Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Psychiatry 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the Beck hopelessness scale (BHS): results from a German representative population sample

Authors: Sören Kliem, Anna Lohmann, Thomas Mößle, Elmar Brähler

Published in: BMC Psychiatry | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) has been the most frequently used instrument for the measurement of hopelessness in the past 40 years. Only recently has it officially been translated into German. The psychometric properties and factor structure of the BHS have been cause for intensive debate in the past.

Methods

Based on a representative sample of the German population (N = 2450) item analysis including item sensitivity, item-total correlation and item difficulty was performed. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) for several factor solutions from the literature were performed. Multiple group factor analysis was performed to assess measurement invariance. Construct validity was assessed via the replication of well-established correlations with concurrently assessed measures.

Results

Most items exhibited adequate properties. Items #4, #8 and #13 exhibited poor item characteristics– each of these items had previously received negative evaluations in international studies. A one-dimensional factor solution, favorable for the calculation and interpretation of a sum score, was regarded as adequate.
A bi-factor model with one content factor and two method factors (defined by positive/negative item coding) resulted in an excellent model fit. Cronbach’s alpha in the current sample was .87. Hopelessness, as measured by the BHS, significantly correlated in the expected direction with suicidal ideation (r = .36), depression (r = .53) and life satisfaction (r = −.53). Strict measurement invariance could be established regarding gender and depression status. Due to limited research regarding the interpretation of fit indices with dichotomous data, interpretation of CFA results needs to remain tentative.

Conclusion

The BHS is a valid measure of hopelessness in various subgroups of the general population. Future research could aim at replicating these findings using item response theory and cross-cultural samples. A one-dimensional bi-factor model seems appropriate even in a non-clinical population.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Table A in the electronic Additional file 1 shows the model fit of the models from the extensive literature regarding the BHS factorial structure.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Beck AT. Depression: causes and treatment. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1972. Beck AT. Depression: causes and treatment. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1972.
3.
go back to reference Abramson LY, Metalsky GI, Alloy LB. Hopelessness depression: a theory-based subtype of depression. Psychol Rev. 1989;96:358.CrossRef Abramson LY, Metalsky GI, Alloy LB. Hopelessness depression: a theory-based subtype of depression. Psychol Rev. 1989;96:358.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Brown GK, Beck AT, Steer RA, Grisham JR. Risk factors for suicide in psychiatric outpatients: a 20-year prospective study. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68:371.CrossRefPubMed Brown GK, Beck AT, Steer RA, Grisham JR. Risk factors for suicide in psychiatric outpatients: a 20-year prospective study. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68:371.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Beck AT, Steer RA. Beck hopelessness scale (BHS) manual. Pearson: San Antonio; 1993. Beck AT, Steer RA. Beck hopelessness scale (BHS) manual. Pearson: San Antonio; 1993.
15.
go back to reference Tanaka E, Sakamoto S, Ono Y, Fujihara S, Kitamura T. Hopelessness in a community population in Japan. J Clin Psychol. 1996;52:609–15.CrossRefPubMed Tanaka E, Sakamoto S, Ono Y, Fujihara S, Kitamura T. Hopelessness in a community population in Japan. J Clin Psychol. 1996;52:609–15.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Beck AT, Weissman A, Lester D, Trexler L. The measurement of pessimism: the hopelessness scale. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1974;42:861–5.CrossRefPubMed Beck AT, Weissman A, Lester D, Trexler L. The measurement of pessimism: the hopelessness scale. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1974;42:861–5.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Brähler E, Fahrenberg J, Myrtek M, Schumacher J. Fragebogen zur Lebenszufriedenheit (FLZ). Göttingen: Hogrefe; 1999. Brähler E, Fahrenberg J, Myrtek M, Schumacher J. Fragebogen zur Lebenszufriedenheit (FLZ). Göttingen: Hogrefe; 1999.
31.
go back to reference Bovaird JA, Koziol NA. Measurement models for ordered-categorical indicators. New York: The Guilford Press; 2012. Bovaird JA, Koziol NA. Measurement models for ordered-categorical indicators. New York: The Guilford Press; 2012.
39.
go back to reference Forintos DP, Sallai J, Rózsa S. Adaptation of the Beck hopelessness scale in Hungary. Psihologijske Teme. 2010;19:307–21. Forintos DP, Sallai J, Rózsa S. Adaptation of the Beck hopelessness scale in Hungary. Psihologijske Teme. 2010;19:307–21.
Metadata
Title
Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the Beck hopelessness scale (BHS): results from a German representative population sample
Authors
Sören Kliem
Anna Lohmann
Thomas Mößle
Elmar Brähler
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Psychiatry / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-244X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1646-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Psychiatry 1/2018 Go to the issue