Top

BMC Psychiatry

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Study protocol

COMmunity PARticipation through Education (COMPARE): effectiveness of supported education for students with mental health problems, a mixed methods study – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Authors: Jacomijn Hofstra, Jorien van der Velde, Petra Jannette Havinga, Lies Korevaar

Published in: BMC Psychiatry | Issue 1/2021

Abstract

Background

The onset of mental health problems generally occurs between the ages of 16 and 23 – the years in which young people follow post-secondary education, which is a major channel in our society to prepare for a career and enhance life goals. Several studies have shown that students with mental health problems have a higher chance of early school leaving. Supported Education services have been developed to support students with mental health problems to remain at school. The current project aims to study the effect of an individually tailored Supported Education intervention on remaining at school, study success, and satisfaction of students with mental health problems studying at an institute for intermediate vocational education and a university of applied sciences in the Netherlands.

Methods/design

The design combines quantitative research (Randomized Controlled Trial; RCT) with qualitative research (monitoring, interviews, focus groups). One hundred students with mental health problems recruited from the two educational institutes will be randomly allocated to either the intervention or control condition. The students in the intervention condition receive the Supported Education intervention given by a Supported Education specialist, the students in the active control condition receive support as usual plus advice from a trained staff member on potential supportive resources regarding studying with mental health problems. The primary outcome ‘remaining at school’, and the secondary outcome ‘study success’ will be determined using data from the school’s administration. The secondary outcome ‘student satisfaction’ and other variables that will be studied in a more exploratory way, such as self-efficacy and study skills, will be determined through online questionnaires at baseline, at 6 and at 12 months follow-up. Focus groups and interviews with the students and Supported Education specialists will be carried out to complement the trial.

Discussion

This RCT is the first to assess the effect of Supported Education on remaining at school, next to study success and student satisfaction among students with mental health problems. The use of a mixed-methods design will result in a thorough evaluation of the effect of the intervention. Issues regarding the influx and possible attrition of students in the follow-up are discussed.

Trial registration

The study was registered with Trialregister.nl, no. NL8349, date registered: February 4th 2020. Register name: Community participation through education. Effectiveness of Supported Education for youth with mental health problems, a mixed methods study – Study protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Protocol Version: 3, date: May 28th, 2021.

Available only for authorised users

Auerbach RP, Mortier P, Bruffaerts R, Alonso J, Benjet C, Cuijpers P, et al. WHO world mental health surveys international college student project: prevalence and distribution of mental disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. 2018;127(7):623–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000362.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bruffaerts R, Mortier P, Kiekens G, Auerbach RP, Cuijpers P, Demyttenaere K, et al. Mental health problems in college freshmen: prevalence and academic functioning. J Affect Disord. 2018;225:97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.07.044.CrossRefPubMed

Hunt J, Eisenberg D. Mental health problems and help-seeking behavior among college students. J Adolescent Health. 2010;46(1):3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.08.008.CrossRef

Stallman HM, Shochet I. Prevalence of mental health problems in Australian university health services. Aust Psychol. 2009;44(2):122–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060902733727.CrossRef

Storrie K, Ahern K, Tuckett A. A systematic review: students with mental health problems—a growing problem. Int J Nurs Pract. 2010;16(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-172X.2009.01813.x.CrossRefPubMed

Turner AP, Hammond CL, Gilchrist M, Barlow JH. Coventry university students' experience of mental health problems. Couns Psychol Q. 2007;20(3):247–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070701570451.CrossRef

Zivin K, Eisenberg D, Gollust SE, Golberstein E. Persistence of mental health problems and needs in a college student population. J Affect Disord. 2009;117(3):180–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2009.01.001.CrossRefPubMed

Hartley MT. Increasing resilience: strategies for reducing dropout rates for college students with psychiatric disabilities. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2010;13(4):295–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487768.2010.523372.CrossRef

Hjorth CF, Bilgrav L, Frandsen LS, Overgaard C, Torp-Pedersen C, Nielsen B, et al. Mental health and school dropout across educational levels and genders: a 4.8-year follow-up study. BMC. 2016;16:976.

10.

Kessler RC, Foster CL, Saunders WB, Stang PE. Social consequences of psychiatric disorders, I: Educational attainment. Am J Psychiatry. 1995;152(7):1026–32. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.152.7.1026.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Verhagen A, Meng CM. [School dropouts between education and labourmarket 2013. Facts and numbers]. ROA Fact sheets 2014.

12.

Cook JA. Employment barriers for persons with psychiatric disabilities. Update for a report for the President’s commission. Psychiatr Serv. 2006;57(10):1391–405. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.2006.57.10.1391.CrossRefPubMed

13.

de Klerk M. Report on disabilities: labor market and financial situation of people with disabilities and/or chronic diseases. Den Haag: SCP; 2000.

14.

Rudnick A, Gover M. Combining supported education with supported employment. Psychiatr Serv. 2009;60(12):1690. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.2009.60.12.1690.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Anthony WA, Cohen M, Farkas M, Gagne C. Psychiatric rehabilitation. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Center of Psychiatric Rehabilitation; 2002.

16.

Sullivan-Soydan AP. Supported education. In: Nemec PB, Furlong-Norman K, editors. Best practices in psychiatric rehabilitation. Linthicum, MD: United States Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association; 2014.

17.

Sullivan AP, Nicolellis DL, Danley KS, MacDonald-Wilson K. Choose-get-keep: a psychiatric rehabilitation approach to supported education. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 1993;17:55.

18.

Unger KV. Handbook on supported education: providing services for students with psychiatric disabilities: Paul H Brookes Publishing Company; 1998.

19.

Rogers ES, Anthony WA, Farkas M. The choose-get-keep approach to psychiatric rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol. 2006;51(3):247–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/0090-5550.51.3.247.CrossRef

20.

Hofstra J, Korevaar L. Supported education toolkit: tools and guidelines for organizations and professionals working with students with psychiatric disabilities. 2016. https://www.supportededucation.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/English-Supported-Education-Toolkit.pdf. Accessed 15 Jun 2020.

21.

Delfgou N. Supported differently: an evaluation study on a methodology aimed at supporting young people with a mental disability in maintaining a Mbo or hbo education. A pilot study; unpublished thesis. Groningen: Hanze University of Applied Sciences; 2016.

22.

Cotton SJ, Dollard MF, De Jonge J. Stress en student job design: Statisfaction, well-being and performance in university students. Int J Stress Manag. 2002;9(3):147–62. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015515714410.CrossRef

23.

Mashburn AJ. A psychological process of college student dropout. J Coll Stud Ret. 2001;2(3):173–90.CrossRef

24.

Duque LC. A framework for analysing higher education performance: students’ satisfaction, perceived learning outcomes, and dropout intentions. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell. 2013;25:1–21.CrossRef

25.

Collins ME, Bybee D, Mowbray CT. Effectiveness of supported education for individuals with psychiatric disabilities: results from an experimental study. Community Ment Health J. 1998;34(6):595–614. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018763018186.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Ellison ML, Reilly ED, Mueller L, Schultz MR, Drebing CE. A supported education service pilot for returning veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychol Serv. 2018;15(2):200–7. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000180.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Mowbray CT, Collins M, Bybee D. Supported education for individuals with psychiatric disabilities: long-term outcomes from an experimental study. Soc Work Res. 1999;23(2):89–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/23.2.89.CrossRef

28.

Rogers ES, Kash-MacDonald M, Bruker D, Maru M. Systematic review of supported education literature 1989–2009. http://www.bu.edu/drrk/research-syntheses/psychiatric-disabilities/supported-education/. Accessed 17 May, 2020.

29.

Unger KV, Pardee R, Shafer MS. Outcomes of postsecondary supported education programs for people with psychiatric disabilities. J Vocat Rehabil. 2000;14:195–9.

30.

Unger KV, Pardee R. Outcome measures across program sites for postsecondary supported education programs. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2002;25(3):299–303. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0095012.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Killackey E, Allott K, Woodhead G, Connor S, Dragon S, Ring J. Individual placement and support, supported education in young people with mental illness: an exploratory feasibility study. Early Interv Psychia. 2017;11(6):526–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.12344.CrossRef

32.

Schindler VP, Sauerwald C. Outcomes of a 4-year program with higher education and employment goals for individuals diagnosed with mental illness. Work. 2013;46(3):325–36. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-121548.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Health council of the Netherlands. Participation by young people with mental health problems. The Hague: Health council of the Netherlands; 2014.

34.

Ellison ML, Mueller L, Henze K, Corrigan P, Larson J, Kieval NE, Sawh L, Smelson D. The Veteran Supported Education Treatment Manual (VetSEd). 2012. https://www.va.gov/HOMELESS/docs/Center/VetSEd_Manual_Version_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 30 Apr 2021.

35.

Kazdin AE, Bass D. Power to detect differences between alternative treatments in comparative psychotherapy outcome research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1989;57(1):138–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.57.1.138.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers; 1988.

37.

Ferguson CJ. An effect size primer: a guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychol Res Pract. 2009;40(5):535–8.

38.

Auerbach RP, Alonso J, Axinn WG, Cuijpers P, Ebert DD, Green JG, et al. Mental disorders among college students in the World Health Organization world mental health surveys. Psychol Med. 2016;46(14):2955–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716001665.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Blanco C, Okuda M, Wright C, Hasin DS, Grant BF, Liu SM, et al. Mental health of college students and their non-college-attending peers: results from the National Epidemiologic Study on alcohol and related conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65(12):1429–37. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.65.12.1429.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Chan A, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346(jan08 15):e7586. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e7586.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

41.

Altman DG, Bland JM. Treatment allocation by minimisation. BMJ. 2005;330(7495):843. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.330.7495.843.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Korevaar L. [Handbook Supported Education: supporting young people with mental health problems with choosing, getting and keeping a regular education]. Stichting Rehabilitatie 92; 2015. https://www.begeleidleren.nl/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Handboek-Begeleid-Leren.pdf. Accessed 21 Apr 2021.

43.

Korevaar L, Hofstra J. Database effective youth interventions: description ‘Supported Education'. 2017. https://www.nji.nl/nl/Download-NJi/Werkblad/Uitgebreide-beschrijving-Belegeid-leren.pdf. Accessed on 22 May, 2020.

44.

Haavet OR, Sirpal MK, Haugen W, Christensen KS. Diagnosis of depressed young people in primary health care – a validation of HSCL-10. Fam Pract. 2011;28(2):233–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmq078.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Derogratis LR, Lipman RS, Rickels K, Uhlenhuth EH, Covi L. The Hopkins symptom checklist (HSCL): a self-report symptom inventory. Behav Sci. 1974;19(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830190102.CrossRef

46.

Nederlands Instituut voor Psychologen: SCL-90, 1981/ 1986. In: Evers A, Van Vliet-Mulder JC, Groot CJ, editors. [Documentation of Tests and Testresearch in the Netherlands]. Assen: Van Gorcum; 2000.

47.

Strand BH, Dalgard OS, Tambs K, Rognerud M. Measuring the mental health status of the Norwegian population: a comparison of the instruments SCL-25, SCL-10, SCL-5 and MHI-5. Nor J Psychiatry. 2003;57(2):113–8.CrossRef

48.

Huebner E, Gilman R. An introduction to the multidimensional Students' life satisfaction scale. Soc Indic Res. 2002;60(1/3):115–22. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021252812882.CrossRef

49.

Otto LKM, Hofstra J, Mullen MG, et al. A cognitive remediation training for young adults with psychotic disorders to support their participation in education — study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020;6(54). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00579-0.

50.

Teeuw B, Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Dutch Adaptation of the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Berlijn. 1994. http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~health/dutch.htm. Accessed 10 Sept 2020.

51.

Scholz U, Gutiérrez-Donã B, Sud S, Schwarzer R. Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2002;18(3):242–51. https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.18.3.242.CrossRef

52.

Horvath AO, Greenberg LS. Development and validation of the working Alliance inventory. J Couns Psychol. 1989;36(2):223–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.223.CrossRef

53.

Paap D, Schrier E, Dijkstra PU. Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory Dutch version for use in rehabilitation setting. Physiother Theory Pract. 2019;35(12):1292–303.CrossRef

54.

Sharac JA. Opening doors: college and you. Worcester: Quinsigamond Community College, Supported Education Services; 1997.

55.

Del Re AC, Maisel NC, Blodgett JC, et al. Intention-to-treat analyses and missing data approaches in pharmacotherapy trials for alcohol use disorders. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e003464.CrossRef

56.

Leys C, Ley C, Klein O, Bernard P, Licata L. Detecting outliers: do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2013;4:764–6.CrossRef

57.

Movisie. Information sheet. Process evaluation in the assessment of interventions. 2020. https://www.movisie.nl/sites/movisie.nl/files/2020-04/informatieblad-procesevaluatie.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2021.

58.

Sanches SA, Swildens WE, van Busschbach JT, Stant AD, Feenstra TL, van Weeghel J. Cost effectiveness and budgetary impact of the Boston University approach to psychiatric rehabilitation for societal participation in people with severe mental illness: a randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15:217.CrossRef

59.

Swildens W, van Busschbach JT, Michon H, Kroon H, Koeter MW, Wiersma D, et al. Effectively working on rehabilitation goals: 24-month outcome of a randomized controlled trial of the Boston psychiatric rehabilitation approach. Can J Psychiatr. 2011;56(12):751–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371105601207.CrossRef

60.

Sanches SA, Swildens WE, van Busschbach JT, Farkas MD, van Weeghel J, van Wel T. FiRe: Evaluation of a fidelity measure to promote implementation of evidence based rehabilitation. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2018;41(1):46.CrossRef

61.

Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis. 2. ed., 4. print. ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publ; 1994.

62.

Kasenda B, von Elm E, You J, Blümle A, Tomonaga Y, Saccilotto R, et al. Prevalence, characteristics, and publication of discontinued randomized trials. JAMA. 2014;311(10):1045–52. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.1361.CrossRefPubMed

63.

Tudur Smith C, Hickey H, Clarke M, Blazeby J, Williamson P. The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise. Trials. 2014;15(1):32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

64.

Khatamian Far P. Challenges of recruitment and retention of university students as research participants: lessons learned from a pilot study. J Aust Libr Inf Assoc. 2018;67:278–92.

65.

de Graaf R, van Dorsselaer S, Tuithof M, ten Have M. Sociodemographic and psychiatric predictors of attrition in a prospective psychiatric epidemiological study among the general population. Result of the Netherlands mental health survey and incidence Study-2. Compr Psychiatry. 2013;54(8):1131–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.05.012.CrossRefPubMed

Title: COMmunity PARticipation through Education (COMPARE): effectiveness of supported education for students with mental health problems, a mixed methods study – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Authors: Jacomijn Hofstra
Jorien van der Velde
Petra Jannette Havinga
Lies Korevaar
Publication date: 01-12-2021
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Psychiatry / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-244X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03329-5

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

COMmunity PARticipation through Education (COMPARE): effectiveness of supported education for students with mental health problems, a mixed methods study – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Background

Methods/design

Discussion

Trial registration

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods/design

Discussion

Trial registration

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

A randomized controlled trial of cognitive control training (CCT) as an add-on treatment for late-life depression: a study protocol

Paliperidone induced neutropenia in first episode psychosis: a case report

Developing an explanatory theoretical model for engagement with a web-based mental health platform: results of a mixed methods study

The mediating roles of coping styles and resilience in the relationship between perceived social support and posttraumatic growth among primary caregivers of schizophrenic patients: a cross-sectional study

Altered spontaneous neural activity in the precuneus, middle and superior frontal gyri, and hippocampus in college students with subclinical depression

Professional perspectives on providing recovery-oriented services in Taiwan: a qualitative study