Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Psychiatry 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

The Prejudice towards People with Mental Illness (PPMI) scale: structure and validity

Authors: Amanda Kenny, Boris Bizumic, Kathleen M. Griffiths

Published in: BMC Psychiatry | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Although there is a substantial body of research on the stigma associated with mental illness, much of the extant research has not explicitly focused on the concept of prejudice, which drives discriminatory behaviour. Further, research that has investigated prejudice towards people with mental illness has conceptual, theoretical and psychometric limitations. To address these shortcomings, we sought to develop a new measure, the Prejudice towards People with Mental Illness (PPMI) scale, based on an improved conceptualisation and integration of the stigma and prejudice areas of research.

Methods

In developing the new scale, we undertook a thematic analysis of existing conceptualisations and measures to identify a pool of potential items for the scale which were subsequently assessed for fidelity and content validity by expert raters. We tested the structure, reliability, and validity of the scale across three studies (Study 1 N = 301; Study 2 N = 164; Study 3 N = 495) using exploratory factor, confirmatory factor, correlational, multiple regression, and ordinal logistic regression analyses using both select and general community samples.

Results

Study 1 identified four factors underlying prejudice towards people with mental illness: fear/avoidance, malevolence, authoritarianism, and unpredictability. It also confirmed the nomological network, that is, the links of these attitudes with the proposed theoretical antecedents and consequences. Studies 2 and 3 further supported the factor structure of the measure, and provided additional evidence for the nomological network.

Conclusions

We argue that research into prejudice towards people with mental illness will benefit from the new measure and theoretical framework.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
The CFA for the seven-factor model did not demonstrate a clear solution, with modification indices suggesting that many items loaded strongly on two or more factors. Similarly, intercorrelations between factors were strong (up to .92, p < .001), indicating that several hypothesised factors measured the same construct.
 
2
We also tested an item-level CFA of the four-factor model with two additional method factors (i.e., positive and negative items loading on their respective method factors). It showed acceptable fit, χ2(316) = 551.32, p < .001, CFI = .88, RMSEA = .07, SRMR = .08, with all items loading on their hypothesised factors. The fit was better than that of alternative models, such as one-factor and three-factor models with method factors. This analysis was somewhat affected by the moderate sample size in relation to the model’s complexity.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fox AB, Earnshaw VA, Taverna EC, Vogt D. Conceptualizing and measuring mental illness stigma: the mental illness stigma framework and critical review of measures. Stigma and Health. Fox AB, Earnshaw VA, Taverna EC, Vogt D. Conceptualizing and measuring mental illness stigma: the mental illness stigma framework and critical review of measures. Stigma and Health.
2.
4.
go back to reference Stephan WG, Stephan CW. An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In: Oskamp S, editor. Reducing prejudice and discrimination. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2000. p. 23–46. Stephan WG, Stephan CW. An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In: Oskamp S, editor. Reducing prejudice and discrimination. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2000. p. 23–46.
5.
go back to reference Eagly AH, Chaiken S. The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1993. Eagly AH, Chaiken S. The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1993.
6.
go back to reference Stigma GE. Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New Jersey. NY: Prentice-Hall; 1963. Stigma GE. Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New Jersey. NY: Prentice-Hall; 1963.
7.
8.
go back to reference Day EN, Edgren K, Eshleman A. Measuring stigma toward mental illness: development and application of the mental illness stigma scale. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2007;37:2191–219.CrossRef Day EN, Edgren K, Eshleman A. Measuring stigma toward mental illness: development and application of the mental illness stigma scale. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2007;37:2191–219.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Haghighat R. The development of an instrument to measure stigmatization: factor analysis and origin of stigmatization. Eur J Psychiatry. 2005;19:144–54.CrossRef Haghighat R. The development of an instrument to measure stigmatization: factor analysis and origin of stigmatization. Eur J Psychiatry. 2005;19:144–54.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Littlewood R, Jadhav S, Ryder AG. A cross-national study of the stigmatization of severe psychiatric illness: historical review, methodological considerations and development of the questionnaire. Transcult Psychiatry. 2007;44:171–202.CrossRefPubMed Littlewood R, Jadhav S, Ryder AG. A cross-national study of the stigmatization of severe psychiatric illness: historical review, methodological considerations and development of the questionnaire. Transcult Psychiatry. 2007;44:171–202.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Svensson B, Markström U, Bejerholm U, Björkman T, Brunt D, Eklund M, et al. Test - retest reliability of two instruments for measuring public attitudes towards persons with mental illness. BMC Psychiatry. 2011;11:11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Svensson B, Markström U, Bejerholm U, Björkman T, Brunt D, Eklund M, et al. Test - retest reliability of two instruments for measuring public attitudes towards persons with mental illness. BMC Psychiatry. 2011;11:11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Masuda A, Hayes SC, Lillis J, Bunting K, Herbst SA, Fletcher LB. The relation between psychological flexibility and mental health stigma in acceptance and commitment therapy: a preliminary process investigation. Behav Soc Issues. 2009;18:1–16. Masuda A, Hayes SC, Lillis J, Bunting K, Herbst SA, Fletcher LB. The relation between psychological flexibility and mental health stigma in acceptance and commitment therapy: a preliminary process investigation. Behav Soc Issues. 2009;18:1–16.
13.
go back to reference Tanaka G, Inadomi H, Kikuchi Y, Ohta Y. Evaluating stigma against mental disorder and related factors. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004;58:558–66.CrossRefPubMed Tanaka G, Inadomi H, Kikuchi Y, Ohta Y. Evaluating stigma against mental disorder and related factors. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004;58:558–66.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Taylor SM, Dear MJ. Scaling community attitudes toward the mentally ill. Schizophr Bull. 1981;7:225–40.CrossRefPubMed Taylor SM, Dear MJ. Scaling community attitudes toward the mentally ill. Schizophr Bull. 1981;7:225–40.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Aromaa E, Tolvanen A, Tuulari J, Wahlbeck K. Attitudes towards people with mental disorders: the psychometric characteristics of a Finnish questionnaire. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol. 2010;45:265–73.CrossRef Aromaa E, Tolvanen A, Tuulari J, Wahlbeck K. Attitudes towards people with mental disorders: the psychometric characteristics of a Finnish questionnaire. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol. 2010;45:265–73.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Baker JA, Richards DA, Campbell M. Nursing attitudes towards acute mental health care: development of a measurement tool. J Adv Nurs. 2005;49:522–9.CrossRefPubMed Baker JA, Richards DA, Campbell M. Nursing attitudes towards acute mental health care: development of a measurement tool. J Adv Nurs. 2005;49:522–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Baker F, Schulberg HC. The development of a community mental health ideology scale. Community Ment Health J. 1967;3:216–25.CrossRefPubMed Baker F, Schulberg HC. The development of a community mental health ideology scale. Community Ment Health J. 1967;3:216–25.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kassam A, Glozier N, Leese M, Henderson C, Thornicroft G. Development and responsiveness of a scale to measure clinicians’ attitudes to people with mental illness (medical student version). Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2010;122:153–61.CrossRefPubMed Kassam A, Glozier N, Leese M, Henderson C, Thornicroft G. Development and responsiveness of a scale to measure clinicians’ attitudes to people with mental illness (medical student version). Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2010;122:153–61.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Watson AC, Miller FE, Lyons JS. Adolescent attitudes toward serious mental illness. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2005;193:769–72.CrossRefPubMed Watson AC, Miller FE, Lyons JS. Adolescent attitudes toward serious mental illness. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2005;193:769–72.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Högberg T, Magnusson A, Ewertzon M, Lützén K. Attitudes towards mental illness in Sweden: adaptation and development of the community attitudes towards mental illness questionnaire. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2008;17:302–10.CrossRefPubMed Högberg T, Magnusson A, Ewertzon M, Lützén K. Attitudes towards mental illness in Sweden: adaptation and development of the community attitudes towards mental illness questionnaire. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2008;17:302–10.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Morris R, Scott PA, Cocoman A, Chambers M, Guise V, Välimäki M, et al. Is the community attitudes towards the mentally ill scale valid for use in the investigation of European nurses’ attitudes towards the mentally ill? A confirmatory factor analytic approach. J Adv Nurs. 2012;68:460–70.CrossRefPubMed Morris R, Scott PA, Cocoman A, Chambers M, Guise V, Välimäki M, et al. Is the community attitudes towards the mentally ill scale valid for use in the investigation of European nurses’ attitudes towards the mentally ill? A confirmatory factor analytic approach. J Adv Nurs. 2012;68:460–70.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Cohen J, Struening EL. Opinions about mental illness in the personnel of two large mental hospitals. J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1962;64:349–60.CrossRefPubMed Cohen J, Struening EL. Opinions about mental illness in the personnel of two large mental hospitals. J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1962;64:349–60.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Anagnostopoulos F, Hantzi A. Familiarity with and social distance from people with mental illness: testing the mediating effects of prejudiced attitudes. J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2011;21:451–60.CrossRef Anagnostopoulos F, Hantzi A. Familiarity with and social distance from people with mental illness: testing the mediating effects of prejudiced attitudes. J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2011;21:451–60.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Jackson D, Heatherington L. Young Jamaicans’ attitudes toward mental illness: experimental and demographic factors associated with social distance and stigmatizing opinions. J Community Psychol. 2006;34:563–76.CrossRef Jackson D, Heatherington L. Young Jamaicans’ attitudes toward mental illness: experimental and demographic factors associated with social distance and stigmatizing opinions. J Community Psychol. 2006;34:563–76.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Wolff G, Pathare S, Craig T, Leff J. Community attitudes to mental illness. Br J Psychiatry. 1996;168:183–90.CrossRefPubMed Wolff G, Pathare S, Craig T, Leff J. Community attitudes to mental illness. Br J Psychiatry. 1996;168:183–90.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Hirai M, Clum GA. Development, reliability, and validity of the beliefs toward mental illness scale. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2000;22:221–36.CrossRef Hirai M, Clum GA. Development, reliability, and validity of the beliefs toward mental illness scale. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2000;22:221–36.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Evans-Lacko S, Little K, Meltzer H, Rose D, Rhydderch D, Henderson C, et al. Development and psychometric properties of the mental health knowledge schedule. Can J Psychiatr. 2010;55:440–8.CrossRef Evans-Lacko S, Little K, Meltzer H, Rose D, Rhydderch D, Henderson C, et al. Development and psychometric properties of the mental health knowledge schedule. Can J Psychiatr. 2010;55:440–8.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Furr RM. Scale construction and psychometrics for social and personality psychology. London, UK: Sage; 2011.CrossRef Furr RM. Scale construction and psychometrics for social and personality psychology. London, UK: Sage; 2011.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Link BG, Yang LH, Phelan JC, Collins PY. Measuring mental illness stigma. Schizophr Bull. 2004;30:511–41.CrossRefPubMed Link BG, Yang LH, Phelan JC, Collins PY. Measuring mental illness stigma. Schizophr Bull. 2004;30:511–41.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Duckitt J, Bizumic B. Multidimensionality of right-wing authoritarian attitudes: authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism. Pol Psychol. 2013;34:841–62.CrossRef Duckitt J, Bizumic B. Multidimensionality of right-wing authoritarian attitudes: authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism. Pol Psychol. 2013;34:841–62.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Duckitt J, Sibley C. Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. Eur J Personal. 2007;21:113–30.CrossRef Duckitt J, Sibley C. Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. Eur J Personal. 2007;21:113–30.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Sibley CG, Duckitt J. Personality and prejudice: a meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2008;12:248–79.CrossRef Sibley CG, Duckitt J. Personality and prejudice: a meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2008;12:248–79.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Ho AK, Sidanius J, Kteily N, Sheehy-Skeffington J, Pratto F, Henkel KE, et al. The nature of social dominance orientation: theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015;109:1003–28.CrossRefPubMed Ho AK, Sidanius J, Kteily N, Sheehy-Skeffington J, Pratto F, Henkel KE, et al. The nature of social dominance orientation: theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015;109:1003–28.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Duckitt J, Sibley CG. The dual process motivational model of ideology and prejudice. In: The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2017. p. 188–221.CrossRef Duckitt J, Sibley CG. The dual process motivational model of ideology and prejudice. In: The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2017. p. 188–221.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Altemeyer B. The other “authoritarian personality”. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 1998;30:47–92.CrossRef Altemeyer B. The other “authoritarian personality”. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 1998;30:47–92.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference McFarland S. Authoritarianism, social dominance, and other roots of generalized prejudice. Pol Psychol. 2010;31:453–77.CrossRef McFarland S. Authoritarianism, social dominance, and other roots of generalized prejudice. Pol Psychol. 2010;31:453–77.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Hayward P, Bright JA. Stigma and mental illness: a review and critique. J Ment Health. 1997;6:345–54.CrossRef Hayward P, Bright JA. Stigma and mental illness: a review and critique. J Ment Health. 1997;6:345–54.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Fiske ST, Xu J, Cuddy AC, Glick P. (Dis)respecting versus (dis)liking: status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. J Soc Issues. 1999;55:473–89.CrossRef Fiske ST, Xu J, Cuddy AC, Glick P. (Dis)respecting versus (dis)liking: status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. J Soc Issues. 1999;55:473–89.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Fazio RH, Roskos-Ewoldsen D. Acting as we feel: when and how attitudes guide behavior. In: Brock TC, Green MC, editors. The psychology of persuasion. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Allyn & Bacon; 2005. Fazio RH, Roskos-Ewoldsen D. Acting as we feel: when and how attitudes guide behavior. In: Brock TC, Green MC, editors. The psychology of persuasion. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Allyn & Bacon; 2005.
40.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Pratto F, Sidanius J, Stallworth LM, Malle BF. Social dominance orientation: a personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;67:741–63.CrossRef Pratto F, Sidanius J, Stallworth LM, Malle BF. Social dominance orientation: a personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;67:741–63.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Duckitt J, Bizumic B, Krauss SW. Heled E. A tripartite approach to right-wing authoritarianism: the authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism model. Pol Psychol. 2010;31:685–715.CrossRef Duckitt J, Bizumic B, Krauss SW. Heled E. A tripartite approach to right-wing authoritarianism: the authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism model. Pol Psychol. 2010;31:685–715.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Davis MH. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology. 1980;10:85–93. Davis MH. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology. 1980;10:85–93.
44.
go back to reference Fischer DG, Fick C. Measuring social desirability: short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Educ Psychol Meas. 1993;53:417–24.CrossRef Fischer DG, Fick C. Measuring social desirability: short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Educ Psychol Meas. 1993;53:417–24.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Goldberg LR. A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In: Mervielde I, Deary I, De Fruyt F, Ostendorf F, editors. Personality psychology in Europe. Tilburg. The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press; 1999. p. 7–28. Goldberg LR. A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In: Mervielde I, Deary I, De Fruyt F, Ostendorf F, editors. Personality psychology in Europe. Tilburg. The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press; 1999. p. 7–28.
46.
go back to reference Rey AM, Gibson PR. Beyond high school: heterosexuals’ self-reported anti-gay/lesbian behaviors and attitudes. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services. 1998;7:65.CrossRef Rey AM, Gibson PR. Beyond high school: heterosexuals’ self-reported anti-gay/lesbian behaviors and attitudes. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services. 1998;7:65.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Holmes EP, Corrigan PW, Williams P, Canar J, Kubiak MA. Changing attitudes about schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1999;25:447–56.CrossRefPubMed Holmes EP, Corrigan PW, Williams P, Canar J, Kubiak MA. Changing attitudes about schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1999;25:447–56.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Kincaid JP, Fishburn RP, Rogers RL, Chissom BS. Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy enlisted personnel. Research Branch Report. Millington, Tennesse, Naval Air Station; 1975. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED108134. Accessed 27 Oct 2014. Kincaid JP, Fishburn RP, Rogers RL, Chissom BS. Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy enlisted personnel. Research Branch Report. Millington, Tennesse, Naval Air Station; 1975. http://​eric.​ed.​gov/​?​id=​ED108134. Accessed 27 Oct 2014.
49.
go back to reference Byrnes DA, Kiger G. Contemporary measures of attitudes toward blacks. Educ Psychol Meas. 1988;48:107–18.CrossRef Byrnes DA, Kiger G. Contemporary measures of attitudes toward blacks. Educ Psychol Meas. 1988;48:107–18.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Little TD, Cunningham WA, Shahar G, Widaman KF. To parcel or not to parcel: exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 2002;9:151–73.CrossRef Little TD, Cunningham WA, Shahar G, Widaman KF. To parcel or not to parcel: exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 2002;9:151–73.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Schreiber JB. Core reporting practices in structural equation modeling. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2008;4:83–97.CrossRef Schreiber JB. Core reporting practices in structural equation modeling. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2008;4:83–97.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychol Rev. 1974;81:59–74.CrossRef Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychol Rev. 1974;81:59–74.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Gosling SD, Rentfrow PJ, WBJ S. A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. J Res Pers. 2003;37:504–28.CrossRef Gosling SD, Rentfrow PJ, WBJ S. A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. J Res Pers. 2003;37:504–28.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Duckitt J. Prejudice and intergroup hostility. In: Sears DO, Huddy L, Jervis R, editors. Oxford handbook of political psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2003. p. 559–600. Duckitt J. Prejudice and intergroup hostility. In: Sears DO, Huddy L, Jervis R, editors. Oxford handbook of political psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2003. p. 559–600.
55.
go back to reference Griffiths KM, Batterham PJ, Barney L, Parsons A. The generalised anxiety stigma scale (GASS): psychometric properties in a community sample. BMC Psychiatry. 2011;11:184.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Griffiths KM, Batterham PJ, Barney L, Parsons A. The generalised anxiety stigma scale (GASS): psychometric properties in a community sample. BMC Psychiatry. 2011;11:184.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
56.
go back to reference Reavley NJ, Jorm AF. Stigmatizing attitudes towards people with mental disorders: findings from an Australian national survey of mental health literacy and stigma. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011;45:1086–93.CrossRefPubMed Reavley NJ, Jorm AF. Stigmatizing attitudes towards people with mental disorders: findings from an Australian national survey of mental health literacy and stigma. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011;45:1086–93.CrossRefPubMed
57.
go back to reference Kenny A, Bizumic B. Learn and ACT: changing prejudice towards people with mental illness using stigma reduction interventions. J Contextual Behav Sci. 2016;5:178–85.CrossRef Kenny A, Bizumic B. Learn and ACT: changing prejudice towards people with mental illness using stigma reduction interventions. J Contextual Behav Sci. 2016;5:178–85.CrossRef
58.
go back to reference Griffiths KM, Carron-Arthur B, Parsons A, Reid R. Effectiveness of programs for reducing the stigma associated with mental disorders. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Psychiatry. 2014;13:161–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Griffiths KM, Carron-Arthur B, Parsons A, Reid R. Effectiveness of programs for reducing the stigma associated with mental disorders. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Psychiatry. 2014;13:161–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
The Prejudice towards People with Mental Illness (PPMI) scale: structure and validity
Authors
Amanda Kenny
Boris Bizumic
Kathleen M. Griffiths
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Psychiatry / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-244X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1871-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Psychiatry 1/2018 Go to the issue