Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research

Process research: compare and contrast the recovery-orientated strengths model of case management and usual community mental health care

Authors: Samson Tse, Catalina S. M. Ng, Winnie W. Y. Yuen, Iris W. K. Lo, Sadaaki Fukui, Richard J. Goscha, Eppie Wan, Stephen Wong, Sau-Kam Chan

Published in: BMC Psychiatry | Issue 1/2021

Abstract

Background

The strengths model of case management (SMCM), which was developed by Rapp and Goscha through collaborative efforts at the University of Kansas, assists individuals with mental illness in their recovery by mobilizing individual and environmental resources. Increasing evidence has shown that the utilization of the SMCM improves outcomes, including increased employment/educational attainment, reduced hospitalization rates, higher self-efficacy, and hope. However, little is known about the processes through which the SMCM improves outcomes for mental health service users. This study explores the views of case workers and service users on their experience of providing or receiving the SMCM intervention.

Methods

A qualitative design was employed using individual interviews with service users and case workers drawn from two study conditions: the SMCM group and the control group (treatment as usual). For both study conditions, service users were recruited by either centres-in-charge or case workers from integrated community centres for mental wellness (ICCMWs) operated by three non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in different districts of Hong Kong. Through purposeful sampling, 24 service users and 14 case workers from the SMCM and control groups joined the study. We used an inductive approach to analyse the qualitative data.

Results

We identified two overarching themes: service users’ and case workers’ (1) perceptions of the impacts of the interventions (SMCM and control group) and (2) experiences of the interventions, such as features of the interventions and the factors that facilitated the outcomes. The results showed that there were improvements in the functional recovery of the SMCM group in areas such as employment and family relationships, how self-identified goals were achieved, and how service users gained a better understanding of their own strengths and weaknesses. Regarding their experience of the interventions, participants in both the SMCM group and the control group reported that a good relationship between service users and case workers was vital. However, some concerns were raised about the use of SMCM tools, including the strengths assessment and the personal recovery plan (PRP) and the risk of case workers being subjective in the presentation of cases in group supervision sessions.

Conclusion

The results were promising in terms of supporting the use of the SMCM, with some refinements, in mental health services for Chinese clients.

Trial registration

The Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), ACTRN12617001435370, registered on 10/10/2017.

Rapp CA, Goscha RJ. The strengths model: case management with people with psychiatric disabilities. USA: Oxford University Press; 2006.

Rapp CA, Goscha RJ. The strengths model: a recovery-oriented approach to mental health services. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.

Mueser KT, Bond GR, Drake RE, Resnick SG. Models of community care for severe mental illness: a review of research on case management. Schizophr Bull. 1998;24(1):37–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033314.CrossRefPubMed

Ziguras SJ, Stuart GW. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of mental health case management over 20 years. Psychiatr Serv. 2000;51(11):1410–21. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.51.11.1410.CrossRefPubMed

Tse S, Divis M, Li YB. Match or mismatch: use of the strengths model with Chinese migrants experiencing mental illness: service user and practitioner perspectives. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2010;13(3):171–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487761003670145.CrossRef

Vanderplasschen W, Wolf J, Rapp RC, Broekaert E. Effectiveness of different models of case management for substance-abusing populations. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2007;39(1):81–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2007.10399867.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Warburton DE, Bredin SS. Health benefits of physical activity: a strengths-based approach. J Clin Med. 2019;8(12):2044. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122044.CrossRefPubMedCentral

Rapp CA, Saleebey D, Sullivan WP. The future of strengths-based social work. Archives of Social Work. 2005;6(1):79–90.

Barry KL, Zeber JE, Blow FC, Valenstein M. Effect of strengths model versus assertive community treatment model on participant outcomes and utilization: two-year follow-up. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2003;26(3):268–77. https://doi.org/10.2975/26.2003.268.277.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Björkman T, Hansson L, Sandlund M. Outcome of case management based on the strengths model compared to standard care: a randomised controlled trial. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2002;37(4):147–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001270200008.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Blow FC, Ullman E, Barry KL, Bingham CR, Copeland LA, McCormick R, et al. Effectiveness of specialized treatment programs for veterans with serious and persistent mental illness: a three-year follow-up. Am J Orthop. 2000;70(3):389–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087648.CrossRef

12.

Fukui S, Goscha R, Rapp CA, Mabry A, Liddy P, Marty D. Strengths model case management fidelity scores and client outcomes. Psychiatr Serv. 2012;63(7):708–10. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201100373.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Green CA, Janoff SL, Yarborough BJH, Paulson RI. The recovery group project: development of an intervention led jointly by peer and professional counselors. Psychiatr Serv. 2013;64(12):1211–7. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201200546.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Hui KY, Leung CW, Ng MC, Yu WC, Lau EK, Cheung SK. Effectiveness of strengths-based case management for people with mental health problems in Hong Kong. Adv Soc Work. 2015;16(2):323–37. https://doi.org/10.18060/18428.CrossRef

15.

Mireau R, Inch R. Brief solution-focused counseling: a practical effective strategy for dealing with wait lists in community-based mental health services. Soc Work. 2009;54(1):63–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/54.1.63.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Modrcin M, Rapp CA, Poertner J. The evaluation of case management services with the chronically mentally ill. Eval Program Plann. 1988;11(4):307–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(88)90043-2.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Rapp CA, Wintersteen R. The strengths model of case management: results from twelve demonstrations. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 1989;13(1):23–32.

18.

Tsoi EW, Tse S, Yu CH, Chan SK, Wan E, Wong S, et al. A nonrandomized controlled trial of strengths model case management in Hong Kong. Res Soc Work Pract. 2019;29(5):540–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731518772142.CrossRef

19.

Brun C, Rapp RC. Strengths-based case management: individuals' perspectives on strengths and the case manager relationship. Soc Work. 2001;46(3):278–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/46.3.278.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Berendsen BA, Kremers SP, Savelberg HH, Schaper NC, Hendriks MR. The implementation and sustainability of a combined lifestyle intervention in primary care: mixed method process evaluation. BMC Fam. 2015;16(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0254-5.CrossRef

21.

Griffin TL, Pallan MJ, Clarke JL, Lancashire ER, Lyon A, Parry JM, et al. Process evaluation design in a cluster randomised controlled childhood obesity prevention trial: the WAVES study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11(1):112–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0112-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Harachi TW, Abbott RD, Catalano RF, Haggerty KP, Fleming CB. Opening the black box: using process evaluation measures to assess implementation and theory building. Am J Community Psychol. 1999;27(5):711–31. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022194005511.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: medical research council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350(mar19 6):h1258. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h1258.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Khan K, Hollis C, Hall CL, Davies EB, Mataix-Cols D, Andrén P, et al. Protocol for the process evaluation of the online remote Behavioural intervention for tics (ORBIT) randomized controlled trial for children and young people. Trials. 2020;21(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3974-3.CrossRef

25.

Schuetz N, Mendenhall AN, Grube W. Strengths model for youth case mnagement: impact on the provider and agency. Child Adolesc Social Work J. 2021;38(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-020-00668-2.CrossRef

26.

Schuetz N, Mendenhall AN, Grube W. Strengths model for youth case management: professionals’ perceptions of model impact on clients. Soc Work Ment Health. 2019;17(4):426–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332985.2018.1563024.CrossRef

27.

Petrakis M, Wilson M, Hamilton B. Implementing the strengths model of case management: group supervision fidelity outcomes. Community Ment Health J. 2013;49(3):331–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-012-9546-6.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Redko C, Rapp RC, Elms C, Snyder M, Carlson RG. Understanding the working alliance between persons with substance abuse problems and strengths-based case managers. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2007;39(3):241–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2007.10400610.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Tse S, Ng SMC, Yuen WYW, Fukui S, Goscha RJ, Lo WKI. Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of strengths model case management (SMCM) with Chinese mental health service users in Hong Kong. BMJ Open. 2019;9(5):e026399. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026399.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval. 2006;27(2):237–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748.CrossRef

31.

Macias C, Kinney R, Farley OW, Jackson R, Vos B. The role of case management within a community support system: partnership with psychosocial rehabilitation. Community Ment Health J. 1994;30(4):323–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02207486.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Macias C, Farley OW, Jackson R, Kinney R. Case management in the context of capitation financing: an evaluation of the strengths model. Admin Pol Ment Health. 1997;24(6):535–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02042831.CrossRef

33.

Stanard RP. The effect of training in a strengths model of case management on client outcomes in a community mental health center. Community Ment Health J. 1999;35(2):169–79. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018724831815.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Slade M, Amering M, Farkas M, Hamilton B, O'Hagan M, Panther G, et al. Uses and abuses of recovery: implementing recovery-oriented practices in mental health systems. World Psychiatry. 2014;13(1):12–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20084.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Mirkovic J, Kristjansdottir OB, Stenberg U, Krogseth T, Stange KC, Ruland CM. Patient insights into the design of technology to support a strengths-based approach to health care. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016;5(3):e175. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.5906.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Gelkopf M, Lapid L, Werbeloff N, Levine SZ, Telem A, Zisman-Ilani Y, et al. A strengths-based case management service for people with serious mental illness in Israel: a randomized controlled trial. Psychiatry Res. 2016;241:182–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.04.106.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Edwards J, Goldie I, Elliott I, Breedvelt J, Chakkalackal L, Foye U. Relationships in the 21st century: the forgotten foundation of mental health and wellbeing. London: Mental Health Foundation; 2016.

38.

Littauer H, Sexton H, Wynn R. Qualities clients wish for in their therapists. Scand J Caring Sci. 2005;19(1):28–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2005.00315.x.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Shattell MM, Starr SS, Thomas SP. ‘Take my hand, help me out’: mental health service recipients' experience of the therapeutic relationship. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2007;16(4):274–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0349.2007.00477.x.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Process research: compare and contrast the recovery-orientated strengths model of case management and usual community mental health care
Authors: Samson Tse
Catalina S. M. Ng
Winnie W. Y. Yuen
Iris W. K. Lo
Sadaaki Fukui
Richard J. Goscha
Eppie Wan
Stephen Wong
Sau-Kam Chan
Publication date: 01-12-2021
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Psychiatry / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-244X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03523-5

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Process research: compare and contrast the recovery-orientated strengths model of case management and usual community mental health care

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Trial registration

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Trial registration

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Comparison of psychological symptoms between infected and non-infected COVID-19 health care workers

Antipsychotics withdrawal in adults with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour: study protocol for a multicentre double-blind placebo-controlled randomised trial

Severe diaphoresis and fever during alcohol withdrawal cause hypovolemic shock: case report

Measuring disparities in police use of force and injury among persons with serious mental illness

Assessment of the structured clinical interview (SCID) for DSM-5 for somatic symptom disorder in general hospital outpatient clinics in China

Artificial neural network application for identifying risk of depression in high school students: a cross-sectional study