Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Psychiatry 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Anxiety Disorder | Study protocol

The ReThink study: a 3-arm parallel randomized trial of cognitive bias modification, with and without adherence promotion, for adolescent anxiety disorder: trial design and protocol

Authors: Shelley Reetz, Gregory Clarke, Robin Weersing, Nader Amir, John Dickerson, Frances L. Lynch, Michael C. Leo, Andreea M. Rawlings, Mi H. Lee, Sara Gille

Published in: BMC Psychiatry | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Anxiety disorders are the most common mental health problem among youth, contribute to reduced quality of daily life, and are associated with high rates of comorbidity. However, treatment rates for anxiety are very low, causing a sizeable treatment gap. There is an immediate need to identify treatment interventions that are effective, affordable, and can be delivered easily to the youth population. Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM) is one potentially effective intervention that could reach youth on a large scale, especially when self-administered at home. Thus, we aim to assess the benefit of CBM to treat youth anxiety. Further, we aim to test whether adding an adherence promotion (AP) component to the CBM intervention can improve outcomes, and whether CBM delivered both with and without the AP component is cost effective.

Methods

This is a 12-month randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted within an existing healthcare system. Potentially eligible youth (ages 12 to 17) will be identified by reviewing the electronic health record (EHR) for clinical anxiety diagnoses, which are then confirmed via research interview. We aim to enroll 498 participants and randomize them 1:1:1 to one of three arms: Arm 1 is a Low-Ratio version of the CBM program (nearly identical to the other CBM versions, but minimally effective); Arm 2 is a High-Ratio “active” CBM program; and Arm 3 is the High-Ratio CBM program with an added AP component. Participants will complete assessments at baseline, 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-months post-baseline. Youth in all three arms will self-administer the CBM program at home and will be asked to complete twelve intervention sessions over a four-week period. Arm 3 participants (High-Ratio CBM + AP) will also receive up to four telephone calls from phone coaches during the intervention period to provide technical assistance, encouragement, and motivational enhancement to increase adherence. The primary clinical outcome will be anxiety remission at 6-month follow-up.

Discussion

This study protocol describes the method and design for an RCT to test whether self-administered CBM both with and without adherence promotion can be an effective at-home treatment for anxious youth.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.​gov: NCT02156531, First Posted June 5, 2014.
Literature
5.
go back to reference Bandelow B, Michaelis S. Epidemiology of anxiety disorders in the 21st century. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2015;17(3):327.PubMedPubMedCentral Bandelow B, Michaelis S. Epidemiology of anxiety disorders in the 21st century. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2015;17(3):327.PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Ringle VA, Read KL, Edmunds JM, Brodman DM, Kendall PC, Barg F, et al. Barriers to and facilitators in the implementation of cognitive-behavioral therapy for youth anxiety in the community. Psychiatr Serv. 2015;66(9):938–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ringle VA, Read KL, Edmunds JM, Brodman DM, Kendall PC, Barg F, et al. Barriers to and facilitators in the implementation of cognitive-behavioral therapy for youth anxiety in the community. Psychiatr Serv. 2015;66(9):938–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Mathews A, MacLeod C. Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:167–95.CrossRefPubMed Mathews A, MacLeod C. Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:167–95.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference MacLeod C, Grafton B, Notebaert L. Anxiety-linked attentional bias: is it reliable? Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019;15.CrossRefPubMed MacLeod C, Grafton B, Notebaert L. Anxiety-linked attentional bias: is it reliable? Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019;15.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Bar-Haim Y, Lamy D, Pergamin L, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Van Ijzendoorn MH. Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(1):1.CrossRefPubMed Bar-Haim Y, Lamy D, Pergamin L, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Van Ijzendoorn MH. Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(1):1.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Taylor C, Aupperle R, Flagan T. al. e. Attentional training boosts top-down neural activation underlying emotion processing in anxious subjects. Biol Psychiatry. In Press. Taylor C, Aupperle R, Flagan T. al. e. Attentional training boosts top-down neural activation underlying emotion processing in anxious subjects. Biol Psychiatry. In Press.
31.
32.
go back to reference Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change. Second edition ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2012. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change. Second edition ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2012.
36.
go back to reference RUPP. The pediatric anxiety rating scale (PARS): development and psychometric properties. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002;41(9):1061–9.CrossRef RUPP. The pediatric anxiety rating scale (PARS): development and psychometric properties. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002;41(9):1061–9.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Guy W. Clinical global improvement scale. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health; 1976. Guy W. Clinical global improvement scale. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health; 1976.
43.
go back to reference Shaffer D, Gould MS, Brasic J, Ambrosini P, Fisher P, Bird H, et al. A children's global assessment scale (CGAS). Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983;40(11):1228–31.CrossRefPubMed Shaffer D, Gould MS, Brasic J, Ambrosini P, Fisher P, Bird H, et al. A children's global assessment scale (CGAS). Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983;40(11):1228–31.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Ascher BHZ, Farmer EM, Burns BJ, Angold A. The child and adolescent services assessment (CASA) description and psychometrics. J Emot Behav Disord. 1996;4(1):12–20.CrossRef Ascher BHZ, Farmer EM, Burns BJ, Angold A. The child and adolescent services assessment (CASA) description and psychometrics. J Emot Behav Disord. 1996;4(1):12–20.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference EuroQol G. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199–208.CrossRef EuroQol G. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199–208.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol group. Ann Med. 2001;33(5):337–43.CrossRefPubMed Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol group. Ann Med. 2001;33(5):337–43.CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Carskadon MA, Acebo C. A self-administered rating scale for pubertal development. J Adolesc Health. 1993;14(3):190–5.CrossRefPubMed Carskadon MA, Acebo C. A self-administered rating scale for pubertal development. J Adolesc Health. 1993;14(3):190–5.CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Brooks-Gunn J, Warren MP, Rosso J, Gargiulo J. Validity of self-report measures of girls' pubertal status. Child Dev. 1987. Brooks-Gunn J, Warren MP, Rosso J, Gargiulo J. Validity of self-report measures of girls' pubertal status. Child Dev. 1987.
54.
go back to reference Petersen AC, Crockett L, Richards M, Boxer A. A self-report measure of pubertal status: reliability, validity, and initial norms. J Youth Adolescence. 1988;17(2):117–33.CrossRef Petersen AC, Crockett L, Richards M, Boxer A. A self-report measure of pubertal status: reliability, validity, and initial norms. J Youth Adolescence. 1988;17(2):117–33.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Bastien CH, Vallieres A, Morin CM. Validation of the insomnia severity index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep Med. 2001;2(4):297–307.CrossRefPubMed Bastien CH, Vallieres A, Morin CM. Validation of the insomnia severity index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep Med. 2001;2(4):297–307.CrossRefPubMed
56.
go back to reference Morin C. M. Insomnia: psychological assessment and management: Guilford press; 1993. Morin C. M. Insomnia: psychological assessment and management: Guilford press; 1993.
57.
go back to reference Attkisson CC, Greenfield T. The client satisfaction questionnaire (CSQ) scales. Outcome assessment in clinical practice. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1995. p. 2–10. Attkisson CC, Greenfield T. The client satisfaction questionnaire (CSQ) scales. Outcome assessment in clinical practice. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1995. p. 2–10.
58.
go back to reference Mander J, Wittorf A, Teufel M, Schlarb A, Hautzinger M, Zipfel S, et al. Patients with depression, somatoform disorders, and eating disorders on the stages of change: validation of a short version of the URICA. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2012;49(4):519–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029563.CrossRef Mander J, Wittorf A, Teufel M, Schlarb A, Hautzinger M, Zipfel S, et al. Patients with depression, somatoform disorders, and eating disorders on the stages of change: validation of a short version of the URICA. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2012;49(4):519–27. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​a0029563.CrossRef
63.
go back to reference Kuckertz JM, Gildebrant E, Liliequist B, Karlström P, Väppling C, Bodlund O, et al. Moderation and mediation of the effect of attention training in social anxiety disorder. Behav Res Ther. 2014;53:30–40.CrossRefPubMed Kuckertz JM, Gildebrant E, Liliequist B, Karlström P, Väppling C, Bodlund O, et al. Moderation and mediation of the effect of attention training in social anxiety disorder. Behav Res Ther. 2014;53:30–40.CrossRefPubMed
64.
go back to reference Raudenbush S. W., Bryk A. S. Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods: sage; 2002. Raudenbush S. W., Bryk A. S. Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods: sage; 2002.
65.
go back to reference Snijders TBR. Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1999. Snijders TBR. Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1999.
66.
go back to reference Hox J. J., Moerbeek M., Van de Schoot R. Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications: Routledge; 2017. Hox J. J., Moerbeek M., Van de Schoot R. Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications: Routledge; 2017.
67.
go back to reference Royston P, Altman DG. Regression using fractional polynomials of continuous covariates: parsimonious parametric modelling. J R Stat Soc: Ser C: Appl Stat. 1994;43(3):429–53. Royston P, Altman DG. Regression using fractional polynomials of continuous covariates: parsimonious parametric modelling. J R Stat Soc: Ser C: Appl Stat. 1994;43(3):429–53.
68.
go back to reference Royston P, Sauerbrei W. Multivariable model-building: a pragmatic approach to regression anaylsis based on fractional polynomials for modelling continuous variables: John Wiley & Sons; 2008. Royston P, Sauerbrei W. Multivariable model-building: a pragmatic approach to regression anaylsis based on fractional polynomials for modelling continuous variables: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
69.
go back to reference Hayes AF. Beyond baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun Monogr. 2009;76(4):408–20.CrossRef Hayes AF. Beyond baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun Monogr. 2009;76(4):408–20.CrossRef
70.
go back to reference MacKinnon D. Introduction to statistical mediation analysis: Routledge; 2012. MacKinnon D. Introduction to statistical mediation analysis: Routledge; 2012.
71.
go back to reference MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods. 2002;7(1):83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods. 2002;7(1):83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
73.
go back to reference Enders C. K. Applied missing data analysis: Guilford press; 2010. Enders C. K. Applied missing data analysis: Guilford press; 2010.
74.
go back to reference Schafer JL, Graham JW. Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods. 2002;7(2):147–77.CrossRefPubMed Schafer JL, Graham JW. Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods. 2002;7(2):147–77.CrossRefPubMed
75.
go back to reference Allison P. D. Missing data: sage thousand oaks, CA; 2010. Allison P. D. Missing data: sage thousand oaks, CA; 2010.
76.
go back to reference Chinn S. A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2000;19(22):3127–31.CrossRefPubMed Chinn S. A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2000;19(22):3127–31.CrossRefPubMed
77.
go back to reference Hintze J. PASS 2008. LLC. Kaysville, Utah, USA: NCSS; 2008. Hintze J. PASS 2008. LLC. Kaysville, Utah, USA: NCSS; 2008.
78.
go back to reference Weinstein M. C., Russell L. B., Gold M. R., Siegel J. E. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine: Oxford university press; 1996. Weinstein M. C., Russell L. B., Gold M. R., Siegel J. E. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine: Oxford university press; 1996.
84.
go back to reference Chisholm D, Healey A, Knapp M. QALYs and mental health care. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1997;32(2):68–75.CrossRefPubMed Chisholm D, Healey A, Knapp M. QALYs and mental health care. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1997;32(2):68–75.CrossRefPubMed
85.
go back to reference Knapp M., Mangalore R. "The trouble with QALYs...". Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 2007; 16(4):289–293. Knapp M., Mangalore R. "The trouble with QALYs...". Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 2007; 16(4):289–293.
88.
go back to reference McCrone P, Knapp M, Proudfoot J, Ryden C, Cavanagh K, Shapiro DA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression in primary care: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2004;185:55–62.CrossRefPubMed McCrone P, Knapp M, Proudfoot J, Ryden C, Cavanagh K, Shapiro DA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression in primary care: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2004;185:55–62.CrossRefPubMed
90.
go back to reference Katon WJ, Roy-Byrne P, Russo J, Cowley D. Cost-effectiveness and cost offset of a collaborative care intervention for primary care patients with panic disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59(12):1098–104.CrossRefPubMed Katon WJ, Roy-Byrne P, Russo J, Cowley D. Cost-effectiveness and cost offset of a collaborative care intervention for primary care patients with panic disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59(12):1098–104.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The ReThink study: a 3-arm parallel randomized trial of cognitive bias modification, with and without adherence promotion, for adolescent anxiety disorder: trial design and protocol
Authors
Shelley Reetz
Gregory Clarke
Robin Weersing
Nader Amir
John Dickerson
Frances L. Lynch
Michael C. Leo
Andreea M. Rawlings
Mi H. Lee
Sara Gille
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Psychiatry / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-244X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2296-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Psychiatry 1/2019 Go to the issue