effective elements of school health promotion across behavioral domains: a systematic review of reviews. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:182.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Rasmussen M, Due P, editors. Skolebørnsundersøgelsen 2006 (HBSC). Population, metode og svarfordelinger (Health Behaviour in School-aged Children 2006 (HBSC): Population, methods and distribution of responses). University of Copenhagen: Department of Public Health, Section of Social Medicine; 2007.
24.
Madsen KR, Brixval CS. Dokumentationsrapport - Skolebørnsundersøgelsen 2010 (Documentation report - Health Behavior in School-aged Children). Copenhagen: The National Institute of Public Health; 2010.
Metadata
Title
Health promotion in primary and secondary schools in Denmark: time trends and associations with schools’ and students’ characteristics
Authors
Kirsten Nabe-Nielsen
Rikke Krølner
Laust Hvas Mortensen
Marie Birk Jørgensen
Finn Diderichsen
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1440-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Public Health 1/2015 Go to the issue

Study protocol

The EPIC Kids Study: a randomized family-focused YMCA-based intervention to prevent type 2 diabetes in at-risk youth

Research article

Do body mass index trajectories affect the risk of type 2 diabetes? A case–control study

Research article

High prevalence and clustering of modifiable CVD risk factors among rural adolescents in southwest Nigeria: implication for grass root prevention

Research article

Texting at the light and other forms of device distraction behind the wheel

Research article

Non-adherence to anti-tuberculosis treatment among internal migrants with pulmonary tuberculosis in Shenzhen, China: a cross-sectional study

Research article

Sexual behavior of migrant workers in Shanghai, China